User talk:Brian Crawford

Welcome to my talk page. Please...friendly users only.

I'll respond to your messages as soon as possible on this page rather than your own talk page.

For information on how to use User talk pages, go to:

• Wikipedia:Tutorial (Talk pages).
• Wikipedia:Talk pages

Hello. I just read your kingston ontario wiki page. Nicely done. The postal codes are outdated though. They only reflect the old city of kingston and not the amalgamated kingston. I'm north of the 401 on patterson rd. I'm in Kingston but my postal code is k0h1x0. Thanks! !

Thanks for mentioning this. I didn't write this part of the article, and have no idea how to update this info. You can change this yourself if you want; just make sure you have a source/reference. I can mention this needed update on the talk page so others may be able to help.  BC  _{talk to me} 03:45, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brian Crawford. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hi Brian,

I have designed this web page that display the locations of Canadian military installations past and present. Some of the info needs correction. I've started with the BCATP and I need to add more data.

Let me know of any wrong data and entries. Pass it along to anyone as much as possible.

Use this link.

http://bcatp20170202051342.azurewebsites.net/

Thanks, Roger Delisle

[email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.64.220.204 (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roger, I'll check and I'll pass it along. I won't get a chance to review for a while, but I WILL get to it. In the meantime you may want to check List of British Commonwealth Air Training Plan facilities in Canada. Cheers!-- BC  _{talk to me} 00:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brian Crawford. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brian, I have been very active on Wikipedia for years, as you know, but have never published an article from scratch.

I just wrote one but it remains as a Draft; I don't know how to actually Publish it.

 Draft:Fred Jacob (journalist) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 

Can you provide any advice? Thanks, Peter K Burian (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, nice to hear from you. The article is no longer "draft" and has been moved by another editor to article namespace. In other words, it's already published. If you want it formally reviewed, go here: WP:Peer review or Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines. At first glance it looks fairly good, but in the lead paragraph make sure there is some indication of why this person is truly notable or significant. This is important or the article could be deleted. Winning a poetry contest, being a reporter, being responsible for a library or being a critic really doesn't illustrate notability. Perhaps he was the first at something or invented/developed something? Also, references should be properly formatted. Right now most are just bare links. Glad you have lots of references, which is most of the battle. You also need some categories. I added one for you.  BC  _{talk to me} 20:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Brian Crawford|<span style="color:white;background:#73C2FB;">&nbsp;<b>'''''BC'''''</b>&nbsp;</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Brian Crawford|'''<font color="DarkGray">talk to me</font>''']]</sub> :  BC  _{talk to me}

to

[[User:Brian Crawford|<span style="color:white;background:#73C2FB;">&nbsp;'''''BC'''''&nbsp;</span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Brian Crawford|<b style="color: DarkGray">talk to me</b>]]</sub> :  BC  _{talk to me}

—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, tx. BC  _{talk to me} 00:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mos:DOB. Since you had some involvement with the Mos:DOB redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 00:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You added the note to the page "BTW, Hatch (p. 203) mentions nothing about 2 FIS having been at Claresholm" and you are correct. that statement and the one on the initial opening date were in the article prior to my involvement. Should we delete it or mark that it need citation. I am still fairly new to the whole editing thing, but I think this is a good endeavor. Your opinion? Mech1949 (talk) 15:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. See my reply on the article's Talk page-- BC  _{talk to me} 15:46, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to post about the College Success Centre? I see that the Artist in Residence is on here, so this would seem logical. See below article from global news for details on the success centre... Jeff Ridgeway is the OPI at the college at the moment. For your consideration. https://globalnews.ca/news/4014189/royal-military-college-opens-success-centre-for-students/

