User talk:Jleon

Welcome!

Please join us for the next Wikipedia:Bootcamp every night at midnight EST (2100 PST, 0500 UTC) to learn the ropes, or leave a message on our talk pages around that time for on-wiki help.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, Jleon! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
One more quick tip: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

Montage for Canadian cities

[edit]

Could you please do montage pics for Montreal and Toronto article? Thank you and God bless you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.63.52.14 (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll see what I can do in the next few weeks. --Jleon (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Church

[edit]

Jleon thank for you instruction, I think it is better for me to seek some tutorial on online for fixing time stamp. Below is a photo of Trinity Church that the time stamp covers a lamp pole as well. [[1]]

Remark: I just learned to use the clone tool in Photoshop, check on the trinity page and see if my work ok!

Time Stamp

[edit]

Thank again for your help to remove the time stamp of the GE building last time. I got quite alot of pictures have the same problem that hesitate my intention to upload them. Would you please teach me how to use the clone stampe tool in photoshop to replace overlapped distraction. I just got back from NYC this week, its urban morphology and cultural dynamics are really impressively, yet academic geography doesn't even has a foothold in this magnificent city. Geographer 17:43, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

DYK

[edit]

New York City

[edit]

You've really done most of the heavy lifting. Feel free to move my music section into "Arts" and edit it, it's not really 100% up to quality but it's not really my field. Kaisershatner 20:09, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

New York City

[edit]

Two words: be bold. I have done a lot of editing on New York City before, but specifically the subway. Frankly, the organisation of the New York City page is awful, and it should never have been allowed to spawn to 62k. Páll 06:12, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and one other thing. Articles with 300px images: MTR (featured), Johannesburg (featured), and South Africa (featured). How's that?

Cooper-Hewitt

[edit]

My page on the Cooper-Hewitt predates yours by three months, and also uses the correct name of the museum, according to its website. Can you figure out how to merge the content/redirect and also fix the link in the New York City article. Bwahahahaha... Kaisershatner 22:22, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Black Death

[edit]

Thanks for your comments. I agree the point is interesting, and perhaps useful in a social consequences section. But social points are difficult to document. The anon who wrote the original paragraph didn't provide a source. If I can find the source that I got my memory from (see my original comment), I'll put a paragraph in. In the meantime, feel free to look for similar references. Comments welcome. WBardwin 01:02, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Re your changes to the L.A. page

[edit]

I concur that the sentence about mugging was probably an exaggeration, but I am putting back in the other sentence you took out. It sounds like you're not a L.A. resident. If you actually read the L.A. Times every day, you would be familiar with the enormous variety of random crimes and car-related crimes that occur in the City of Los Angeles on a daily basis. There have been two fatal random shootings on the Harbor Freeway in the past three weeks, as well as random thrill killings on the streets of Pacoima and Harbor City during that same period. All these crimes occurred in broad daylight.

If you want an even more comprehensive list of the variety of murders, assaults, and robberies that occur in L.A. every day, look at the Newsroom Web page on the LAPD Web site:[2]

And don't forget to look at the press release archives for past months, too.

Also, if you run a LexisNexis search through past L.A. Times articles you'll notice that the crime rate was actually much higher in 2002.

--Coolcaesar 09:19, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

NYC

[edit]

Hi.

You ask:

Hi, what was your intention of breaking apart the intro just to add the heading "overview"? I think its pretty clear that for most large city articles the intro serves as the overview. I've also never heard of what you're calling the "convential position" of having those separate, and I think the article looks much worse now. --Jleon 18:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly let me congratulate you on your speedy response. I've actually yet to see the results of my edit (apart from the pre-save preview) as all Wikipedia will give me is Sorry- we have a problem... The wikimedia web server didn't return any response to your request.

