Towers in the park

The Penn South cooperative (1962) in Manhattan.
Cabrini-Green (1957 now demolished) in Chicago at ground level
St. James Town in Toronto (1964-71)
Debney Meadows (Flemington Estate) (1962–1965) in Melbourne.
Waterloo Estate (1968) in Sydney.
Brownlee Towers (1969 now demolished) in Perth.

Towers in the park is a morphology of modernist[1] high rise apartment buildings characterized by a high-rise building (a "slab") surrounded by a swath of landscaped land. Thus, the tower does not directly front the street.

It is based on an ideology popularised by Le Corbusier with the Plan Voisin, an expansion of the Garden city movement aimed at reducing the problem of urban congestion. It was introduced in several large cities across the world, notably in North America,[1] Europe[2] and Australia[3] as a solution for housing, especially for public housing, reaching a peak of popularity in the 1960s with the introduction of prefabrication technology. The towers themselves are typically simple, brick or concrete-clad high-rise buildings with little ornamentation. The footprint was designed with simple geometry to minimise construction costs whilst maximising light, air, and views of the surrounding open space for occupants, sometimes including balconies for the apartments.

It is now generally seen as a failure in urban planning for the many problems it introduced in urban sociology including isolation and segregation from the wider community, a lack of privacy, as well as inefficiency in land-use planning. While it is increasingly popular in Asia, it has declined in the Western world. Many existing complexes, especially those government owned, are planned for demolition and redevelopment. Redevelopment of the complexes typically favour the antithesis of towers in the park ideology, mixed-use development, which is said to have more positive social outcomes including making people feel safer and more integrated with their community.[4]

History

[edit]
Layout for Bijlmermeer, Amsterdam, 1965. Hexagonal tower grids and accessways were an attempt to improve the model's access to transportation.

Le Corbusier pioneered the "tower in a park" morphology in his unrealized 1923 Ville Contemporaine. Responding to the squalid conditions of cities in the 1920s, Le Corbusier proposed razing the old cities and replacing them with new, clean, hyper-rationalist layouts employing the "tower in a park" morphology.[5] The skyscrapers were intended to house the new city's three million residents on only 5% of the land.[5] By placing the buildings near the center of the block, there is room for parking, lawns, trees, and other landscaping elements. Le Corbusier further employed the morphology in his 1930 plan for Paris, the Ville Radieuse (also unrealized). Owing to the wide diffusion and influence of these two plans and their ideas post–World War II, especially the latter, the "tower in the park" morphology spread throughout Europe and North America.

Criticism and current state

[edit]

By the early 1970s, opposition to this style of towers mounted, with many, including urban planners, now referring to them as "ghettos".[6] Neighbourhoods like St. James Town were originally designed to house young "swinging single" middle class residents, but the apartments lacked appeal and the area quickly became much poorer.

From its early days of implementation the concept was criticised for making residents feel unsafe, including large empty common areas dominated by gang culture and crime. The layout was criticised for normalising anti-social behaviour and hampering the efforts of essential services, particularly for law enforcement.[7] Within less than a decade Sydney's 1960s public housing developments at Surry Hills, Redfern and Waterloo were labelled the "Suicide towers" due to their high rates.[8]

Pruitt-Igoe in St. Louis, Missouri, was demolished in 1972 just a couple of decades after its construction due to deteriorating social conditions. Pruitt-Igoe's demolition became a major turning point in popularity of what was increasingly seen as a failed social experiment. Postmodern architectural historian Charles Jencks called its destruction "the day Modern architecture died" and considered it a direct indictment of the society-changing aspirations of the International school of architecture and an example of modernists' intentions running contrary to real-world social development.[9]

By the mid 2000s, it became popular to reclaim the green space surrounding towers with lower buildings in an effort to increase density mix instead of segregate the land use.[1]

Examples

[edit]

Some examples of the tower in a park morphology are below:

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c How to rejuvenate urban 'towers in the park', Globe and Mail, John Bentley Mays, May 12, 2011
  2. ^ "Your Broadwater Farm | Tottenham Regeneration". tottenham.london. Retrieved 2021-12-28.
  3. ^ Frykholm, H. (2023). ‘A Village Stood on End’: Anthropology and the Interior of the Modernist Tower. Fabrications, 33(2), 359–377.
  4. ^ Trench, Sylvia; Oc, Taner; Tiesdell, Steven (1992). "Safer Cities for Women: Perceived Risks and Planning Measures". The Town Planning Review. 63 (3): 279–296. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.3.r16862416261h337. ISSN 0041-0020. JSTOR 40113842.
  5. ^ a b Kashef, Mohamad (2008). "The Race for the Sky: Unbuilt Skyscrapers". CTBUH Journal (1): 9–15. ISSN 1946-1186.
  6. ^ Tall Buildings, Toronto Star, August 27, 1973, C3
  7. ^ OPERATION SMOKE AND MIRRORS by Jamie Kalven 6 October 2016
  8. ^ LEARNING FROM THE NORTHCOTT GOVERNMENT HOUSING ESTATE, SURRY HILLS, SYDNEY.
  9. ^ Jencks, Charles (1984). The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Rizzoli. ISBN 978-0-8478-0571-6.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Towers_in_the_park&oldid=1249072374"