User talk:Biruitorul

/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 /Archive7 /Archive8 /Archive9

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandru Piru, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Salvation Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Szatmárnémeti Nemzetközi Repülőtér is the native name of this airport in Hungarian in addition to the Romanian name. Szatmárnémeti has a mixed Hungarian-Romanian speaking population, and Hungarian is the second most widely spoken language in the region. User:Biruitorul has been constantly removing Hungarian names, this is unacceptable, and can be deemed as anti-Hungarian sentiment, and xenophobic. According to Romanian law, regions and towns where the native local population is above 20% bilingual signage can be used and Hungarian can be also used in official communication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.168.186 (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disgusting how this user biruitorul is constantly deleting Hungarian language entries.

This user is also a supporter of Romanian Fascism and is an anti-Hungarian provocateur that does not support autonomy or independence of Transylvania Transylvania and does not support the rights of Hungarians in Transylvania to self-determination. This user is a hypocritical Romanian Chauvinist that persistently vandalises pages where Hungarian names should and can be used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.9.168.186 (talk) 12:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I interest you in this or a 1000 Challenge for Romania/Moldova?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

N-am cum sa citez din moment ce n-am gasit nici macar sursa pe Google. Pot doar sa iti dau cuvantul meu de onoare ca a zis la TV de ziua nationala. Eu zic ca e important sa amintesc ca e si un sfert egipteanca. Sudaneza nu e pe jumatate intrucat tatal ei era pe jumatate cu origini din Egipt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvinistul (talk • contribs) 03:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding Chez alexito listing you as a user involved in the dispute. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "C%C4%83l%C4%83ra%C8%99i steel_works". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 01:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an FYI. The case has not been officially opened as of yet, and I am not one of the parties listed under the dispute. I am merely posting this notice on your talk page, as the case filer did not do so.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Statue of Wendell Phillips in the Boston Public Garden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Bobroczky (basketball), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article is significantly different from the one listed at AFD. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 13:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garchy

All the mess could have been avoided if you would have explained on my talk page what I did wrong instead of pointing to the MoS which didn't actually say what I was doing wrong. It is easy to revert and point to MoS. But as you can see, quite unproductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mess110 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of other fictions by Eric Rohmer. Since you had some involvement with the List of other fictions by Eric Rohmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for properly restoring the sourced information at the Socialist Republic of Romania article. Unfortunately, the same user has repeatedly removed "state atheism" from the article about Polish People's Republic. Since you are Eastern European, I would appreciate if you could help add a native source that supports the category. My reference, despite it being in English, was removed by User:Xenophrenic. God bless, Jobas (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biruitorul should be banned from editing ion wikipedia because he is a Romanian chauvinist facsist who is constantly vandalising Hungarian related pages and information, he has repeatedly removed Hungarian language names of institutions that are also used by Hungarians in Transylvania.

Category:History of Soviet Moldova, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul, thank you for your contributions. In contemporary academic practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, we use "Historical" to refer to the post-European colonization period, recognising that the indigenous peoples had history, and that the "Historical" period refers specifically to not only post-European colonization, but when their (European peoples) record-keeping dominated the historical discourse. So I, as with my academic colleagues prefer the nomenclature of "Historical" rather than a generic "historical". Hope this clarifies the matter for you. regards Brunswicknic (talk) 15:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello are you Aromanian ? Kp4816 (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notificare despre o discuție ce ar putea să te intereseze. XXN, 18:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... și un AFD interesant‎. --XXN, 11:40, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came across Ioan Sterca-Șuluțiu today, which you created in 2006. My gut instinct was to just send it to AfD and let things run their course, but noticed that in a 2009 AfD you said you were confident you could find sources. I've spent over an hour googling and digging through my local library (also a long shot, admittedly) and I've not turned up anything. The only source I can really find is this, but I wouldn't like to bet that that isn't based on the enwiki article. There are a couple of obscure academic papers that Google scholar suggests might mention him, but as they're not easily available online and none of them are in English, I'm struggling a bit. His brother, archbishop Alexandru, is mentioned fairly liberally, but as far as I can see none of those sources mention Ioan.

