This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Moving the 1917 elections to specials section may be a good solution to the odd-numbered years. So let's see how it evolves over time.—GoldRingChip21:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It didn't seem appropriate to have them listed in the normal section. However, there is inconsistency in how they are presented – the more recent ones are Special elections to the XXXth Congress, whilst the 1917 one follows the standard yearly format and covers two Congresses. Should the latter be split into two articles, or would it be better to split the XXXth Congress ones into their respective years? Number5721:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]