User talk:InnocuousPseudonym

Welcome!

Hello, InnocuousPseudonym, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Your edits to Perotin so far have been quite good. I definitely agree that calling his music proto-minimalist is problematic. I edit a lot of early music articles, and am an administrator, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Mak (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your amazing edits to the Betty Carter article :) Gareth E Kegg 21:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, I created Open the Door (song), I'm sure you'll be able to add to it :) Gareth E Kegg 11:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's brilliant. http://youtube.com/watch?v=tBgfKgDqzjs Gareth E Kegg 08:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos to you for your work on the Whitman College article. The change was much needed! Jacobko 21:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As seen at Viol, you're a master wikificator! Badagnani 00:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're overstating the case that Marais was among the first to write virtuosic solo literature. This certainly goes back at least to the "division" music and natural trumpet music of the 16th century and maybe back to the lute solos of the 15th. Badagnani 01:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid doing [[Right|rights]] as you did in Qatar, you can do [[right]]s. It should save you some headaches! Happy editing! --Matt 03:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JuliusKniplStrip.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have contributed as an editor to the List of recordings preserved in the United States National Recording Registry. It is undergoing an overhaul according to the recent peer review that generated the following feedback. In addition to the changes there, it is undergoing stylistic changes that prevail at lists that have been selected as featured lists. Conversion to wikitable format began with 2002 today because most articles that reach featured list status are in this format. Feel free to convert additional years, add more columns, or add further details. Hopefully many of the editors who have helped edit this page to its pre review state will help improve it to a featured list quality level. I may not return to make further edits until next week. TonyTheTiger 21:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I wasn't sure what was up. Wahkeenah 03:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes...JB did record for Dade Records (owned by Henry Stone). (NOTE: I have to make a correction, as I've put "Dash Records" in the infobox). See the last paragraph under "The Beginnings of The Flames" and footnote 18 for details about the recording.

Brown and his band recorded (Do the) Mashed Potato after Syd Nathan refused to let him record the song. So, as it goes, Brown contacted Henry Stone and asked for help in recording the song. "Mash Potatoes" was recorded under the name "Nat Kendrick & the Swans." Nat Kendrick was Brown's drummer back then, and the group "The Swans" was really The Flames. Although this site mentions the real name of Brown's backing group as "The J.B.'s," I don't think the group had yet changed its name from The Flames, if I have the history correct.This information can be found at http://www.henrystonemusic.com/store/kendrick.htm.

I happened upon this information when I came across an article (interview) about troubles JB had with Syd Nathan not letting him record anything with his group (The Flames), and the article mentioned Henry Stone as the person who helped him get this single on the market. Brown also talked about Henry Stone helping him (in a mentoring role) for "Please, Please, Please." This reference comes from a video clip of an interview with Larry King, which is also in the article (see footnote 19). Now, a new entry needs to be created for "Dash Records."

After re-reading your message, maybe limit the labels to those for which JB did significant recordings? As for Dade Records, JB did other, minor records. So, I'll remove the Dade reference from the infobox since no article can be wikilinked to the label's name, and leave the reference in the main article.

What I was trying to do is to get the main events of JB's life included in the article to at least a point where the article can be reviewed as a featured candidate for one or more portals (besides, class is now in session, and I won't have much more time to work on the article if classload becomes heavy). From what I can see, the article lacks info about JB's politics (MLK, Humphrey and Nixon and a blurb about his view of economics of the AA community) philanthropy/civic activities in his hometown (Thanksgiving turkey and Christmas toy giveaways), and something about the funeral/memorial services (2 public and a private service - links to one of the public memorial services (James Brown Arena) and and private service are included in the footnotes). These paragraphs need not be long, as the article is already long (~77K). I have already drafted a paragraph about his civic activities in Augusta, GA, but haven't had time to put something together about politics or the funeral.

One other thing -- this article may need to be broken up into subsections, particularly the section for the James Brown Revue. Maybe, this section can be summarized (with a picture of the cape), with a link to a subarticle for the Revue. Let me know what you think about this.

