User talk:FocalPoint

Welcome!

Hello, FocalPoint, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  RJFJR 14:49, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

is the only one that's confusing AFAIK (Geoffrey the chronicler, his nephew Geoffrey I, and Geoffrey II). Sorry to step on your edit. Choess 21:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem.;-> There were only three of them, and all of them sufficiently serious to deserve an answer.

My position on the matter is not intransigent; if I were the only interested editor, what would happen is that Aristarchus would remain the dab page, because of the majority modern usage - but only until Aristarchus of Samothrace becomes a proper article, and the ones that should link to it are written. This will be a while, and I may have to do it myself.

"Correctness" is, according to policy, not the way to settle these questions. See Wikipedia:Use English and Wikipedia:Naming conventions for more; although several editors regularly ignore them. (You will find several other useful links on my user page; feel free to copy them - or not.) Septentrionalis 15:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit, see WP:POINT. Sciurinæ 13:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same user as Χρήστης:FocalPoint on the el.wiki? If you are, can you upload the picture to Commons, so we can include it in the Bridge of Arta article? By the way, we need someone to translate the rest of the article. Thanks! СПУТНИК^{ССС Р} 01:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Σχετικά με το..., πρέπει να δεις αυτό και αυτό και να πράξεις αναλόγως. Thanks. --Enas Filos 21:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent photo!! Do you have any others that could be used at Nafplio? Cheers! - Gobeirne 20:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Superb! Another great shot - Gobeirne 09:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit [1] and weigh in!  NikoSilver  ^{(T) @ (C)} 23:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Ton bot de la wikipedia anglaise, pense que c'est necessaire de mettre un liens vers la wikipedia italienne au sujet en:Perlite. Pourtant, le liens it:Perlite n'existe pas. J'ai fair deja un "revert" mais ton bot insiste. Je te prie de prend la situation en charge. Merci pour ton action.--FocalPoint 3 juin 2006 à 15:20 (CEST)

Bonjour,

Désolé, le bot est un peu idiot :o) Je vais lui demander de faire attention.

Hashar 11:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, no, not what you think! This time is for something that all of us need:

Improvement of the <ref> function.

Please weigh in at Wikipedia talk:Footnotes#Poll! NikoSilver  ^{(T) @ (C)} 18:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Χα! Καλησπέρες και σε σένα Focal. Βασικά την ψηφοφορία αυτή, εγώ την οργάνωσα. Είναι η πρώτη μου εδώ, και μάλλον πάει καλά! Γι'αυτό αν θες μπές στον κόπο να διαβάσεις την πρόταση, και αν συμφωνείς, στήριξέ την.  NikoSilver  ^{(T) @ (C)} 23:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's a debate about how much "X-ian" one must be in order to be considered "X-American" (or X-Yian for that matter) and be categorized as such. The poll is here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Rules for lists of X-Americans. Kindly weigh in! :NikoSilver: 21:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that'll be the first article we're not bitching too much about! :-) :NikoSilver: 22:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, kindly check:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misconceptions about Iran
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehud Olmert and Iran

Thanks. :NikoSilver: 01:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Due to a crash of my HD image epir1.cdr was lost. But I have three CDR images refered to Epir (1235-1251, 1252-1315 and 1315-1358). If you has interest in this images I can send you to your e-mail adress the original cdr files that you can edit freely. They are made in CORELL 11 version. Please contact me. 88.12.146.224 10:57, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the images in png at http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Despotat_de_l'Epir. I believe that historical maps don't need translation because it can be easely understables for all the world. In catalan vikipedia we use sometimes historical maps on english, spanish, italian, french, etc..., only the cyrillic alphabets or others as grec, sinhala etc... offer dificulties. In fact I'm unable to made the maps on correct english because I'm only catalan speaking, and I know only french and spanish (I know only a few words of english, portuguese and italian). I made some historical maps in english (i.e. see urartu) but I'm afraid that they are plenty of mistakes (in language).

88.12.146.224 22:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Lincher's talk page.

