User talk:Bouron

Welcome!

Hello, Bouron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 10:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please consult Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and WP:NOTAFORUM.--Kober^Talk 12:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all Central Asia and the Caucasus is pro-Russian journal, no doubt. Secondly footnote 9 is quoted from „South Ossetia“which comes from Encarta Encyclopedia. And sources like this don’t count for sources. Thanks! --Serafita (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serafita, you are wrong. Both Swedish independent scientific journal with international board of editors [1] Central Asia and the Caucasus, and global leader company in information technologies Microsoft are well respected sources and may be used in articles. Comments like the one above on the pages of newcomers are very unhelpful. FeelSunny (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you would be interested in working on this article. There are many Georgian users editing it, and it would be nice to have editors from all sides involved. FeelSunny (talk) 08:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Two or more stub types which you created have been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature. Grutness...wha? 01:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bouron, I just tried to add more details concerning the southern Ossetian tribe. We can discuss the issue further on the Talk:Ossetians page, if you think there's something wrong with my edits. Kouber (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know your opinion concerning a proposal I made, which I think represents a decent compromise.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping you could offer your opinion specifically on whether you think the proposed compromise title is an acceptable alternative.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your question from 19:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC). Only now got around to read it. The answer is simple: According to Russia, Georgia hit the Russian peacekeepers right at the start of the war. According to Georgia, Russia invaded Georgia right at the start of the war. No matter who is right, in either case both have been at war with each other from the very start. --Xeeron (talk) 12:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dæ bon xorz! Please take a look at this. Taamu (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article is very poor. I will try to expand it and start new language section. Thanks for informing me.--Bouron (talk) 12:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Логично, что карты должны быть одинаковыми. Вставлять карту Грузии и карту адм. единицы РФ республики Осетия-Алания по меньшей мере странно. Так же логично, что часть горы является частью государства под названием РФ, а не государства Осетия-Алания. С другой сотроны, указание карты РФ глупость, т.к. на ней разобрать можно только Сибирь. --Gaeser (talk) 08:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Но тогда, по вашей логике, вставить карту Казбегского района еще более странно. А Северная Осетия и есть государство, но в составе Российской федерации. вы путаете " государство " и " член ООН ".--Bouron (talk) 08:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Да, но тогда Техас это тоже государство. А хотя пожалуй вы правы - карта казбегского муниципалитета слишком удлинит инфобокс.--Gaeser (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madloba! I hope we will successfully collaborate in wikipedia.--Bouron (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Арфæгонд у.--Gaeser (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bouron. Could you discuss your reasoning for adding a second map at Template talk:Infobox mountain? Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 12:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reported about my contribution at Template talk:Infobox mountain--Bouron (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I can clarify the status of the problem. The map currently on the page is found at Caucasus topo map-blank.svg. Plastikspork took the time to integrate it into Template:Location map Caucasus mountains. It took about about a half hour to write the template. See here. It seems Plastikspork went out of his way to help satisfy you. Like all of us Plastikspork did this voluntarily and was not obliged to do so.

You are correct, in my opinion, that a labeled map would be more satisfactory but none exists in English. There is one in French here. Apparently there was once an English version. Translating and tweaking the French version is possible but it requires skill in editing Scalable Vector Graphics (svg) files. I'm not sure why the English version is not available. Perhaps the borders are out of date or something.

I suggest that if you want to pursue this issue further you should get the French version modified and translated into an English version. There are editors who do this kind of work voluntarily. Maybe you could ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Maps.

If you succeed in getting an English version created, contact me and I will integrate it into a Location map template. Best of luck. –droll [chat] 05:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. There is also a Russian version at File:Caucasus topographic map-ru.svg. –droll [chat] 05:42, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the template talk page.--Bouron (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bouron,

you called me a ""clear turkish propagandists"". Beside the fact I am German, I think I want you to apologize to me, because I constantly emphasized the Iranian character of the Scythian language.

Or are you just confused of the "list" I've made with neutral facts? Iranian words are going to be more completed in near future. I think you should respect my aim to be neutral.

Cheers!

