User talk:Antonioatrylia

Picture of the day

Diwali is a five-day Hindu festival of lights which symbolises the spiritual victory of light over darkness and good over evil. It commemorates the day when Hindu god Rama, along with his wife-consort Sita and brother Lakshmana, returned to his kingdom of Ayodhya after defeating demon-king Ravana and following 14 years of exile. Celebrations peak on the night of the third day of the festival—the main day of Diwali, which is today—marking the darkest night of the Hindu lunisolar calendar. People celebrate on this day by lighting traditional lamps (diyas) and candles. Pictured here is a woman lighting candles on Diwali.Photograph credit: AjoyDutta1997; edited by Aristeas

Archive – More featured pictures...

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user may have left Wikipedia. Antonioatrylia has not edited Wikipedia since August 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

ayyyy lmao Acronach (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antonio, I really appreciate your time and help. I changed the page because I added 2 public news citations. I think that I forgot to mention it in the recent changes box. Should I revert it?

Thanks.

Valentinetzekas (talk) 07:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I added back one of the references. I will add the other one back. If you are the article subject it is best to put requests on the talk page. Thanks. Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the addition of the table of contents to the page I made. Much appreciated! Blunt001 (talk) 09:39, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. The article also needs a lead section at the very top. See WP:LEDE for help on that. Let me know if you have any questions. Antonioatrylia (talk) 09:45, 10 February 2017

Can you please vote me on my Wali page for keepShah Aqeeq Baba if you are not interested please don't complain against me 😥😥 Hammadsaeed1 (talk) 07:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on that article now to improve it and find some more sources. After I am done I will likely join the deletion discussion. Antonioatrylia (talk) 07:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edits Antonio! This is a great practice project for me. I've add more edits. Can you please look at the page again before I resubmit? Soli58 (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Will do today. Antonioatrylia (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking the article again Antonio! I trimmed the content more and added some citations, but am unable to remove the "needs citation" tag. Also wondering about what to link. I looked at the Wiki page for guidelines, but it's very unclear. Can you look at the article one more time before I resubmit it? Thank you again!!! Soli58 (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will take a look later tonight or in the morning. Antonioatrylia (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soli58 I looked it over, and I am not seeing those youtube testimonials that had been used as references. (unless I missed one) That is good. Tidy up anything else you might want to and maybe you should submit it again. Please let me know if you have any more questions or need help. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Antonio. I still the citation needed tag after I added citations. Should I submit the article with the tags or can you remove them before I submit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soli58 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the draft again. Please check the link for the official website under external links.

It is not working for me. Antonioatrylia (talk) 21:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the external link. Should work now. Thank you soooo much for helping me on my practice project! I'm wondering if I should trim more of the promotional quotations before submitting? They are all verifiable but may still make the article seem to promotional. Soli58 (talk) 22:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is best to trim anything promotional. There were one or two spots with quotes that were referenced to the subject's website. Since you have provided the website where the reader could go to read those. I would remove those quote referenced to his website. You are welcome for the help. You are a pleasure to work with. Antonioatrylia (talk) 23:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Antonio! You are also a pleasure to work with Soli58 (talk) 00:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antonio. I just resubmitted the article! I removed any promotional content and cleaned it up a bit more. I'll keep my fingers crossed! This has been a good project for me. Thank you soooo much again for all of your help! I'm looking forward to working on another article after this is hopefully accepted. Soli58 (talk) 00:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antonio! I saw on your page that you're considering retiring? Nooooooo! You are my favorite editor! I have a question: I am continuing to edit other articles, but keep going back to Michael Bayard's article and looking at the Rhythm Magic links. It interests me because it involves "risk of use" topics, which I am very interested in. What would you think of me writing an article about the Rhythm Magic program? I believe many people would benefit from knowing about programs such as these, and it may be a good place for me to start. While I love editing, I'd also like submitting articles. Thank you Antonio. Please don't retire!!!!!! Soli58 (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Antonio! I'm trying to submit an article which is in draft form now titled: Rhythm Magic. Its been denied a few times. Can you look at it for me? I've trimmed promotional content, but still getting the "advertisement" rejection. I think its an important article as it is a great way to help at-risk-youth. Please suggest what I can do? thanks so much!!!!!!! Soli58 (talk) 17:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi Kurdistantolive (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need some help .Kurdistantolive (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kurdistantolive What could I help you with? Do you have a question? Please leave me a link to the article. Antonioatrylia (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC) Antonioatrylia (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notes on Vanessa Parise's page. I didn't realize IMDB was not a usable source and when I saw "citation needed" I thought it was because I hadn't put one there in the first place. I didn't mean to be replacing links that were ruled un-unable. Cheers! Jen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjenred5 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I talked with JoJo before and her name is Joelle Joni Siwa, not Joelle Joanie Siwa. Please stop changing her name to the wrong information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alliealee (talk • contribs) 05:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change the name again unless you provide a WP:RS reliable source independent of the article subject to cite the name change to for verifiability. Thanks. Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello, you've made a mistake citing Shawn James & the Shapeshifters as the author of Through the Valley when in fact it is my solo material just under Shawn James. Check Spotify or iTunes where the track comes from the Album Shadows and that it is in fact my solo material. My work with The Shapeshifters are a heavy southern Blues Rock sound. -Shawn James

