User talk:Jameshdl

Dude, try to end up with only one article on your Emmerdale characters, please. I've redirected both Bernice Blackstock and Bernice Blackstock (Emmerdale character) since this is the caption of the infobox you put on the left side of at least two of those pages. Enjoy wikipediaing. Well, what am I saying. You are already. (I could never cope with Emmerdale, btw. THere you go. Standard form welcome follows. --Tagishsimon (talk)


Welcome!

Hello, Jameshdl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Image tagging for Image:Adam Forsythe.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Adam Forsythe.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Betty_Eagleton.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Betty_Eagleton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Emily Kirk.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Emily Kirk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Edna_Birch.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Edna_Birch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Debbie Dingle 2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbie Dingle 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Explosion.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Explosion.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making unneccessary redirects. The name of the Emmerdale characters are Martin and Kayleigh Crow, not Crowe or Gibbs. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 18:17, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 18:22, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lily

[edit]

Please do not redirect Lily (Emmerdale character) again. The reason I moved the page in the first place was because her name will not be Lily Birch, as Edna took her husband's name when she got married, therefore Edna's name is Birch, but her sister's won't be. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 13:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember

[edit]

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)#Capitalizations, and stop changing the headings on List of Emmerdale characters. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 21:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Edna Burch.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Edna Burch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lily (Emmerdale)

[edit]

I noted you directed Lily Lovett to Lily Butterfield. Although i am not yet dismissing that move, but i didn't notice you quote sources at to where you found that information (and reliable sources would be desirable). Information on the character currently is thin on the ground, but if you could quote your source, and for future changes similar too, it would be useful. Bungle44 18:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

String of new articles

[edit]

Hi. I see that you have created many new articles for minor characters of a TV show. As a general rule, we try to avoid that and per WP:FICT these are generally coallesced into a list-type article. Pascal.Tesson 15:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale Characters

[edit]

Hi, Jameshdl, I notice you've been making lots of entries for Emmerdale characters recently, and I'm just wondering whether you plan to expand them any furthur than they are at the moment. The problem I can see is that they are all very short and stubby, i.e just having family relations and their names. Thus, I would politely suggest that it might be better to just expand the list of characters unless you have some actual content to add to the articles, or if you do plan to write more detailed character profiles to do these before posting any more. Thank you. Bob talk 15:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could try adding Template:Emmerdale Character to the articles to give them more information... Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 16:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, more content makes them more acceptable. Making millions of stubs and leaving them is unacceptable; making a few and expanding them to create decent articles is acceptable. And the template doesn't make it any more acceptable, it just makes the article more identifiable as an Emmerdale article... I'd advise you to stop creating these articles, however, as they really don't have any information in that isn't already in the cast list. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 17:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Project Stub Sort

[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! -Ohms law 18:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

[edit]

Lucy Webb previously deleted by AfD process and will be speedily deleted

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lucy Webb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Lucy Webb is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Lucy Webb saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. —C.Fred (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale pictures

[edit]

Trying to avoid getting into a revert war, but I disagree with the current image layout on the Emmerdale article, and have done for some time. If the layout I suggested doesn't suit your resolution for whatever reason, that's fine, but when you compare the article to other professional articles on wikipedia (or even to Coronation Street), the images on there are properly organised, and not just cramped together in a space on the right hand side. I might try a slightly different layout soon, but half the text for me is hidden, so it really isn't an option to keep it like that. Bungle44 14:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images: TV screenshots

[edit]

Please only use the TV-screenshot tag for genuine screenshots. A screenshot is one frame from the 25 per second that makes up the moving image. It is not any image related to TV. Many of the images you have uploaded and mistagged as TV-screenshot are promotional images. I have spent a good amount of time tonight revising the images you uploaded in August and tagging most for deletion. The notice "Do not copy images from other websites without permission. They will be deleted." on the image upload page is not there for fun! We welcome your efforts to improve Wikipedia, but uploading such images not only wastes the time of admins, but also makes us vulnerable to legal action. The JPStalk to me 02:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Alan_Turner.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alan_Turner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ashley_Thomas.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashley_Thomas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bell_Dingle.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bell_Dingle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bob_Hope.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob_Hope.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cain_Dingle.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cain_Dingle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Plane Crash.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Plane Crash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ BigrTex 17:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Five more images in the same situation that have also been tagged:

~ BigrTex 18:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you changed the summary information for Image:Jimmy, Matthew and Carl kill Tom.jpg today and removed the orphaned fair use tag. The issue with that image is not the fair use rationale, but that the image doesn't have a record of being used in any articles. Since the image is under copyright, we aren't allowed to host it if it isn't being used. ~ BigrTex 15:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this:

[edit]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale#Goals for the project! before making any more changes to Emmerdale related articles. I think points 1 and 4 apply mosty to your contributions. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Emmerdale

[edit]

Three articles is too much when they can be combined. I used the equivalent EastEnders article as a template, so removed the exact dates. Feel free to add them back, but I think it looks a bit clumsy like that. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 15:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use the really bad tables that were on the previous pages. They look awful. Feel free to put the dates, just don't put them in those godawful tables, especially with hyphens at the end of the columns! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you just don't see what I see?

