User talk:I love entei

• Archive 1
• Archive 2

Hello, if you need to leave a message, I ask of only two things.

• Remember to sign your message. Failure to do so, may result in no response. You can sign messages by typing in (~~~~)

• Leave new messages at the bottom of this page.

(I love entei (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Was due to me trying to direct the English to the American spelling, and doing the spelling the same way twice. Please let me know if not fixed, now. SBHarris 04:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Swivel Sweeper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 15:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Perfection Vacuum Cleaner, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Perfection Vacuum Cleaner. WODUP 17:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you place the speedy deletion notice on the Joan Perez de Lazarraga article? Lazarraga is a major figure in the history of Basque literature, as is stated in the article.  Madler  04:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't answered my question. Why did you put the tag on the article?  Madler  04:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you tagged it because it was a poor article, lacked information, and had broken links, why was the reason for the tag stated as being that the article lacked any indication of the importance of the topic?  Madler  04:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the third sentence? I'll quote it for you: "As a writer, he was one of the only Renaissance authors in Basque-language literature, together with Bernard Etxepare." How about the sixth sentence? "It is one of the only Basque-language texts which has reached us from the 16th century, and the oldest from the southern Basque Country." This doesn't give you an indication of the importance of the subject? The reason I'm asking is because what you did looks pretty malicious, like a kind of vandalism, and I'm considering reporting you if you can't explain why those two sentences were not enough to communicate to you the importance of the subject. If I hadn't been around to catch you on this, the article might've been deleted.  Madler  04:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black & Decker Pivot Vacuum. Thank you. Pharmboy (talk) 13:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently renamed several pages to capitalize words that, according to Wikipedia naming conventions and the manual of style, should not be capitalized. I have moved back the following pages that you had renamed:

• Rose Gold -> Rose gold
• Racing Game -> Racing game
• Civil Air Ensign -> Civil air ensign

Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Lowercase second and subsequent words in titles, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Article titles for clarification on capital letters in article titles. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 14:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PinkXjellocreature (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

hi, lollipop-3 asked me to give you this smile and say hi

Unfortunately, her talk page has been protected, so you can leave her messages on my page if you need to!

*cough* catch my drift?PinkXjellocreature (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Hi. 70.231.150.141 (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it wasn't me who placed the speedy delete tag (that's done automatically), but I did put the notification here so you would come back to this image. I have also placed {{hangon}} on the image page for you. You might want to take a look at File talk:Freedom Tower New.jpg to see more info about an onging discussion. Astronaut (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Cidco MailStation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cidco MailStation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 21:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Landel MailBug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landel MailBug (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 07:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article WebFetch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article establish notability, and I couldn’t find any sources that would establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 07:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WebFetch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebFetch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]