User talk:JDefauw

Welcome! 

Hello, JDefauw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!   Will Beback  talk  22:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting my recent updates. --Pass3456 (talk) 21:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to apologize. When I made that edit, I had not seen this edit of yours. --Pass3456 (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After you made the revision referred to above, I made another revision and had not seen your revision. I had no idea that there had been any editing conflict until I returned to the computer 3 or 4 hours later. The edit summary of my last revision was intended for any contributor who might want to restore the sentence saying that the chart below showed that President Hoover increased spending. I still need to review all the revisions that happened since then.JDefauw (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2012 (UTC)JDefauw.[reply]

I am satisfied now that the material that was added earlier does not any longer interrupt the flow of the article. So I decided to blank out the material under the third sub-heading. I hope the other contributors will be satisfied with the changes.JDefauw (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)JDefauw[reply]

Your edit summary was not taken as an offense at all. I still had to add again the data pointing to the Hoover stimulus. There's some alternative point of view but as far as I could read on the sources given, they don't contradict the data on the stimulus. I think it's OK to let this even if it's just for the sake of letting it be known there are diverging points of views. Thanks for praising my addition of Hoover's views on the liquidationists. I thought it was kind of not genuine to let only that statement on - since it passes the impression that he was endorsing the liquidationist view - while right on the next page on his memoirs (literally, you didn't even have to turn the page) he said he didn't agree with them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leobons (talk • contribs) 03:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Deism". Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 19:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JDefauw. You have new messages at the Help desk. –– Anonymouse321 (talk • contribs) 01:08, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Not sure if this is the right place to reply..but i'll give it a go.

The congregation of Sister minor of the Immaculate, is a totally separate community than the FI sisters, and their habits are also different.

I didn't know how to change the photo, so i just changed the caption.

Many thanks Allformary (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC) --Allformary (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I am a member of the FI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allformary (talk • contribs) 02:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work. I have a friend who is also a member of the order. I think the FI is a great order.

Thank you for answering my question. At least now I know that the name in the present caption of the photo is accurate.

I don't know how to add photos to Wikipedia articles either. When I get a chance, I will leave a message on the talk page of the article encouraging other contributors to substitute a photo of a member of the FI in place of the present photo.Dulcimer music (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)JDefauw[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I would like to bring to your attention that even when I do sign my posts, Sinebot still signs them again. Is there a problem with my custom signature that causes the robot to think that I did not sign my posts?Dulcimermusic 03:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)JDefauw

Yes, the problem is that signatures need to have at least one link to your user or user talk page. (See WP:SIG for guidelines.) I'd be happy to help you code a custom signature if you need any help. ~Adjwilley (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I added the link and tested it in my sandbox.Dulcimermusic 01:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)JDefauw[reply]

The article Social Market Economy needs a consensus version [1], [2]. You seem to be knowledgeable on that subject. Please engage if you like. --Pass3456 (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JDefauw, you have given your input on the discussion of a possible lead. To finally find a consensus version (almost) everyone can agree upon there is a (hopefully) final attempt at Talk:Social_market_economy#working_on_Lead_consensus to make a one for all version. When we have a consensus version we can approach Jayron32 to unblock the article. I whant to invite you to probably make changes on that final version and finally give a thumb up or down. --Pass3456 (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JDefauw!

I just wanted to thank you again for caring enough to suggest and overview things for my edit of the Unification Church "Beliefs" section.

May this kitty bring you laughter and smiles! :)

Jorge

JorgeCCE (talk) 01:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Duchy of Luxembourg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• in 1700, the Spanish Netherlands came under the rule of the [[Habsburg Monarchy]] of [[Austria]] (thereby becoming the [[Austrian Netherlands]]. The area remained under Austrian rule until the [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hey JD! Thanks for your beautiful kitten a long time ago. I just want to return the love man. Thanks!

JorgeCCE (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JDefauw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JDefauw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JDefauw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]