User talk:-- -- --

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A different bureaucrat has a follow-up request wanting to know if you had some preference for the renaming of your account. The bureaucrat further said, "I suggest we default to a random username on or after Jan 10th." If you have any preference or objections could you please post it at your user name change request. My apologies for the late notification. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 07:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Just a couple of tips. 1) Be careful not to log into Wikipedia (or other Wikimedia Foundation projects) using your old user name. 2) You will probably want to update your signature in Special:Preferences. 3) Secure the m:SUL on your new user name ASAP. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 22:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, -- -- --. You have new messages at Deliriousandlost's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 21:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification, -- -- -- is the new user name. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 00:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

There is no problem with a username of "-- -- --"; the user should not be blocked. -- Avi (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

This account, -- -- --, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

{{}} Daniel Case (talk) 15:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un reviewed|````}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Allowing username change to 1 2 3 4 (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk) Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

You might want to look at the user name policy again. -- -- -- is neither offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, a company name, or an internet address. The one thing it is is non-English. It is Morse code. And just like above when i clerked the rename to -- -- -- i am also noting on this forced rename that -- -- -- was already approved as a user name by Avi. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 21:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The name was then reported to UAA by someone else; I couldn't find any evidence of the previous name change nor the new one. I did think it a little confusing; someone could possibly see the three dashes and think them a signature attribution. And we usually ask people with usernames that might be confusing to change them. We decided not to in this case, and I am sorry for any inconvenience this caused. Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is in part my bad. I used the same style of link that JC did (i changed it a few minutes ago for future reference). It is a very handy method to link but once a rename goes through it apparently creates the impression that the new user name is the subject of a rename. I never realised this was the result until i started looking at this this afternoon.

@ -- -- -- i am so sorry for the problems that my choice of linking method caused. Please add links to your signature. See my note below. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 00:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"-- -- --" is an interesting user'name'.
Read as morse code dashes it comes out as "M M M". Is there something to that?
Regards, 220 of ^Borg 04:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC) (I could also be 010 010 000 of ^Borg in base-2 binary)[reply]

The morse code interpretation was pointed out to me after I chose the name. See, for example, here. Regards, -- -- -- 04:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 04:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COPIED FROM MY TALK PAGE : Also, you are supposed to have at least one link to your user page or talk page. Given your user name i have this below suggested signature. You would go to Special:Preferences and paste it in to the section for a signature and then check the box to "Treat signature as wikitext". Feel free to change the colours if you don't like the random ones i selected.

-- -- --

<big>[[User:-- -- --|<span style="color: #FFDD33">'''--'''</span>]] [[User talk:-- -- --|<span style="color: #33cc99">'''--'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/-- -- --|<span style="color: #6633cc">'''--'''</span>]]</big>

Having the links to your user page, user talk page, and contributions should remove issues around your user name and the appearance that it is a typographical error. The above was on my user talk page earlier this month but maybe you just never read it. It really should have been put here to ensure you got the message. I am sorry. If i had put this message here you likely would have never had to deal with this. Without the links in your signature you are almost certainly going to continue to have issues. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 00:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you created this page with a speedy deletion template? It shouldn't have been holding up the move until you created the page. What am I missing here? --Selket ^Talk 03:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for showing interest. Vien (Hasidic dynasty) is about a Hasidic community which is not led by any rabbinical dynasty. There does exist, however, a Hasidic dynasty known as Vien (that of the ZEGELBAUM family) which deserves its own article. I read the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves, but couldn't figure it out (see talk page). I apologize for any confusion I might have caused.

