• un-reverted, an edit by a now-banned sockpuppet. Deicas (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Hi Deicas. A few points: You appear to misunderstand the difference...
    85 KB (11,567 words) - 06:17, 5 March 2023
  • me that what Deicas had written to Charles could have been taken as something other than a request for Charles to pick up where Deicas had left off....
    25 KB (3,132 words) - 09:04, 24 March 2022
  • potentially-interested editor that I also failed to invite I encourage you to do so. Deicas (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC) How sad that we are actually spending...
    46 KB (2,766 words) - 18:46, 7 March 2013
  • editor/admin/forum in which to ask the question? Thank you Deicas (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC) About the links, Deicas: I've put a note on your page, because I get...
    17 KB (2,031 words) - 00:27, 27 March 2022
  • 2013 (UTC) Charles35, Deicas has been indefinitely topic-banned from discussing Paul Krugman anywhere on Wikipedia. Advising Deicas to continue dealing...
    69 KB (9,629 words) - 23:13, 2 November 2023
  • 0 bytes (0 words) - 17:19, 17 January 2013
  • (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC) I thought your responses at User_talk:Deicas were excellent, I hope the advice is followed.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:01,...
    18 KB (1,061 words) - 15:12, 8 April 2023
  • your assertion of "undue weight for off hand remark" as a revision reason? Deicas (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Hello. Your account has been granted...
    58 KB (7,090 words) - 07:21, 12 March 2022
  • effect of "I amend User:Deicas refutation of the claim of WP:UNDUE, above, with ..." <User:Bdell555's reasons> + User:Deicas's reasons. I don't want to...
    262 KB (37,367 words) - 00:23, 28 November 2023
  • potentially-interested editor that I also failed to invite I encourage you to do so. Deicas (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2013 (UTC) At the moment there is overlapping discussion...
    34 KB (4,226 words) - 23:30, 5 March 2023