I believe that you should have another look at your assessment of stub class for this article. My opinion is that a start class is more fair to its authors (I only put 4-6 letters, so I cannot be counted among them).--FocalPoint 15:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The stub tag goes with the no sources added to the article which is a real problem on wikipedia. If references are added to go with the article or sources of the original material is given then start- or maybe B-class can be given. Lincher 15:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Sodium oxide Rhodes, Greece Communist Organization of Greece Vathy, Samos Cyclops Karpenisi Alfeios River Jocasta Ermoupoli Communist Party of Greece (Marxist-Leninist) Faliro Zelus Turbopause Banitsa (pastry) Kingdom of Greece Marxist-Leninist Communist Party of Greece Magna Graecia Pogoniani Thermosphere

Cleanup Saturday Mykines, Greece Alexandros Giotopoulos Merge Dia (disambiguation) Graecus Echion (mythology) Add Sources Nikos Beloyannis Rainbow Serpent December Wikify Petroto, Achaia Wireless energy transfer Dej Expand OTE Tower International Atomic Energy Agency Cuneiform script

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have Morea on my watchlist, and that led me to click on the Chronicle link, which I seemed to recall was a redirect to Morea. I briefly looked at it, but I'll see if I can add anything to it. Adam Bishop 21:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's the story. The person you mention probably had a good SQL script that ceased to work because MediaWiki database schema was changed. Of course, I could take a look at the script, find out what's wrong, etc., but I'm only moderately familiar with the schema in question, and I don't have a toolserver account (which is - as I gather - necessary to run SQL scripts against the database). However, there is a simple(r) solution: I've taken a look around and found a page dedicated exactly to this: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_queries. If you take a look there, you'll find a request virtually identical to yours, and it seems that the SQL solution is here. So, there are already queries that do the job, you'll just have to inquire at the Requests for queries page and ask for somebody to run the script against the Greek wiki and copy the result to the location of your choosing. Hope this helps... GregorB 18:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after the closure of Wikisign, I had problems with establishment of SQL scripts on my PC, so I haven't done any from that time on. Sorry. Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic 10:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you any idea why this article [2] is not included in this list [3] for further dicussion? I fear that it is not visible to a wide audience there could be a biased verdict. Unfortunately I have not got the expertise to fix it; that is if there is something wrong. Thanks, Georgeg 17:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and how do i get hold of the relevant administrator? Aftos o KRBN (A.K.A. Moutalos) mou tin exei pai3ei, mou exei salatosei 2-3 arthra sto parelthon.Georgeg 18:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your AfD recommendation. Unfortunately I do not know many of the intricacies of Greek football - being uninformed I decided it would be best if I decline to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achaia Football Clubs Association, which in any case looks like it is going to be kept anyway. Qwghlm 22:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, don't worry about it. I think it was fine that you alerted me to the other AfD, no need to apologise at all! Qwghlm 15:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good friends are all around! Dr Moshe 10:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To template για το cyprus-stub προτείνεται απο τουσ τουρκους να αλλάξει. "This Cyprus-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it." Ηδη προτείνεται να αλλάξει το link για την Κύπρο στο να ειναι link gia το αρθρο για τη γεωγραφία της Κυπρου, και επίσης κερδίζει ηδη έδαφος στο να φύγει η σημαια μας και να αντικατασταθει με τον χαρτη της Κυπρου. Ηδη προσπαθω εγώ μόνος μου αλλα και εγω ειμαι σε εξεταστικη περιοδο και δεν μπορω να πολυασχοληθω με τιν βικιπέδια αν μπορουσες να βοηθησεις... KRBN 14:27, 9 January 2007(UTC)

