User talk:Bigelarkin12

Hi Bigelarkin12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Chitty Chitty Death Bang, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to User:Cirt. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Chitty Chitty Death Bang. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for You may want to familiarize yourself with our policy on original research. It is up to you to provide references for your claims, not others.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. [DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 03:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting feed up with this website after my ban gets lift I will never come back to this website every again, so you lost a website viewer, just because how this website is runned. I will will put negitive comments about this websites on messgaes boards.

Why, because we won't let you post unverified content? – Luna Santin (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Bigelarkin12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.174.181.56 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Bigelarkin12". The reason given for Bigelarkin12's block is: "User page vandalism and continual insertion of original research in

• Blocking administrator: DeadEyeArrow (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MBisanz ^talk 04:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigelarkin12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Reasons that what I'm trying to add to the chiity chitty death bang - is that it is real just watch that episode on the CW Network PLEASE watch that episode on the CW network. ASS was replaced with BUTT on the CW version. That is the only way to verfiy this just have the staff of the site watch the episode. Just watch the freakin episode on the CW Network

Decline reason:

That would constitute original research. We need a reliable source saying this, or some very skillful use of the {{cite episode}} template (tell you what, if you can copy that here and fill out templates for the two versions of the episode in question (that would include their original airdates on both fox and CW), I'll at least add them as footnotes. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigelarkin12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

just watch the f****************episode. I HAVE SEEN ALL OF THE DIFFERENT VERSION OF FAMILY GUY I EVEN OWN ALL OF THE DVDS AND ON THE DVDS THEY MENTION ASS NOT BUTT, BUT ON THE CW VERSION ASS IS REPLACE WITH BUTT

Decline reason:

I am sorry that you still do not understand the verification policy, and that your failure to understand is making you so angry. On Wikipedia, verification meets an independent source, like a book, newspaper, or magazine article. If no one has written about a specific piece of information, then that piece of information probably isn't so important that an international encyclopedia needs to include it. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I will not unblock you, because it seems that, if unblocked, you would go back to making the same edits, and it also seems that you are having difficulty following the civility guidelines. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

'M PISSED OFF AT THIS WEBSITE AND VERY UPSET - I'M GOING TO BOYCOT THIS WEBSITE AND MAKE NETGITVIE COMMENTS ON OTHER WEBSITES. SINCE THE ONLY FREAKIN WAY TO VERIFY WHAT I'M TRYING TO ADD IS TO WATCH THE EPISODE. IF YOU ONLY WATCH THE EPISODE THEN YOU WILL SEE THAT IS VERIFY IT SINCE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY. I DO NOT TRUST ANY OF ADMINS ON THIS SITE FUC****************************************************************** YOU ALL

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigelarkin12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

A while back I added something something to A Hero Sits Next Door about brian say Chew on the Back of my Leg for about five minutes and that was in the CW Version, and I did not have any problems with that being posted, so what the heck is going on here.

Decline reason:

Incoherent reason; unblock abuse. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome back, you should know that we have a very specific policy on verifiability (at WP:V) for content. Basically it states that content must be attributed to reliable sources, simply being true isn't enough for content to be included. This policy is in place for our readers so, when they have to, they can quickly and easily check something. It's not up to them to prove something, it's the one that adds content. You're obviously here to try to improve the wiki, so I suggest you don't return to continually re-adding it in the manner which got you blocked previously. The passage about the editted family guy episodes has been challenged, so just find a source to back up your claim. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 09:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding [1] - simply saying "tvrage.com" in the edit summary is not satisfactory for sourcing requirements. Please take a read through WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:CITE to get some familiarity with policies on the project regarding citing sources. Cirt (talk) 22:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you indeed have a position with FOX, that can't really be used itself as a source in the article, we must rely on WP:RS/WP:V sources, preferably secondary sources, for the type of information you would like to insert into the article. Also, if you are being prevented from inserting links from a specific site into the article on this project, there is probably a good reason for that related to a history of spamming from that site. Cirt (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Cirt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 18:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]