User talk:CFLeon

Hello CFLeon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask me on my talk page or see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Again, welcome! --Sean|Black 05:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFLeon, I was working on Monoclonius today, and noticed it was in a lot better shape than when I had last left it a few days ago. Checking the edit history, I noticed your edits, which are quite welcome and of obvious high quality. Your edit history also shows a pattern of editing many dinosaur aticles. With that in mind, I thought I'd invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs, a project that develops the Wikipedia articles on dinosaurs. You're not on our modest list of members, but would be, I can see from your edits, a welcome addition. I hope you'll consider it, because you would be a big boon to our group. Take care, --Firsfron 01:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your name added to the list of members. Welcome. :) --Firsfron of Ronchester 04:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cool editing, amazing how the articles meld and grow really. I'm new to this too cheers Cas Liber 10:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Aku-Aku is by Thor Heyerdahl; you mistakenly added it to Ivan T. Sanderson. - DavidWBrooks 23:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. My mistake. I misread my note about The Dynasty of Abu. [I usually do not have access to my print sources when I'm online.] CFLeon 23:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. I had a quick look at Google and found some interesting stuff. As we at Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles are always keen to get new input, could I ask if you would like to write the article? Please make your answer known at Talk:The Beatles. We also have a project, if you are inclined to become a member.LessHeard vanU 12:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add alink to this generic crocodilians site, either do it on crocodylus or crocodylidae, or link to a page in the site that specifically discuss the Cuban Crocodile. Otehrwise, it is considered link spam. Circeus 01:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously have never been to the site, then. There are pages for each particular species. It is THE website for ANYTHING to do with Crocodilia. A bit poor on the evolution of the group, perhaps, but I challenge you to find any site that's better. CFLeon 01:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not complaining about the site itself. I am merely observing that the page you link to has nothing to do specifically with the species you link from. Searching the site for an appropriate page to link to is not my duty, it's yours to do before linking. Circeus 02:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you even so much as read my comments above and Samir's under? Circeus 02:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have the courtesy to answer my question, I asked first. WHAT DO YOU HAVE AGAINST THE SITE? Maybe they don't pay you scratch? CFLeon 02:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CFLeon, a couple of things,

1. I changed the crocodilian.com link to the Cuban Crocodile subpage.[1]
2. Probably not necessary to use a test template on User:Circeus's page; he's an administrator and a reasonable guy and it would be easy just to talk to sort things out.

Thanks and hope that the above meets with your approval -- Samir धर्म 01:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me be more frank. Do not place warning templates on Circeus's page for removing spam. It is not the correct use for them. Instead, discuss the issue on talk pages. Thank you -- Samir धर्म 02:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"a reasonable guy"? then why does he keep on showing bias against the link, to the point of following me and reverting the edits? Sounds more like either a personal bias or a conflict of financial interests to me. "Reasonable people" don't keep on reverting edits without the courtesy of reply.

To you, Samir: thanks for the direct link, but a couple of points:

• I find all the time links on Wiki pages to the home page of a site. Thought it was the way Wiki did things, and I agree with this. I personally prefer to be directed to the home page of a site unless it's some general thing like Straight Dope. or Wiki itself. I have the homepage bookmarked, and I give the average reader enough credit to find things on their own once they find the site, especially when there's a Table of Contents. (You want "linkspam"? Try some of the entries which list every page on a site, even when there's several on the same site.)
• The guy has just been rude to me personally. That's NOT "reasonable", and I respond in type.
• Oh, and when did he ever talk about the deletions on a Talk page?
• I'll keep on reverting his edits until Doomsday until he shows me some courtesy. CFLeon 02:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Madison DeWolf has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's enough general interest in Custer's battalion to warrant the inclusion of bios of the officers and staff. Many are significant enough to be included in the popular Find-a-Grave website, including DeWolf. Scott Mingus 19:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I stuck it on. Now to find some pix..Cas Liber 09:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Map krakatau.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you had better explain yourself on Talk:Malware, where it appears, judging from your edit summary, that you were alleging that I had an "economic conflict of interest". Please keep WP:NPA and WP:NLT in mind in your explanation. --FOo 07:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your change about Luna 9 soft landing on the Soviet space program page. Both Luna 9 and List of space exploration milestones, 1957-1969 both say that Luna 9 soft-landed, so do you want to correct it on those pages (and explain the difference)? Thack you. Bubba73 (talk), 17:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFLeon!