Could you give us a hint where we might find sources to at least substantiate - if not flesh out - this article? GoldenRing (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stii cumva cum pot primi functia de rollback sau sa schimb numele paginilor? Editez de mult timp paginile fotbalistilor romani si uneori am nevoie de aceste chestii.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am aplicat acum pentru rollback. Multumesc pentru ajutor! :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 14:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Am propus ca pagina FC Steaua Bucuresti sa fie redenumita FCSB. Poti sa iti spui opinia despre asta la discutia de pe talk page, te rog? Te intreb fiindca esti roman si ar trebui sa gasim o solutie.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 18:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chiar daca articolul despre ro:Vasile Ladislau Pop nu este prea bine scris, totusi cred ca ar fi de interes sa fie tradus in engleza. Multe salutari, --Mihai Andrei (talk) 10:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liked your edit summary restoring csd. Panache. Dlohcierekim 05:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting without bothering to give a reason is highly disruptive. 2.25.45.163 (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.45.163 (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Biruitorul. Just to let you know: I have restored the article Moldova Veche. Although you created the original page as a redirect, the substance of the article was constructed by another editor (as a translation from German Wikipedia) Therefore, it did not qualify for WP:G7 speedy deletion. At this point, any merging of the article's text will require a merge discussion and a consensus opinion before proceeding. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why are you denying a historical fact? The Danube is the border between Dobruja and Bessarabia. Every island on the Romanian side of the Danube (Chilia arm) is part of Dobruja, and Ukraine has such islands, meaning that Ukraine has gotten a small part of Dobruja. It doesn't matter how small the area is, it is still part of Ukraine. And there's nothing wrong if the source is Romanian. Google can be used to translate. I've seen numerous people adding sources in other languages, no one was against it. TheBlueMapper (talk) 06:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've just made this edit, a sourced information with citation https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Transylvania&diff=784140334&oldid=781491435 Please, if you can, keep an eye on it to prevent vandalism. (I'm a former WP editor) Thanks an keep up the good work ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.247.59 (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'd like to create a new article: Paolo Aldighieri. I write it in my sandbox User:99ernst/sandbox . What can you think about it? Can i create it? --99ernst (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You removed a link to Petre Sava Baleanu, the artist's first husband, a well known theater and tv director. Please restore the link.

The spelling in English is Naparus; the artist is well known iwith this spelling. There exists a wikipedia page in Romanian with the Romanian spelling. I added the Romanian spelling in the first line. Please consider when making disruptive changes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igandrew (talk • contribs) 21:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry about my misunderstanding. I didn't realize I'd copied the citations instead of cutting them. Can I make a request? When you write an edit summary, can you please document the change that you made? When I saw that you had written "sigh", I guessed your meaning to be "I had to change this back again", and I failed to notice the context when I looked at the diff. A description like "deleted duplicate inline references" is much more helpful (and assumes good faith). —Ringbang (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alexander Adamescu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not substantially identical to the version deleted at AfD. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Osebiţi, Biruitorul!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs additional references related to Its modern day incarnation not just ancient history.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Biruitorul, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of Tazlău Monastery. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 18:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is some contradictory information regarding Văitoianu:

• The Romanian wiki page states that he's interred at the Mărăști Mausoleum, while the English article he's laid to rest at Mărășești. More confusing still, I saw a picture taken by you with Văitoianu's grave at Bellu. While I'm inclined to believe that the General was rather interred at Mărăști along Marshal Averescu, why is his grave at Bellu? Was he laid to rest initially there and then moved to Mărăști, or is he still buried at Bellu?
• The Romanian wiki page states that he was imprisoned for 7 years at Sighet, however I could not find a single source for this.

Regards, Mentatus (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply and the infos. If the story about Văitoianu's remains proved true, it would be another sad affair about how Romanians treat the memory of their heroes. Mentatus (talk) 18:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your countless and valuable contributions! Codrin.B (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If there's "only one ethnicity to which someone named Ibolya Korodi could belong" then you'll have no problem finding a source for it. Please do not add categories that are not supported by such sources in the article. See also WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:BURDEN and WP:CATEGRS. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to read this: Romani. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 15:21, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you redirected the page Mihai Gruia to the Akcent giving the reason that it doesn't fulfill the notability criteria. You said it doesn't fulfill the point 6 of notability criteria. But you don't need to jump straight to point 6 because if any one of the points is fulfilled it doesn't fail the notability. The notability criteria say:

Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria. And for your information, it fulfills the point 1 of notability criteria. The point 1 says:

1- Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

There are hundreds and even thousand of non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published regarding the Mihai Gruia. Also, you said virtually all coverage of him is in relation to Akcent, not all but apart. He has been part of Akcent for 13 years and there is nothing wrong in mentioning the Akcent. He doesn't fulfill the notability criteria due to Akcent but due to his work. Out of 11 sources and two external links, 7 are those sources which are totally irrelevant to Akcent. How could you say everything is covered in Akcent?

