User talk:Aepstein607

Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Aepstein607! Thanks for the contribution over on the Louis B. Marshall article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

• Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
• When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
• Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
• Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, Aepstein607, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 19:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to be a part of WikiProject Backpacking, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to backpacking. To accept this invitation, click here!

I would also invite you to join WP:TRAILS, WikiProject Protected Areas and WP:WPNY, based on your edits.

Thank you for creating those articles on the wilderness areas ... I've been cleaning them up a bit, adding them to the protected areas and NY state projects etc. (For a long time there was only one NY wilderness-area article, the Slide Mountain Wilderness Area in the Catskills, which I had created. That follows project guidelines and uses the UMP heavily as a source ... you might want to follow the example in organizing any further articles on protected areas you create.

Since I mainly hike in the Catskills, I have been working on those articles, but I had started some of the High Peaks in my early days on Wikipedia. Good to see someone else taking up the slack.

You are right that the title of the Adirondack and Catskill park articles will have to change ... as section 9-0101 of the Environmental Conservation Law states, they are both simply "parks". (I hate when people say the Adirondack Park is the biggest state park in the country ... it's so not a state park in the usual sense. Both "parks" are more like national forests). The main problem was the huge list of redirects, but I have AWB now so I can fix that quickly. Maybe I should do that this weekend? Daniel Case 03:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't copy too much (like, any) text from the state's documents. It's not public domain, and it's easier to rewrite it. Otherwise it creates a lot of style violations besides the copyright violations. Daniel Case 05:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ack! I assumed that a public government document was automatically in the public domain, but I now understand that's only true for federal documents. I'll check with the APA to see if there are any restrictions on how the text may be copied and adapted (Adirondack Mountain Club, for one, seems to have copied sections verbatim for their website). As for the other concerns, I agree with those too. But I do think the text provides excellent seed material to stimulate and structure further discussion. Thanks! Ari Epstein 14:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave this up to assuage any concerns that might arise. I just spoke with John Banta, a counsel for the Adirondack Park Administration, and he confirmed that the State Land Master Plan is public domain although there is no explicit statement currently out there to that effect. Apparently there's bureaucracy involved in putting up such disclaimers, and concern about the need to protect some documents that contain proprietary information (particularly the maps). Still, I agree that we should work towards rewriting the articles on stylistic grounds and I will be working on that over the next month or so. Ari Epstein 15:45, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's some confusion as to whether some NYS docs are PD or not ... some state officials believe they are, and in some cases (GIS images that originate with the federal government) they actually are. But there has never been a statement from the legislature that they are, and barring that we cannot assume anything.

Even when it is, huge blocks of appropriated text don't make Wikipedia look good.

I'll do the move and AWB thing tonight ... it's long overdue. Daniel Case 16:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops. I can't just move them ... I forgot the official names already exist as redirects. Since it's against policy (and the GFDL) to change that via cut-and-paste as it leaves the article history in the wrong place, I have listed them on requested moves so that an administrator can do it. Daniel Case 14:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's all done now ... the moves and the AWBing. Daniel Case 05:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have two other ideas for how we can improve the Adirondack coverage:

• I'm planning at some point to create an .SVG location map of the Adirondack Park similar to the one I already did for the Catskill Park ... we need to give readers a clearer idea where the park is and what its bounds are than we can do with the big US locator map. Which is almost useless for showing the reader where specific management units are. So I'd also like to create one showing the boundaries of all the management units, which would then allow the creation of individual maps highlighting their locations much like we already do with counties within the state. We would use them in the infobox rather than the main US map. (And speaking of which, with a good map and picture we can also use the newer, more comprehensive {{Geobox Protected Area}}.

• Are you planning to do articles on the wild forests and primitive areas as well? (I love that last term ... I've always half-expected that its distinguishing characteristic would be that hikers in them would be required to wear only animal skins, use stone tools, and speak to each other in monosyllabic grunts :-)). If so, we should set up a separate navbox template for the park's management areas ({{Protected Areas of New York}} is just too big to be realistically used in an article).

Let me know. Hope you're out on the trails this weekend ... wish I was. Daniel Case 16:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I know who you are:) How's it going Ari? cOrneLlrOckEy 11:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aepstein607 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think a mistake's been made. I've received no notice about being blocked, am not aware of any of my postings being controversial, cannot find any history of changes to pages to suggest someone else hacked my account. I don't know who Shevashalosh is, but am not aware of any connection to me.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for sockpuppetry by Jpgordon (talk · contribs), an arbitrator and checkuser. Such blocks are generally not undone by normal administrators. You may appeal this block per e-mail to WP:ARBCOM. —  Sandstein  21:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Unblocked. Appears to be an error on my part. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 15:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Big Slide Mountain (NY).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to be a part of WikiProject Backpacking, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to backpacking. To accept this invitation, click here!

Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 02:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]