I'm planning to send Stegosaurus to Featured Article candidacy. The article failed its first nomination, but user:Casliber and I have been hard at work fixing stuff. As you're listed as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Dinosaurs, I figured I'd drop you a line and see if there was anything you thought should be added/removed/cited on the article before it is sent to FAC. We definitely want it to pass! :)

(Feel free to make any edits on the article itself, comment on the talk page, or leave a note on my talk page). Thanks for your time, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit  The Amphibians and Reptiles Portal I'm glad to announce that The Amphibians and reptiles portal (P:AAR) has been created and is ready for you to use. This portal covers any subjects related to amphibians, reptiles, herpetology, as well as WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles. Purposes of the portal to act as the "main page" for editors interested in amphibians and reptiles. The portal page should contain all the common and useful links to relevant articles, lists, categories, as well as the project tasklist. As this portal is your tool, please feel free to organize, modify, or expand the Topics, Categories, Lists, and Tasklist sections of the portal as you see fit. to lead potential AAR editors to WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles as well as to educate general readers. Feel free to add more items for the "Did you know..." section. Thank you for reading. If you have any questions, please leave them on the portal talk page or my user talk page. --Melanochromis

--Melanochromis 06:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your distress. First of all, I played only a small part in this matter- Publicola was the one who made the redirect and TexasAndroid was responsible for the protection of the article, I just closed the debate. However, I have dealt with this sort of thing plenty of times before, so there is no problem contacting me about it. The last version of the article on the webcomic before the reversion to a redirect can be seen here- it wasn't actually deleted. That said, it did not assert notability as is required per the appropriate guidelines, and so it was lucky to come to AfD at all- normally, it would just be speedy deleted under criteria A7. If you show me sources proving that the webcomic meets the notability guidelines for web content, I will talk to TexasAndroid for you, and arrange to have an article about the web comic placed at that title. However, until that time, any such article would be deleted/reverted on sight by any administrator. J Milburn 19:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for September has been published. October's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
• Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 20:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about this. How'd you get a copy of it? I haven't seen it or heard mention of it from any of my usual anime sources. Feel free to email me if you think we need to discuss this off Wiki. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 06:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may be a promo episode for 2nd Term. The source I got all my SR eps from doesn't have it and I can't find it online. If you, could you let me know? --BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 05:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You made a minor edit to Mount Fuji; but, as far as I know, your data is incorrect. If I'm the one who is misinformed, so much the better. This is how Wikipedia evolves. If your reference source is persuasive, I'll not only restore your edit -- I'll also modify Hōei eruption of Mount Fuji accordingly.

If volcanic eruptions are of interest to you, perhaps you'll want to scan the following:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Renaming 1703 Genroku earthquake?
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management#Renaming 1703 Genroku earthquake?

FYI -- this is my first edit of 2008. Happy new year. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I've discovered that the Hōei eruption of Mt. Fuji began on December 16, 1707 and ended on January 1, 1708 -- ergo, your edit was correct. You were quite right to catch this relatively trivial mistake; and my hat's off to you. Maybe I can apologize for my mistaken revert by sharing a link to a Shizuoka University web page which confirms that your edit was correct. As it happens, my 19th century French translation of a 17th century Japanese reference source was correct as well; but -- critically -- I misinterpreted the full meaning of a terse French sentence because I neglected to take into account its broader, extra-textual context....Click link for dates of Hōei eruption of Mt. Fuji --Ooperhoofd (talk) 18:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My info was from the PSU's copy of Catalogue of the Active Volcanoes of the World (CAVW), Japan volume. CFLeon (talk) 07:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user wants you to join WikiProject Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 02:03, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for folks to help convert Respect Threads to wiki formatting on Project Fanboy: WikiFans. Respect Threads, showcase scans of feats performed by comic book characters and have gained an audience on several comic book message boards. A few other wiki editors and myself are trying to convert them from the unprofessional look of a bunch of posts on a message board to the formatting common with WikiMedia wiki's. To view an example of what we're doing, here is a link to Respect Silver Surfer.