You should respect the works of others and don't be aggressive and misuse your authority.TMOR (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Biruitorul. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 01:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you agree with what I said at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Daewoo_Mangalia_Heavy_Industries (at the bottom). I believe the name of the Mangalia Shipyard (Daewoo Mangalia Heavy Industries) is currently wrong and should be changed to something else, for example, Damen Mangalia shipyard or just Mangalia shipyard. What do you think? Dragnadh (talk) 01:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. AfC submissions Random submission 2+ months 2,046 pending submissions Purge to update v t e I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul. I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 05:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: in year 2011, you reviewed around 5000 pages. —usernamekiran(talk) 15:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Maybe you have time to give some comments on my FLC above? Just overlook this if you are busy right now... Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand if you think that the photo gallery listed doesn't apply well to the Lupeni strike of 1929, but why did you tag it as spam? The web portal is the official portal for Jiu Valley, and the photo galleries are of the Lupeni miners. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyrja (talk • contribs) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely correct about Francisco Kröpfl, I was just going by what the sources said but that was obviously wrong. Thank you for spotting it! Dr. Vogel (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lasa te rog referinta la Uzina Mecanica Marsa din articolul Avrig. Se leaga cu articolul DAC 120 DE. Multumesc frumos. 64.71.94.2 (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Este nevoie de ajutor cu --> Draft:Universal Tractor Braşov . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Platinia Hotel, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Linguist^unEins^uno (Linguist111) 20:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biruitorul. You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The article about the person you added to June 14 did not have any source that I could add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been undone. If you restore it, please provide a direct reliable source. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded or restored , File:Statue of Charles Sumner in the Boston Public Garden.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Am trecut doar a saluta și pentru a-mi arăta aprecierea față de munca pe care o faci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupul carpatin (talk • contribs) 20:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC) --Lupul carpatin (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what is he doing?Skyhighway (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just wanted to inform you that we have the somewhat older WikiProject Alexandra Stan (which was not quite a success) and the new WikiProject Inna out there. These are great opportunities to discuss on things related to the two singers, how to improve articles related to them and so on. I would really appreciate you joining one of these two projects, but of course you don't have to. I think you're a great editor in this direction, and your help would definitely be needed. To join one of the aforementioned projects, just list yourself in the "Participants" column and put both the page and its talk page on you watchlist to stay updated on the matter. Have a wonderful day!! Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Merry Christmas! Crăciun fericit!
		Merry Christmas/Crăciun fericit! Mentatus (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lee McClung.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the following coordinates he deleted major article updates with no possible motivation, evidently trolling as proven by his note "Yeah, no" or "Rmv soapboxing"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Court_of_Romania (cur | prev) 07:14, 16 March 2019‎ Biruitorul (talk | contribs)‎ . . (12,050 bytes) -54,613‎ . . (Yeah, no) (undo | thank)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_of_Romania (cur | prev) 07:13, 16 March 2019‎ Biruitorul (talk | contribs)‎ . . (2,064 bytes) -3,906‎ . . (Rmv soapboxing) (undo | thank)

A proper and only logical argument motivation structure to contribute to wikipedia consists of a particular premise correlated with an universal premise such as a law, and a logical inference, in other words a syllogism, which is verifiable and true according to wikipedia regulations. Since user Biruitorul is clearly a wikipedia vandal, he must be banned

Also typical to vandals, user Biruitorul doesn't use his real name, as I do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tudor.raneti (talk • contribs) 21:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Biruitorul, When nominating an article for speedy deletion, please don’t forget to notify the article creator on their talk page. This is an act of courtesy, and not doing so can really rile them if they discover their article deleted without any sort of notification. Also, I removed your tag - this article definitely has multpile credible claims of significance at the very least - see my edit summary. Regards, Zingarese talk · contribs 01:45, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019

