User talk:Doanri

Hello, Doanri! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, Just finished completion of your graphic request Vwanweb (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Tibetan Plateau, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. That edit appeared to be a good faith edit, well explained based on an editorial policy or guideline. That you note it's an incomplete reading and disagree with the edit based on a more complete one doesn't make the original edit bad-faith or vandalism. DMacks (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michiel Meyer Cohen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never had any sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 19:56, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since those Taiwanese IPs have been persistently vandalizing the Chinese words in the language box, I suggest that you resort to WP:RFP to request semi-protection for this page so that those annoying IPs will be automatically banned from vandalizing further. --221.13.92.178 (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 習近平談治國理政. Since you had some involvement with the 習近平談治國理政 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 习近平谈治国理政. Since you had some involvement with the 习近平谈治国理政 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doanri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doanri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SenseTime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blood type distribution by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doanri. You have new messages at Richard3120's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Richard3120 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Doanri. You have new messages at Richard3120's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Richard3120 (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Kole Black, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kuyabribri: My bad, thanks for the explainer. Article is in AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kole Black (2nd nomination) now. Doanri (talk) 01:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Public Security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doanri, many thanks for the information. It will, no doubt make my Wiki referencing more concise and effective. Best wishes, Melroross (talk) 20:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! Good day Doanri (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Esiymbro (talk) 14:17, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Esiymbro: Could you explain what I did wrong? You didn't leave an edit summary on any of your reverts. Doanri (talk) 14:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Vladislav Surkov. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Although many IP editors do indeed fail to edit constructively, that was a good edit which did improve the grammar. It would be helpful in future if you use edit summaries as well. Please do not be unnecessarily biased towards IPs. Many long term editors began as an IP; most don't even remember which one they were! Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 10:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Psiĥedelisto: Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. Doanri (talk) 10:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doanri: I think it's perhaps not fair for you to call my reply canned when I wrote almost as much text as the template has in it. I'm aware of WP:DTR, thank you; I used Twinkle to send you a personalized, not canned, message for convenience sake. Best, Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 10:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am new to Wiki and still learning, please have patience with me.Even with your profile I initially did not see your edditing. So hence the distrust. Can you help me to see if we can make this work. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 Shenqijing (talk) 10:54, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shenqijing:Of course, I'd be glad to! I think the resources I left on your talk page might be a good place to start, and I'd be happy to help you if you have any other questions. Also, and forgive me if my assumption is wrong, if you're more comfortable reading Chinese, you could take a look at zh:Wikipedia:可靠来源, which is the equivalent of WP:RS (do keep in mind that the policies will differ a bit, and that the rules here are generally more strict, especially regarding self-published sources). Let me know how everything goes! Doanri (talk) 11:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently warned me about vandalising a Wikipedia page. I just want you to know it was an accident, I did not mean to vandalize. Guardian101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardian101 (talk • contribs) 06:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... by a couple of folks on Sinicization of Tibet but the pings look like they're failing. FYI. Pasdecomplot (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pasdecomplot: Thank you! Doanri (talk) 19:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EDF energy.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the human rights abuses committed on the Uyghur population of China a state-sponsored sinicization of Xinjiang by the Chinese government, albeit with more repression than in Tibet? -EvaTheWingdale, December 14th, 2021.

@EvaTheWingdale: They are a part of it, as far as I can tell. Why do you ask? Doanri (talk) 07:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Doanri: I was just mentioning it. Maybe another page could be made from that, an article detailing the sinicization of Xinjiang. Also, you're good at China-stuff. -EvaTheWingdale, December 15th, 2021.

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tencent QQ.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

nableezy - 19:16, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DTR. I'm glad another editor stepped in and pointed me to the established unreliability of the sources. Doanri (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a required notice. DTR doesn’t apply to those. nableezy - 19:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a 'required notice'. It is a mandatory template for an optional notice. Wikipedia:Contentious_topics#Awareness_of_contentious_topics Good day. Doanri (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine it is a notice I am required to place unchanged to ensure your awareness prior to seeking any sanctions for disruptive editing. Take care, nableezy - 20:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oof, take a breather, maybe? Doanri (talk) 20:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doanri. Thank you for your work on Aron Broches. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Doanri Nice work!, you may add early life section with more information. Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cernobbio coat of arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]