I was wondering if you might have time to contribute your comic book knowledge and/or scans of comic book characters performing feats, and help us out with our Respect Articles project?Millennium Cowboy (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CFLeon, I was wondering if you'd be interested in joining the Palaeo WikiProject? I think you'd make an excellent contributor, especially after grappling with ichthyosaur taxonomy! Best, Mark t young (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Row (cryptozoology), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Row (cryptozoology). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you ever locate the missing film? Electric Japan (talk) 01:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, we recently did a purge of the members list, which your name was on. Please re-add your username as well as your area of expertise at our list of participants if you plan to stay active in this Wikiproject. Also, a discussion is going on regarding the standardization of taxonomy in lizard articles, located in this section. We'd like to have some more voices in this matter. Thanks everyone! bibliomaniac15 23:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While its appreciated that you are cleaning up the list some, if an article has been done, please actually remove it from the list, do not just mark it as done. If the requested name is appropriate, a redirect should be created. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, if you want to conserve more talk space, you might want to look into talk page archiving :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, enough. You've been asked to following the existing guidelines and editing method of that list, but you continue to ignore it and then revert a clean up of unnecessary requests. That, your lack of a response here, and your refusal to use edit summaries leaves me no choice but to consider your edits in bad faith. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your articles about islands in the sunda strait - could you please help by adding categories and project tags as I have just done - it would be much appreciated if you could do that as it helps keep track of new articles - thanks SatuSuro 01:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also if you are citing a book - to actually use page numbers and citation methods - would help - as at the moment - just a book ref and comments in text with no specific lead as to where from in the book - could lead an editor to put the citations tag on the article asking for where you got the info - effectively a follow up of WP:V related to WP:RS - thanks SatuSuro 01:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a rule of thumb - please do not create stubs and leave them without category and project tag - or reference - you have the material - please help the Indonesia project by creating more complete stubs SatuSuro 01:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a category - Sunda Strait - please add this to any other articles you may have created that I have not found - thank you SatuSuro 02:05, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are on at the same time - trust the requests above are ok with you? SatuSuro 23:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CFLeon : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 23:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youre on your own with that - I have separated the other material - and started a category - but hey I am not a supporter of 'in popular culture' arts - I would think it deserves a cleanup SatuSuro 00:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC) Also it would be very useful if you could actually use talk - it is almost impossible to know what you are up to if you remain silent during the various changes that I have initiated - cheers SatuSuro 00:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hell - Sunda Strait is for the articles re the places - and Krakatoa the actual explosion - unless the arts are tied in with refs other than furneaux (redundant ref) like simkin and fiske with specific aspects of the explosion and events - I'd rather keep the two - one does not duplicate cats - parent and child categories together is v bad practice. problem SatuSuro 01:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page at krak at pop culture needs to be attended to - as it is i know some eds would delete without question - if you could cleanup and find refs it could go back in - but pop cult entries are go nowhere deadends - lack of RS is a serious issueSatuSuro 01:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also getting any of the islands out of Category:Indonesia articles missing geocoordinate data would be very useful SatuSuro 01:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009 Next issue Project news WikiProject Horror has been under reconstruction for the past month, in hopes to re-invigorate participant activity and re-activate the Collaboration of the Month department. Please take a look at the project’s redesign and post any suggestions to the new Notice Board. Spearheading this reconstruction movement has been interim coordinator Hornoir, with assistance from Bignole. An official election for Project Coordinator and Assistant Coordinator positions will be held in the coming weeks. Any active member of the project will be able to nominate for and/or vote on the positions. Please watch the coordinator’s page for developments. WikiProject Horror currently has over 2600 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2200 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Nemesis, an article on the fictional character from the Resident Evil series of games, was promoted to Good Article-Class in January. The current horror-related Featured Article nominee is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include Horror comics in the United States, 1947–1954 (talk • review), The Frighteners (talk • review), Raaz - The Mystery Continues (talk • review), and White Dog (talk • review). WikiProject Horror now meets all Wikipedia v. 1.0 Editorial Team criteria. Task force and related news WikiProject Saw has agreed to become a task force under WikiProject Horror. Please make them feel welcome and help them become part of our project. They are fully integrated into the {{HorrorWikiProject}} banner and their main page has been relocated to WikiProject Horror/Saw task force. A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on November 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (67 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (440 achieved): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (CFLeon) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009 Previous issue • Next issue Project news Nominations for the Coordinator positions are now open. The nomination process will run throughout March, with voting running throughout April. Any member of Project is welcome to nominate themselves for a Coordinator position. The Project has a new Task Center, which allows any Project member to volunteer for as a Task Editor within the Project. Task Editor positions currently open include Project Promoter, Collaboration Coordinator, Peer Review Coordinator, New & Stub Article Monitor, and Article Monitor. Our first Collaboration of the Month has been selected and it is The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. Please help out in improving the article towards Featured Article-Class. Nominations for the next Collaboration of the Month are, of course, ongoing. WikiProject Horror currently has over 3000 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2600 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Articles promoted to Good Article-Class in February include: Eerie (comics), The Frighteners, , Left 4 Dead , and James Whale. There is one current horror-related Featured Article nominee, which is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include Raaz - The Mystery Continues (talk • review) and White Dog (talk • review). A Peer Review has been requested for Friday the 13th (franchise). The review can be found here. Task force and related news A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on November 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (67 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (440 achieved): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (CFLeon) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 3 / April 2009 Previous issue The Coordinator nomination has been extended! Please go to the nomination page now to add yourself to the election for a coordinator position. Voting will begin on May 1st. The current Collaboration of the Month (The Texas Chain Saw Massacre) has been extended by a month! The next collaboration will be selected on April 30th, 2009. Please place suggestions for the next collaboration here and/or vote on current suggestions. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

