User talk:BrianKnez
Wikipedia ads | file info – #256 |
|
Help?!
[edit]HELP
{{Helpme}}
After editing several pages, (Please see my history, please, and let me know what you think..) I have tasked myself the David hash page, originally without knowing how recently it was tagged. After looking about online, I have seen that the text of this page is nearly the same as a myspace page of the same name. There appears to be opera related information on this page, on http://www.davidhash.com/, and on a few other pages I Googled. However, these pages were in Italian. Is there a way to find an interpreter of Italian, or someone knowledgeable in modern opera/modern Italian opera who can check on this?
- Just leave it be. It's been tagged as a PROD, and it doesn't look like it stands a chance of surviving long here. I don't know much Italian, but it does look indeed like a copyvio from the few cognates I can pick out. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Don't want to be beaten anymore? Get HUGGLE! Please go here to get it. Thanks. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 00:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback may be removed at any time.
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Font?
[edit]Hi! I'm curious; what font are you using for your signature? Thanks! --Captain Infinity (talk) 02:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I use Blackletter. Sometimes it comes up as unloadable / unrecognizable, though.. Hopefully, this isn't why you're asking. Frankly, it was unrecognizable to me for three hours this evening, for no apparent reason. 𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 02:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I can see it fine in my browser, so it must be on my system, but when I trid pasting it into Word it was not recognized. Odd. Anyway, I asked because it looks cool and I'd like to use it sometime. Thanks! --Captain Infinity (talk) 03:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- I have Eric Cartman on my watchlist. Today it was vandalized by User:70.44.14.180. I went to his talk page and saw your sig there on a warning for a different vandalization. --Captain Infinity (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
[edit]My cat sat on my keyboard while I was using Huggle.. I hope she didn't do anything catastrophically unjust to anyone. I got up to get a drink..
𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 04:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Vandals are a pain
[edit]Regarding this edit, there's nothing "confusing" about what's been done. OK, I'm not in the best of moods at the moment, but really, there is a limit to how much "Good Faith" you need to "Assume".
Perhaps my response is a little "over-the-top", but I do tire of namby-pamby "warnings" that say nothing.
No, it's not your fault, you didn't commit the vandalism, but if you are going to say something, I feel you should at least say something ... Pdfpdf (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Re: {{user AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD}}.
- Interesting, mostly because I think I agree. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Re: your response. Yes, your "automation" rationale is a sensible approach; my complaint is with the inane stupidity of the wording of a "standard message" that says nothing. I'm sure that it is usually very obvious to you the difference between blatant vandalism and misguided-otherwise-good-intentions; huggle should have a switch to let you skip the namby-pamby inane message and go to a more direct message when the situation warrants.
- By-the-way, I think I don't agree that in an ideal world, all messages would be personalised; my expectation is that, in the majority of cases, your additional efforts would produce no additional value. I only give personalised messages to the obviously mis-guided who I feel are likely to respond to "guidance", or when I'm really pissed-off and want to vent my spleen! In such circumstances, simply clicking a button would not provide me with sufficient satisfaction!
- No, I wouldn't call you lazy. As we've both said in different ways, it's all about "return-on-investment", "cost/benefit ratio" or whatever the current buzz-phrase is.
- In closing, I'd say that it is probably a good thing for me that I can't deliver my anti-vandalism warnings in person - the consequences of personal delivery might severly (and painfully) increase the cost!
- Meanwhile, keep "huggle"ing! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Just FYI
[edit]I don't know what this person's deal is, but just a heads-up. Maybe s/he thinks pretending you have a blocked sockpuppet account will besmirch you or something. Beats me. - Vianello (talk) 21:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, no problem. I just noticed it while I was squatting in the recent changes area, clicked it, red flag went up in my head, thought I'd let you know. - Vianello (talk) 01:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiLove
[edit]Jake WartenbergTalk has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating! Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
|
what are you talking about? what content have I removed? I haven't removed anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.151.179.34 (talk) 05:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
You're the ones who have removed content including Zhang's early career and summaries of her seasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.151.179.34 (talk) 06:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
[edit]No problem for the reverting, I guess it all was good in the end, with him getting blocked. Tis' all good! :) Andy (talk) 12:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
About Caroline Zhang
[edit]you left this message on my talk page and I would like to comment in reply:
"At least, that's what this and Huggle say. Now, I'm not saying that you really deleted all the content, but a reasonable amount of information was removed(AS far as I can tell - I could be wrong.) and this content was well referenced and had appropriate style. Be that as it may, yours certainly appears to have been a 'good faith' edit, and there is something to be said for the more simple presentation of your version, as well as brevity, as opposed to verbosity. However, in the future, I would highly advise discussing any major changes of this nature in the relevant pages' discussion section. I'm also entirely aware that I could have made a mistake, and may not be looking closely enough.. Did you move those citations and other info to somewhere else, on a related page?"