Tirgil34 (talk) 00:27, 20 January 2012 (CET)

Don't mislead. I didn't call you propagandist. The authors you mentioned there mostly are unnotable and folk-history makers. E.g. Zakiev claimed that turkic peoples inhabited Eastern Europe many centuries BC.--Bouron (talk) 23:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no theory of Zakiev. There is just mentioned Karl Bouda as a short neutral reference. For further information, see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. There could have been living turkic peoples in eastern europe many centuries bc, see Budini etc. But this is not for sure, because Pliny and Mela later changed the "Iyrcae" of Herodot into "Tyrcae" and "Turcae".--Tirgil34 (talk) 10:38, 20 January 2012 (CET)

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

BTW please see here: [2]..--96.255.251.165 (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the ip is still vandalizing Iranian(Ossetian..) articles [3]--96.255.251.165 (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you check the Nart Saga article? The sock-master is claiming that the word Nart is of Mongolian origin..He usually puts a source that is either Fringe (and cannot be found) or manipulates the source (he has done that multiple times). It seems the same sort of people also vandalize Iran related articles (Greek and Armenian ones as well). Perhaps in the future, a special task force in Wikipedia should be setup to deal with such users as it is not a single incident. --96.255.251.165 (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution.

The theory of Mongolian origin of the word Nart is not fringe theory. For example, Abaev supported it.--Bouron (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your comments (conclusive, if possible) @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Tadeusz_Sulimirski_.26_Rahul_Sankrityayan — 117.207.62.240 (talk) 09:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you like disruptive/no constructive edits and started to revert all of my edits without any clarification. If you repeat your works, I'll report you. So it's better for you to watch your works/edits. --82.113.122.164 (talk) 19:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explain this: 1, 2. --Riversides (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanations for the first diff can be found on the talk page of the corresponding article. For the second diff explanations are given in its body. --Bouron (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I will take your statements to a neutral court. --Riversides (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый, посмотри пожалуйста на Appendix:Cyrillic script -- там всё правильно для OS wiki? Потому как я заметил что по крайней мере "а" была латинской. Также, подозреваю что когда там написаны две буквы, на самом деле используется одна с другим unicode #. Я понял насчёт Ӕ - её буду всегда приводить к латинской или игнорировать (хотя могу сразу везде уже сейчас заменить). И ещё, посмотри на User:Yurik/CaseCheckerBot - там я написал весь mapping который будет использоватся. Всё правильно? И последнее - можно добавить ВП: как shortcut для os:project: namespace? Иначе я буду расставлять ссылки на project:КЛ (я его чуток подчистил). Спасибо. --Yurik (talk) 06:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Там не хватало девяти букв. Теперь все правильно. Символы тоже проверил, все киррилические.

На счет Ӕ. Сейчас, в освики ее лучше приводить к латинской. Во остальных проектах лучше оставить киррилическую (или даже переводить в нее). Освики, по идее, должен скоро перейти обратно на киррилический Ӕ, и тогда ваш бот понадобится. В User:Yurik/CaseCheckerBot тоже вроде все правильно, но вам видней.

Вы можете использовать ВП: как перенаправление. Префикс ВП в освики пока не является алиасом Project.--Bouron (talk) 11:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

South Ossetia is a disputed region and partly recognized state so in infobox there must be bouth  Georgia (country), and South Ossetia too! --Giorgi Balakhadze (talk) 16:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bouron, why are you deleting Populated places in Znauri district category ?? "Znauri" is correct name "Znaur" is incorrect ! (Source Wikimapia) you are doing bad thing!--Balakhadze ^{ႫႨႼႤႰႠ} 20:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The name of this town is disputed. But the name of district is not. Znaur district is virtual thing. It is defined in the constitution of South Ossetia as one of its districts named "Знауыры район" (based on Ossetian name of Znaur). If you have source which uses alternative name based on Georgian name of Znaur then please let me know. Without that source the name is not disputed and it have only one version. --Bouron (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ладно, но придет время когда это территория вновь будет освобождена от русского ига, до этого вы как хатите так и можете называть русскими оккупирование грузинские территории Шида Kартли.--Balakhadze ^{ႫႨႼႤႰႠ} 08:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox RSO district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nero the second (talk) 22:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collab-os has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]