[edit]

Do you truely believe every picture on the article for Emmerdale's main storylines are better suited on the right? When I see it, it all seems congested when they are like how you ordered them, hence, the title for one of them has a massive gap before the text starts (which is due to the pictures). Taking the Coronation Street article for example, many pictures are on both the left and right sides to keep the article organised. It can't stay like it is in it's current state.. Bungle44 14:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable Emmerdale child actors

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lucy Webb, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Lucy Webb is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Lucy Webb saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. —C.Fred (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Lucy Webb, doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles so it will shortly be removed, if it hasn't been already. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale minor characters

[edit]

I have noticed your disagreement with a couple of merger proposals on some of the soap's characters. I think the idea of the consolidated article was to list characters that appear on a recrurring basis too, not just those who aren't as important as the rest. I agree with you that several characters aren't really classified as "minor", but certainly would be classed as "recurring", and hence for that also don't support their claims for own articles.

Maybe a separate, but similar article by the lines of List of recurring Emmerdale characters might be a potential consideration? Bungle44 14:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Emmerdale - Who Killed Tom King?

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your suport in making the new pageon Who Killed Tom King. I reccomended to user:Jennyplus (one of the main cointributer)that it be split into another section, to which she refused, i went ahead and done it, only to be reverted. So thanks for that, a great help Thenthornthing 11:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rachel Ambler

[edit]

An editor has nominated Rachel Ambler, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Ambler and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Edna Birch.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Edna Birch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Pearl has a few quiet minutes with her fiance.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pearl has a few quiet minutes with her fiance.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i'm sorry to have to be so bloody harsh but, linking to youtube brakes the wiki external lniks policy. "If linked to youtube it must not contain copyrighted material" which all the emmerdale films do. Believe it or not. See Youtubes policy for this. So stop reposting this link and check out wikis policy on external links. Also. spoielr tags MUSTbe in place, as i discussed with an administrator earlier tonight. I know you are trying to make the page better, but it's long enough as it is , ahd too many pictures and needs wikifying anyway! Thenthornthing 20:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Webb (British actress) subject to speedy deletion

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lucy Webb (British actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4, repost of an article deleted by AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Webb)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TNA World Tag Team Championship.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TNA World Tag Team Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 08:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Reynolds

[edit]

Lady Tara has married Sean Reynolds off-screen and is now known as Tara Reynolds, ithout the title of "Lady". Please do not change this again - it was mentioned on-screen by Eric Pollard. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 20:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well the fact that she married Sean means that she lost the title of Lady anyway, so I can't see why she wouldn't be Reynolds also. The credits must be a mistake. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Jessica McAllister

[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Jessica McAllister, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I have prodded this stub because it is one sentence has no refs and it is already covered in the main article, I suggest a redirect to her section Cronholm144 09:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also feel free to delete this warning, I think they are rather ugly. Also my tag is only a proposal, if it gets expanded etc... within 5 days, remove the tag, I certainly won't mind. Cheers.--Cronholm144 09:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Né Discussion

[edit]

If the surname was the Male's birth name, then It's fitting. This is reference to the Scott Windsor article. His parents Reg and Viv were married and he was born Dawson, before Vic adopted him and Scott took the Windsor name. I don't see why the article should differ to other ones with a similar status ala Corrie, EE, Neighbours, etc Conquistador2k6 8 June 2007 23:27 (UTC)

né is the masculine form. Check the article French phrases used by English speakers. Conquistador2k6 9 June 2007 22:20 (UTC)

Née or né means "born", so Scott was born Dawson, therefore, it's Scott Windsor né Dawson. Just like it's Simon Wicks né Beale, David Wicks né Beale and Bobby Beale né Hobbs - and Sharon Rickman née Stretton and Clare Bates née Tyler - who were both adopted. Né is the male version of née, in many French words, when the e is taken away from the end of a word, it turns from feminine to masculine. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scott Windsor, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom King plot summary

[edit]