I am wondering abuot your Huggle tool. I rewrote the section and did not delete anything. Actually, I moved things down and then rewrote parts of it and interspersed my own writing with what was there. When I saw the difference between the pages, I saw that it lookedl ike I had taken what was there, removed it, and then added some more, because it picked out words from the original paragraph and picked out words in my new paragraph, and then assumed that my new paragraph was a removal of the old one, instead of a new pargraph and the old one had been moved down. I am wondering what tripped the automatic tool, because I did not remove information, I just added some that made it seem like I did. Can the tool not detect for adding sentences? Does it treat each paragraph like a different paragraph? I am concerned about getting automatically reverted in the future.
Puede01 (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages
[edit]Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! SBHarris 23:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
That edit is not vandalism, I am trying to let people know that there is no connection. Wetman88 (talk) 02:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
That's actually a surprisingly good point. Alright then. Wetman88 (talk) 02:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Your signature
[edit]I wanted to give you a heads-up that your signature seems to be causing some issues. I was following up on your AIV report here, but I could not click on the IP's "contribs" link because your name overlapped it. Just something I thought I would bring to your attention. Cheers. TNXMan 13:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- your signature just shows up as blank characters on my plain en system Nasnema Chat 22:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, it does that on some peoples' systems. As I recall, there are font downloads available for such problems, but I have never downloaded them myself. Also, for reasons entirely unknown to me, periodically I can't read my own signature.. Beats me, but I like its' aesthetics too much to change it. It should read BrianKnez in a sort - of medieval looking fancy Blackletter. Oh, and where'd you run into me?
- -𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 22:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- That'll be it then: it's Unicode but most of the western world won't be able to see anything but squares for characters without them installing the character set to go with it. I was just browsing the recent edits and thought I would drop you a note when I saw there was a problem with the sig. Nasnema Chat 13:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
sources
[edit]Sorry, but actually I am the leading authority on the topic. I put references in the original changes and the Greeks have just removed the text. To avoid reverting, I have put new text without references. Please don't tell me how to write encyclopedia articles, because I write them professionally along with books and articles. What was written there before is propaganda and references student works, rather than the leading published works. And the Greeks know it too... Xenos2008 (talk) 23:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I meant This edit, which really seems to be more of an NPOV issue, in a way, in retrospect. Be that as it may, your edit is undoubtedly lacking in appropriate style and tone, as well as standard syntax. I have no doubt that your edits are intended in good faith; your indignation is certain proof of that. However, if you have concerns that this article's neutrality is being consistently breached, you should request mediation, but you ought not use the article to voice your opinions. 𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 00:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I do believe that Xenos2008 is currently under amok state of mind and must slow down and discuss. His edits are more close to the disruption than to contribution. Also his way of dealing with the other editors is problematic. What I think is that he must start to discuss before remove, revert or choose which source is better. Friendly, --Factuarius (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Indeed, it is disruptive to challenge the Greek POV, I know well in real life professionally. However, what was written there was amateurish and incorrect and I corrected it. The response of the greek editors is simply to remove anything that they dont like, even though it is factual, sourced and NPOV. I see no reason to debate with people with an agenda and no expertise. Xenos2008 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I try not to be a Troll, or to side with any one point of view, myself. To the greater extent, what I see here are largely good faith edits from divergent points of view. As an academically trained historian, mainly in medieval history, I find this entirely typical. The only advice that I can offer is: please, do not allow your emotions to dictate your editing. Try not to delete good - faith edits, and If there is a problem please use the discussion page, or Mediation Instead of engaging in an Edit War.𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 01:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Still believing that Xenos2008 is currently under amok state of mind. What he is telling us is that for (unknown) personal or professional reasons had grown a hate for Greeks and in the same sentence is trying to convince us about how much NPOV is. I don't know what has with the Greeks, or what Greeks did "during his professional life" but I find his attitude by definition POV. He is making me wonder for his real reason choose to contribute in Greek-related articles. Then the napoleonic character of his edits and his way of dealing with the other editors ("shut the fuck up" etc.) is giving me a sense that his spirit is totally incompatible also with WP. Anyway I do believe that he must stop to create a battleground all over the place and start to discuss, setting aside his hate for the Greeks. Βut I am not optimistic about. Regards, --Factuarius (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well, this is a typical Greek response, that anyone who disagrees with the propaganda obviously hates Greeks. Let me tell you what I really hate: it is nationalistic crap from anywhere and corruption. Greeks who participate in those are reviled by me, but otherwise I have no problem with Greek people. It is very difficult to argue against the overwhelming propaganda nurtured in Greek schools, but I can assure you that I work with most of the leading historians and political scientists and am considered an authority in my own field. Factuarius: if you are prepared to learn new facts about Greece, then we will get on OK. I realise that some of my edits were not referenced, but I have had technical problems inserting them. I will also try to keep my temper, but it's like a broken record, dealing with these nationalist fictions...Xenos2008 (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Still believing