User talk:Bowdenford

I am no longer active on Wikipedia.

Regarding "established formats"... My edits bring the Daleks/Davros (and others) more in line with common practice on Wikipedia (opposed to those on Wikia). So I really don't understand your reverts. Listing one episode per group is space-wasting and frankly, fancruft. We have been cleaning up template like this for some time now, so maybe you want to vent your opinion there? -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 20:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See my response at User talk:Edokter/Archive 9#Navboxes. "Venting my opinion". Seriously? Bowdenford (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see more on this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who/Archive 31#Navboxes, where Edokter insisted the matter be taken for "opinion venting". Bowdenford (talk) 09:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bowdenford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dalek Generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dalek Generation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Dalek Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]