I hope I've answered your question. lwalt 04:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes...the top ten singles list and the chronological LP collections are redundant, since a fuller list is already available. Maybe this information can be moved to the subarticle for JB's discography and can represent his best of his charted records as a summary. The the notable albums and singles, on the other hand, can be left in the article, since the list is much shorter. Besides, the albums and singles on the "notable" list are notable for being the best of Rolling Stone's 500 greatest.

About the James Brown Revue - this section now seems self-contained. If this section is separated from the main article, an introduction to this material needs to be included. I'm pretty sure that, when this article goes up for a feature article review, someone else may point this out. But, for right now, I'll leave this section in the main JB article.

BTW, as you can see, I removed the reference to "Dade" from the infobox, and I'll let the reference stand in the main text. lwalt 06:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ColdSweat45.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, I don't recall uploading an image by this title. If I did, and forgot to tag it properly as a fair use single/album cover, sorry for the mistake. InnocuousPseudonym 16:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After getting fed up with the constant vandalism of the article, I requested semi-protection to slow down some of these errant changes. You'll notice a lock on the James Brown article to prevent certain users from fooling around with blanking, adding garbage to or deleting sections from the article. lwalt 10:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An obvious solution (which dodges the question): Create Category:The James Brown Orchestra members. Odum was definitely a member of that.--Mike Selinker 13:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About that Criterion Collection category, you may want to look here, as it's likely to get deleted right quick. Doctor Sunshine talk 21:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note ImmocuousPseudonym. No apologies are necessary. Having seen this category deleted three different times my main concern is to try and keep you (or any editor) from putting in a lot of work only to see it eradicated as I know how frustrating that can be. The CC is a wonderful treat for anyone who loves film and I am glad that you like them. Take care and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 21:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you want me to revert your edits adding the criterion collection category? It takes a lot less time with the rollback button. - Bobet 21:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no problem, it's all done now. - Bobet 21:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SuperBadAlbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FunkyDrummer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your work on List of albums titled Greatest Hits. I noticed that you redirected Greatest Hits Volume One (and several variants) to Greatest hits rather than to List of albums.... I think it would be more appropriate to redirect to the list, because if someone searches specifically for "volume one," they are more likely to be looking for information on a particular album. If you don't object to this, I'd like to change these redirects. Thanks for your work. —taestell 18:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I've redirected those pages. —taestell 18:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AsSeenOnTV.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 14:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done on the duet categories. I considered categorizing duet albums a while ago, but this is far more complete.

I suppose there's a lot more population to be done for vocal duets... Would any song with the vocals of a second singer added to an existing recording after the fact count as a duet? –Unint 03:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current prevailing attitude at CfD seriously disfavors categories reliant on any degree of subjectivity whatsoever. Also, the prevailing attitude of random editors in general suggests... start by assuming that some person is going to interpret the category as broadly as possible.

I'm not personally familiar with the oldies, but I do have similar concerns to yours. If the overdubbing is trivial to that extent... is there any other qualifying characteristic? Are there enough examples to warrant a subcategory for overdubs? (I'll offer Slipping Away as another candidate.) –Unint 03:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The practice being as profuse as you describe it, I'm still thinking about intent. It seems to defeat the purpose, for example, to put everything on Duets (Frank Sinatra album) into the top-level category, as the whole point of the album seems to be that the songs are far better known as solo performances. On the other hand, simply subcategorizing overdubs would place "In Private" in the top-level category, though its duet version (Pet Shop Boys and Elton John) was an obscure non-album track.

In any case, I like "solo recordings later overdubbed as duets" (as they were first solo), although it sounds a bit odd to have temporal qualifications like "later" in categories. Would "songs overdubbed as duets" be enough qualification? (by implication, they were not originally duets...)

Also, for "Slipping Away", the relevant part is actually further down ("French and Spanish language versions"). I would not say, however, that most remixes could be described as "duets" by any stretch of the imagination. –Unint 22:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One problem, which I just seem to have been unsuccessful in changing, is that what used to be a "Songs by composer" category is now "Songs by songwriter" and there is a gross non-parallelism here; lyricists have their own supercategory and those who write music do not. I really do not feel happy about this situation, and until we can find some way to fix it, I hesitate to do what you suggested. I could not even get people to discuss this problem; instead there got to be a hang-up on the question of whether "musicwriter" is a legitimate word (I had suggested that it was better than "composer" for popular music writers, since "composer" to me suggests classical music. All the comments seemed to be on that point, rather than on the necessity to reverse the unfortunate folding of musicwriters into songwriters!)