|}

Did you see this? Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_music_videos_using_animation_(2nd_nomination) Fences and windows (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon;

Thank you for working on the taxoboxes. I think it would make sense if you'd omit type species from alphabetizing; it just seems fitting to have the type species first, as it is the name-bearing species. Thank you for your time! J. Spencer (talk) 02:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was my first inclination, but many pages don't give the type information and I got tired of the inconsistancy from page to page and just started doing it all the same way, even when the type is shown. I don't mind showing the type first, if it is indicated that it is the type and it is consistant from page to page. Although then, to be consistant, then you probably should then put the species listing in chronological order (which, to be fair, many pages do attempt to do), and with many fossil species that becomes too complex for the taxobox. Whichever system is being used, it does need to be clear to a casual reader, and as things stand, it often is not. CFLeon (talk) 00:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! mgiganteus1 (talk) 22:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I probably should fill out the boxes more often, but my time online is spotty, and my connection often craps out. Guess what! You can't fill in the box after the edit is made, so if the connection is interrupted- no info in the box. Most of my edits are self-explanatory, so I often don't bother with those that are. CFLeon (talk) 00:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CF, thanks for clarifying. My main concern was with Parvorder, as this appears to be totally unsourced and was probably added by a too ambitious editor a while ago and was never reverted. It's a good idea to have the pages agree, and a project currently in testing stage over at Talk:Taxobox is attempting to automate all the taxoboxes so they're automatically generated based on a centralized taxonomy. However, we do need to be careful not to get into OR territory, and have to accept that the Taxonomy and Phylogny sections will never agree because they're based on two totally distinct systems, and any exceptions to that need to be sourced. It also doesn't help that right now definitions of even clades are arbitrary and vary from source to source. MMartyniuk (talk) 02:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon. You have new messages at Nick Number's talk page.
Message added 03:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donovan's Brain (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nancy Davis and Steve Brodie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Spice of Life (Discovery Channel Series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Constitution: That Delicate Balance, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Constitutional Convention and Benno Schmidt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Constitution: That Delicate Balance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Court Justice [[Potter Stewart]], who also participated in related discussion with Fred Friendly (these discussions took place in [[Independence Hall]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
Back in 2009, you added a large section to the article Colossi of Memnon, about the sounds made by the colossi. This section was removed a few months ago as it was suspected to be a copyright violation from here. Can you explain where the text came from? JudgeDeadd (talk) 20:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've now restored your text; I'd like to apologize for any accusations of copyright violation. However, if you still have access to the books you used as sources, it would be useful if you added some inline citations into the section. JudgeDeadd (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of dinosaur parks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinosaur Land. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, CFLeon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fantastic Animation Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. » Shadowowl | talk 20:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you are very interested in horror films and I was wondering if you would like to review an article I nominated for GA: Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes. Thanks for your consideration!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Hello, CFLeon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Given that you asked the question ages ago, I don't know if you still follow Talk:I"s so I'm posting a notification here as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A457:9497:1:D0E2:F8F:F5E3:519F (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Between the Wars (documentary series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 10:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Between the Wars (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been closed, according to present 15 sources. Also, YouTube is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Between the Wars (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Between the Wars (TV series), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CFLeon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Between the Wars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Journey Through the Solar System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]