User talk:Gumbi93

Hi Gumbi93! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wells of Bajan. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wells of Baján. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wells of Baján, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gumbi93/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Gumbi93/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Discuss 22:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Citizens' Movement (Mexico), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Action Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaime Rodríguez Calderón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galeana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :-) I reverted your profile image change because one can hardly make out his face on the World Cup 2018 picture. I wanted to add it to the "International career" section instead but a third image seems to make the section difficult to read… Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Beatriz Gutiérrez Müller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article has been already reviewed and created, here is the existing page on english Wikipedia Beatriz Gutiérrez Müller.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original page for Beatriz Gutiérrez Müller looks awfully similar to the first draft I submitted. Oh well.Gumbi93 (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican legislative election, 2021, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olga Sánchez Cordero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretary of the Interior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carlos Vela you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlos Vela you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Carlos Vela for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberto de la Rosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texcoco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Presidency of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Carlos Vela, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Carlos Vela, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enrique Peña Nieto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carte blanche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricardo Ferretti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States men's national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You mind giving an example? It's rather difficult to tell what you are referring to when you accuse without specifying. There is a reason why the "Citation needed" template exists. At least, propose on deleting the template if it does not satisfy what I have contributed.Gumbi93 (talk) 14:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just noticed your recent edit to the Hirving Lozano article, which generally looks really good. I think a couple of the sources will need to be replaced though, as they wouldn't fit the criteria as reliable sources:

• totalfootballanalysis.com: The author is "an American college student [and] football fanatic"
• tribalfootball.com: The website is described as "fan driven"

In both cases, no journalistic credentials are required for writers on these websites and there is no evidence of editorial control. They would therefore be covered by the self-published section of the policy, which is made even more explicit for BLPs.

This is just a heads up, I'm not intending to revert.. Thanks, Nzd (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've just given it a little cleanup and removed those two sources. Hope that's OK. Nzd (talk) 07:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I'm currently looking for other sources that discuss Lozano's style of play. Thanks! Gumbi93 (talk) 14:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Javier Hernández you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Javier Hernández you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Javier Hernández for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:42, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gumbi93. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Chivas logo I added has 12 stars across the bottom. The logo with the star at the top was last used in Clausura 2017-18. Since Apertura 2018-19 they've been using this logo. -Chlorineer (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrés Guardado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Héctor Moreno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ACL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uriel Antuna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gumbi93. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maya train".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrés Guardado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rodolfo Cota have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GiantSnowman 16:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luis Alfonso Rodríguez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alejandro Zendejas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wondering why my edit on Jairo González was reverted. Not a problem at all. It is a fairly standard edit that I do on some pages. Red Director (talk) 18:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If unsourced content has been challenged and removed, please do not re-add it without including reliable sources to verify the information. GiantSnowman 16:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rodolfo Cota, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop re-adding unsourced content. Please include a reference. GiantSnowman 16:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone is doing the disruptive editing, it is you considering that I have already listed the citations for related article within the main body. As I have said before, the "Citation Needed" template exists so there is no reason to remove it entirely. Gumbi93 (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Putting the honours aside for one minute - and I invite you to please directly cite them ASAP - why are you changing the short description and why are you removing the accessdate from the reference? GiantSnowman 16:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Jonathan dos Santos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 FIFA World Cup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]