Please see the citations on the talk page of the article. Three reliable sources do not agree with what you are saying. Antonioatrylia (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources have been added and cited along with content. Please reconsider article deletion for Jessica Matten — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roughhead (talk • contribs) 22:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can see some have been added, unfortunately many do not even mention her. Notabilty is not inherited. The article is promotional and does not show notability for her. I will take another look later today. Antonioatrylia (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work at Paige Brooks... I still don't think the notability is there but it will at least make it easier to judge the AFD going forward. Nice work. I'd just make the suggestion to check the citations against what they are asserting, for example it says she was a finalist at Miss USA, but she wasn't... none of the three citations there assert that. See here and in fact two of the citations are to the same article hosted on her site/fan site/whatever it is. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing. I have not even do e my searches yet. I am taking out most of the primaries and will find better citations hopefully and then we can see. That article eas in horrible. I happened to notice it on ANI while I was skimming thdre. So I clicked it. O my. Antonioatrylia (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my indeed! I was probably too hasty bringing it to ANI but the behaviour of the editors/their "ownership" of this article was concerning me and I wasn't sure it was wise waiting for the AFD tao take its course, especially as I could see it heading for relisting. You've done some sterling work here, hopefully the ANI will act as a wake up call to the editors to pay a little more attention to guidelines & policies so your edits stick. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for opening the sockpuppet investigation. Hopefully this will be the end of it all now. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 03:19, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Or not. Did you see this? --- PageantUpdater (talk) 10:32, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I skimmed it. I am really not so bothered. She got a checkuser block. Only a checkuser can unblock her. In the unblock request, she used her opportunity to try to bash me and said a bunch of lies and things that were not true. Blaming others in your unblock material never really works to well, as far as I have read in the couple ones I have read over. Who the heck knows?

Hey if you have time will you look over this guy, and in a five minute period of searches on your computer, let me know if you deem him to be notable. I would like your opinion on the article. It is here: Milcho Manchevski. Thanks! Antonioatrylia (talk) 10:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Hoped/figured someone would see through it. Yes of course, will go have a look now. My opinion on the notability of Paige Brooks probably seems weird to you given my username. The topic has gone through a really contentious year or so of AFDs and as such what seemed to qualify as notability changed so much the articles seem to have been held to very strict sense of notability. People with much more newspaper coverage than Brooks were being deleted due to the articles only being considered from "local" sources. Won't lie, the conflicting standards of what will and won't get deleted have left me very confused. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 10:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The current sources seem to be more about the films than the filmmaker but of course notability is based not on what references are in the article but what can be found. Most of what I can see on Google isn't from newspapers or sources which would generally seem to pass WP:RS (from magazines etc) but of course we're 20 years out from when he was most famous. A quick search of Newspapers.com seems to show much more coverage from the 1990s, the only problem is I can't really assess it properly as I don't have a subscriber account and can only see search snippets. I think on the whole the source material is promising, and of course this is only what I'm finding in English as well, I would assume there would be more in his native Macedonia. What a shame Google dismantled their news archive. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 11:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And of course I start to find the most promising sources on page 8... thanks Google ;) this this cover him in significant depth, as does this article from Film Quarterly which I think would qualify as a RS more than just your run-of-the-mill mag? --- PageantUpdater (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your guidance on improving Edward J. Steele My efforts seem under attack.