-- -- -- 21:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should have been able to just move it. You probably still can. --Selket ^Talk 21:28, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

 Done -- -- -- 00:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in any way a stoliner chossid, or have some shaychis to the rebbe and his mishpoche?Shuliavrumi (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may ask whatever you wish, although you might want to ask 84.9.32.167 (talk) and/or Jewishhistorian (talk | contribs) (they might even be one and the same) since they are the one(s) who originally inserted the information about Rebbe Baruch Meir Yaakov’s children to Karlin-Stolin . -- -- -- 22:30, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you may be aware that it is policy for all biographies of living people (BLPs) to be referenced to reliable sources. There is currently a WikiProject - WP:URBLPR - attempting to reference all Unreferenced BLPs. One article that I have just tried to reference is Yeshaya Labin. As his title sounds fairly important, I won't nominate him for deletion, but I would ask if you could assist in finding and adding at least one reference from a independent reliable source. It doesn't have to be an online source, it could even be in Hebrew, I'm just struggling to find anything online. Thanks for any help you can provide. Regards, The-Pope (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I added some more information and references.

Regards, -- -- -- 22:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-I see now that you are using your own subpage template for a user warning, but wouldn't it be better to use the official Template:uw-delete1? Otherwise, the incremental process for uw-1, uw-2, etc. won't work for Twinkle on your subpage template; if someone else using Twinkle warns the same user, then they'll be starting at level 1 also, instead of level 2, because Twinkle wouldn't be able to read your template warning and which level it is. --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. One reason why I didn't like the official template is because the template assumes that the edit is recent, which might not be the case. Would it be OK if I modify the wording manually (without actually changing the template) like I did here? Or, perhaps should the official template be modified? (I have already consulted the template's talk page here). -- -- -- 21:41, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see the problem with the word "recent", but if I find an edit that needs to be reverted, and it's an old edit, I sometimes use the template anyways, or just rvv without warning the IP, if there have been many vandal edits on a page. I use WP:HUGGLE, and the incremental warning system goes back to the 1st level, I think after about 1-2 days, if the editor hasn't made anymore unwanted edits since then. That's why I think the word "recent" is in there, because Huggle and Twinkle assume that vandal may have gone away by then. :-) --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just came across User:-- -- --/Template:Uw-delete1 revised. Looking through the code, I saw

~~<includeonly>~~</includeonly><noinclude>~~</noinclude><noinclude>

Can I ask why you don't just use

~~<noinclude />~~<noinclude>?

Using <noinclude /> breaks up the signature while still displaying it normally, and then when you use the template it disappears and the signature works normally.

Just wondering, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. As for your question, I simply copied it from Template:W-link. (I changed it there as well). Thanks, -- -- -- 05:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you not do 10 small edits to the lezgin section incubator wikipedia. Not enough for statistics. Thank you in advance.Лезгинский разделNamik555 (talk) 04:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I do not know Lezgian. -- -- -- 23:51, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that recently you edited Makó, including {{Jewish Encyclopedia}}, you might be interested in reading Wikipedia talk:Jewish Encyclopedia topics#Citation templates. If you include the parameter inline=1 into {{Jewish Encyclopedia}} it will alter the the attribution string from:

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

to

 One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Singer, Isidore; et al., eds. (1901–1906). The Jewish Encyclopedia. New York: Funk & Wagnalls. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