Any input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, thanks for your corrections and addition to the Timișoara article, regarding the Cioca airfield. I live far away and do not speak Romanian (not yet, at least :) ) so I am sure you have better sources than I have. Do you have any information, with a bit of authority, regarding the current status of the field? On openstreetmap.org, someone claims that the airfield has entirely disappeared, leaving only pasture. This is what made me begin to look into the matter. Kind regards! Jan olieslagers (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page, I answered there. Kindly yours! Jan olieslagers (talk) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bill King(rugby league player). Since you had some involvement with the Bill King(rugby league player) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Leschnei (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am o rugăminte. Să modifici la Wikidata informațiile despre Emanoil Bacaloglu. Cu mai mult timp în urmă ai modificat pe pagina lui data de naștere - 11 aprilie. Nu știu de unde ai luat-o, dar este greșită. Nu ai pus nici o referință. Data corectă este 11 mai (29 aprilie pe stil vechi) și este menționată de o cercetătoare a vieții lui, Florica Cîmpan, în volumul "Emanuel Bacaloglu" din Colecția Oameni de seamă, Editura Tineretului, 1963, p.19. Eu corectasem pe ro.wiki, dar cineva a modificat zilele astea preluând informațiile din Wikidata. Deci ar trebui să se corecteze la bază. Inclusiv sursa! Doar că eu am mai puțină dexteritate la operat acolo. Mulțumesc,PheonixRo (talk) 09:07, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mulțumesc mult! PheonixRo (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am dat întâmplător peste acest entry și îl consider ilegitim, o mistificare împotriva careia voi începe o procedura de ștergere. Entryul englezesc este abuziv legat de cel de la Rowiki Curentul latinist pentru a se crea o falsă impresie de legitimitate.

În timp ce **Curentul latinist** descrie un curent academic, soldat cu dezbateri și controverse, dar fără consecințe semnificative asupra limbii române, **Re-latinizarea limbii române** prezintă un fenomen lingvistic spontan, popular și desfășurat pe parcursul mai multor generații, drept o campanie intenționată și ideologică de ”re-latinizare” a limbii române.

Este o uzurpare de sens și o falsificare a istoriei. Niciodată nu a avut loc în România vreo re-latinizare intenționată a limbii: ”a process during the development of the Romanian language aimed at the strengthening of its Romance character.” așa cum este în mod fals prezentat in introducere. Aceasta este o veche teză ungară, fără nici un suprt in realitate.

În perioada 1830 - 1880 avem într-adevăr de-a face cu un foarte viguros proces de modernizare lexicală a limbii române, destinat a oferi limbii acele instrumente necesare vieții moderne. Acest influx lexical l-au cunoscut și alte limbi în sec XIX el fiind legat de necesitățile de modernizare. Entryul pe care-l critic prezintă lucrurile ca pe o campanie ideologică inițiată de Școala Ardeleană și Curentul Latinist.

Este o mistificare pe care intenționez să o combat. Am dorit să te anunț văzând că ai contribuit la articol. Te țin minte de acum 10 ani, pe când mai eram activ aici.

Sănătate și numai bine !

PS În afară de ștergere, se poate face și o scimbare de titlu, de exemplu ”Latinist school of thought” pe aceeași linie cu entryul românesc ”curentul latinist”, sau eventual ”Lexical modernization of Romanian”

The file File:SamDonaldson.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biruitorul. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cosmin Alexandru Cernica, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. SoWhy 07:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dealul Mitropoliei Barbu Catargiu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Farhikht (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul,

You tagged this category for deletion, which is correct because it is an empty category. However, you didn't post a notice to the category creator's user talk page. Please set up your Twinkle preferences so that all CSD categories boxes are checked and that these notifications are posted automatically. Then you don't have to worry about posting user talk page notices. Thank you for your work. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

