User talk:Curtis23

Archives

Archive 1 (July 1, 2009 to December 22, 2009) Archive 2 (December 27, 2009 to March 28, 2010) Archive 3 (April 11, 2010 to July 4, 2010) Archive 4 (July 4, 2010 to January 7, 2011) Archive 5 (June 18, 2011 to July 28, 2011)

I understand Curtis23 so in this case I invite you to delete all the external links here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes#Computer_implementations, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method#External_links and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_options_pricing_model#Computer_implementations. Because all this people are putting their website on wikipedia too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crougeaux (talk • contribs) 09:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand Curtis23 but in this case do you think that

'Black–Scholes in Multiple Languages, espenhaug.com Black–Scholes Pricing and Greeks, soarcorp.com Chicago Option Pricing Model (Graphing Version), sourceforge.net' (in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%E2%80%93Scholes#Computer_implementations computer implementation) are reliable source?

It's a question of equity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crougeaux (talk • contribs) 09:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curtis. I have closed your RfA as unsuccessful as I do not believe it had a realistic chance of succeeding at this time. Please take on board the advice the participants have offered. Best, 28bytes (talk) 17:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, WikiProject Disney has been rather inactive recently. I saw that you are a member of the project. If you still consider yourself to be an active member, leave a response on the Project's talk page. Hopefully we can get the project up and running again. Thanks!--GroovySandwich 00:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Eugene (2011) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Eugene (2011) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 23:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know that the annon edit blanking the page was fine. The userpage was a copyvio. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for letting me know. Curtis23 talk to me 23:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your WP:AIV reports! bibliomaniac15 23:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curtis23. I'm leaving you this message because you have previously been involved as an adopter with Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. A clean-up of this program is currently underway, and as part of the process I am trying to find out who is and isn't still interested in remaining an adopter.

If you would prefer not to be part of the adoption program anymore, you need do nothing; when the overhaul of the project is completed your name will be removed from the list of active adopters. However, if you have current adoptees, an active adoption school or an interest in adopting in the near future, then please let us know by signing here.

If you want to remain in the project and can currently take on more adoptees, there is a serious backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user; it would be enormously helpful if you could take on one or two of the users there. Please do keep an eye on the project for upcoming changes, we could use your opinions and your help! Yunshui 雲‍水 09:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]