BSmith821 (talk) 17:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be glad to take a look at it today. Antonioatrylia (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for vastly improving this article. I appreciate your help in making it better. Today, I made some formatting changes, which I think are improvements and make it easier to read, etc., and I also added a few more items to the titlebox. Certain sentences needed to be relocated to the appropriate topic area. (i.e. L'Vegue should appear under Modeling as opposed to Film and Television.) Since it will be very difficult for me to re-add the improvements individually at this juncture, (and I do think you will agree that the formatting changes are making the article better), I will just do a revert and then an immediate edit to remove the added sources that you mention above and make sure that your sources stay. I think that way, we both can keep our good edits. I am only doing a revert because it is so much easier, not because I do not like or agree with your work and research. I hope you find this agreeable since it is so much easier for me. Thanks, again, for your help! SSIISS (talk) 23:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, again, Antonioatrylia. I was in the process of removing sources that you thought were unreliable, but then I realized that I have no idea to which sources you are referring. Could you please provide a list of sources that you think I should remove and I will do so? Or, I will provide more information on those sources so you can judge for yourself. All of the sources that I am using are verified (newspapers, magazines, legitimate websites, etc.) However, please let me know if it is done correctly. I will list the sources here for you and you can tell me which ones you think need more research, etc. I do strongly prefer the formatting and clean-up and hope that you like it, too. SSIISS (talk) 23:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Here are the sources for your perusal: "Hall of Fame - Miss Alabama USA/Teen USA USA Pageants". Miss Alabama USA/Teen USA USA Pageants. February 15, 2014. Retrieved March 21, 2017. Amo, Gary. "In Store Summer Fashions for Her", Beverly Hills 213 Magazine Press, D. (2004). Your Modeling Career: You Don't Have to Be a Superstar to Succeed. Allworth Press. p. 251. ISBN 978-1-58115-986-8. Retrieved March 21, 2017. "TPIRModels.com" Willis, J.; Monush, B. (2004). Screen World 2003. John Willis Screen World. Hal Leonard. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-55783-526-0. Retrieved March 21, 2017. "IMDb Men In Black II Full Cast & Crew "IMDb Salutes Hollywood Blondes - Paige Brooks" "Official Website of Paige Brooks" "Official Website of Paige Brooks" "L'Vegue Magazine Aug 2016 issue". issuu. August 17, 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017. "Official Website of Paige Brooks" Amo, Gary. "In Store Summer Fashions for Her", Beverly Hills 213 Magazine SSIISS (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSIISS (talk • contribs)

I've reverted both the redirect and the AfD close. While I believe my closing was correct, I am not 100% sure and that's good enough for me. Coretheapple (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick attention to the matter. Happy editing! Antonioatrylia (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem at all. In reviewing the AfD rules again I noticed that withdrawals are allowed if the sentiment is "keep," Not merge! So we might as well go ahead and continue with it. Coretheapple (talk) 21:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your patience. I have finished editing this article and any improvements will be welcome. Op47 (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very good question. I've never done that before. I see that nominating multiple articles is covered by WP:MULTIAFD, and my reading of that is that such articles need to have a relationship to each other, not just similar qualities. The technicalities are covered by WP:BUNDLE. Coretheapple (talk) 12:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonioatrylia. I received your e-mail, but I prefer to talk on-wiki. It doesn't seem as though the proposal is going to gain consensus as is, although sometimes compromises happen. A lot of things are proposed, but most aren't adopted, and those that are are often modified to be more acceptable. No use worrying prematurely! I've been a Wikipedian for four years, which is not a particularly long time compared with others, but even over that time there have been a lot of changes. I've disagreed with some of them, but I believe in the project and have always been able to find many ways to contribute. I agree that helping new users get started can be fulfilling, but the proposal wouldn't stop you from doing that even if it passes. Any autoconfirmed user can improve draft articles and move them to mainspace.—Anne Delong (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Novonium. I wonder how many other sockpuppets they have used? PamD 07:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look. Thanks. Antonioatrylia (talk) 09:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Antonioatrylia:,

I saw you made edits to Davey Nate could you help me on the page. What is it that I need to do to make sure everything is correct and so it doesn't get delete. Thank you. Dman54321 (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have addressed the problems with this article at the AFD page. Thanks, Antonioatrylia (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the BLPPROD you removed from the article. All of the sourcing was to blogs, iTunes/Spotify, was not independent of the subject, or was in some other way deficient from our RS standards. A validly placed BLPPROD on an article with no sources can only be removed if an RS is provided. Since I didn't see any, I went ahead and reverted so that an admin can review it. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:57, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni We are not in agreement that there are no reliable sources in the article. If you read over the policy at WP:BLPPROD you will see that when there is an objection, 2. however, in borderline cases, such as where a source of questionable reliability (rather than an obvious unreliable source) has been added, the biography should be listed instead at Articles for Deletion.

3. If a relevant and reliable source has been provided but you still believe the biography should be deleted, use one of the regular deletion processes.