-- PBS (talk) 03:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kopychyntsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, -- -- --. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism.
Message added 04:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for your contributions. You are doing a great job with this article. Joe407 (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, -- -- --. You have new messages at Talk:Ritual_washing_in_Judaism#Zav.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.0.179 (talk) 20:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	AfC barnstar
	Thank you for your work at AfC! CookieMonster755 (talk) 16:56, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; but next time, please spare me the effort of archiving my talk page by not clogging it up with barnstars and/or suchlike. (Barnstars may be placed here, instead.) -- -- -- 21:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Nice username there. Don't know how it got approved, but... it's cool! Dibbydib (talk) (contribs) 08:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did I restore Rabbi Dov Schwartzman? I honestly don't know. :( You can fix my mistake. Yoninah (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- -- -- 21:38, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on Talk:Baal Shem. I've added a responding comment there. Can you help with this recommendation? (I can't read Hebrew) (I've been writing up the page on Baal Shem - including some extra clarifications today). April8 (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Baal Shem. I've added a new response! April8 (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Elazar Rokeach of Amsterdam, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe something like: that Elazar Rokeach, chief Rabbi of Amsterdam, was born in Poland and died in Palestine? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Emil Czyrniański, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus (talk · contribs), are you sure the article qualifies? I don't think it has 1,500 characters of prose. -- -- -- 22:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, it needs a bit more expansion, but just a few lines, doubling the existing content at least, should suffice. SO I pointed it out as something that's pretty close, in case you'd like to see it on Main Page. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you, -- -- -- 15:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Heinrich Rauchinger, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Piotrus, are you sure the article can qualify? It was created back in November. Regards, -- -- -- 07:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right it may be too late, but I also wanted to remind you about the DYK process. Your articles are very nice and useful, and they could go on the front page. Let me know if you need any assistance! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks, -- -- -- 02:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

-- -- -- (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

209.2.61.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Vao Tv1". The reason given for Vao Tv1's block is: "CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked permanently to prevent abuse. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). ".

• Blocking administrator: Timotheus Canens (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: Appears to be a shared library IP. Autoblock lifted. T. Canens (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note for the checkuser, User:Timotheus Canens to see if he wants to look into this. EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both of you. -- -- -- 21:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

-- -- -- (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Funnycoolman". The reason given for Funnycoolman's block is: "Edit warring: +WP:HARASS".

• Blocking administrator: DangerousPanda (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: The autoblock was set to expire in an hour, so I removed it. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ponyo. -- -- -- 03:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

-- -- -- (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Seth8883". The reason given for Seth8883's block is: "Vandalism-only account: see also filter log".

• Blocking administrator: MusikAnimal (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: This appears to happen to you a lot; would you like me to look into giving you the WP:IPEXEMPT right? It's been a while since I've done that, so I'll have to read up to see if you qualify (so, sorry if it ends up that I'm promising something i can't deliver). Ping me here if you're still autoblocked, I believe I took care of everything but one never knows. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Floquenbeam, for your help. I would appreciate if you would be able to ensure that I don't get blocked from editing from a shared library computer. Honestly, I don't see why someone who's logged in as an autoconfirmed user should be blocked because of someone else's vandalism. Thanks again, -- -- -- 21:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've given you the WP:IPEXEMPT user right (here: [1]), so this shouldn't happen to you any more. People take this particular user right really seriously (perhaps more so than needed), so please read that page to make sure you're clear about what that means to you. Let me know if you have any questions, and I hope this makes editing easier for you in the future. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- -- -- 01:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• For reasons that made sense to people above my pay grade, almost everyone who had IPBE but wasn't currently editing from a hardblocked IP had the right removed today. It isn't really my place to fight the power on this one, even though I disagree, so I won't immediately restore it. But you should be aware that (a) it was done to almost everyone, so this is not a judgement on your level of trustworthiness, and (b) if the problem comes up again, please ping me and I'll restore the right as soon as I log onto Wikipedia. Sorry for the trouble. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for letting me know. I'll ping you (by mentioning you here by name) if necessary. Thanks again for your help. -- -- -- 20:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your email, I've re-added IPBE. Let me know if you still encounter problems. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was quick. As you see, I can edit again. Thanks again, -- -- -- 20:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I slightly modified your userpage. Bureaucrats deal with renames (until global SUL goes into effect at least), not admins. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 22:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abbahu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Mineans (''Minnin'') are not to be saved from a conflagration on [[Shabbat|Sabbath]]: "the books [written by ''Minnin'' for debating with Jews at Abidan may or may not be saved" (''Shab.'' 116a).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed (18 June). -- -- -- 21:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kashmiri Muslims may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• written in 1934; Published 2003 by Nigarshat, 24 Muzang Road, Lahore, Pakistan, pages 259 to 260]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed -- -- -- 21:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shimon Sofer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• districts of [[Kolomyia Raion|Kolomyia]], [[Sniatyn Raion|Sniatyn]] and [[Buchach Raion|Buchach]]) which had large Jewish electorates.<ref name=marg/> In 1879,<ref name=je>{{JewishEncyclopedia|url=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. -- -- -- 11:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Pardo (Dutch rabbi, born at Salonica) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''David ben Joseph Pardo''' (c.1591<ref name=tzorafolk>{{cite web|url=http://www.tzorafolk.com/genealogy/history/pardo.htm|title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed. -- -- -- 21:44, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I read your new page and felt it sounded too much like an Ami article. It should be written much more impartially, so that even non-Jews can appreciate his contribution. Also, it does not even begin to express what an important contribution he made to post-war Torah education. Surely there are more sources available than Ami and Esther Leah Avner? Yoninah (talk) 13:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your talkpage, where the discussion began. -- -- -- 10:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking for info about his siblings as well as his grandparents. My family (Mothers) are Hurwitz, changed the surname from Shiff (sp - Ziv possibly), are einiklech from the GrA. My email is [email protected]. I have a document stating that his fathers grandmother was Raizel Klatzki - daughter of the GrA's brother Yissocher Dov Klatzki.