valereee (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the article Voicu. I kindly ask you to expree your opinion on Talk:Voicu. 86.120.179.60 (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Pensions in Romania you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dave Brown*. Since you had some involvement with the Dave Brown* redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while since I came to you for help and I hope all is well with you. I'm working on an article on Anca Giurchescu and several things have me stumped. When she died, a post was made on facebook giving her birthdate as 17 December 1930. I can't find any other source that gives the date, but I'm thinking that is because I don't know her maiden name. I thought maybe this would help, but it gives neither of her parent's names, just her great grandfather's. It does however, state that she was the Romanian national shooting champion (with an 8 pound rifle, maybe that makes a difference). The article doesn't say when this was, but it does say she was the only woman on the team and sort of indicates it was when she was in university. A Hungarian source says she attended the University of Physical Education in Bucharest, beginning in 1949 and began working at the Institute of Ethnography and Folklore, Bucharest in 1953, which to me, gives a fairly narrow time range. Any idea how I might figure out what her maiden name was and if that is her correct date of birth? Any help you can give would be very much appreciated. SusunW (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back. She really did win a silver medal in the team shooting and a bronze individual medal in 1955 at the European championships, (pp=502-503) but I cannot figure out what this excerpt is taken from or when it was written. Looks like the name of the book is Cartea de aur and the chapter is "Medaliaţii la campionatele mondiale şi campionatele europene. Alte performanţe la nivel mondial şi european ale sportivilor români," but when I go to the website for the Ministerul Tineretului si Sportului, I cannot find archived documents or what this might be a piece of. I hope I am not wearing you out with my questions and truly do appreciate the help. SusunW (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really appreciate your help. I've taken it live here Anca Giurchescu. Will ask Ipigott if there might be Danish sources that have anything to add. If you could look over the spellings, etc. to make sure there are no huge errors, that would be greatly appreciated. I also wonder if there is a bot/script/assistant of some sort. Seems that various letters like "ț" and "ţ" or "ș" and "ş" end up being redirects on wiki, which tells me that the texts they are pasted from must use them interchangeably but they aren't actually interchangeable. If there isn't an automated way to correct them, which character is correct? Again, I really appreciate your help with this one. She was really interesting to write and I learned a lot. SusunW (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SusunW: I'm afraid I couldn't find much about her in Denmark apart from this interesting study of the Vlachs - or maybe Kahl, Thede (21 October 2016). Von Hora, Doina und Lautaren: Einblicke in die rumänische Musik und Musikwissenschaft. Frank & Timme GmbH. pp. 155–. ISBN 978-3-7329-0310-8.. I thought the section on dance was particularly interesting and perhaps pertinent to our coverage of folklore. There are also some interesting details about her time in Denmark in Anca Giurchescu (1930-2015): Memories from her ICTM friends.--Ipigott (talk) 07:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for your copyedits and help. I've added your info on her publication Ipigott. Loved reading the remembrances of her colleagues and added it as an external link, as I think others might enjoy it as well. As it is uncurated, and I intend to nominate it for GA, I didn't include any of the info in the body. I'm betting her legacy will more fully emerge over time, but as its a fairly recent death, most everything now available is a memoir rather than an analysis. Don't want to take up any more space on Biruitorul's page here, but I wouldn't have been satisfied with the article without your help. That maiden name was key to unraveling her full story. :) SusunW (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - back in 2011, you created a redirect from Mirsa to Avrig. I have just created an article for Olga di Grésy whose knitwear company, Mirsa, was pretty significant in Italian fashion history/American fashion and I just wanted to check whether "Mirsa" is a common alternative spelling of Mârșa, and if not, whether there was any reason why the redirect could not go to Olga di Grésy's page instead? If you feel that Mirsa should remain as a redirect to Avrig, that's absolutely fine - I just thought I would ask. All best, Mabalu (talk) 23:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vă salut. Ați uploadat la Commons imaginea https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CeausescuSatuMare1970.jpg, afirmând că ea ar fi fost făcută la 15 mai 1970. Am găsit în Fototeca ComInRO imaginea http://www.comunismulinromania.ro/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1975-Inundatii-Satu-Mare.jpg unde scrie că ar fi fost făcută în 1975. Cele două fotografii par a fi făcute în aceeași zi. Vreau să vă întreb, prin urmare, dacă sunteți sigur că prima fotografie e de la inundațiile din 1970. Donarius (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tatarani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bărcănești (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biruitorul.

You've recently removed my edit on the Romania article about the Romanian overseas territory, saying it's a very obscure chapter that shouldn't be mentioned on a country page. I do understand that I had initially added the information in a much too detailed way, but don't you think it would be OK to add it as a one-sentence note, like I did the second time? It's a part of our country's history, so I think it should be added to the History section. This will also help spread awareness of it, since it's a very little known fact.

Could you please express your opinion on that here? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Romania#Overseas_territory

Thank you. Lupishor (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for joining that debate. I've just responded to your argument. Sorry for doing it so late. Lupishor (talk) 13:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vecinii nostri promoveaza peste tot originea romanilor. Motivul il stim cu totii vezi. They should be more concerned about their origins vezi.

They have made a habit of editing a lot of articles concerning our history. They twist things to suit their agenda. I have nothing against Hungarian people I have Hungarian friends but this just too much. I think most of the editors here are Jobbik members.

These articles here are made for the rest of the world to read and the Hungarian bias is very unfair in this matter. It's a huge problem and you should address this issue to wiki administrators because it's been going on for a while. They mislead and making us look like liars, thieves. Edits should be objective and neutral for both Hungarians and Romanians.

If this is how the articles about Romania look on the English Wikipedia due to the edits made by some Hungarians then I can only imagine what kind of lies about Romanians are on the Hungarian Wikipedia. I won't bother editing any of those articles such as the Hungarian-Romanian War because It's just too much effort. The articles here are written in Hungarian points of view. These people ignore Wikipedia policies and guidelines.— unsigned comment added on 21 May 2020.