User talk:DilletantiAnonymous

Hello, DilletantiAnonymous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Holy Innocents Church, South Norwood. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 15:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Hans Bontemantel, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please move the sources inline? It would be very difficult for another editor to find where each fact has been sourced from. Thanks for creating this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 11:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Baptism of Christ (David), DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Nicnote just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks fantastic, thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Nicnote's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 16:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might like d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Creator/Gerard David. The category contains more overviews per painter. Multichill (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Antony Dainan, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more sources

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please make the reference clearer on this article? 'bol313' won't make much sense to most readers. Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 10:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Noli me tangere (Correggio)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease WP:INLINECITE your sources; this will make it far easier for other editors to expand the article, and for readers to use it for research. It's also very hard for anyone but the creator to rectify this, without going to a lot of trouble.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Campori Madonna, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start on the new stub. It could really use additional references though.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 14:46, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Nurteria bicolor!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've tagged this as uncategorised and as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 05:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Saints Roch, Anthony Abbot and Lucy!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for two issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Gustavo primo re di Svezia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating St Nicholas Church, Ringwould, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great to see a new article on a grade I listed building! And thanks for doing a Wikimedia Commons link. I've added a link from the Grade I listed buildings in Dover (district) article.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Allegory of Vice (Correggio), DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Bolognini Madonna, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Texts only found in the Septuagint, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Charles Egon IV, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Adding footnotes would help the reader verify the information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been tagging and assessing some milhist articles and see that you have started adding tags. Thankyou. If you look at Heinrich Julius Alexander von Kalb and look at the edit page, you will see how I have made the translation tag appear the same size as the others. When you add the Template:WikiProject Military history, you probably copy it fully to the talk page and then delete the unwanted bits. It would be useful if you left the assessment part (B-Class 5-criteria checklist and the five points) behind. Thankyou in advance. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Karl Joachim, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please make it clearer what 's. Fickler S. 295' means in your references? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 10:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Joseph Wenzel, Prince of Fürstenberg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing better sourcing, and I have de-linked the dates.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can't see any need for this, which will almost certainly only ever contain one article - Last Judgment (Michelangelo) (which I have removed). Was it a mistake? Johnbod (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it was, just add "{ {db-c1} }" (no spaces) to see it off. Johnbod (talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Franz Christoph Neubauer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you please add your source to the article; all articles need references. Thanks for creating this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This page is at risk of being tagged for deletion as it stands, and you have not responded to the original message. I also tried to review Aubin Vouet, but it is also unreferenced. Please add your source. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)::The same for Inácio da Costa Quintela. Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DilletantiAnonymous, you have not responded to my previous messages; please be aware that WP:Communication is required. You have continued to create unreferenced articles; all articles need sources and the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to WP:VERIFY the information they add - I'd encourage you to click on these links. With an article like Cimetière Sainte-Marguerite, it has 'external links'. These are usually 'friendly suggestions' rather than sources - are they actually your sources? If so, can you please change the heading from 'External links' to 'References' or 'Sources', and preferably WP:INLINECITE them? That makes it so much easier for the reader to see where you have got your information and how reliable it is. I'm happy to help you, just ping me, but please do respond to my message and please do not continue to create articles with no clear references. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could actually assist in finding references rather than being so keen to be the References Police? It's often the result of translating foreign-language ones which didn't have references and which I'm still scratching around for references to make up that deficit. I know, I should hold off on translating until I have sources, yada yada, but the need for translation seemed to outweigh that. I'm making a list of my ones with this issue here so you, me and the world and his wife can assist in this noble cause. DilletantiAnonymous (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I used to think the same, and created many unreferenced articles. I was pretty sure on their content, but there turned out to be serious errors and it cost far more time to rectify than if they'd been deleted and started from scratch. Unreferenced articles on other Wikipedias are not reliable. The articles you've created lack verified information, and it will be very difficult for someone else to go sentence by sentence verifying it. It would be worth you looking at WP:BURDEN - it is your responsibility, no one else's, to verify the information you add to Wikipedia. Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sculptures depicting Daniel, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films based on the Old Testament apocrypha, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art depicting Hebrew Bible figures by medium, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Simon Douglas-Pennant, 7th Baron Penrhyn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have removed the links to dates, as we don't link dates on English Wikipedia. Thepeerage.com is also not generally accepted as a reliable source and I have marked it as a stub.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art depicting Old Testament apocrypha themes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Book of Revelation art, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Paintings illustrating the Song of Songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Friderike Elisabeth von Grabow!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This also has referencing issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Philippe Macquer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. We don't link dates on English Wikipedia; this has been tagged as needing improvements to its sourcing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sabine Elisabeth Oelgard von Bassewitz, DilletantiAnonymous!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please stop linking dates on English Wikipedia - it is the consensus that we no longer do this.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm My name is not dave. DilletantiAnonymous, thanks for creating Ignacio de Ries!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It is unsure whether the book listed at the bottom is one big reference for the whole page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