See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 18#Category:Songs by songwriter -- BRG 13:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_May_30#Category:Songs_by_composer and confirm that I am reporting your comment correctly. I need all the help I can get. -- BRG 14:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've really got my work cut out with these rationales, I thought that the fair use tag was enough...It's clear that it's for an album! I've recieved no feedback on wether the tag will be lifted, and I don't know the appeals process, they often make it so oblieque for people unfamiliar with their bizzare system. In a worst case scenario, couldn't we just upload them again with loads of info? Thanks for messaging the beta, Don't let the Wikinazis grind you down... By the way, Betty Carter is def the best article on a jazz vocalist, it's a shame that she's the least known! Gareth E Kegg 01:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your response to Gareth:

If you have an image deleted for lack of rationale, the best process would be to write the rationale and contact the deleting admin who can undelete the image and add the rationale. ~ BigrTex 21:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BettyCarterLiveattheVillageVanguard.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your message on BetacommandBot's talk page:

• User:ESkog/Rationales has at least one link to an exemplary album cover rationale.
• Wikipedia talk:Fair use rationale guideline#Album covers, movie posters, book covers has more discussion on album cover rationales, including a couple of examples that people are using. It is not clear if these are fully acceptable or not.

Hope this helps. ~ BigrTex 21:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that. ~ BigrTex 21:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe that the rationale I put up on Image:Dottie West-Special Delivery.jpg should suffice for now. There is some question in my mind whether album covers whose articles do not specifically address the cover with 'critical commentary' will continue to be allowed. Technically (according to Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images) they are not allowed, but currently they obviously are being allowed and it will take a lot of time and effort to change that status quo. ~ BigrTex 21:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to pass it along to anyone, with some caveats:

1. It really only works for album covers on the album page, not elsewhere (artist page, discographies, etc)
2. It is best if it links to both the album page and the artist page so that if it gets lost, someone can put it back where it belongs
3. It needs to point to the real source - or say something about how the source doesn't matter because the copyright is held by the artist/record company
4. I can't guarantee that it will suffice now or in the future.

~ BigrTex 22:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry for the late reply. I got your point, and I agree with you. By the way, I've just created a disambiguation page for it, you might want to take a look and see what you think of it. Funk Junkie 19:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Tell me about it, I can't stand all this BetacommandBot any more, but I can't afford being blocked. Hope this whole mess gets fixed soon, huh? Funk Junkie 20:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to do those as you suggested, but I'm sure there are a _lot_ I haven't found. If you see any, just put in the supercategory references. -- BRG 14:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_May_30 the decision was to permit recreating the Category:Songs by composer category, so I have done that. And currently there are a fair number (61 as I write this) of [[Category:Songs with music by...]] entries in there. -- BRG 19:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to you for the recent editor review that you've posted about my contributions to Wikipedia. Lwalt ^{(talk ☯ contribs)} 13:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it Webbs and not Webb? Corvus cornix 22:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Saw it in Recent changes.  :) Corvus cornix 22:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was going to put "fair use" rationales on all the P-Funk album covers today, but I see that you beat me to it. Nice looking out. Thanks! — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 17:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you figure out what this user is referring to as to sources? I believe that the person is referring to the lack of sources mostly in the Music career section, which was written before I got involved in editing the JB article.The conversation about this issue can be found here and here. Note the tag that the user placed on the JB article. →Lwalt ^♦ talk 21:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the rationale for deleting all the other "E" categories, but I feel they just lumped Duke in there, without even looking at it. I bet "F" will be up next week... It's sheer snobbery, as I tried to say in reference to Schubert. Gareth E Kegg 10:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no problem, I realized I could prolong things with my vote and i felt it was the right vote to make. As it so happens, there is a discussion at the bottom of the discussion page at WP:ALBUMS I think you might be interested in. Your opinion would be greatly appreciated there. (Mind meal 21:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:VareseSarabande.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've been working on it in my spare time, and I figured it was time to unleash it. :-) — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 05:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a moment to spare, your opinion would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Folk-blues musicians. Thank you. (Mind meal 08:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi! Thanks for welcome! Sorry for bad english, I'm Italian! Are there problems with the image? I uploaded in Common, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:JamesBrown.jpg from http://www.flickr.com/photos/bootbearwdc/335683040/ --Melancholyblues 17:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the wikifying on his page? His books need a page of their own, hence the wikifying.Zigzig20s 11:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The James Brown article has been been nominated as a candidate for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive by Pascal.Tesson on August 13, 2007. The goal for this drive is to improve the article to featured status in time before the first anniversary of James Brown's death. If you're interested, a link has been provided on the James Brown talk page to vote on improving the article. To have your vote count, please visit the visit Article Creation and Improvement Drive page for the James Brown article by August 20. At this time, two votes have been recorded for improving the article; at least four votes are needed to proceed with the project.

