Template talk:The Big O
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Episode articles
[edit]I've removed the epiode article links from the template, please see Talk:The Big O#Episode articles for why I've done this. -- Ned Scott 06:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
My edit
[edit]The template you named is not sufficient enough as mine. I spent a lot of time working on that edit there is no reason to revert. You made it so that the navbox isn't even necessary. -The Big X 21:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Take a look at Template:RahXephon. GunnarRene created articles for all 26 episodes but they're not in the main navbox. He did use the Episode navbox in God and Man Awaken, God's Uncertain Music and the rest. And, per the above, you shouldn't add articles to the navbox that aren't created (yet).--Nohansen 22:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why is it that the moment I edit this template you feel the need to change it? You have made this template obsolete! You could just replace it with:
== See Also == *Characters *Setting *Megadeus *Etc.
And that is one, one example. The way I made it will help editors to see, when they scroll to the bottom of The Big O, "hey, there are some incomplete articles I think I can make them," that template you named only covers three pages, to the 26. What if I wanted to jump to the 5th episode from the 1st? -The Big X 20:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Then, create something like Template:Avatar episode for Big O episode articles (when you create them). The purpose of a navbox is a lot like a "See also" section. See Template:Avatar.--Nohansen 20:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- You ... are ... being ... a ... control ... freak. There is nothing wrong with having the episodes there like that, it looks fine that way and it stimulates editing by anyone who sees the red links. Do you know why Avatar has a box just for its episodes? Because there are 50+ episodes to Avatar. There are simply 26 to The Big O, so there is no reason for another template, it looks much nicer the way I put it. -The Big X 22:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Alright I reverted it to the way it was, lets keep it as it is. -The Big X 23:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)