!dave 17:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Helmut Glück has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beeblebrox, I'm surprised as this editor has received numerous messages raising concerns about their creations over the last couple of months, most of which weren't responded to. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pamela (paintings), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The unsourced material you added to February 14 has been reverted since there were multiple additions. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In case you didn't know, this article is proposed for a merge at [1]. If you have additional sources for notability of the C19 church, you may want to add them. --Cedders^tk 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libro de' Disegni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Castelvecchio and Triton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Stefano Bonsignori requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/dover-castle/history-and-stories/operation-dynamo-things-you-need-to-know/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#Birth_date_and_place for guidance. Places of birth and death should not go between the brackets. Deb (talk) 15:16, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, while I appreciate that it was to undo your own edit, the map still does not match the caption (Essex is not displayed in pink). Is it the map or the caption that is wrong? Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 16:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice username. Have a cookie. Chris Troutman (talk) 11:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Georg Giese does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Hello- I'm not sure we need articles on both Georg Giese and the Holbein portrait of him, as he may be mostly notable because of the portrait. Eric ^talk 12:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portrait of Nicolaus Kratzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering if this is a legitimate title for the category. The Church in Wales only came into existence in 1920; all but one of those currently named in the category died before that date. Deb (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Heston does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I see you were warned about this just over a month ago. Please abide by community standards and provide edit summaries.  DDStretch  (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you add citations to your additions to 22nd (County of London) Battalion (The Queen’s), 23rd (County of London) Battalion and 24th (County of London) Battalion (The Queen’s). Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added citations and amended some of the material you added so that the dates are correct (or at least conform to the citations I have added). I note that you have been asked before to add citations and edit summaries. Please can you do so if editing wikipedia. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DilletantiAnonymous,
I've noticed there is no internet English language mention of this purported series of paintings, aside from this article. Similarly it:Storie di Mosè ed Evangelisti - la cosa stessa ed il problema identico. It would appear to me a concatenation of two different series of works by Beccafumi. Your thoughts about this?
Pietro di Melbourne aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please note this is not regarded as part of the "Nativity". One could start a seperate cat for it - there's an oddly stranded & incomplete Presentation of Jesus at the Temple (disambiguation). Not to be confused with the Presentation of Mary. Johnbod (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be a prolific creator of visual art pages. Thank you for that. I am worried after going through some of your pages (not even all of them) just for 10 July that you may have hundreds if not thousands of paintings which may not have the title italicized and, as importantly, missed on artist's templates. You don't seem to add your pages onto the templates, and there, as I mentioned, could be hundreds of pages missed. If you've kept a list of painting pages you've created somewhere that would help tremendously. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are on a roll to reduce the backlog on the Gentileschi painters. Thanks so much for that! I also did some work on both of them a while ago and if you do find an image on Commons to use in one of your stubs, then I think you will find also that I already linked it to its Wikidata item. From there is a small step to adding your new article title to the Wikidata sitelink for said painting. I believe there is a way to add the Wikidata references automagically into your stub, thus decreasing your chances of getting annoyed messages from Wikipedians who don't like to see reference-less stubs showing up in their watchlists. In any case, I don't want to burden you with extra tasks, but after adding sitelinks for several of your recent creations I thought I would take a stab at convincing you that adding your new articles to Wikidata is a helpful thing to do. Thanks in any case for the work you have already done. Jane (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to echo the comments above, it is great that you are creating new articles on important artworks. Given the rate you are working, I suspect you are using some sort of semi-automated algorithm, perhaps based on machine translation or the content at Wikidata. Just three comments.

• Unreferenced: Please could you consider adding at least some references, even if just a link to a catalogue raisonée or (where relevant) a museum page.
• Stubby: Some of them are nice little articles, but many are one line substubs (eg Woman by a Window, which indidenally I suspect should be moved to Woman at the Window). Where you can, please add more.
• Orphan: I know you are adding categories, but please could you add the navigation template for the artist, where one exists, eg {{Caspar David Friedrich}}, and add the new articles to the template too. That at least ensures that there are some links from other articles to your new ones, so there is more chance that someoene else might spot them and improve them.

Thanks again. 213.205.198.245 (talk) 11:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do take on board the points that previous editors have made about referencing / sourcing the picture stubs you are producing in quantity, and also, that not every painting of which there is an image in Commons is notable enough for an independent article. Best wishes, Eustachiusz (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good and Evil (painting), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athanase Coquerel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Something like that should have been proposed on the talk page first. Currently you have managed to screw up the references on both articles, and the Tiepolo doesn't seem to link to the generic one. Have you sorted incoming links? Quality is important as well as quantity. Johnbod (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are wonderful, and are filling the Wikipeda artist's collections . Yet please (pretty please with an original Rubens sketch on top) consider adding your pages to the artists templates, and the templates to the pages (past, present, and future?). I and others can catch some of them, but judging from your recent output, how many of your art articles are missed, untemplated, and alone out there in the Wikipedian universe. Dozens, hundreds? I dare to say, more? You deserve podium status (you can tell what I'm watching on the tube), but please remember the finicky template fans and readers, and throw us a few. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• You have emptied Category:Etchings by Rembrandt. This should be discussed, as should any significant rearrangement.
• Please DON'T add relatively common prints to individual museum categories - these will be in over 100 museums. See the note on the BM page: "Drawings in the Department of Prints and Drawings at the British Museum, and prints with a special connection with the collection that is mentioned in the article, for example unique copies. Most common, and very many rare prints, will also be in the collection, but should not be categorized here." Categories need to be "defining" for the object, and for most prints being in a particular collection is not.
• Please format your refs correctly, and call them references. No bare urls please.
• Where there is an English version of a museum page, please use and reference that - this will avoid mistakes arising from your own translations

It is good to see new articles, even if very short, but frankly following you around and tidying up is becoming irksome! Thanks, Johnbod (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]