However the intention was not about breaking up anything, but rather about making sure that the contents were shown in a rational place in the article. When I first looked at the article, viewing full screen on a 17" monitor with medium sized font, I couldn't even tell that it had a contents list, and I therefore assumed it was a fairly short and lightweight article. Obviously I was sufficiently motivated to scroll down and find that wasn't true, but other readers may not. The contents list performs an important 'selling' task in giving the reader a quick view of how comprehensive the article is, but only if readers don't have to scroll to see it.

Or to put it another way, here is what the Wikipedia:Manual of Style has to say about the lead section:

The lead section is the section before the first headline. It is shown above the table of contents (for pages with more than three headlines). The appropriate lead length depends on the length of the article, but should be no longer than three paragraphs in any case.

(my emphasis). The lead section before my change had four relatively long paragraphs. Please feel free to change what I have done, but do please consider the need for the contents list to be immediately visible. -- Chris j wood 18:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've managed to display the article now, and I see what you mean about the whitespace mismatches. Obviously someone had carefully aligned the contents and the info box, and my change kicked them out of kilter. I've tried again; if you still don't like feel free to revert. Will copy this discussion to Talk:New York City -- Chris j wood 19:22, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

GE Building

[edit]

Response to: "Hey, I like the photo you added for the GE Building, but the time stamp needs to be taken out using Photoshop. If you'd like me to, I can easily handle it. Just let me know. --Jleon 15:47, 15 May 2005 (UTC)"[reply]

Hi Jleon! I would like you to remove the time stamp for me THX! --Geographer 00:07, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Size limit

[edit]

I do not oppose a long (61k) article on the USA (as long as it is <64k ) but I oppose double standards. See talk:Germany. Andries 19:52, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]


African Burial Ground

[edit]

Hey, thanks for creating the article. I know very little about the subject, to tell the truth, but just enough to know that there should be an article on it and it should be mentioned in the New York City article. I will try to do some research though, and add to your start. --Sophitus 17:51, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

World cities - Tokyo photo

[edit]

You mean you don't recognize the bridge? It is Nijubashi Bridge at the Imperial Palace. It is THE symbol of Tokyo as much as the Eiffel Tower is to Paris, Buckingham Palace is to London. The old Tokyo photo is not a good picture either. All cities have urban sprawl. Nothing unique about that. Photojpn.org 18:43, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Louisville on the United States page

[edit]

Louisville was removed from the list of 20 largest cities in the U.S. on the page United States because it was not one of the 20 largest cities in 2000 (see the official list from the United States Census Bureau). That list lists the 20 largest cities as of the 2000 census. Louisville and Jefferson County were merged into a single government in 2003—in 2000, the population of the city of Louisville was the number now shown on the United States page. Mateo SA | talk 17:57, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)


Houston- Fastest Growing

[edit]

I have removed the quotes that were restored. I do not know the source for the quotes because they were already there before I started editing the Houston, Texas article. UH Collegian 17:44, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I also don't like the fact that you and your colleages keep on removing the picture of Houston, Texas in the United States article. It seems like the materials on that page are very exclusive and guarded from "non-regular" Wikipedians from adding in anything. UH Collegian 17:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Interested in an L.A.-area Wiki meetup?

[edit]

It appears as though L.A. has never had a Wiki meetup. Would you be interested in attending such an event? If so, checkout User:Eric Shalov/Wikimeetup.

- Eric 28 June 2005 23:57 (UTC)

U.S. city names

[edit]

I noticed that you supported having major U.S. cities just be on [[city name]] articles on the requested move for NYC a few months ago, I proposed that rule on Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(city_names)#New_proposal. Please come add your two cents! Dralwik 1 July 2005 21:03 (UTC)

New York City illustratons

[edit]

I see that, in providing a consistent pixel width for the images worthy of Thoreau, you have grouped them like stamps in a pane. Since you allow that you are a student of urban planning, I can only surmise that you are perhaps not yet entirely finished? In sizing images, it is the nature of the essential interest within the illustration that suggests its finished size. Surely you must have some well-designed illustrated books that might guide you. --Wetman 4 July 2005 23:01 (UTC)

