User talk:Ehlla

Doing this from my phone, hopefully it goes through.. you're missing a WHOLE bunch of military flag officers who endorse Trump for president. I gathered the links for you:

Trump endorsed by 165 military flag officers:

Full list: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/flag-officers-endorse-donald-j.-trump-for-president

Original Announcements: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/88-retired-u.s.-generals-and-admirals-endorse-trump

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-announces-support-of-21-new-military-leaders

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/thirty-two-new-military-leaders-endorse-donald-j.-trump-for-president

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/forty-four-new-flag-officers-endorse-donald-j.-trump-for-president — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.174.30.234 (talk) 17:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sergei Sobolev (politician). The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ehlla! Good sources on Ukrainian politicians are available at file.liga.net. It is OK to use non-English sources in English Wikipedia especially when English sources are hard to find... And with Ukrainian politicians this is usually the case... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While working on Sergei Sobolev (politician) I got the feeling you found that website already and you might benefit from reading Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Abdullin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		Ukraine Barnstar
		I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for making tons of edits in Ukrainian politics related articles the past months! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 22:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kkj11210. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Serhiy Kvit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KJ ^{click here} 22:59, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andriy Mokhnyk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		Ukraine Barnstar
		You are hereby awarded this Ukrainian National Award "For Merit" for creating new Wiki-articles about the (new) Ministers in the Yatsenyuk Government. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oleksandr Shlapak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Master (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you've made several new short articles about living persons. Please, when you do so, provide them with reliable sources. Otherwise the articles might be put up for speedy deletion. There is more information about things to take extra care about when writing about living people here.

Best, Yakikaki (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 08:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS Your links are all over the place. Please take note! Tony (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oleh Rybachuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Our Ukraine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the third message about overlinking. If you don't understand English or the guidelines on linking for en.WP, please ask me.

This article.

AGAIN, we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This applies to infoboxes, too.

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 08:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the third time. If you don't understand, please ask and I'll have the text translated.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Tony (talk) 12:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE STILL DOING IT. Tony (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ehlla,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ivan Plachkov for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 19:51, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saimir Tahiri, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.kryeministria.al/en/government/prime-minister-cabinet/tahiri-saimir.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Saimir Tahiri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to English and Italian

Mimi Kodheli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lincoln University

Yuriy Smirnov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bui

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Viktor Hvozd, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fisu.gov.ua/index_en/index.html%3Fpage_id=11.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ehlla, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MER-C 12:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Oleh Rybachuk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 00:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Erion Veliaj, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://antikorrupsioni.al/speaker/erion-veliaj-eng/?lang=en.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Erion Veliaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://antikorrupsioni.al/speaker/erion-veliaj-eng/?lang=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crow^Caw 22:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested to participate in the discussion going on here: Talk:Novorossiya.--BoguSlav 04:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yuriy Kosyuk has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JBH (talk) 20:55, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've recently edited a few articles on my watchlist, and I've noticed that you haven't included an edit summary. Looking at your contribution history, it appears that it's your usual practice not to include one.

Could I ask you to reconsider this? Edit summaries help article-watchers decide whether or not they need to check up on edits to watchlisted articles; without a summary, I have to assume that every edit needs checking. This is especially true of articles on politicians and political subjects, which is where you appear to do a lot of your editing. Such articles tend to draw problem edits—POV-pushing, editorializing, OR, and outright vandalism—and on such articles, the absence of an edit summary is a red flag for article-watchers.