Please contact me if possible.

Kol Tov,

Efroim Snyder Monsey, NY

Sorry. I currently have no info. about any of the above. Regards, -- -- -- 19:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I posted inquiries at Talk:Vilna Gaon#Siblings & Talk:Yosef Yozel Horwitz#The rabbi's family. So you might want to watch those pages. -- -- -- 10:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/pardo (surname).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bernard Friedberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject appears to be non-notable and does not meet WP:AUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Keithbob • Talk • 03:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion was removed by User:Colapeninsula, 12:42, 10 December. -- -- -- 00:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, -- -- --

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Whiteguru, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Israel ben Josef, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 07:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a small amount of encyclical references to "Israel ben Josef" constructing a synagogue on his own land in Krakow, Poland. There is contention over the content of the article and the dedication of the synagogue. However, this is notability for a single event only. Fails notability, WP:BASIC applies. Whiteguru (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: The article also cites The Jewish Encyclopedia [2] which states that he (the father of Moses Isserles) "was a rich and prominent Talmudist" and that "it may be concluded … that he was the chief of the community"; so in case that is not enough, then the page should be "merged", not deleted. Thanks, -- -- -- 03:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, -- -- -- , the page has been reviewed (and passed), and another editor suggests a merge. It will not be deleted, it will either stay or merge. Let's see what unfolds in the week coming. Thanks for your reply. -- Whiteguru (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yehuda Amit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kobi Michael has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With an h-Index of 11 and low citation counts, does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR, and not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed that the correct spelling is Armon HaNetziv, with an "e" and a capital "N". If any newspaper, or whoever, will spell it differently, as happens quite often, this is a mistake, and Wikipedia should not copy that mistake. Explanation: the word for governor (in this case referring to the British High Commissioner for Palestine), is "netziv", that you can check in any Hebrew dictionary. And according to WP:HEBREW, the letter coming after "Ha" should be capitalized. By the way, you can check the website of the Jerusalem municipality to see how they spell it. Should be okay. Debresser (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No need to notify me. Just cite your source so that other editors shouldn't have the same mistake as I had. -- -- -- 02:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first source in that article is a link to the Jerusalem municipality. If you enter in their search "Talpiot Mizrah", you'll see it spelled "Armon Hanetziv". Add to that the rules of WP:HEBREW that after "ha" should follow a capital in proper names, and there you are. Debresser (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. -- -- -- 04:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect View history. Since you had some involvement with the View history redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me. I'll let the more knowledgeable editors decide. -- -- -- 04:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Google Books had shown that it was a book that was frequently quoted/mentioned, I wouldn't have removed it. But that's not what I found and I think that for a scholarly article further reading should include books that are clearly significant to other scholars. Dougweller (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. By the way, why did you respond here instead of on your talkpage as the instructions both on your and on my talkpage indicate? -- -- -- 21:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am tempted to undo this edit, except if you can convince me otherwise.

