User talk:Hirolovesswords

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Hirolovesswords (talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, I am working to address your concerns regarding the advert and peacock templates you added to Mark Roosevelt's page on May 5, 2016. May you cite the passage(s) that warrant the templates so that I can fix them? Thank you so much. Johnnie Stringfellow (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Richard H. Demers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 02:09, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Mara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josh Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry G. Lapham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boston Braves. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jared Remy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Remy (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 02:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CBSWH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CNNWH has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 07:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Tobin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blizzard of 1978. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You keep changing the biography of Nancy Newman. Unfortunately there are several errors in that biography, including an error in the article by Ken McKee. Nancy has asked me to change her biography since it is incorrect to her current YES Network biography, which I did. I ask that you please stop changing it back to it's incorrect version. Lyndsayalarice (talk) 21:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article from Ken McKee is incorrect, as Newman is not her maiden name. However, that's not important. If you would like to keep the biography as is, please just simply remove any reference to the anchor name Nancy used in Canada, for privacy reasons. I hope you can understand. Lyndsayalarice (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirolovesswords. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Edward A. Flynn page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James R. Lawton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beacon Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pan American World Airways, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated an article of yours for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Hotel Manger. SL93 (talk) 03:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hotel Manger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Hotel Manger once used a steam locomotive to heat the building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hotel Manger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hotel Manger), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 00:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, if you do any more add them to List of hotels in the United States, cheers. You're welcome to join the Wikipedia:50,000 Challenge too!♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your hook received 9,105 views. Awesome. SL93 (talk) 06:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marion L. Starkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion L. Starkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Daniel H. Coakley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Daniel H. Coakley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Daniel H. Coakley was impeached after he secured a pardon for mobster Raymond L. S. Patriarca? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Daniel H. Coakley. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Daniel H. Coakley), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 00:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you nominated Jeffrey McCormick for deletion based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff McCormick. The article was not really deleted, it was redirected to Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 2014. I have removed your nomination and redirected it to that article. My best to you... reddogsix (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- I am the one who put the page as its own entry. This page, from what I can see, meets notability guidelines and therefore should not be a redirect. Open to discussion. --Starshine60 (talk) 01:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirolovesswords. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one notified you but your list is up for deletion as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mayors of Wildwood, New Jersey. There is about a dozen mayor lists up for deletion. None of the contributors have been notified, so maybe you can spread the word. --RAN (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lud Wray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Dietz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Dudley Daly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army War College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al Pierotti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revere High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hirolovesswords, I have nominated List of current ACC football announcers, which you created, for deletion. Please see the discussion here. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hirolovesswords. Just so that you know, if you want to move a page to a new name and create a disambiguation page in its wake, as you did with Bob Cutler, you should use the Move Page feature located at the top of the article rather than simply copying and pasting from the old page to the new one. If you use the move page feature, it will automatically create the redirect, which you can then change as a target to your newly-created disambiguation page. The reason you must use the Move Page feature is that attribution of the edit history is required for copyright. In other words, the edits that you built upon on the old page must be attributed correctly to the users who provided them, as this is required by Wikipedia’s copyright license. What you did by copying and pasting them makes its look like you contributed all of the content when you started the article, when in fact you kept some material contributed by others, which means that it is misattributed and thus the copyright permissions have been violated.

