User talk:Bassophile

Hi there. Anything of mine that needs attention, or anything you'd like me to look over, please leave me a link

Bassophile 13:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phosphatase looks great! I've gone ahead up upped its class to B status. :) Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 18:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

– ClockworkSoul 18:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You voted for X-ray crystallography and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article.

NCurse _work 21:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Midwinter1.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Star Trek-style starship simulators, which you utilized, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 14:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Basophile,

I notice you have created your own userbox, viz;

This User is an X-ray crystallographer

Can I ask a huge favour? Can you please give me a few pointers on how I can create one myself, or point me in the right direction?
PS. I see you are a protein crystallographer. I have a bit of a crystallography background my self, but pertaining more to condensed matter.
Sincerely, Romaioi (talk) 04:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Midwinter1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cellmatadhes.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ply-em.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Xray Crystallography, a portal in which you may be interested, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Xray Crystallography and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Xray Crystallography during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a new editor here at Wikipedia and I am interested in elevating Isaac Newton to FA status. But since I am new, I have been advised to seek the help of other more experienced editors before submitting it for FA. I was wondering if you can help me with the article, or to seek out other editors who can do that? The article is very nearly FA status; and only needs someone experienced to handle all the trivial details that need to be ironed out. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 07:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bassophile. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bassophile. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. When you uploaded file:Eden.png, you specified that it could only be used in the article on X-ray crystallography, and that if anyone wanted to use it elsewhere, they'd have to get your permission first.

This isn't really compatible with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. As well, it's not optimally illustrative for that particular context — but your insistence on permission means that if we replace your image with a more suitable one... we'll have to delete yours. Because there's no other use to which we're allowed to put it.

If at some point you read this message and would like the image restored, this can be done by any admin — although you'll have to accede to its use by anyone for any purpose. DS (talk) 01:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually a bit of two unrelated situations. First is the licensing concern. We generally can't host images that are not fully compliant with certain types of free use regardless of whether the image is highly useful in this article. So it's not if we replace, we then delete but instead we pretty much must delete period unless you provide us greater permission. My other concern is that the image is not well suited to illustrate this encyclopediac content. I'll explain here why, though this is all solely my opinion and we can certainly discuss it if (and only if) the image itself were to have suitable license... Although the central bonds are clearly drawn as line segments, the electron-density map is too faint and large-grid mesh to see well, and much of the backbone is actually curved. Instead, the point seems to be to illustrate density or probability, so we might want to see the surrounding cloud more clearly, and the point is about resolving atom locations, so actual curves rather than segmented bonds is not that. DMacks (talk) 02:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly happy for anyone to use the image for whatever, and to update the license accordingly. It might have been helpful to have been given more than an hour to reply before the image was deleted. Regarding the map - The mesh size is typically based upon the data resolution - the map can be resampled on a finer grid if needed, but this isn't typically done. The faintness of the mesh can be fixed. The backbone is curved as it is a spline-fit to the alpha-carbon positions. This type of visualization is widely used in macromolecular crystallography. IIRC the original caption made it clear that this was a spline fit (aka 'cartoon' representation), but as the image has already been deleted, I cannot double check this. --Bassophile (talk) 09:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image restored; please update the license. DS (talk) 01:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the mesh is reasonably based on the level of data available. But it was too faint to be seen easily, so it was not great for those who don't already know about either the limits of the analysis or even what/where they should be looking to see anything. And I agree that the curved nature of the backbone is likewise a standard type of abstract representation for non-well-defined areas. But that is at odds with the whole concept of using specific atomic coordinates and then updating them iteratively. One should not have to know about backbone vs the main focused area, or average spine fits if the goal is to discuss individual atomic locations and modeling based on their bonding nature. DMacks (talk) 04:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bassophile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Edeqn.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]