1. The article provides a link to the verse in Isaiah 66:2: וְחָרֵד עַל-דְּבָרִי and its archaic translation, and trembleth at My word, which I changed to Modern English trembles. So you can see why the words one who belong in brackets.
2. I'm pretty sure that the word word in the phrase The word connotes refers to the word trembles (hared, וְחָרֵד) and not to the word word (דְּבָרִי); so why the added quotation mark glyphs? -- -- -- 21:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead with your edit; it's fine with me. I was looking at one of the sources that said #2, but it doesn't make sense to me, either. Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. -- -- -- 21:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! :) --96.228.30.198 (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:-- -- --, Shalom, chaver. I noticed where you mentioned in your recent edit on the article Menahem Recanati that "one part of Levushei Ohr Yekoros (authored by Rabbi Mordecai Yoffe) is a commentary on Recanati's Perush 'Al ha-Torah." My question to you is whether or not "Levushei Ohr Yekoros" was the title of Rabbi Racanati's work? As you know, almost all rabbinic compositions have commentaries appended to them, and this does not take-away from the main work itself.Davidbena (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Levushei Ohr Yekoros" was not the title of Rabbi Recanati's work. The Wikipedia article in question follows The Jewish Encyclopedia [3] which calls Rabbi Recanati's work Perush 'Al ha-Torah; although on the title page of the first edition (Venice, 1523) it is calledביאור על התורה על דרך האמת להחכם השלם מהר"ר מנחם מרקאנטי זצ"ל. In 1595, Rabbi Mordecai Yoffe published Levushei Ohr Yekoros which is divided into 3 parts; the 1st part of which is a commentary on Rabbi Recanati's work. Regards, -- -- -- 21:05, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I added a picture of title page to the article. -- -- -- 21:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for starting this article. Are you working on expanding it now, or would you like other editors to work on it too? Yoninah (talk) 15:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still working on it for now. -- -- -- 22:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I did a Google search for sources and found these two bio sources: Hamodia and The Jewish Press. Perhaps there's more about her in Hebrew. She is also quoted quite a bit by other sources. Good luck, Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- -- -- 23:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: You may have already noticed that an AFD discussion was started by [email protected]. Feel free to comment. -- -- -- 06:07, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm finished with the article for now. Your input would be most welcome. -- -- -- 08:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't hold out much hope for this AfD. So far the only good sources I found were the two obituaries written after her death. She was a famous personality here in Jerusalem, and her first book, All For the Boss, introduced a new genre for Feldheim Publishers, but back in those days there wasn't so much written about her. Recently Noach Orlowek was also deleted for the same lack of solid verification. Yoninah (talk) 21:33, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I don't think the Jewish press article in an obituary. It was published a year after her death. -- -- -- 04:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention to this page, and for your thoughts. My target in editing the page was to identify and elucidate Kesten's major contributions to mathematics (of which there are a number). This required review of a number of areas, and led to some inclusions and some deletions, in order to maintain consistency of standard. I should have explained my changes better. He has a very large number of fine and worthy papers, inevitably not of equal impact, and they cannot all be included here. 2deff (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for the explanation. -- -- -- 21:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear -- -- -- ,please would you correct the following inaccurate statement regarding the Barrett name on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_(name) Barrett is a common Afrikaans surname that occurs in South Africa.[citation needed]

The name Barrett has never been associated with the Afrikaans people. Whilst there are people who live in South Africa with the Barrett name they are usually descendents from the United Kingdom.

As can be verified on one of the links submitted below, a search on the white pages of South Africa reveals a grand total of 127 results for Barrett, including business numbers.

