(UTC) No. 'We don't want what you want to share with the world, just because you (and only you) think it is important .' Nor is original research another...

the scholarly community. The original idea that is junk has source material. Refuting the idea will require original research because nobody else has done...

template {{original research}}, similar to {{disputed}} and {{NPOV}}, that could be used to mark articles that include material that is arguably original research...

(UTC) So the argument for "no original research" is one sentence from Jimbo Wales? deisenbe (talk) 02:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC) No, that one sentence is based...

the point on original research. Something does not have to qualify as ground breaking research to fail the no original research policy. - Taxman Talk...

section is disputed". This would be no more a violation of "Avoid self-reference" than putting an "Original Research" or "NPOV" tag on sections of articles...

of no original research because the information must be verifiable. However, how can any "new" research be done without it being (somewhat) original? Think...

also: Wikipedia talk:No original research Wikipedia talk:No original research (draft rewrite) Wikipedia talk:No original research (draft rewrite -- archive...

This is a continuation of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:No original research/archive9#Editors citing themselves. As a practical matter, the proposed...

possible be put in a trivia section of an article. Does it count as original research until I can find a publication that mentions it? SleepyDan 22:39,...