Πολύ κακές παρέες, όντως. Παρασύρετε αθώες κορασίδες στην ακολασία, στον επικίνδυνο κόσμο του Ίντερνετ. Θα προσπαθήσω όμως να δείξω χαρακτήρα και να μην παρασυρθώ από τα εντυπωσιακά λάβαρα των Φράγκων ιπποτών και τα οικόσημα των Παλατινών αρχόντων! Και φυσικά ευχαριστώ για … το τρίτο ποδαρικό!--Elena153 18:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ευχαριστώ πολύ για τις πληροφορίες! Για ό,τι χρειαστείς στην Αγγλική Wikipedia μη διστάσεις να επικοινωνήσεις μαζί μου.--Yannismarou 09:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Achaia FCA.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do, but I've just moved so I don't have access to my books or my own computer :) I have the edition by Juliam Eugene White, but there is an older one by Jean Alexandre Buchon on Google Books. Note that our article on Buchon (via Britannica) says "None of his publications can be described as thoroughly scholarly", and this one has the annoying habit of translating random Old French words into modern French in brackets. I'll try to get to White's edition as soon as I can. Adam Bishop 00:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have books and Internet! White's edition is based on one manuscript but he says he used Edmond Faral's "definitive edition" (I do not know whether this edition is still the definitive critical one). It's not exactly the same as Buchon but the differences are no greater than expected from variant Old French manuscripts (i.e. all the orthography is different!). Adam Bishop 15:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FocalPoint, this doesn't appear to be available online, through JSTOR or elsewhere. My university library has it though, back to 1959. Adam Bishop 08:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FocalPoint! Thank you for your vote on the Indo-Greek FARC! My understanding is that the subject of the presence of the Indo-Greeks in India, even if more than 2000 years old, still hurts some national sensitivities. Some users such as User:Devanampriya, who actually initiated this FARC through a request to an Indian administrator, have been very aggresive with any claims of Greek influence in India, and very aggressive with other users in the process. This combines with the fact that many things are indeed uncertain about the Indo-Greeks, hence the request by a few initially uninvolved users to have more references etc... to which I complied (rather intensely) during the last few weeks. In the process, I think the article has become even better than before, more balanced, and much much more referenced. In any case, I believe this is a fascinating subject, and that this Wikipedia article offers one of the best summary available anywhere on the Indo-Greeks. Thank you for your support! PHG 19:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have replied to your post on Indo-Greek discussion. Best regards--Sponsianus (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, just noticed you replied here. I have created the dump in my user space, but feel free to move it anywhere else (or copy and split it, the page may be a little too big). Creating the dump doesn't take much time, so I can do it whenever you want. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I have fixed all the interwiki links to Anna (name). --Pipep (talk) 20:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice contributions. Any chance of transferring the Greek Gazette information (spread across 3 issues by Kyriakos Metaxas) to the Anglo-Hellenic League article? The pictures are almost certainly free of copywrite and many are of hight quality. Politis (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)t[reply]

Dear Focal Point. Thanks a lot for your interest in the discussion. I have to caution you though that all my remarks constitute OR and they cannot therefore be used in any article. My transliteration and my translation are most certainly flawed since they are based on a rather sketchy copy. I will keep on looking for an authoritative publication of the inscription which may be properly used in wikipedia and post every bit of information to the relevant discussion pages. I am very happy to see that you are interested and I look forward to any feedback. Thanks again!--Giorgos Tzimas (talk) 08:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anything to help! :-) I got the full list (I think there were 9,000 hits) but am having a little trouble at splitting it... I was going to create a list for every starting letter, but I think there would be like 30 or 40 lists, some small and some long. I am trying to overcome my almost complete ignorance of Greek, though :-) -- ReyBrujo (talk) 22:15, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I noticed that you have a serious project to improve interwiki links in the Greek Wikipedia.

In the Hebrew Wikipedia we have such a project, and it has been pretty successful. I was looking for such projects in other Wikipedias, but found nothing. I started setting up similar projects in Wikipedias in Russian and Esperanto (i know these languages), and then i stumbled upon your project in the Greek Wikipedia. (I found a link to it at Wikipedia talk:Special:WithoutInterwiki.)

Unfortunately i don't know Greek, but i would like to know what is your way of working.

You can find a description of our way of working here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Interlanguage Links/Ideas from the Hebrew Wikipedia. I'll be glad to share our experiences!