Revert on U.S. article

[edit]

What the hell is your problem? Do you own the article? Do you control the content of what is and what is not to put? Who says you can control of what and what not to put? Wikipedia is for anyone to contribute and you are preventing that. You need to get a life, whoever you are. What the hell do you mean referring me as a sock puppet? Define that for me. I see you are a graduate student but you sure don't act like one. Grow up, you don't own or control anything on Wikipedia. If you like to respond, please do it here on your talk page. That picture stays and stop reverting my edits. I wasn't vandalising "your" page so you had no reason to keep on reverting and calling me names such as "sock puppet". Whatever that is. 129.7.156.63 18:43, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


-This issue has been discussed at length on the United States talk page, to which you have not participated. There are many good reasons not to have the picture of Houston on the article: 1) Houston may be the fourth largest city, but only the tenth largest metro area, while the top three cities are also the top three metro areas, 2) The top three are each considered to be true global cities and each has been very important culturally to the U.S.- Houston does not match these qualities under any sense of the terms, and 3) in the past, as soon as someone puts a fourth pic onto that section it opens the floodgates for others who want to see their own hometown on the article. A "sock puppet" is either a screen name or anonymous user that another, regular user uses to mask what they are doing. No one ever tried to put a picture of Houston on the article until User:UH Collegian became an active wikipedian and he is the only one who has ever argued for its placement on the talk page. Therefore, I am somewhat suspect that you may indeed be a sock puppet for him- but of course, I could be wrong.--Jleon 18:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So I see you made an accusation about me being a "houstonian" and reverted again. I am not from Houston by the way, but actually in Galveston, Texas. How about you get a life and revert other user's vandalism. I was not trying to vandalise "your" page because I wanted to put in a different picture. Again, you do not own anything on here. To my knowledge, it is the 8th largest "metro", not 10th. Don't act like you know everything as I am also an architect student, but undergraduate. That doesn't mean you know more than I do. Also, I remember seeing a picture of Houston back then on this page. I am not a "sock puppet" for anyone, whatever you call it. I've been around here before and even edited the U.S. page without having it reverted. 129.7.156.63 19:03, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--If it was just me that felt this way I would let you put it on there, but just look at the talk page and you will see that there is a far reaching consensus regarding the pictures. Please explain to me your rationale (aside from your personal opinion of Houston) behind having the Houston pic there instead of leaving it with the neat, orderly, and common sense way of having that section. --Jleon 19:11, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I read the discussion that you asked me to. So you started the quest/demand for removal and most of the posts on there were from you. I also read some of your other posts regarding other topic matters and found that, in my opinion, you think you "own" the article and you seem like a very uptight person. Also, explain your "neat" and "common sense" above. What is my personal opinion of Houston and how would you know? I would never live in Houston!!! I have lived in Houston but moved out of Houston. I don't plan on ever living in Houston (the city) ever again. Just like I would never consider to live or buy a house in New York City (the city you awefully love so dearly), Chicago (ghetto), or Los Angeles (super ghetto). I have been to all these 3 cities before as well. Of course I do like your New York City, don't get me wrong. But I would never want to live in it. I dont like Houston as much as you think I do. I want to put the picture on there because it is the fourth largest city. Houston is important as well, even though you dont think it is from your post on the U.S. talk page. They have the Texas Medical Center, the world renowned medical center of the world, dont you deny that. They have NASA and many other things. Again, I would never live in Houston again, but I dont deny that it is a nice city to visit, to work, to conduct business, etc... Have you been to Houston? Why don't you visit Houston one day, it is not as negative as you think. I used to hate Houston with a passion as well, but then I grew up and became more mature and looked at things differently. I urge you to change your views on other cities besides new york city. 129.7.156.63 20:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--Yeah, Its been real nice chatting with you, whoever you are (by the way, I'm quite surprised that an architecture student like yourself would call Chicago a "ghetto" as it is perhaps the most architecturally rich city in the entire country). --Jleon 12:42, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Houston, Texas

