User talk:Gerrit

Hello Gerrit and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
• Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Ook hallo! Ik heb me op Commons ook maar geregistreerd aangezien het een interessant concept is, sterker nog, heb het altijd dubieus gevonden dat er geen centrale image repository is. Nu hopen dat het project een beetje rap van de grond komt, hoe eerder hoe beter. -- Solitude 13:36, Sep 27, 2004 (UTC)

I don't know what editarticle.py is, but please don't use it again until the part is fixed where it breaks links across newlines. That's pretty bad. Knudde met een rietje, zeg maar. :-) JRM 13:54, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)

Sorry. The error is not in editarticle.py, but caused by my editor doing newlines, but I should have thought of it and prevented it by hand. I will next time. Gerritholl aka Topjaklont | Talk 14:06, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I hacked editarticle.py to replace all newlines not followed by a whitespace-only line with a single space character. Thank you for your feedback. Gerritholl aka Topjaklont | Talk 15:12, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I do not have anything that could be used right away. If you want to do such a map yourself, maybe Image:Nordic-countries.png would be usefull? I have done location maps for Finnish towns and municipalities, for example Image:Finnish map with Rovaniem highlighted.png. I guess something similar for Sweden and Norway would be best. -- Jniemenmaa 18:27, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

saw your comment on the change user name page, just wanted to hint that User:Gerrit seems to be free, its red. GOGETIT! :) Dan Koehl 22:09, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's not: "The user name you entered is already in use. Please choose a different name." Gerritholl aka Topjaklont | Talk 22:12, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me about that! By the way, are you left handed? =) Oven Fresh 22:08, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

No, I'm not left-handed. But I do have my watch on my right hand and I do like rtl-smiley's, especially to confuse irritating software converting smileys into pictures (-:

Warofdreams 11:31, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Would you, please, consider participation in the discussion about the naming of the articles on rivers? Certain users suggested that the word "River" should be omitted from the title. Currently the discussion is held at User talk:Markussep#River naming, but it will hopefully be moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers soon. Thank you for your attention.—Ëzhiki (erinaceus europeaus) 21:10, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

Because his number was 00 and I thought it would be cute. Feel free to change it if you don't like it. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 12:05, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

I'd already put a speedy tag on Summary element. Your Mgmbot added a second one. Maybe it still needs a bit of work? — P Ingerson (talk) 16:32, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My bot is user-controlled. Before a user decides an article should get a speedy tag, it shows the contents of the article to the user. The user then decides, and the bot then adds it if the user decides to do so. It is possible that between those two instants, someone else has added a speedy tag to the article. A solution might be to ensure the article is unchanged between the two instants. Gerrit ^CUTEDH 28 June 2005 09:37 (UTC)

Sorry you see it that way, but I those categories serve a great purpose. There is no racist intent in them; if anything, it is the exact opposite. --FuriousFreddy 17:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your edit. I've seen info about past meetups -- is there a calendar somewhere that we can watch for future meetups?

Thanks.

paul klenk

I don't know. I just felt like expanding the acronym. Gerrit ^CUTEDH 12:47, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to thank you for correcting my error in placing deletion notes on Hopkin Green Frog on that page's "talk" page. --tgeller 21:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Elbert Frank Cox, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Now, I'll be damned if I understand why you show up in the ga-0 category, and I, who uses the exact same template (and has the category showing up on my user page), do not. Any ideas?--Ag Foghlaim 21:52, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strange... no, I have no idea, sorry! Gerrit ^CUTEDH 22:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Might I ask why you wish to use a separate page only for transcluding a single line in a template? Radiant_>|< 15:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was messing up the community portal, because the entire article got included. Gerrit ^CUTEDH 15:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, but why are you including a single line, rather than including the LPMCOTW template, or simply copy/pasting the name of the current collaboration? Because that's what every other COTW does. Radiant_>|< 00:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerritholl. Thought you may want to know that the Dayton Peace Agreement is already on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 14. -- PFHLai 23:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have listed yourself in Category:Atheist Wikipedians. That said, you will probably be interested in my suggested featured article for December 25th: Omnipotence paradox. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is Christmas, although Raul654 has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-11-28 08:15

Beste allemaal Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org . Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 13:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geritt,Im takin a Debate course in which the subject we're supposed to be debating is the possibility of havin platonic relationships between guys & girls.I was lookin 4 the exact definition of platonic love 'n i read ur name under the "Quotes" :( 

The quotes section mentions only negative quotes. How can that be? Gerrit CUTEDH 18:48, 14 Jun 2005 ). I wonder if u have any idea abt these quotes,can u plz fill me in?? & if u dont mind can u give me ur personal opinion abt the it?

Gerrit, I can see from your userboxes that you love cats.

Would you be interested in joining the Wikipedia Cat Lovers' Committee?

If you want to join, you can add yourself to the members list and contact the committee founder, me, GeorgeMoney on my talk page.

