User talk:Pandeist

Well.

I'm not fluent in Italian, and the Italian in the book is not modern. I also don't understand the theology, but as for translation, the gist is:

The wild nomad* (who lived outside the law) stopped at/in the caves with fear and admiration at the impressive meteor shower, for the first time saw that reason was powerless,* experienced a most colossal power outside himself of his Herculean brutality, and for the first time he understood worship.*

His robust imagination recognized the effects as a cause, then deifying natural phenomena, he became a Pandeist, an instructor of Mythology, a priest, an Augur.

• Nomado could be proper name rather than "nomad". "debole" may also mean weak or tenuous. "concepi un culto" could also mean "conceived of a cult"

Or less word-for-word, a nomad sees a meteor shower, is blown away and abandons reason for worship. His worship of natural phenomena made his a Pandeist, etc....

Hope it helps...

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect, thank you!! Pandeist (talk) 23:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I've noticed you've wiki-linked Neil Godfrey at a number of articles...but such an article does not exist. Were you planning on attempting to create it or something? Otherwise, I'm not sure there's much of a reason to believe there's going to be an article anytime soon... Sergecross73 msg me 17:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking I might. I actually sought another Neil Godfrey, an atheist writer, but he's not here at all, but I managed to come across these many references to this same guitarist. Pandeist (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let me know if you do. I'm pretty knowledgable about the band's he's been in, and could try to help...though he's never really ever been a huge focus of the bands he's been in, so I'm not sure if you'll be able to meet the WP:GNG or not. I'll try to assist if you try though. Sergecross73 msg me 18:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you my friend, I will arrive back at the question in a few more days. I do not have any bad feeling about the possibility of proving this well-circulated artist to be notable. Blessings!! Pandeist (talk) 02:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

belay that, sir, be careful not to speak ill of things you don't understand. thank you for your concern, have a good one. :)

paul herrin (talk) 17:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pandeism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am Weiwen Leung, a student at the University of Minnesota. I am currently conducting a study on how people on the LGBT+ Wikipedians group use and contribute to Wikipedia.

Would you be willing to answer a short 5 minute survey? If so, please email me at [email protected]. It would be helpful if you could include your Wikipedia username when emailing.

Thank you, Weiwen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 18:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think per WP:COMMONNAME this should be moved back to Cuban Thaw, with the lead sentence saying "United States–Cuban Thaw". Valoem ^{talk contrib} 15:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• That suits me just as well. It wasn't my idea to change the name of the page in the first place, but I was overruled by the majority. Pandeist (talk) 17:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sidd Bikkannavar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. General Ization ^Talk 15:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• But to cover up what? Pandeist (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• See WP:BLP1E. Also see WP:AGF. General Ization ^Talk 16:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidd Bikkannavar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidd Bikkannavar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. General Ization ^Talk 13:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Who created God?, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 Gulf of Alaska earthquake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2018 Gulf of Alaska earthquake), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know my friend. Pandeist (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pandeist,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bert Beverly Beach for deletion, because it's not written in English. To request a translation, please visit the translation page. If you'd like to contribute to another Wikipedia, take a look at our full list of language projects.

If you feel that I made a mistake, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:37, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bert B. Beach. Since you had some involvement with the Bert B. Beach redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:49, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Theory that God became the Universe. Since you had some involvement with the Theory that God became the Universe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Anselm Bolton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Anselm Bolton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CNMall41 (talk) 19:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bernardo Kastrup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Peake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Calliopejen1 (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pandeist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bernardo Kastrup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]