that Xenos2008 is currently under amok state of mind. What he is telling us is that for (unknown) personal or professional reasons had grown a hate for Greeks and in the same sentence is trying to convince us about how much NPOV is. I don't know what has with the Greeks, or what Greeks did "during his professional life" but I find his attitude by definition POV. He is making me wonder for his real reason choose to contribute in Greek-related articles. Then the napoleonic character of his edits and his way of dealing with the other editors ("shut the fuck up" etc.) is giving me a sense that his spirit is totally incompatible also with WP. Anyway I do believe that he must stop to create a battleground all over the place and start to discuss, setting aside his hate for the Greeks. Βut I am not optimistic about. Regards, --Factuarius (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- Since "you have no problem with Greek people", the sentence "There is some sort of cultural problem in Greece, and it seems to exist also in Serbia, Romania and Russia [all Orthodox countries, you will note], which is that the entire population is paranoid" is there any possibility to be yours? Is there any possibility to be so sick as to blame entire populations in being paranoid? I mean have you took your pills recently little Adolf? --Factuarius (talk) 04:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, here we have the old Greek story again. Yes, there is a cultural problem in Greece, and it comes from nationalism. I have already told you my opinion, and you choose to accuse me of lying. You claim to know who I am and attribute casual comments on the internet to me, without reading any of my publications. Obviously you are in the camp of extreme nationalists, who cannot accept foreigners. Xenos2008 (talk) 12:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Yummy!
[edit]I dream of horses @ has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
Look at my talk page, by the way. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]for taking care of my talk page. Cheers --Howwi (talk) 07:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome! That's mainly what I do around here (anti-vandal work).. And it seems to get under vandals' skin - my userpage has been vandalized 12 times, by my count, and my talk page once or twice.. Usually, they're not even very witty, although I can usually get some smiles out of a day's vandalisms. Happy editing!
- -𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 21:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]... for reverting the vandalism to my userpage :) ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome; that's mainly what I do.. Meaning general anti-vandal work, that is; so much easier than copy-editing, and even after six years studying there's not too much well sourced info to add to our Northern European Dark - to - Medieval Ages history articles.
- -𝕭𝖗𝔦𝔞𝔫𝕶𝔫𝔢𝔷 talk 01:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank'ee much for joining! Your request has been approved and you are now a proud member of Wikipedia's only counter-vandalism cabal! Want a userbox to go along with it? (Also, we've got an InvisionFree board; check the cabal page.) 21655 ταλκ/01ҁ 21:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March copy edit drive
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE March drive newsletter
[edit] Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive update Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! Here's the mid-drive newsletter. Participation: We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far. Special thanks: Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (talk), Stfg (talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE March drive wrap-up
[edit] Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna (Talk), Stfg (Talk), and Dank (talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
GOCE May copy edit drive
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE May mid-drive newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter Participation: Out of 49 people signed up for this drive so far, 26 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive, largely due to the efforts of Lfstevens and the others on the leaderboard. Thanks to all. We have reduced our target group of articles—January, February, and March 2011—by over half, and it looks like we will achieve that goal. Good progress is being made on the overall backlog as well, with over 500 articles copy-edited during the drive so far. The total backlog currently sits at around 3200 articles. Hall of Fame: GOCE coordinator Diannaa was awarded a spot in the GOCE Hall of Fame this month! She has copy-edited over 1567 articles during these drives, and surpassed the 1,000,000-word mark on May 5. On to the second million! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE May drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their July 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on July 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on July 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to eliminate the articles tagged in April, May and June 2011 from the queue and to complete all requests placed before the end of June. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 6 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in April–June 2011", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE July 2012 mid-drive newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter Participation: Out of 37 people signed up for this drive so far, 25 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, every bit helps; if you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're almost on track to meet our targets for the drive. Great work, guys. We have reduced our target group of articles—May, June, and July 2011—by about 40%, and the overall backlog has been reduced by 264 articles so far, to around 2500 articles. Copy Edit of the Month: Starting in August, your best copy-editing work of the month will be eligible for fabulous prizes! See here for details. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE July drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Out of 45 people who signed up this drive, 31 have copy-edited at least one article. Lfstevens continues to carry most of the weight, having edited 360 articles and over a quarter of a million words already. Thanks to all who have participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, will be available early in August here. Progress report: We are once again very close to achieving in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog. Only 35 such articles remain at press time. The total backlog currently sits at under 2400 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We are just two articles away from completing all requests made before July 2012 (both are in progress). Copy Edit of the Month: Starting in August, you'll be able to submit your best copy-editing work for palaver, praise, and prizes. See here for details. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:50, 27 July 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE news and September drive invitation