One last thing: I added an interwiki link to your project from Wikipedia:WikiProject Interlanguage Links. This project in the English Wikipedia appears inactive (i am trying to revive it), but a link to your project may facilitate the communication between our projects. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please note that I have filed a request for appeal here. Comments welcome! Best regards PHG (talk) 16:16, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 23:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FocalPoint. Thank you so much for your comments at Arbcom! I truely appreciate! Best regards PHG (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:)))... PHG (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I backed out all your wood wool changes, and added a source to make it more clear that excelsior is a generic term; why did you think it was a brand? Dicklyon (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we don't need a content fork. Dicklyon (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a request for possible additional evidence at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PHG/Evidence. Cool Hand Luke 18:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'nuf said. Dicklyon (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Wood wool. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. If you really want to move or split content, you need a discussion and consensus. You tried that, and got no support. Give us your ownership of "wood wool" and work on improving the article on this topic at excelsior (wood wool). Dicklyon (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP, if you really want the article to move to wood wool, here's the procedure: use the "move" link to attempt to move it; it will fail, but will give you a link to the instructions for how to ask for a contested move; follow the instructions, starting a discussion section for it and registering it on the appropriate page, to attract a few people to comment; if there's a consensus to move it, an admin will then do so, making the existing one a redirect to the other. Dicklyon (talk) 16:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to wood wool. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. If instead of following the procedure described above, you insist on recreating your inappropriate content fork again as a way to circumvent the normal contested move process, I will request than an admin block you for persistent disruption of wikipedia. Dicklyon (talk) 16:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. You have made it in the past as well and I chose another path: To suggest a merger of the two articles; a proposal which is under discussion now. I find it difficult to understand why a different course of action from the one you are suggesting makes you think it is disruptive and you call this vandalism. I really find this sad. You are welcome to call any administrator to take a look at my actions and your actions of course. --FocalPoint (talk) 17:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To assist this, I point here to deletions of content by Dicklyon:

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&diff=262335435&oldid=262334671
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&diff=264956655&oldid=264936715
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&diff=266005255&oldid=266002509
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&diff=next&oldid=266079819
5. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&diff=266149808&oldid=266141240
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wood_wool&curid=6247691&diff=266332064&oldid=266288359

and also removal of a suggestion for merger:

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Excelsior_(wood_wool)&diff=264902703&oldid=263760235
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Excelsior_(wood_wool)&diff=266005479&oldid=265974147
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Excelsior_(wood_wool)&diff=next&oldid=266128674 (claiming finishing the merging without an actual merge taking place, just copying content from the article wood wool)

I suppose that we have a better picture here. --FocalPoint (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing a merger to new name to justify your inappropriate split is just a ruse. So stop it. I already merged all your new content into the orignal article when you proposed a merge, since you wouldn't put it there yourself. What you're seeking is simply called a move. Dicklyon (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested intervention, such as a temporary block, via the usual shortcut for vandalism. If they tell me this is not a satisfactory mechanism, I'll go to AN/I or whatever. Dicklyon (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. Please note that I will not be able to make any comment or replies for the next days due to other obligations. --FocalPoint (talk) 03:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you wouldn't, I started a move proposal for you. Your comments are welcome on Talk:Excelsior (wood wool). Dicklyon (talk) 05:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was on Kevin's advice. We can wait a few days for your comments if you're not available. I didn't mean to use your schedule inconvenience as an advantage. Dicklyon (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Focal Point! I think I am leaving. Thank you for your support! Cheers PHG (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above-linked Arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published.

PHG's mentorship and sourcing arrangement is both revised and extended; the full list of new conditions are available by clicking this link. Furthermore, the original topic ban on editing articles related to medieval or ancient history has been rescinded. PHG is prohibited from editing articles relating to the Mongol Empire, the Crusades, intersections between Crusader states and the Mongol Empire, and Hellenistic India—all broadly defined. This topic ban will last for a period of one year. He is permitted to make suggestions on talk pages, provided that he interacts with other editors in a civil fashion.

Any particular article may be added or removed from PHG's editing restriction at the discretion of his mentor; publicly logged to prevent confusion of the restriction's coverage. The mentor is encouraged to be responsive to feedback from editors in making and reconsidering such actions. Furthermore, the Committee noted that PHG has complied with the Committee's restrictions over the past ten months, and that PHG is encouraged to continue contributing to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects. PHG should be permitted and encouraged by other editors to write well-sourced suggestions on talkpages, to contribute free-content images to Wikimedia Commons, and to build trust with the community.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Daniel (talk) 22:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that excelsior is sometimes called wood wool is not in dispute, but in America the primary name is excelsior; leave well enough alone; se don't need a brit trying to force their terminology on us. Dicklyon (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you found it! Cheers PHG (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move war without discussion. Physchim62 (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you still wish to include the "Smoking Kills" image on Health effects of tobacco, I would support you with that. Johnfos (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FocalPoint, I wonder, could you positively identify the species of Tamarix in this image you uploaded back in '07? Your help would be greatly appreciated, if you can. Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,

