User talk:HyeSK

Hi HyeSK! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian.". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 25 May 2016. 

The request for formal mediation concerning Listing spellings of Armenian items in Western and Eastern Armenian., to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. 

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duduk has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 22:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1.) I'm Armenian 2.) The official name is Duduk, everyone calls it a Duduk, Armenians call it a Duduk. Why change the name to Tsiranapogh? Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The official name is not duduk. The official name is tsiranapogh. Duduk is only used as it's more common, especially on the world stage. My apologies for labeling you without asking. That's not my style. G'nerek. HyeSK (talk) 23:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK[reply]

You can post it in the talk page and see what others have to say. The reason i reverted is because everyone knows it as the Duduk. You can add to it "also known as the tsiranapokh." http://www.unesco.org/culture/intangible-heritage/03eur_uk.htm Ninetoyadome (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Instead I wrote it as "also known as the duduk". UNESCO has a gift of misrepresenting items. There is an Armenian monastery set to be added to the list and they are calling it a Byzantine monastery. HyeSK (talk) 13:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duduk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you edit Armenia-Azerbaijan related articles, the following info might be helpful. Regards, Grandmaster 15:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Duduk has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 19:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not constructive? Rather than just making a change, give a reason. I reverted to the instrument's true name. HyeSK (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Duduk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HyeSK reported by User:Class455fan1 (Result: ). Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edit warring complaint about Duduk has been closed with a warning to you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Armenian Genocide for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yerevan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- LouisAragon (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yerevan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 16:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HyeSK reported by User:Class455fan1 (Result: ). Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 16:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The closed report can now be seen at this link. It's not easy for an outsider to see what this dispute is about, but it does appear that you have a different opinion from most others about Western Armenian versus Eastern Armenian spellings. You tried taking this to mediation some time ago, but the mediation was not successful. If you continue to revert about this, prior to getting a real talk page consensus, administrators may decide that you are indeed edit warring. I have not noticed anyone actually agreeing with you on this. I see you've also been in a dispute about Duduk where you incorrectly referred to another editor's change as vandalism. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is simply not true. 2 people are against me, and 1 is with me. It's a tied battle.

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Hasmik Karapetyan. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Երևանցի ^talk 17:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See this ANI link. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this ANI thread I'm warning you against any further edits on the topic of Western Armenian. For example, changing article leads to insist that a Western Armenian spelling should be included. In the past you have done this at Yerevan and at Gumri. If you intend to make this change again, you must have a prior talk page consensus in your favor or you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HyeSK. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HyeSK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did NOT create another account. This is the ONLY account I have on Wikipedia, period.

Decline reason:

The technical evidence indicates otherwise. If you make a new unblock request, please explain how the two accounts could technically appear to be the same. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.