User talk:Ariel.jacobs

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Travelling salesman problem. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. my apologies. I removed the remaining addition. thank you. -Ariel

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. my apologies. All additions have been removed. thank you. -Ariel

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Riemann hypothesis, you may be blocked from editing. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:55, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just created my wiki account today, and was not aware of the no original research policy. My apologies. I will remove my additions. Thank you. -Ariel

Hi Ariel - I saw you were trying to write an article about yourself. There are a couple of things to watch out for. The first is that Wikipedia strongly discourages people from creating or editing articles about themselves. You can read more about this here WP:COI. The main reason for this is that people writing about themselves don't write in a neutral way, and include original, unsourced research. That seems to be the case with the sourcing you used for your draft - your two papers. My math and theoretical physics skills are not nearly what they would need to be to follow your logic, but even if I could, we require that the articles be sourced with reliable third party sources. See WP:RS. These independent sources should validate what your article says. Since the two problems are considered long unsolvable, if your papers are indeed the solutions, it shouldn't take long for a more knowledgeable journalist or scientist to write about your accomplishment in a scientific journal, and then viola - we'd have some proper sourcing to use. Until then, it's unlikely that your draft article will be approved. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 06:39, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:YOURSELF. EEng 19:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ariel Jacobs (mathematician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ariel Jacobs (mathematician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ariel.jacobs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is and is not. Wikipedia is not just another news, forum, blog, or social networking site – it is a place for serious, collaborative, scholarly assembly of knowledge into a high-quality encyclopedia. Many come here with other expectations and have a difficult time as a result.
• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

∯WBG^converse 11:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ariel.jacobs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)