User talk:JustAnotherCompanion

Hi JustAnotherCompanion! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Just dropping a line regarding Special:Diff/1232488936. The pipe was basically in preparation for a pending move where the baseline ABC News would be moved and converted to a disambiguation page (differentiating ABC News (Australia) among others (Talk:ABC_News#Requested_move_18_June_2024). Anyway, it looks like this might get reversed (User_talk:BilledMammal#ABC_News_move), making this moot, but I just wanted to explain. -2pou (talk) 00:18, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2pou: Oof. I've spent a little bit of time reading up on this situation now. Can open, worms everywhere. Leaving aside the specifics, I'd just like to say that a more descriptive edit summary than 'pipe' would have helped avoid my reverting your edit (and subsequently my revert being reverted by another editor). Something like 'Redirecting following closed move discussion at PAGE', say. Then - regardless of any rights or wrongs - I would at least have seen enough reason to leave until the dust settles, as were. This is only a suggestion; if you look at my edit history you'll see it comes from the basis that I'm a bit fan of clear and descriptive edit summaries. Best regards, JustAnotherCompanion (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears my edit summary was cut off in the page history so I Just wanted to provide the full edit summary I had written here really fast: WP:ROUTINE is a notability guideline for articles on events, that doesn't fall within the scope of this article as it's not about an event. This is confirmed by the part of WP:N that says "notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article." Note the part of routine that says "events [...] may be better covered as part of another article", this is that other article. ROUTINE would only apply to this if we were perhaps writing an article called "Doctor Who at the 2024 Comic Con". Regardless, it's not routine as the last DW SDCC panel was in 2018. The relevant notability page for series 14 would be WP:NTV (which albeit, is an essay not a guideline, so WP:N technically). Notability guidelines purely cover whether the article is worthy for a topic, not for the content within said article once notability is established. TheDoctorWho (talk) 16:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]