I hasten to say that I'm not complaining about your edits themselves, or suggesting that there've been any of the abovementioned problems with them. However, in the absence of an edit summary, I have to check each edit individually to make sure it's OK. Your inclusion of a summary would save me and other article-wathchers this bit of unnecessary work. Thanks—Ammodramus (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Scott Walker presidential campaign, 2016 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Jeb Bush presidential campaign, 2016 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scott Walker presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Thanks for all the work finding, citing, and including all endorsements for the presidential candidates. Spartan7W § 21:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely +1. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added a new subsection for Walker, since he had several mayors/treasurers/etc in his Iowa list. There are a few other candidates with mayors, too: Christie and Fiorina, that I know about. Should we give those two a new subsection, or should we merge Walker's back into his activist-subsection, where he has his Iowa staffers Polyansky and Woolson? See longer analysis of the other subcategory-names here, if you like. You can reply either place, or on my talkpage if that's easier, thanks. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Cruz presidential campaign, 2016, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Rogers and Dan Fisher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chris Christie presidential campaign, 2016

added a link pointing to Robert Scott

Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016

added a link pointing to Robert Scott

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ehlla,

I just wanted to make sure you saw my edit summary. New endorsements should always go before the <section end> tag that is in each section. The way the automatic copying works is that each section is marked off with section begin> and <section end> tags. Those are what tells the code what to copy so if you add a new endorsement outside those it won't copy over to the candidate's page. Fantastic work keeping up on all the new endorsements by the way. I hope by doing what I did I can cut down on your workload. --Stabila711 (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike McCarthy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Peterson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User All4peace (talk) has initiated a discussion, on the article talk page on English Wikipedia about how we present MOE.

I would very‐much appreciate your participation ! Info por favor (talk) 22:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Oleh Bilorus.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Rogers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your continued editing and help on Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. However, I've had to revert several edits of yours due to your use of Twitter as the only source. Per this Wiki Policy, Twitter is not a reliable source. Please only add content that you can reference with reliable sources. All the best, Light-jet pilot (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• fyi, this List of John Kasich presidential campaign endorsements, 2016.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Clark. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ehlla,

I am currently working on a research project with several professors at the University of Virginia on the effect of celebrity endorsements on political campaigns, and I have seen that you are a major contributor on the endorsements page. I would love to enlist your help and discuss your contributions further. If you are willing, please let me know.

Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WatsonWahoo (talk • contribs) 17:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Endorsements for the Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McCarthy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ehlla, here's a link to help you with doing proper referencing - Wikipedia:Citing sources as you are adding lots of polls for the following article - Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016. If you need any clarification, please message me. DrFargi (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder that the template in Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016 is shown here as below.

This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. (January 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

You will need to fix the reference citations to conform with the standards.DrFargi (talk) 05:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is just another reminder to add proper references with citations in the article-Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016.DrFargi (talk) 12:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is just another reminder to add proper references with citations in the article-Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016. Thank you. DrFargi (talk) 16:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona, 2016, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Lee and Mark Meadows. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is another reminder to fix the citations when quoting pollster in Statewide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016. Hope you will do this properly.DrFargi (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for adding all the election polls! MB298 (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Michigan, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Barrett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Senate election in Maryland, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RNC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States House of Representatives elections in Kansas, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Marshall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Maryland gubernatorial election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTOP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ehlla, thanks for your editing on Andriy Yermak. I just spend a truck load of time on cleaning up the Wikipedia article Far-right politics in Ukraine..... I think it was unintentionally, but nevertheless it had turned into a WP:WEASEL looking Kremlin written nonsense piece that made it look like currently Ukraine is a extrem right controlled country where ethnic Russian and other minorities get regularly beaten up.... And all of this was "proven" with a minimum of sources..... Since you are one of the most level headed and neutral Wikipedia "Ukrainian related articles editors" out there, I would like it if you have a look at the article. Although I you would not fall in my rating if you did not. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to apologise for my above rambling message. I was busy and stressed at the time of writing (it) but I should not have written it as a stress relief.... Unfortunately I have retired from Wikipedia because I don't have the time anymore. I thank you for updating Wikipedia political related articles. Unfortunately I don't have the time to do it anymore....

I made some Yuliya Svitlychna related edits to make it up to you — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ehlla, I found this handy website https://ukr.vote/en for Ukrainian election date on persons and parties. Since you edit on this subjects it might be something you want to use. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.

I edited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Future_for_Ukraine_Charity_Foundation . Could you review this article? -- Niveus (talk) 13:38, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]