108.170.161.138 (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems relevant and notable to me. I would place mention of the CSC in the Libraries section, since the CSC is in the library. The content should probably be cited.- BC  _{talk to me} 06:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brian Crawford. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I am putting this in the right spot. I was just checking my watchlist and found a couple changes that you had made on RCAF Station Claresholm. Your change had me rechecking a bunch of research that I conducted several months ago. I had found notes in the Operational Record Book of No. 15 SFTS in Clairsholm that directly contradict Mr Hatch. I have added the reference that states the school was initially opened as a sub-unit of 15 SFTS at Clarsholm in Apr then moving to their new base in Vulcan in September of that year. Just wanted to provide some clarity to avoid a editing war. Mech1949 (talk) 23:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. As long as the ref explains this and the new information is cited so that this information isn't contested. This other reference does mention that it was formed at Vulcan: http://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.lac_reel_c12325/457?r=0&s=6 though. Was it truly labeled 2 FIS at Claresholm? If it wasn't called 2 FIS at Claresholm can we truly say it was formed there? Cheers!-- BC  _{talk to me} 23:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the Daily Diary reference you provided at the Claresholm article and didn't see any information about 2 FIS being a subunit of 15 SFTS. Perhaps you copied the wrong link?-- BC  _{talk to me} 23:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have a happy birthday, Brian Crawford! Supplied by the Wikipedia Birthday Committee, have one free cake! Enjoy! Best wishes to you on your special day! Clovermoss (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:26, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's University Current Events. Since you had some involvement with the Queen's University Current Events redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grant Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolfe Island. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the source. I had done a Google search before I reverted, but found nothing at that time. I did one just now, and it was there. Just so you know . :) BilCat (talk) 23:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I was curious as well, so also did a quick search, expecting to see nothing. But, alas, there was the news item. I thought the name hadn't been decided yet. Take care.-- BC  _{talk to me} 23:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• William Mahlon Davis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion
• Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This is an article to which you contributed. Another of the WP:Soldier deletions. Canadian soldier in WW I. Article is minimally sourced and in need of a transfusion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I would just like to thank you for making sure that I didn't add copyrighted material and bringing it to my attention. it wasn't my intention to add it verbatim. I thank you. have a great day. Rommel's editior. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rommel's editor (talk • contribs) 18:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you cancelled the changes I have made by Fredéric and Peter Haldimand. The changes I made are correct and if you need a proof, tell me where I can send you the sources. Ma Name is: Hansjörg Haldimann and I am a descendant of the General and I have a lot of correction to made. Tell me how I can do that. Kind regards Alibary (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may indeed be correct, but Wikipedia needs these kind of changes to be properly sourced. These sources are placed on the page. See wp:RS for details on what a source is. To place the sources/references on the page, see wp:cite. Your personal knowledge may or may not be correct, and in any case, would be considered original research, which isn't permitted. The Dictionary of Canadian Biography, says he was probably born in Switzerland. If you have a reliable source that says otherwise, feel free to make the change.-- BC  _{talk to me} 19:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you cancelled my edit on the page of San Benedetto Po, Italy, and while you are correct in saying that the population data I put was unsourced, I know for sure the population count is not nearly as high as you put (I've lived there). I am new to Wikipedia editing, and I'm still really trying to find out how sources work, so could you please change it back/restore it to what it was before my edit? Thanks in advance Fre 798 (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re right, it can’t be that high. Looks like someone last year vandalized the page. I’ll change it back. However, your figures must have come from somewhere, and if so, you can easily mention the source. These sources are placed on the page. See wp:RS for details on what a source is. To place the sources/references on the page, see wp:cite. Your personal knowledge may or may not be correct, and in any case, would be considered original research, which isn't permitted.— BC  _{talk to me} 21:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mos:DOB has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Mos:DOB until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Crawford -

Sir -

Please be so kind as to explain fully why you reverted both Brock and Sheaffe additions as your statement is definitely incorrect about the latter -

This double addition has been entered before then incorrectly removed tree times -

Do you know any Canadian / British military history as you really should not be arbitrarily removing entries unless you know / are well aware of true facts -

You only needed to check each biography for what we entered about both of these officers when Wikipedia began years ago.

We are military historians who lectured / led tours around Queenston Heights decades ago.

Shall expect an explanation and restoration for both removed names at your convenience -

Do hope above was ' friendly ' enough for you.

Thank You - 69.159.70.82 - 69.159.70.82 (talk) 00:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC) -[reply]

I removed the “Sirs” because they weren’t consistent with the rest of the article where the "Sir" isn't associated with the name. Although he indeed was not knighted as I mentioned in the edit summary, a baronet is addressed by "Sir". My bad.-- BC  _{talk to me} 01:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Crawford -

Sir -

Possibly you as well as a number of you far too many other unknowing Wikipedia editors should slow down to first do some proper research / learning some important things before instantly making all these far too many unprofessional reverts which are driving many people away from entering correct / proper / true / accurate facts / figures / data.

Thank You.

- 69.159.70.82 - 69.159.70.82 (talk) 13:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticizing like this isn't recommended on Wikipedia and is "unprofessional". Mistakes happen. BTW, as far as your "true accurate facts" are concerned, Sheaffe would not have been known as "Sir" until awarded his baronetcy in January 1813, so your edit has been partially reverted.-- BC  _{talk to me} 17:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Crawford -

Sir -

The Colonel has now gone back over to the base for outgoing late evening flights to the war zone in Europe however he would wish a response go out to your most recent above entry now on his behalf -

If you were at all aware of any correct history you should know once a person is named as a - Sir / Lord / Baron / Duke / etc. -, and is deceased, it then does not matter at all as to when this occurred in time -

Actually, when you get down to brass tacks you are the one who is not acting in a professional manner so should expect some proper criticism at times like this -

This, then, will be final return in this rather small, somewhat insignificant matter as it is not worthy going around and around any further with someone who is terribly uneducated / absolutely ignorant to straight historical facts.

Therefore, no follow up from your end is necessary.

Thank You

- 69.159.70.82 - 69.159.70.82 (talk) 20:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make any changes you feel necessary to the article.-- BC  _{talk to me} 00:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]