directors, GM Deeks, GS Deeks, Hinds, and Cook. It helped in the construction of railways in Canada. The first three directors wanted to exclude Cook from the...

leads to a fine. Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378 Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley [1972]...

a new trial. Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378 Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley [1972]...

The position on taking corporate opportunities begins with the case of Cook v Deeks, where directors must have authorization by independent directors before...

controlling minds of the company Cook v Deeks [1916] UKPC 10, no conflicts of interest for company directors Jones v Jones [1916] 2 AC 487 Great West...

economic crisis following the South Sea Bubble in 1719. For example, in Cook v Deeks, three directors took a railway line construction contract in their own...

economic crisis following the South Sea Bubble in 1719. For example, in Cook v Deeks, three directors took a railway line construction contract in their own...

175 Companies Act 2006 Keech v Sandford (1726) Sel Cas. Ch.61 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] All ER 378 Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554 Industrial...

new company were liable to account for profits (Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554; Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley (supra)). It was not necessary, in order...

beneficial ownership of the opportunity itself. We have also seen that in Cook v Deeks the Privy Council did not say that the opportunity itself "belonged"...