Many thanks for your help. →Lwalt ^♦ talk 11:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really like your proposal, though I don't want to get into a fight over it. I've suggested a compromise (I would actually prefer keeping it as it is, but I hope we can agree on my compromise) on the talk page. Note that whatever we fo for "Template:Pop song 2" we should also do for "Template:Pop song 1" as well. -- BRG 17:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 05:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to say thank you very much for all your hard work with Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of notable songs. Your contributions are much appreciated. Thanks again. --Rocket000 18:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Follow the Bouncing Ball, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Follow the Bouncing Ball is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Follow the Bouncing Ball, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 04:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheDuplexPlanet.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheDraughtsmansContractDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing that. Would it be a good idea to delete Category: Tundra Press and Category: Tundra Press titles? As the only editor on them (before your redirects) I can tag them with {{db-self}} and get them speedied. I think this would be preferable to having a redirect. (Emperor 14:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]

OK nominated for speedy deletion. Thanks for the comments - my edits have largely been focused on getting the categories straight and getting things sorted out to the right ones so I am slightly off most people's radars ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emperor (talk • contribs) 17:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nubian Nut, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nubian Nut. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 23:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 7th August "The Lady is a Tramp" was moved to "This Lady Is a Tramp", after little discussion by User:Yip1982. What do you think? They say it is the original title, yet the ibdb disagrees, [1] as do the many readings by Frank/Tony/Mel/Sammy and Buddy Greco, and Ella, who should be the one using "This" if anyone... Gareth E Kegg 16:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Why Don't You & I; how much more can we do to clean it up? Expand maybe, but clean up? Please review. IP4240207xx 22:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you know, I don't like to remove tags that other editors put in to an article that I have created, or done lots of work on. I have gotten yelled at before. Thanks...IP4240207xx 05:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The most detailed Sinatra article in a week...My Kind of Town (Sinatra song) Gareth E Kegg 17:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. My goal was to clean up some practically empty categories. I never expected that the P-Funk category would be considered for deletion. Had I known that somebody would propose that, I wouldn't have started this at all. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 19:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see your rationale on the talk page. Okay, I can agree with that. I was thinking that the content could be merged to James Brown as a seperate section of the article, with a redirect. I can help with that if you'd like. Other than "the James Brown article is too long," I really don't see any reason for this to be a separate article. -- Tckma 00:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:I Didn't Know About You Gareth E Kegg 13:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crisis over, it'll happen again soon though, I'm sure. Gareth E Kegg 16:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on Tramp, I'm creating the remaining articles from Ella's songbooks this week, so am working my way through the ellington set. I'm sure you can add more to "Cotton Tail". I think it has the potential to be an important article, if this is anything to go by :) Gareth E Kegg 21:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Frank's category is being depopulated, and heading on the road to deletion...I don't know how Duke survived...[[2]] Gareth E Kegg 22:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlfredTheGreat.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to ask your thoughts about List of P-Funk projects. According to its title, it aims to be:

a chronological list with all known projects with contributions from P-Funk members, released and unreleased. It also features the pre-P-Funk and post-P-Funk projects from these members.