[edit]

I have responded to your comment on the Houston, Texas talk page. UH Collegian 18:24, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I could not help but notice my username with a blue link above this section. What was that all about? It seems like you have a dislike for me for whatever reason(s) — can you tell me what they are? I remember we had a talk session a while ago on my talk page (it is still there in archive). I was never rude to you in anyway, but from that point on, you have been giving me a negative attitude and attacking me every way possible. Still, I have nothing against you at all and think you have done a great job for the New York City article. All I am trying to do for the Houston article is bring it up to featured article status and hope that one day it will be a featured article. I would appreciate your reponse. Thanks! UH Collegian 18:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like you have no justification for attacking me and saying negative things since you can't answer a simple question I asked you. Therefore, stop finding things to attack me with on the Houston talk page. UH Collegian 23:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What was your simple question? I do not have a dislike for you, nor do I dislike Houston. I simply dislike some of your edits, and some of your behavior on the talk page. --Jleon 12:33, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:City Hall 2.jpg

[edit]

Hey. If you took this great picture of New York City Hall, please license it accordingly. Right now it is at risk of being deleted. Thanks. --Howrealisreal 16:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Midtown NYC.jpg has been listed for deletion

[edit]
An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Midtown NYC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Bash 06:26, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

[edit]
  1. Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful.
  2. You need to give the image name so that I can look it up and answer your question. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks; I found the deleted image-page; all that was there when I deleted it was: "Metropolitan Museum of Art, NYC (May, 2004)"[3]. Where did you find all the details that you cited? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Heights 2.jpg

[edit]
G'day there. This little notice is about Image:Jackson Heights 2.jpg - an image you've uploaded. All images on wikipedia need to have
a) source information (where you found the image, where it was published, or its owner)
b) copyright information (choose the appropriate tag from this list)

At the moment some of this information is missing, and images like this are usually deleted within a week. If you want to keep the image on wikipedia, you need to update this information on the image page as soon as possible. (Agnte 18:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]

just as followup - you need to actually put {{self2|cc-by-2.5}} in the summary on the image page for that to work... :) Agnte 11:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New York City; 13:36 . . Jleon (Talk) (Rv-vandalism and unimportant external link.)

[edit]

hello. is I would like to know in what it vandalism to put a bond of photographs on New York (bond without any publicity) and in what this bond is ' unimportant external'? cordially O.perrin

Hi, I didn't refer to you edits as vandalism- I reverted the anon's edit before yours at the same time, which was clearly vandalism. I actually liked the photographs on that page, but you must realize that there are thousands of NYC photo galleries online, and the External Links section is generally reserved only for the most important links for NYC information. You might find a good place to link to that page on the NYC Portal though. --Jleon 15:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

of agreement,I understand better.as much the in love one with large apple, I wanted to divide my photographs, I will see on another place. afflicted for my English, I start to take courses cordially O.perrin

I've reverted your reversion on NYC

[edit]

(cur) (last) 13:54, 13 December 2005 Jleon (→Culture of New Yorkers - I've heard 'bridge and tunnel people' said in movies, never in real life.)

I quite frequently hear the phrase "bridge and tunnel crowd" mentioned while nightclubbing in NYC. Granted its usually by the arrogant assholes I want nothing to do with, but it is actually used.  ALKIVAR 19:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Blatantly" ignoring consensus?

