(UTC) No. 'We don't want what you want to share with the world, just because you (and only you) think it is important .' Nor is original research another...

the scholarly community. The original idea that is junk has source material. Refuting the idea will require original research because nobody else has done...

the point on original research. Something does not have to qualify as ground breaking research to fail the no original research policy. - Taxman Talk...

template {{original research}}, similar to {{disputed}} and {{NPOV}}, that could be used to mark articles that include material that is arguably original research...

section is disputed". This would be no more a violation of "Avoid self-reference" than putting an "Original Research" or "NPOV" tag on sections of articles...

(UTC) So the argument for "no original research" is one sentence from Jimbo Wales? deisenbe (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC) No, that one sentence is based...

possible be put in a trivia section of an article. Does it count as original research until I can find a publication that mentions it? SleepyDan 22:39,...

the danger of original research. I believe it is overly strict for articles that rely predominantly on secondary sources. I go along with no analytic, synthetic...

there's no effective explanation I can see in WP:NOR that explains why we don't use primary sources, and why using them is original research. SamBC(talk)...

of no original research because the information must be verifiable. However, how can any "new" research be done without it being (somewhat) original? Think...