Ernestokokenia

Ernestokokenia
Temporal range: Early-Middle Eocene (Itaboraian-Mustersan)
~51–42 Ma
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Family: Didolodontidae
Genus: Ernestokokenia
Ameghino 1901
Type species
Ernestokokenia nitida
Ameghino, 1901
Species
  • E. chaishoer Simpson 1935
  • E. nitida Ameghino 1901
  • E. patagonica Ameghino 1901
  • E. trigonalis Ameghino 1901
  • E. yirunhor Simpson 1935
Synonyms
  • Ernestokokenia marginata Ameghino 1901
  • Notoprotogonia patagonica Ameghino 1901
  • Euprotogonia trigonalis Ameghino 1901

Ernestokokenia is an extinct genus of mammal, belonging to the Didolodontidae. It lived during the Early Eocene and the Middle Eocene, and its fossils were discovered in South America.

Description

[edit]

This genus is only known from its teeth, and it is then impossible to reconstruct its exact appearance. From comparison with similar and better known animals such as Didolodus, its size is estimated between 60 centimeters and a meter long. Ernestokokenia was characterized by very simple molars and premolars, with a bunodont structure, similar to those of Didolodus. The upper third and fourth molar were differently shaped and lacked a mesostyle. The labial and lingual cingulum were well developed.

Classification

[edit]

Ernestokokenia was a member of the Didolodontidae, an enigmatic clade of south-american mammals typicals of the early Cenozoic, of uncertain relationships. The first fossils of this animal were found in the Chubut Province in Patagonia (Argentina), in soils dated from the Middle Eocene, and were described by Florentino Ameghino in 1901. The type species is Ernestokokenia nitida. Ameghino described also Notoprotogonia patagonica and Euprotogonia trigonalis, later attributed to the genus by George Gaylord Simpson in 1948. In 1935, Simpson had described two other species, Ernestokokenia chaishoer and E. yurunhor, from the same Chubut Province, and from the Lower Eocene. Other fossils dubiously attributed to the genus have been found in soils of the Upper Paleocene of Argentina and the Eocene of Chile.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • F. Ameghino. 1901. Notices préliminaires sur des ongulés nouveaux des terrains crétacés de Patagonie [Preliminary notes on new ungulates from the Cretaceous terrains of Patagonia]. Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Córdoba 16:349-429
  • G. G. Simpson. 1935. Descriptions of the oldest known South American mammals, from the Rio Chico Formation. American Museum Novitates 793:1-25
  • G. G. Simpson. 1948. The beginning of the age of mammals in South America. Part I. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 91:1-232
  • C. d. Paula Couto. 1952. Fossil mammals from the beginning of the Cenozoic in Brazil. Condylarthra, Litopterna, Xenungulata, and Astrapotheria. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 99(6):355-394
  • R. Cifelli. 1983. The origin and affinities of the South American Condylarthra and early Tertiary Litopterna (Mammalia). American Museum Novitates 2772:1-49
  • A. R. Wyss, M. A. Norell, M. J. Novacek and J. J. Flynn. 1992. New ?early Tertiary localities from the Chilean Andes. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 12(3 Supp.):61A
  • J. N. Gelfo. 2010. The "condylarth" Didolodontidae from Gran Barranca: history of the bunodont South American mammals until the Eocene-Oligocene transition. In R. H. Madden, A. A. Carlini, M. G. Vucetich, R. F. Kay (eds.), The Paleontology of Gran Barranca: Evolution and Environmental Change through the Middle Cenozoic of Patagonia 130-142
  • E. V. Oliveira and F. J. Goin. 2011. A reassessment of bunodont metatherians from the Paleogene of Itaborai (Brazil): Systematics and the age of the Itaborian SALMA. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 14(2):105-136