User talk:Csloomis

Hello Csloomis why did you revert my edit on Robert’s Kaplan?

I wanted to get a second opinion before changing it but wasn't Lily older than petunia? LizzieHarrison 11:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Petunia is older. She had to be old enough to be able to go to Hogwarts when Lily first went. So she is older.CSLoomis 17:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add a Wife of George and Other Children next to and under George? He definitely has other kids, because Ms Rowling said, "[H]e names his first child and son Fred", meaning there were more. Therequiembellishere 20:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 05:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Csloomis,

I noticed you 'rolled back' my edit on the 'Islamic Philosophy' Wiki page. The URL is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy I was not committing any act of vandalism in removing the section I did. I you read the description of the edit I wrote down that the section was repeated - word for word - right underneath. In fact, there are a number of sections on that page that reappear further down. I will like to see that the page is coherent, and is not repeated. Please review the page, and the decision to 'roll back' Thanks mischa667 Mischa 667 (talk) 07:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. There was just some suspicious activity on the page earlier and I thought that it had to do with that. I will not revert any further edits. CSLoomis (talk) 07:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you templated me (a regular) with an erroneous tag here. I'm guessing this is an accident.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 12:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left you a message on your talk page. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 21:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I responded regarding M.C. Thanks! 63.131.4.149 (talk) 06:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the other ones I missed. I replied to the talk page before reviewing your changes. Thanks for formating the sources I added. I admit I'm bad with doing the references correctly, but acceptable/easier the way I include them (although lazy). Smile! If you can fix the main title of the article to M.C. too, that would be great. Happy 2011! 63.131.4.149 (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the recent edit (after several attempts to keep it from reverts and edit wars by others without discussing first), even though it was reverted again and finally re-approved. At any rate, I appreciate it... 63.131.4.149 (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wonder's talk page again regarding another revert by a previous user after discussion that the edit was acceptable. Perhaps you can assist? I've mentioned this to two others who stated the edit I made was fine. I think he is doing it out of spite? [1] Thanks! 63.131.4.149 (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding your image File:Burj Dubai 20080523.jpg to Burj Khalifa. Unfortunately, the image is very likely to be deleted from Commons - some deletionists over there have interpreted UAE law to mean there is no freedom of panorama and therefore all images on this free website must be removed irrespective of any licensing you may apply. If you wish the image to remain in the article, can I suggest you upload it to en.Wikipedia and add a valid fair-use rationale. Be careful though, the fair-use rationale can be disputed at any time, so make it a good one. Astronaut (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your restoration of the PROD at Half-Heart; proposed deletions can be contested by the article creator. I have nominated the article for deletion, however. Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 08:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adamrce, Anna_Frodesiak, Baseball_Bugs, Csloomis, Cntras, Evaders99, Fæ, Shrike, Qwyrxian, WWGB, Who.was.phone:
met you guys at edit conflicts for undoing vandalism/ warning the same vandals/reporting at AIV.
I've made a proposal at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Recent_Changes-_tags_for_patrolled_and_reverted_edits. This is regarding managing vandalism at RCP. What do you think?Staticd (talk) 11:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Csloomis! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Why are you keeping this page in your User space? It seems to me it should be deleted -- could cause confusion. It's already appearing in Google searches for Topher at Wikia. -- 2001:558:1400:A:5D5E:1A87:CB47:56EA (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Csloomis, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison to other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Faizan -Let's talk! 12:04, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Csloomis,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Csloomis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

98.148.167.84 (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Android 10 and beyond have no official code names. So adding them is not appropriate. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 18:38, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Georgia Institute of Technology College of Design has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cited sources do not indicate that the subject is independently notable (notability is not inherited from the indisputably notable parent institution)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ElKevbo (talk) 05:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has challenged this proposal so the discussion is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheller College of Business. You are welcome to join in! ElKevbo (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]