I have removed the prod according to policy. Antonioatrylia (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. All of the sources provided are blogs or not independent of the subject, so I wouldn't consider them borderline under BLPPROD, they just aren't reliable by our standards. I'll take to AfD though. Not worth fighting over. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Editor was a sock, the master created an identical article called Cory Daniel Edwards. Doug Weller talk 09:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear! I thought something must be up. I remember seeing Lil Cory before. Can you help me with on Riff Raff (rapper). The first reference is to LA Weekly which is a dead link now, plus it is only a blog. I know how to remove the reference, but it has 10-12 sub references to the same dead blog. How does one address those? Thanks for handling the Lil Cory incident. Antonioatrylia (talk) 10:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For dead links, wee WP:Dead link. I'm not sure I agree with you about LA Weekly given its Pulitzer Prize, etc. I suggest you ask at WP:RSN. See also this. As for the question, you'll just have to remove by hand, deleting quotes, adding cn tags where appropriate. Unless you use Wikiedit, which has search and replace tools. Ping me if you need more help, eg {{re|Doug Weller}} If you ping someone you have to get it right. If you save and find an error, you have to start a new edit as you can't fix a broken pin. Doug Weller talk 11:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you help improve the article instead of just removing the sources and posting up deletion notices? If am doing the wrong thing I don't understand why you cant look for the right sources.

Thanks User:Manunited20 undated , 11 August 2017 20:10 UTC

I have searched on two different occasions for reliable sources for this subject. I found none. I always search as part of WP:BEFORE. It is part of my process before nominating an article for deletion. Please do not keep re-adding unreliable sources back to the article. I see that you have been warned several times regarding that, and you are at risk of a block because of it. Regards! Antonioatrylia (talk) 16:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Bundy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox philosopher. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox writer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that IP has a good basis for comment, then post it under your own name.

Your sock puppet allegation is ridiculous and fucking laughable. I look forward to seeing it crash and burn in flames. - SchroCat (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Antonioatrylia (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bee Gees. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa Bonheur's The Horse Fair has been chosen as the first-ever Met Weekly Challenge, starting today, for the coming week. There are a lot of resources at the artwork's Met Collection record (see 'Catalogue Entry'), and also lists of other references. We could also benefit from the French Wikipedia version and Commons:Category:The Horse Fair — see the section for Week 1: The Horse Fair (Sept 25 - Oct 1) for more on how to participate, or just get started editing!

I also very much encourage folks to share and vote for your ideas on future collaborations!--Pharos (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lee Rhiannon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, if it fulfills the criteria of WP:NOTE, then we can make an article on it. Of course, each individual artwork is different, and it depends on the strength and spread of WP:RS in each case.--Pharos (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ingres' The Princesse de Broglie has been chosen as the Week 2 focus of the Met Weekly Challenge. There are a lot of resources at the artwork's Met Collection record (see 'Catalogue Entry'), and also lists of other references. See the section for Week 2: The Princesse de Broglie (Oct 1 - Oct 8) for more on how to participate, or just get started editing!

I also very much encourage folks to share and vote for your ideas on future collaborations!--Pharos (talk) 20:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Liberty University people. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Velázquez's Portrait of Juan de Pareja has been chosen as the Metropolitan Museum of Art Weekly Challenge for the coming week. There are a lot of resources at the artwork's Met Collection record (see 'Catalogue Entry'), and also lists of other references. See the section for Week 3: Portrait of Juan de Pareja (Oct 9 - Oct 15) for more on how to participate, or just get started editing!

Simultaneously, we are also encouraging collaboration on the biographical article for Juan de Pareja, the artist depicted.

I also very much encourage folks to share and vote for your ideas on future collaborations!--Pharos (talk) 20:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manny Pacquiao. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gillian Keegan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the global online Wikipedia Asian Art Month (sign up here!), running November 1-30. As part of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month, there will be Met postcards for all who participate, and art books as grand prizes. Let me know if you have questions, or need help finding a good topic and matching images from the Met CC0 collections release.--Pharos (talk) 19:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Woody Allen. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary the Goat. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonioatrylia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim McGraw. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trace Adkins. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The New York Times. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Billie Lourd. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah Oppenheim. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonioatrylia. Ijeoma Oluo, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bahar Mustafa race row incident. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dorothy Tarrant. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ijeoma Oluo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the shooting of Trayvon Martin, Seattle author Ijeoma Oluo started writing about her social concerns on a blog that she had previously devoted to food? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ijeoma Oluo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ijeoma Oluo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Coco Austin. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jorge I. Domínguez. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably an accident but please be careful from next time when using tools. With thanks. --QEDK (後 ☕ 桜) 15:43, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly accidental. Sorry. Thanks! Antonioatrylia (talk) 05:34, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mikhail Bulgakov. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christina Hoff Sommers. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Washington. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Mara. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andrew Scheer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Hannity. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:D. H. Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diamond and Silk. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cameron Kasky. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Thiel. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:InfoWars. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Death year and age. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joan Freeman (Irish psychologist). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John McCain. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Page. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles K. Kao. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doria Ragland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Wardlow. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonioatrylia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Antonioatrylia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]