You're probably right, I think, that there is probably a certain dominant species of Tamarix in the region. I'll start with the hints you gave me, and see if I can figure it out. Although it is doubtful it can be positively I.D.'d to a degree of certainty, I can probably narrow it down fairly well. Thanks for your help! Hamamelis (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Orestes (Greek mythology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Protonk (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FocalPoint, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Metaxourgio - a page you tagged - because: makes an useful redirect. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 16:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xeno^talk 14:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on all your work on the articles about my compatriot Richard Church on the English and Greek Wikipedias. You obviously have a great interest in the man, as do I.--Damac (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten it a bit, and removed the reference to the Septinsular Republic as I am not sure whether Kapodistrias was indeed inspired by this. If you know that for a fact, feel free to re-add it. Constantine ✍ 12:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You were previously involved. Please see.

Hi FocalPoint,

I do not have checkuser access now because I'm on the ombsbuman commission for the WMF. So, I suggest that you contact another person with checkuser access who could forward your request for information to the checkuser mailing list or a steward. FloNight♥♥♥♥

Hi FocalPoint, thanks, but what should I see on that page? (I can only see part of their article about Planudes.) Adam Bishop (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I see, I guess he's Turkish now. Adam Bishop (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the new article. Thanks. Span (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi. When you recently edited Greek identity card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see why you reverted my name change. There was no such thing as "Ottoman Serbia", "Ottoman Croatia", "Ottoman Bulgaria", etc. Ottoman Empire was divided into provinces that mostly were named after their capital cities and by usage of titles "Ottoman (add name of a country here)" we sending inaccurate message to the readers that some vassal Ottoman countries with these names existed. Title "History of Serbia during Ottoman administration" refers to "territory of present-day Serbia" in the time when it was governed by the Ottoman Empire. PANONIAN 16:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started discussion here already: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_Ottoman_Serbia PANONIAN 17:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With your reverts of my edits in naming of Ottoman histories of modern Central European countries. Why you doing this? There were no such territories as "Ottoman Serbia", "Ottoman Hungary", etc. I did not had time to discuss this issue further on talk page of Serbia-related article, but you now moving Wikipedia to heavy POV. PANONIAN 17:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

also please stop with Wiki stalking of my edits. It is not coincidence that you appear in same articles that I edit. PANONIAN 18:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the issue of naming of articles about Ottoman history of countries, you can have what ever name you want in Greek article (I will not touch any more either that one or other ones about non-Central European countries). However, please do not rename articles about Central European countries only to make case about name of Greek article stronger. Also, please do not move a single article out of category simply because you do not agree with name of category - you moved article Silistra Eyalet to category "Ottoman Bulgaria", but you left all other Bulgaria-related articles within category "History of Bulgaria during Ottoman administration" - you should either move all articles from the category either none of them. This what you done is a disruption of categorization. PANONIAN 18:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well, can you then explain how you appeared on pages Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander)‎ and Ottoman period in the history of Hungary just after my own edits? PANONIAN 19:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no further intentions of renaming "all categories of Ottoman-areas". I will only rename few Central or Southeastern European country categories into new name version, which would be "Ottoman period in the history of (country)". I will not touch either Greek-related articles/categories either articles/categories about Mediterranean countries. And you proved nothing in your post - the fact that you read some names in some sources does not mean that you understand meaning of these names. Or can you explain meaning of term "Ottoman Serbia"? Can you explain to which territory (with which borders) and to which time period term "Ottoman Serbia" would refer? No, you cannot - it is fictional term that you imposing into Wikipedia. The second problem is your propensity to aggressive revert-warring. Regarding articles Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander)‎ and Ottoman period in the history of Hungary it is irrelevant what kind of involvement you had there - the important thing is that you appeared there just after I edited these articles (no matter of "whose side you would support"). You have very few edits in the last month and you obviously came to these pages by tracking of my edits. PANONIAN 08:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have no intention of discussing name for all country categories. I think that we should not have same name for all country categories. In fact, there is no problem that we have different categories for different countries: "Ottoman period in the history of Serbia", "Ottoman Greece", "Ottoman period in Palestine‎", etc. My basic mistake was that I tried to rename all categories. Editors from each country should decide what category to pick for their country. I will rename only few categories to new name version, but I repeat: I will not touch any Greek-related category, so you can stop to track and revert my edits. PANONIAN 08:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to point put that I consider all your accusations and aggressive attitude as personal attacks and I am asking you to stop. I am not the one who renamed a great number of articles and categories - you did it on the 17th and 18th of March 2012. I only reverted some of your edits for which you consulted nobody. I am not trying to impose changes in Wikipedia. You did and you still try to, despite consensus [4]. I would appreciate if you would stop. --FocalPoint (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's an WP:AE discussion taking place that may concern you. Regards -- Director (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, are you actually reviewing this or just passing comments? Jezhotwells (talk) 08:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same question. If you are just passing comment let me know and I will finish the review for you. AIRcorn (talk) 04:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had to close your request to rename this category on procedural grounds. As mentioned in Wikipedia:Requested moves#When not to use this page, categories can only be renamed through the Wikipedia:Categories for discussion process. I'm sorry this wasn't caught earlier. Favonian (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.