An entire encyclopedia could be filled with every record that included George Clinton, Bernie Worrell, or Bootsy Collins, not to mention Sly Stone, Maceo Parker, and Fred Wesley (to name just a few of the people who are included).

I'm thinking of nominating the list for deletion under WP:NOT#INFO, but I wanted to ask your opinion first. Do you think I should leave it alone? Should it be limited in scope and turned into an overall P-Funk discography without including session work)?

Any thoughts? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 23:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Vocal duets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Vocal duets and collaborations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TundraPress.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why 2 different categories are neccessary?Cosprings (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

grrrr Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:28, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could make a different sample, but that would probably entail nominating the original sample for deletion, as having two fair uses of the same song is probably not advisable (as the page wouldn't use both). Kakofonous (talk) 03:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I spoke too soon. I can just upload a new version of the file. Not sure though—the article is about the entire song, not just the break, so I'm not certain that having the break is any more useful. Kakofonous (talk) 03:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to my edit summary, I wasn't referring to you. :) In this edit and this edit, an anon changes it make it look like the "over 9000" meme. My edit changed things back to the way you originally wrote it. -- RattleMan 06:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add references to Family Guy. The use of the song in the episode is not noteable, and sets a dangerous precedence to mention every nuance and use of songs in other media. It would be in direct violation of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Refer to the guidelines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs for further info. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise accepted. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 04:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am so sorry, you're right: it's my usual problem, i.e. I know exactly how the title should be correctly spelt following Wiki rules, as for album or single song titles, but each and every time I end up by doing the same thing in reverse, and quite often no-one realizes nor tell me, so if it's not myself realizing it while subsequently re-reading the given article, the mistake punctually stays there, alas! So, that's whay I thank you very much and again say that I am sorry, but I was working on another page at the time (belonging to Lisa Stansfield's), and the "Never, Never Gonna Give You Up" page, I just came across by chance, when I decided to expand it - I was still doing the other one, which I left open to add on "Never, Never..."... By the way, is it right, right now?!?! Let's check it back... Oh yes, OK! It is: I thought I had written again something like Never, never... etc. See you the next page round. Good-night and always check me out, please: these things, I feed off them - I graduated in Germanic Philology, y'see, and such small details are so much important for me only most of the times, but they need a careful eye to be seen, which neither I sometimes have... I count on you then. Ciao!--TTZnju (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC) P.S. Sorry for being so "philologically heavy" in my writing too!!! :)[reply]

There exists Category;Jazz vocal albums and Category;Vocal jazz albums....this cannot be! One must go. Thoughts? P.S. I've just bought the Bauer book, and am thinking that we need to nudge Ms Carter toward good article. It's stable, so I don't see why not. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Category:jazz vocal albums' sounds much better to my ears, but it depends upon the other category, if it does exist, and whether it's 'Category:Jazz instrumental albums' or 'Category:Instrumental jazz albums'. Anyway, they might be both changed, mightn't they?

Hi! How ya doin'? As you've been suggesting, I've been adding the InfoBox to the Lisa Stansfield cover version of Barry White's "Never, Never Gonna Give You Up" original song, plus some additional information concerning the related eponymous remix album, which includes 2 of the many remixes originally contained on the CD single release of the track. Go on check it out if you will, and then please report if it fits, again if you will. I've tried to be as short as I could, since I noticed that you've been synthesizing some of my previous sentences, which were actually too long sometimes. Thank you very much for your attention. Have a nice evening. --TTZnju (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC) P.S. By the way, I was also referring to the spelling differences between album titles and "single song titles" myself, and not to the general name of the page, which I took for granted was correct...[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ForTheLoveOfMoney.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bootzilla.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NotJustKneeDeep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BopGun.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TearTheRoofOffTheSucker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:P-FunkWantsToGetFunkedUp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for the pointers and I hope to learn more about how this all works over the next few weeks. Cheers.Iiidonkeyiii (talk) 09:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Blab!11Cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing the problem - I also noticed the category problems. I have removed the template from the category page, which I imagine is the source of the problem (I should have thought about the logic of that!). I'll wait and see if it self-corrects, if not it's easy to fix case-by-case. Editor437 (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - removing the category from the template worked -- I think that's what caused the crazy loop - thanksEditor437 (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HolidaySingAlongWithMitch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:InvictusRecords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 01:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TheChronicReissue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ScottiBrothers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 02:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're considering deleting Shamrock Squid and as you have contributed to the page in the past (I know it's still a stub), I was wondering if you could put your two cents in on the 'Articles for deletion' discussion page. Thanks!! Twalls (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for taking so long to get back to you.