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE September activities
[edit]Reminders from the Guild of Copy Editors A quick reminder of our current events:
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE mid-drive newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
>>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE September 2012 drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Out of 41 people who signed up this drive, 28 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We achieved our primary goal of clearing July, August, September and October 2011 from the backlog. This means that, for the first time since the drives began, the backlog is less than a year. At least 677 tagged articles were copy edited, although 365 new ones were added during the month. The total backlog at the end of the month was 2341 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We completed all 54 requests outstanding before September 2012 as well as eight of those made in September. Copy Edit of the Month: Voting is now over for the August 2012 competition, and prizes will be issued soon. The September 2012 contest is closed for submissions and open for voting. The October 2012 contest is now open for submissions. Everyone is welcome to submit entries and to vote. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE fall newsletter
[edit]Fall Events from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE November 2012 copy edit drive update
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
>>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE November drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors November 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up Participation: Thanks to all who participated! Out of 38 people who signed up this drive, 33 copy-edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. All the barnstars have now been distributed. Progress report: We achieved our primary goal of clearing November and December 2011 from the backlog. For the first time since the drives began, the backlog consists only of articles tagged in the current year. The total backlog at the end of the month was 2690 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We completed all 56 requests outstanding before November 2012 as well as eight of those made in November. Copy Edit of the Month: Voting is now over for the October 2012 competition, and prizes have been issued. The November 2012 contest is closed for submissions and open for voting. The December 2012 contest is now open for submissions. Everyone is welcome to submit entries and to vote. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our fourth tranche of Guild coordinators will expire at the end of December. Nominations are open for the fifth tranche of coordinators, who will serve from 1 January to 30 June 2013. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 20:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE mid-December newsletter
[edit]End of Year Events from the Guild of Copy Editors The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:
Coodinator election: Nominations are open for candidates to serve as GOCE coordinators from 1 January to 30 June 2013. Nominations close on December 15 at 23:59 UTC, after which voting will run until the end of December. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC) |
GOCE 2012 Annual Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors 2012 Annual Report The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations! Our 2012 Annual Report is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE mid-drive newsletter, January 2013
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors January 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter We are halfway through our January backlog elimination drive. The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE February 2013 newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors February 2013 events newsletter We are preparing to start our February requests blitz and March backlog elimination drive. The February 2013 newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the February blitz and March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE news: February 2013
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/February 2013 wrap-up Participation: Out of 19 people who signed up for this blitz, 9 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the six-day blitz, we removed over twenty articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the March drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, BDD and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE mid-March 2013 newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter We are halfway through our March backlog elimination drive. The mid-drive newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the March drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE April 2013 newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors March 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our March backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the April blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE April 2013 newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors April 2013 events newsletter We finished the April blitz and are preparing to start our May backlog elimination drive. The April 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the May drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE May drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors May 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our May backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the June blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 05:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE June/July 2013 events
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our June blitz and are about to commence our July backlog elimination drive. The June/July 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis Sign up for the July drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE July 2013 news report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
– Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. >>> Sign up now <<< To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter We have completed our July backlog elimination drive. The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the August blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors August Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of sixteen people who signed up for this blitz, nine copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we removed 26 articles from the requests queue. Hope to see you at the September drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the September drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC) |
GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
User category proposed deletion
[edit]You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)