We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi 19:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [email protected] your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at [email protected] and, second, email [email protected] along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Roger Paton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
Review. Volume 8, 1897.djvu/19]], the 1899 and 1921 Journal Folklore of the Folklore Society (*Paton*, WR, Esq., Ph.D., *Vathy*, *Samos*, Greece (per Messrs. Burnett & Reid, 12, Golden Square, org/details/greekanthology05newyuoft] (contains book IX of the Greek Anthology, σελ. XIII–XVI)]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carthagena, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Names of the Greeks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pausanias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Labrèche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page If Only (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drachmi Greek Democratic Movement Five Stars, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plan B and Golden Dawn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 16:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	Many thanks for adding the article in question. Hope you can do more :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 23:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Before anyone starts a translation in ... for example ... Greek, you should also provide what is already written in el wikipedia. It makes no sense for us to delete everything already writtern (good or bad) and replace it with a translation from en-wikiedia. --FocalPoint (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Would you be able to mark which ones we should and should not translated? Have emailed about the epilepsy article and stopped translating. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Imqaret may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/about-malta/category/maltese-culture-tradition/maltese-food/ Food and Drinks of Malta], Malta travel guide</ref>. It is very popular in Malta and it is sold in street markets, as well

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aspasios may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Aspasius)]], 1st-2nd cent. bC. C.π.Χ., περιπατητικός φιλόσοφος, δάσκαλος του Ερμίνου, σχολιαστής του

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borsko jezero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Richard Church (general) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - It takes a long time to write a series articles like this (in this case on lieutenant governors of Jersey). You have added a block of text which has not been wikified (i.e. you have not inserted links) and does not contain in line citations (as required by WP:SOURCE). Indeed you have merely lifted a block of text from the Dictionary of National Biography without any work on it at all. Please look at any other military biographies (e.g. Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington to name just one) and see the comparison. What is the point of wikipedia if editors are just going to copy and paste material from elsewhere and destroy the hard work of others? A little bit of thought please! Dormskirk (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All you have done is a cut and paste job. As previously explained, you need to use a variety of sources, in-line citations and proper wikilinks. There would be no point in wikipedia if everything was a cut and paste from public domain sources. Dormskirk (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – I have now re-written the text (so it is no longer a cut and paste job), wikified the text (i.e. added the links) and added a few in-line citations. I still find it surprising that you “fail to see” how expanding an article with a 30 second cut and paste job destroys the hard work of others who have taken the trouble to write original wikipedia articles from a diversity of sources. Dormskirk (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vlach "Roman Legion", you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ELAS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolaos Matussis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Richard Church Greek Light Infantry of the Duke of York 1813 by Denis Dighton.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Processed meat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IARC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandria Carmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carmania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FocalPoint.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FocalPoint, I have started a discussion over our Village pump with the aim of maintaining a public list of all editors who are granted access to any TWL resource. Your thoughts and opinions on the proposal are welcome:-) Regards, ∯WBG^converse

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karolina (painter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karolina (painter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —S Marshall T/C 01:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ALBA Graduate Business School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ALBA Graduate Business School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hero (Greek mythology). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 28#Hero (Greek mythology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]