I advise you to read What Wikipedia is not, and specifically note that Wikipedia is not a plot summary. Someone who is obsessed with the show might want to read 40K of badly written plot summary, but it doesn't belong here. I would like to direct you to the deletion debate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Killed Tom King?, and note the significant dismay the community expressed (particularly those not heavily involved in Emmerdale stuff) of the extreme level of detail. Also, please see WP:FICTION: an encyclopedia article on a plot in a soap opera should be an out-of-universe treatment of the subject; plot summaries are not the point, they're just one aspect, and should not be belabored. Mangojuicetalk 23:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than create a new section, I'll amend the above. It seems evident that you wish to keep the article in its current state whilst others wish for some review of it's state. May I first thank you for not readding every picture (i.e: not directly reverting my change), although the ones you put back I feel are equally less-important as the ones you agreed need not be retained. Simply a picture of someone's facial expression (Len, for instance), can be summed up in a few words, which takes up less space and will load the page that little but more quicker. The same with Jamie's face - it doesn't add any more to the reader, who not forgetting is whom the article is supposed to be aimed at. Pictures of the actual events (ie: fights/punchups) have a purpose as to give an idea to what the atmosphere was like, but we really need to cut out the ones which wont be missed. Even after my edit I think there were too many pictures. I'd appreciate if you review the other pictures, or at least acknowledge mt stance. Cheers. Bungle44 10:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Grayson contemplating his mother's insecurity with Tom.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Grayson contemplating his mother's insecurity with Tom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Guests look on in horror as Tom falls to his death.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Guests look on in horror as Tom falls to his death.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Jamie feels disgusted after realising his father had a chance with Tom.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamie feels disgusted after realising his father had a chance with Tom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rosemary discovers that Tom expects her to hand Home Farm Estates over to Carl.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosemary discovers that Tom expects her to hand Home Farm Estates over to Carl.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Len looks on at a lifeless Tom and just walks away.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Len looks on at a lifeless Tom and just walks away.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see, with some dismay, that you continue to exert ownership issues over Who Killed Tom King?. The images The JPS removed are not fine. Actually, not one of the images in the article are used justifiably within the policy, since they only contain boilerplate text in their Fair Use justifications, and no actual explanation specific to the individual images. Providing that is an absolute requirement. However, the fair use rationale must also be a good one, and you are going to have a very hard time justifying why we need to have so many copyrighted images on the page, considering the tiny amount of value each one adds. Most articles even on TV shows contain at most a couple of images. What you have been trying to do is to "storyboard" the plot summary, which is not an acceptable use of images at all. Mangojuicetalk 11:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your "strong objection" to minimizing the article is clear. However, Wikipedia policy is also very clear that the article is unacceptable as it is now. Policy trumps individual opinions, so the extreme plot summary will not be kept just because you prefer it that way. If you want the article to be a certain way, I'm quite happy to listen to your arguments as long as it's clear you understand Wikipedia policies and are on board with them. So let's try this again. The article now is overwhelmingly a plot summary, with very minimal time or text on anything else. Wikipedia policy says that is unacceptable. What do you think we should do? Mangojuicetalk 13:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a very clear explanation of non-free image overuse. Your recent edit summary made no sense in this respect. The difference between the images that were removed and the ones that remain is the quantity of those that remain! Wikipedia is not some cheap Geocities site with haphazard images dotted about for illiterates who can't go a paragraph without a pretty picture to look at. Non-free images are really enhance an understanding of the subject when words fall short. Most of the images are there merely for illustration, not to enhance understanding. I hope this is clear: I note other editors have attempted to explain this to you. The JPStalk to me 16:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Chas attempts to hit Tom with a Champagne bottle.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chas attempts to hit Tom with a Champagne bottle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The King boys brawl.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King boys brawl.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tom being pushed towards the window.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom being pushed towards the window.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tom crashes through the window.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom crashes through the window.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tom's sons look on in disgust after he passes.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom's sons look on in disgust after he passes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bob contemplates hitting Tom.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob contemplates hitting Tom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:A lifeless Tom King.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:A lifeless Tom King.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Charles tries to resuscitate Tom.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Charles tries to resuscitate Tom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The boys right after the fight.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The boys right after the fight.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Marlon_Dingle.png

[edit]
Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Marlon_Dingle.png. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Terry Punches Tom.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Terry Punches Tom.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:The King boys stand trial.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King boys stand trial.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:The King's in Court.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King's in Court.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Tom King, Cain Dingle and Sadie King Kidnap Plot.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom King, Cain Dingle and Sadie King Kidnap Plot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:TomKing.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TomKing.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JamieHope.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:JamieHope.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mill Cottage.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mill Cottage.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The King boys stand trial.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King boys stand trial.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The King's in Court.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King's in Court.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew attacks Jimmy.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew attacks Jimmy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew presses Jimmy.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew presses Jimmy.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:07, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mill Cottage.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mill Cottage.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Katie and Jo catfight.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Katie and Jo catfight.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Len's close friend look on as the ambulance takes him away.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Len's close friend look on as the ambulance takes him away.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Len's dead.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Len's dead.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frank Tate looks on at the first fireball to hit the village.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank Tate looks on at the first fireball to hit the village.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PC Mike Swirling.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:PC Mike Swirling.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Len's close friend look on as the ambulance takes him away.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Len's close friend look on as the ambulance takes him away.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Len's dead.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Len's dead.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The King boys stand trial.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The King boys stand trial.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The King's in Court.png

[edit]