decided to rename Flow to mw:Structured Discussions, the official ratio is this: Structured Discussion was formerly known as “Flow”. Flow was a bigger project...

earlier code than mediawiki.org , so check bugs there (mw:Talk:Sandbox). And Flow team's test server is more bleeding-edge. SPage (WMF) (talk) 21:38, 3 February...

interactive prototype for Flow here. Very nice! πr2 (t • c) 03:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC) One thing I'm wondering is whether Flow will support wikitext. If...

Prototype: http://ee-flow.wmflabs.org/wiki/Sandbox Wikipedia:Flow Wikipedia:Flow/MVP Wikipedia:Flow/Community engagement Wikipedia:Flow/Community engagement/Sandbox...

Flow on the Flow test page here (which is a good thing). However, if you really want Flow on those pages, you can request it at mw:Flow/Request Flow on...

I plan to change WP:FLOW to redirect to Wikipedia:Flow as the walled garden essay does not mention flow or flowers or anything else, so I can't see a...

I see some people have been able to access the Flow comments page on MediaWikiwiki, but I've not been able to do so for a day or two, regardless of what...

What we've got here is a discussion over the user-facing terminology with flow: specifically, whether a user's talkpage will be called their board or, well...

insufficient"; this is what I feared the most since the very first moment that Flow was announced. I can tell you right now that lazy loading of content through...

discussions about Flow and avatars, then please share here. Wikipedia_talk:Flow/Design_FAQ#Flow_and_whitespace_in_practice Wikipedia_talk:Flow/Archive_7#Avatars...