Thank You. --GeorgeMoney^{Talk  Contribs} 22:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I restored Eureka as the coldest average place based on verifiable data. If you look at Environment Canada's weather data for Eureka and Resolute you can see that the daily average for the year is -19.7 for Eureka and -16.4 for Resolute. Also, Alert is -18. Oymyakon is difficult to research as this only gives the daily weather and most sites are only interested in the fact that it got down to -65, -68 or -71 depending on where you look. The problem is that it may be colder on average but it's not possible to say for sure. I did use the link to Oymyakon to check their summer temperatures and they seem to be a bit warmer than Eureka. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I was basing myself on Resolute, Nunavut, which quotes an average temperature of -23. Gerrit ^CUTEDH 08:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I edited that and never noticed it. Thanks for spotting it. Environment Canada are so helpful in providing free weather services. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:The German solution, here’s a a tip for you: {{User:Olve/Userboxes/Public transport}} (in lieu of the blanked template:User Public Transit). -- Olve 22:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it's taken me so long to answer, but I needed to ask a few people about it. None of us could figure out which language it might be in, but the majority said it must be northern Sami. None of us could understand the text though. Have you tried contacting User:Ante Aikio? He's a native speaker :) -Yupik 19:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the effort! --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 22:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you seem to like Backpacking and was wondering if you'd be interested in WikiProject Backpacking, a new project geared towards improving backpacking related articles on Wikipedia. If you'd like to join, show support by signing your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Backpacking and by helping to edit our beta project page at User:Leif902/WikiProject Backpacking. Thank you, and have a nice day! -Leif902 00:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(On a personal note, You have some awesome userboxes and we seem to share a few of the same interests, Backpacking and Physics especially)

You're invited to be a part of WikiProject Backpacking, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to backpacking. To accept this invitation, click here!

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 08:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

On 13 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sjisjka, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Andrew c ^[talk] 00:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going over the list of bots and noticed that Topjabot (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz ^talk 02:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Another contributor has tagged Harry van Bommel for copyright concerns, citing its source as [1]. It was listed according to procedure at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 January 22, but evidently you were not notified. I see you indicated in edit summary that you had permission to replicate this material. Please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for the requisite steps for verifying that. In brief, a GFDL release at the website, which is still marked © SP 1996-2006, would suffice. Otherwise, we can use an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication. If you have any questions about the verification procedure, please let me know at my talk page. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. You have a reply. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:46, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since the time for closure of this is well passed and there's no sign of verification, I have deleted the earlier version and replaced it with a new one, rewritten. Where possible, I have incorporated updates with attribution in edit summary. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, ok. I actually got a reply today that the linked page is very old, unlinked and unmaintained, and that they were surprised it still existed, and deleted theirs too. They recommended to use the Dutch Harry van Bommel article as a basis instead. --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 16:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here. [reply]

Hi, I've undone your change to Maelström (film), as 'In Popular Culture' is quite a common section on Wikipedia. Mebden (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think there are some guidelines regarding the In Popular Culture section, and I think this one was out of proportion. --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 12:06, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added to the discussion on that page. Mebden (talk) 13:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerrit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Gerrit, thanks for creating Naked marriage!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Ana (talk) 17:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Greetings! Since I found your name on the Notice board for autism-related topics, I figured you might be interested in the recently created WikiProject Autism. Muffinator (talk) 21:49, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Wikipedia ads	file info – #251

History of Somalia (1991–2006), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AHeneen (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me. --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 22:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HDRC. Since you had some involvement with the HDRC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerrit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerrit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gerrit. There is a discussion going on about using which type of treemap for 2016 United States presidential election in each state articles. Please join the discussion, so the dispute can be resolved. Thank you. Ali 03:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bengt Pohjanen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J04n(talk page) 17:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerrit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 March 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Ouagadougou attack, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:18, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I invited you to the AfD even though you'd already said you challenged the speedy deletion. However, I also asked you to review the article, its content, and its sourcing. There are lots of bad citations and lots of text unrelated to the Swiss Referendum in the current version of the article. Recently some editors have found better sources by googling the German term for the proposition, and I'm now hopeful that we may be able to get a decent article from them. I hope you'll join in that effort. I also would ask you again to review the current text and sources, which you appear to be endorsing at the AfD, and which are highly questionable, for reasons that have been enumerated on the article talk page. At any rate, thanks for joining and I hope we can get many more editors to work on this. SPECIFICO talk 17:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gerrit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article FairBnB has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON. Sources are about the company's launch, and there is not enough significant coverage about the company's merits to warrant a page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 14:26, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not both the Forbes and the taz article count as significant, independent, reliable, and secondary, thus meeting the notability for organisations and companies? Does not the fact that the launch of an organisation is causing international significant press coverage (there are Italian and Spanish language sources too) evidence of notability? I don't see anything on organisations in the TOOSOON essay either (and is this just an essay or enwiki policy?). I am considering to challenge this proposed deletion (would it in this case go to AfD? I know AfD and Speedy deletion but I'm new to "Proposed deletion"). --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 16:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerrit! You created a thread called Notability for a new organisation at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overhang seat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Die Linke. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]