[edit]

Hi, you reverted my edit, which cut the list of big cities from 20 to five on the United States article. You claim I am "Blatantly ignoring the concensus made" but there was never a consensus! In fact there was a fairly large effort to stifle what discussion there was, (and there were arguments from both sides.) Please reconsider your decision. --sansvoix 21:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Staten Island Ferry

[edit]
Staten Island Ferry
Staten Island Ferry

Hey Jleon, I think I have a better Ferry pic, give me a minute and I upload it. .-) --Dschwen 18:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here I actually found two. Highter resolution than the one you just inserted in the New York City article. --Dschwen 18:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NYC pic

[edit]

Greetings! By the way, I do like that newer pic of NYC on the global city page. I do speak with some experience and appreciation for the splendid panoramic views/pics and skyscrapers: I've visited the Big Apple on numerous occasions, including the WTC before its demise. Of course, I hail from Hogtown, where the CN Tower is arguably not even a building. Ah well. Thanks again! E Pluribus Anthony 01:15, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Wikiproject

[edit]

I made a few requests on the Wikiproject talk page. If you want, you can take the Queens pics. WhisperToMe 04:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

US Collaboration of the week

[edit]

You have voted for Transportation in New York City on WP:USCOTW. It was selected to be this week's winner. You are invited to contribute to improve Transportation in New York City in any way you can. Cmadler 13:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Panorama clip2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Longhair 07:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:BK_College.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BK_College.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 11:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Midtown pic

[edit]

Jleon, nice work on the NYC midtown panorama photo. I'd meant to make a similar edit. Looks much better. Wv235 00:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Midtown NYC1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 14:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Midtown_NYC2.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Midtown_NYC2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Good article

[edit]

Template:Good article has been listed for deletion and has defaced the New York City article because of it. Please vote to keep this template at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_March_25#Template:Good_article. The {{good article}} template places a small Good Article symbol (Plus icon) in the top right corner of an article to indicate that it is a good article on Wikipedia. —RJN 10:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United States article on featured candidate nominations list

[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United States

Cast your vote! The more responses, the more chances the article will improve and maybe pass the nomination.--Ryz05 t 17:55, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Met Opera Picture

[edit]

Everything being talked about in that specific area is music, not contemporary art museums or the village. I've been actively making sure that this picture has stayed there for over 6 months and have not had any problems until now. It is undoubtedly the most famous opera company in the world and deserves a picture on the city's main page. With that said I'm certainly not the one breaching the "assuming good faith". On the other hand I have had revert wars in the past and they are nothing but a pain in the ass. I don't know, I'd like to see it stay in the article - that's all I can say.
NewYork1956 06:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

[edit]

I've noticed your excellent work over the past couple years on NYC-related articles. Lately, I've been working to bring the WTC article, and its subarticles to featured status. Right now, one is at peer review - Wikipedia:Peer review/Design and construction of the World Trade Center. It covers historical/planning aspects, as well as structural design and construction. Before going to WP:FAC, this article can use some folks to look it over and make suggestions, make sure it's not missing any important details, etc. Any help with reviewing the article would be most appreciated, should you be interested and willing. There's no obligation at all. Also, can think of anyone else to ask to review it? --Aude (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Heights Image 1

[edit]

Hi Jleon,

I would like to ask your permission to use this image in an educational curriculum. Can we speak via e-mail about the project?

Thanks, Alice

Congratulations!

[edit]

Congratulations! Your image Image:Top of Rock Cropped.jpg was the random picture of the day for October 19, 2007. It looked like this:

Skyline of New York City
Image credit: Jleon (talk · contribs)

. Again, Congratulations! - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 20:14, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 1/13/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of United States

[edit]

An editor has nominated United States, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area
Last: 3/16/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For sourcing and attribution reasons, would it be possible for you to link to the original images on the image page? Otherwise (especially if the images originally required attribution) there may be copyright problems, and the image may end up being deleted as having inadequate sourcing. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that should be fine. J Milburn (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic

[edit]

Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:African American ethnicity

[edit]

Hello. You expressed an interest in the pictures in the photo montage in Template:African American ethnicity that appears in the article African American.

I'd like to settle on some new pictures in the montage, and I'd appreciate your opinion. Please join the discussion at Template talk:African American ethnicity#Malik Shabazz & Therock40756 Edit-war Discussion.

Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis Take Manhattan

[edit]
Wikis Take Manhattan


Next: Saturday September 27
This box: view  talk  edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

349 W. 12th St. #3
Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC montage

[edit]

Hi! I saw this very nice photomontage of NYC that you put together, and was inspired to make something similar for the Stockholm article. This might be a simple task, but I'm afraid I'm not skilled enough to this without a little help. What software did you use? And how do I make all the photos parallel to each other with maximun resolution etc.? Thanks! /Slarre (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You are invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday November 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 6/01/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Obama, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 22:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday January 18th, Columbia University area
Last: 11/01/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You're invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza


Next: February 6-7, at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum
Last: 01//2008
This box: view  talk  edit

Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

[edit]

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday May 17th, Columbia University area
Last: 03/29/2009
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newtown Creek 2009.JPG missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Newtown Creek 2009.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Williamsburg rezoning.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Williamsburg rezoning.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Williamsburg Arts 2009.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Williamsburg Arts 2009.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Greenpoint, Brooklyn 2009.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Greenpoint, Brooklyn 2009.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Williamsburg Park 2009.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Williamsburg Park 2009.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday September 13th, Columbia University area
Last: 07/25/2009
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference New York, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Takes Manhattan and Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis Take Manhattan

[edit]

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

148 Lafayette Street
between Grand & Howard Streets

FOR UPDATES

Please watchlist Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NYC Montage 1.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Montage 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NYC Montage 2.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Montage 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NYC Montage 3.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Montage 3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NYC Montage 5.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Montage 5.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NYC Montage 6.jpg

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:NYC Montage 6.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

[edit]

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Jleon! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 745 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Stephen Wright (writer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Day NYC

[edit]
Wikipedia 9th birthday coin

You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday March 21st, Columbia University area
Last: 11/15/2009
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAR

[edit]

I have nominated New York City for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Arsenikk (talk) 12:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jleon - you seem to have an excellent hand with pictures and images - might you be able to help provide some good images for the young Chinatown, Flushing article? Perhaps a picture of a crowded sidewalk on a Saturday afternoon at the intersection of Main Street and Roosevelt Avenue, in the heart of of Flushing Chinatown; or maybe a picture of a Lunar New Year/Chinese New Year celebration? Unfortunately, the Unisphere wouldn't qualify, given its location outside the Chinatown area of Flushing.

Feel free to respond on my Talk page, if you wish.

Thanks!

Thmc1Thmc1 (talk) 15:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Jleon - I feel guilty asking you again (I won't make a habit of it!), but if you could possibly be able to help out with pics for this new article at your earlier (earliest?) convenience, that would be greatly appreciated! (I realize from your prior response that you don't necessarily get up to Flushing that often.) Pictorially the article is bare and starving for good images, and as you know the place is actually a great source of fodder for just that.

Thanks so much!

Thmc1Thmc1 (talk) 12:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Times Square 112808(2).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Emirr

[edit]

Hello. I'm sorry, I didn't know a voting has to be done. Have a good day.

 The Emirr Disscussion 17:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Saturday May 22nd, OpenPlans in Lower Manhattan
Last: 03/21/2010
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not forgetting Lyndon Le Roach

[edit]

I wish I could forget him. I remember when he was "Lynn Marcus" and his cult was called the National Caucus of Labor Committees. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New York City mayoral election, 2013 for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article New York City mayoral election, 2013, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City mayoral election, 2013 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CTJF83 chat 20:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Saturday October 16th, Jefferson Market Library in Lower Manhattan
Last: 05/22/2010
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How did you go about creating this? Did you just take pictures and photoshop them together? CTJF83 chat 22:23, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Noted your conversation with another editor about contributing downtown pictures for this article. Are you still planning to do this?

NYC Meetup: Saturday, December 4

[edit]