I submit the following as evidence for your consideration:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Afrikaans-language_surnames

http://buzzsouthafrica.com/afrikaans-names/

http://www.behindthename.com/submit/names/usage/afrikaans

http://www.whitepages.co.za/search/barrett/south+africa/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:262A:2A00:D1CF:AF5:52F0:F3E9 (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Welcome to Wikipedia.
2. Thanks for voicing your concerns.
3. When posting comments on talk pages, please remember to sign your posts.
4. I'm not a Wikipedia administrator, if that's what you meant by "Admin".
5. According to the Wikipedia:Verifiability page, [a]ny material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. And you don't have to be an administrator in order to make changes to Wikipedia; so you can be bold and make the changes yourself.
6. Now, regarding the links you provided as proof that the name Barrett is not associated with Afrikaans:
   • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Afrikaans-language_surnames
     • Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
   • http://buzzsouthafrica.com/afrikaans-names/
     • I did not notice anything in this page about Afrikaans language surnames; only about given names.
   • http://www.behindthename.com/submit/names/usage/afrikaans
     • This might be a good source.
   • http://www.whitepages.co.za/search/barrett/south+africa/1
     • This only proves that there only 127 listings for Barrett in South Africa. To deduce from this that Barrett is not associated with Afrikaans would be original research.

I hope this solves your questions. Regards, -- -- -- 03:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your help in improving the {{Welcome non-latin}} template with a better experience for users with Hebrew/Yiddish characters in their names. I wanted to let you know that your work has not gone unnoticed and unappreciated. AlexEng(TALK) 21:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome. -- -- -- 20:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I wanted to take a bite out of the falafel. But one minute – is it kosher? -- -- -- 04:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MMM defaultkid99 (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just too bad I had to throw it away. Cheeseburger isn't kosher, y'know. Please see milk and meat in Jewish law for more info. -- -- -- 21:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, -- -- --, whilst I appreciate your's helping out at different venues, please do not deny requests at WP:AFCP.Accepting or denying requests is an admin-only-task but you can choose to leave your comments/advice over there, as a guide for the admin, who will eventually review the request.Best,~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. -- -- -- 23:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be slow in responding to your question about Alfred Percy Sinnett. He seems to be safely on the list now. Duplication means occurring twice, which can happen if the alphabetical order is a bit wonky. Best wishes and thanks for your help. Bmcln1 (talk) 09:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- -- -- 20:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you warn a stale account about vandalism that occurred 8 years ago?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better late than never . There's no proof that the user won't decide to vandalize again in the future. Thanks for showing interest, -- -- -- 21:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really better late than never. An account named "Quacking Non-duck" , which was created solely to vandalize eight years ago, doesn't need to be reminded that they have an unblocked Wikipedia account. I have no doubt your edit was in good faith, but it wasn't particularly helpful (unlike the many many other things you do here).--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish identical twin actors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish identical twin children, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:24, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish twin child actors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish twin actors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish twin children, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish twins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish identical twins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Identical twin child actresses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female American identical twins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American twin actresses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American identical twin actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American twin child actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American female twin children requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Twin child actresses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American female twins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female twin children requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Female children requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male politicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 20:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles containing Turkic languages-language text requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let the experts decide. -- -- -- 01:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American twins, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. -- -- -- 20:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Identical twin male child actors has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Twin male child actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Polish actors, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- -- --, Greetings. Pls note that stand alone lists do need sources just like any other articles. Pls see WP:STAND. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Article was accepted by User:DGG. Thanks to all, -- -- -- 05:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jacob Alyashar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I hope it's OK now. -- -- -- 21:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jan Drozdowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy of the translation of http://www.psm.nysa.com.pl/artykul_04_boguslawakos.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. -- -- -- 21:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- -- --,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joseph Yuspa Nördlinger Hahn for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 04:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- -- -- 20:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Benjamin Ashkenazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/1959-ashkenazi-benjamin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]