For reasons unknown to me, the powers that be decided that subpages are a no-no. Until about two years ago, the standard way of generating an article that was a subtopic of another - and of interest only to those reading the main article, but possibly giving more detail than the casual reader would care to see - was as a subpage. One example might be the Cast of Characters in a novel, movie, or TV series. Thus "Wilkins Micawber" would be found on a page located hierarchically under David Copperfield and "Severus Snape" would be physically located under Harry Potter. And ... in the case at hand, artists associated with The Saints would be under the song itself.

Under the new system, what used to be subpages are now moved up one level on the database and are only connected by standard links to the basic article. In terms of navigating Wikipedia, it makes absolutely no difference; what has changed is that subarticles no longer have a specific logical connection to their primaries. So ... When the Saints Go Marching In (artists) is logically independent of When the Saints Go Marching In, although for the life of me, I can't imagine why someone would want to look at the former while having no interest in the latter.

Thay can't seem to suppress the vandals (grumble, grumble), but create a subpage and within two days, some busybody will be screaming for it to be changed into a separate article.

See Wikipedia:Subpages, disallowed uses #3. Also see the "History" section below that.

B00P (talk) 05:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted this edit - [3] - we use british english on british bands and american english on american bands. British english considers a band to be a collective, american a singular entity so "Bon Jovi is" and "Def Leppard are" is the correct construction. Exxolon (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grrrrrrrr...[4] Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded File:ResidentsTheWhiteSingle.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to specify that it's the arrangements which are near identical, not the melodies. I have rectified the error. What am I supposed to do for a source? Give a link to sheet music? I didn't obtain the info from any website. As I am a huge fan of JB, Hawkins and Sinatra, I've just listened to the songs numerous times. It's an glaringly obvious similarity, at least for one with even the slightest musical ear.

Sincerely yours,

Ron —Preceding unsigned comment added by YoungRonJeremy (talk • contribs) 17:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Just thought I'd let you know, the Heartlight (song) article has been nominated for deletion, you can add your comments and track progression here. Thank You ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 13:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Songs overdubbed as duets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you are one of the top five contributors, I'm letting you know that James Brown has been nominated for GA Review, and I have started the review. SilkTork *^YES! 10:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of work to do. I have put it on hold for seven days; but given the low level of activity so far, I anticipate that the work will not be completed by that time, and the nomination will fail. SilkTork *^YES! 17:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello InnocuousPseudonym! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Jane Holzer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Shockhead45 (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Dude, are you the person who, switched the original Planet Rock (single) image for it? Because my Ipod erased itself last Wed. and one of the album artworks, I loved was that funky/spacey/colorful album that had red wavy bars on the front, with a blue BG, and a planet in between "Planet" and "Rock". Now I can't find it anywhere.[reply]

"Summertime (song)" is huge now, and looks terrible. How can we include versions w/out ending up like this? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 18:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is presently a (mostly civil) debate in the Talk:Kitsch page about the Kitsch#21st_century_kitsch_issue_involves_copyright_infringement section. I see you edited and later tagged it, so you might want to have your say about what to do with it. Bye, Goochelaar (talk) 13:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CompleteMontereyPop.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JuliusKnipl.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly four years ago, you used {{sir}} to request an infobox for My Blue Heaven (song). Well, patience is a virtue: I added one, and worked a lot on the article while I was at it. 72.244.204.218 (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KeepOnTruckin'.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 64.81.73.35 (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:KeepOnTruckin'.jpg instead. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TSOPRecords.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]