User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law

Hello, Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 14:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shaitani Rasmein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shaitani Rasmein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 19:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ishq Murshid. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. This removal for the show being finished has nothing to do with the reason the tag exists. CNMall41 (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 06:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please don’t add male and female Color’s in tables please as we know who is who gender please remove them. 2A02:6B68:10:EF00:3152:C892:B897:EC4B (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, adding the gender column is required as per standard Wikipedia guidelines. Not everyone who reads wikipedia watches the show. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for letting me know also could you please do me a favour. In Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8 in Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8#Housemates could you change the sub heading Pontentail with Not-selected housemates as it already has that title over here Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 8#Potential housemates 2 thanks 2A02:6B68:10:EF00:7D91:86FE:B4ED:889A (talk) 16:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ems 27 03 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ems 27 03. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 21:27, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I would like to confirm that I'm not a Sockpuppet. This is my only account. I have interest in editing the article Splitsvilla (mostly) and that is why I created this account. User Ravenfire has been targeting me since he begin editing the same page (Splitsvilla 15) and now suspected me as a Sockpuppet because our interest doesn't match. I am new to the community and request to please help me.Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every sockpuppet says they aren't one, as that is the whole point. You'll have to do better than that. Even if this is your only account, that would make this meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please read the next statement, check my edit history. check the talk page of Splitsvilla 15. The only reason he suspected me as a Sockpuppet of someone I didn't know about is because he just don't like the way I edited. He has been doing it since he begin editing the article Splitsvilla 15 saying I don't edit as per Wikipedia MOS (I'm new and still learning new things everyday it takes time). You can verify by checking history, our talk pages, article editing history and talk page. I would request you to give me a chance and also take strict against user Ravenfire for harrassment. 331dot The Wordsmith^{Talk to me Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 11:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)} [reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining this request and revoking TPA because of the user's block evasion at WP:AN. Bbb23 (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser (technical) data is mostly stale in this case. I'm pretty confident Era Amber Spencer is unrelated to this user but I can't say whether or not either is related to Ems 27 03. No comment on the behavioural evidence. --Yamla (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand what were the links between Ems 27 03 and me. Just because I edited the way article have been editing I am become the "suspect" please complete the investigation, I am innocent. Yamla please read the previous message for thorough investigation. I have given my proofs.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You already have an open unblock request, it's abusive to make a second simultaneous request. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove or edit a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At least do not remove my justification. I made previous comments in a hurry. Here I'm explaining my side. Replying @User:331dot:. I am allowed to reply I have been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Ems 27 03. I would like to confirm that I have no relation with that user. I am blocked because of abusing multiple accounts which is absolutely a false accusation. I have been editing MTV Splitsvilla (season 15) as it was been edited past seasons. Please see Special:Contributions/Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law. Later, User talk:Ravensfire then involved and removed few sections calling it WP:FANCRUFT. I involved in Wikipedia:EDITWAR with User talk:Ravensfire. He further edited the page whole article saying it is not as WP:MOS. I realised my mistakes (my editing style was not appropriate as per WP:MOS and apologized to him Wikipedia:AGF on User talk:Ravensfire talk page (seems like he didn't forgive me) and just to satisfy his ego he accused me as a sockpuppet. He keeps reverting my edits asserting Wikipedia:Ownership of content MTV Splitsvilla (season 15) without even reviewing the edit (check his latest revert of my edit on MTV Splitsvilla (season 15), I updated the page but he reverted because it included minor edits that was not the way he wants). User talk:Ravensfire continued Wikipedia:personal attacks and Wikipedia:Harassment. My talk page User talk:Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law, User talk:Ravensfire, Talk:MTV Splitsvilla season 15 are the proofs of conversations and our conflicts. The sole reason he accused me as a sockpuppet is our conflict of interest and editing style. You can review my Special:Contributions/Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law before even accusing me as a sockpuppet (On Investigation User talk:Ravensfire said, I am pushing fan trivia and making similar edits) please review my contributions. I make minor edits, still If I went against wikipedia policy I sincerely apologise. I newly joined to the community and would request an honest investigation. I genuinely want to contribute more and can't wait to edit again. Please give me a chance. User:Fritzmann2002 is my mentor, you can also check his talk page where I asked him questions about editing wikipedia and even asked him to review MTV Splitsvilla (season 15) page following edit wars. To conclude, I have been accused as a sockpuppet by User talk:Ravensfire only because of our conflict of interest in editing style for which I already apologised and agreed with his way of editing. I am aware that I should not accuse someone but he falsely accused me of someone's sockpuppet. I made mistakes in my edit that were against WP:MOS but I agreed to right WP:MOS Injustice and wrong happened to me. Kindly provide justice as soon as possible. @Fritzmann2002: @331dot: Thank you. Dr. Trafalgar D Water Law (talk) 13:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional statements after your unblock request should be unformatted, only one open request is needed. I've removed the formatting from your above comment. 331dot (talk) 13:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sir, I am just hoping that this matter gets resolve soon.