I have corrected the problem with Cutler, so there is no need to do anything now, but please keep this in mind for the future. Thanks. Canadian Paul 19:00, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of current ACC basketball announcers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current ACC basketball announcers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Sailor 16:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you add elections to the Massachusetts elections template(s), please also add them to List of elections in Massachusetts. Thanks!—GoldRingChip 13:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Again, can you also please add them to List of elections in Massachusetts? Thanks. —GoldRingChip 14:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Natalie Jacobson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Elizabeth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leo J. Sullivan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Governor John Volpe sought Boston Police Commissioner Leo J. Sullivan's removal after Biography of a Bookie Joint showed officers visiting an illegal gambling parlor? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Leo J. Sullivan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Biography of a Bookie Joint, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Governor John Volpe sought Boston Police Commissioner Leo J. Sullivan's removal after Biography of a Bookie Joint showed officers visiting an illegal gambling parlor? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Biography of a Bookie Joint), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henry S. Russell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Henry S. Russell, commander of the 5th Regiment Massachusetts Colored Volunteer Cavalry, later served as the first solo commissioner of the Boston Fire Department? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry S. Russell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Henry S. Russell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CNNWH has been nominated for merging with Template:White House press corps. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CBSWH has been nominated for merging with Template:White House press corps. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 11:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al McClellan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of Masonic buildings in the United States —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doncram (talk) 17:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you contributed to similar List of Odd Fellows buildings where the same question may apply. Your participation would be welcomed. --Doncram (talk) 17:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for May: Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenny Dell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Dell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Sullivan Alioto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Sullivan Alioto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wizardjester (talk · contribs)
  • User:Wizardjester (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not sure what else is required. I have attempted to rectify any problems but would need specific items that need to be changed. I have attempted to cite sources using footnotes (references) "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you." Perhaps my age (82) is responsible so I require a helping hand.

Wizardjester (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, would you be able to look over one of your creations, John Ahlers, and see if you can add references? Thanks for your help, Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirolovesswords. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Ahlers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 20:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Foley Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Foley Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MonctonCoach has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:DeMoulas Market Basket, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 22:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why exactly has this entry been selected for deletion? SENIRAM (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		Red Link Removal Barnstar
		Thank you for creating articles on CFL head coaches and GMs. I was pleasantly surprised to learn today that five people on my list to be made (2 Head coaches and 3 GMs) have already been made by you! Keep up the good work. :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mike Kelly (gridiron football); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
I mean, really? Edit-warring to shoehorn in a potential BLPVIO? Take it to talk, get a consensus of editors who agree with your assessment and there you have it. But as you must know better than me, BLPs always verge towards caution. ——SN54129 19:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hirolovesswords reported by User:Serial Number 54129 (Result: ). Thank you. ——SN54129 20:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SN54129 20:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Providence Public School District superintendents has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you or this well done article. Stretchrunner (talk) 12:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Town managers of Barnstable, Massachusetts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence DiCara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence DiCara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LovelyLillith (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Hirolovesswords--Linda McMahon chairs a number of organizations that collect and disburse dark money to causes and events designed to support President Trump. You and others seem to be resistant to stating this with regard to Linda McMahon's bio, even though this is substantiated by the footnoted article & blogpost (by a note legal scholar re election law, who is himself politically conservative). I'm new to Wikipedia editing, so there's a good chance that I don't understand the appropriate protocols. Scraigyonetwo (talk) 16:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul McNally (basketball coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBIO. No reliable sources, no claims of notability. Just because he coached five games for Boston College does not make him notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul McNally (astronomer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mike Kerrigan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirolovesswords. Thomas J. Hannon, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas J. Hannon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas J. Hannon succeeded in having a playground in his neighborhood named after his mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas J. Hannon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas J. Hannon), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William J. Flynn (athletic director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newark.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Jick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Jick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Lucey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Lucey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 13:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Underwood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies exclusively on primary source and webpage profile. Found many others sharing the name, including a professor and a fictional character, but no significant coverage of this individual. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Underwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Underwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arnie Fielkow, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doug Mackie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 9 § Building collapses on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. + Qwerfjkltalk 21:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John E. Walsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regis College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hirolovesswords!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of NHL Entry Draft broadcasters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NHL Entry Draft broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of College World Series broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of College World Series broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of MLS Cup broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MLS Cup broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 06:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of New England Revolution broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New England Revolution broadcasters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of CFL on TSN commentators has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of CFL on TSN commentators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of CFL on TSN commentators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 02:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of Canadian Football League broadcasters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Montreal Expos broadcasters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CFCF and Richard Griffin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]