User talk:Kevorkmail

Thanks for uploading File:Alain Boghossian.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alain-boghossian1214388854.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ararat cement.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Company logo.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Noy Tirakal.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ararat Cement Factory.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ararat Cement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NPervez (talk) 13:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ararat Cement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ararat Cement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Dank (push to talk) 13:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Robert_Emmiayn_2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Robert_Emmiyan2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Church of the Holy Mother of God, Aleppo. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk | _Sign 13:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gevorkian Seminary.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gevorkian Seminary.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 22:32, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ngar1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 13:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ngar1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 13:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yerevan Fortress.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to addhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevorkmail&action=edit comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yerevan Fortress2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 15:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Erivan Fortress article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 15:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barev, Kevork jan. I saw that you had uploaded 2 images of Erivan Fortress. Can you upload them now, please, if you can. Thank you.--Hovik95 (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ngar3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued disruption to Wikipedia after numerous notifications of policy regarding images and copyright. Please use this time to review the policy to prevent yourself from subsequent (longer and/or indefinite) blocks.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kevorkmail. Is it possible to add your sources? (Online sources, written records from reliable printed sources, etc?) Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karen Demirchyan Sports and Cultural Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced. Not clear how this is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 14:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to National Museum of Aleppo. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Chrisch^Talk 12:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to National Museum of Aleppo has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Chrisch^Talk 12:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kevork, I know you have good intentions, but please do not upload pictures to Wikipedia for which you do not own the copyrights or for which you have not asked for permission from its owners. These type of images that you upload will eventually be deleted, and therefore it's better that you don't upload them at all to begin with. Please ask for permissions from their respective authors before doing so.

Thanks, Serouj (talk) 06:33, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Alaverdi121.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 14:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Congress Yerevan 897.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:23, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The www.worldstadiums.com site does not necessarily indicates a correct information. Believe me, I took those capacities from a reliable sources (even some of them I counted myseself). Regards. --Avdav (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Kessab12 Nabaain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Holy_aleppo1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Holy_aleppo2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Parliament Yerevan building.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pic998akhg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kevorkmail. You have claimed that File:Silva Kaputikyan kev.jpg is owned by you and the same for File:Sero Khanzadyan.jpg. The first image is available all over the internet, at a higher resolution, and I've deleted it as an obvious copyright violation. The second is a scan of a printed image whose creation predates your birth - again not your image to claim and I've deleted it. If you think I have made a mistake here please drop me a note. You cannot claim that an image is yours unless it is like the ones you've uploaded from your camera - Peripitus (Talk) 11:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what do u think, I hava my own sources, I am Armenian and I have a lot of encyclopeadias, I've scanned them from by books

You cannot scan an image from a book and claim it is yours. The copyright always belongs to the images original creator. If you got them from a book then the copyright belongs to the publisher of the book, or the photographer....not yourself - Peripitus (Talk) 11:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Happy editing - Peripitus (Talk) 11:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Antranig in Yerevan new.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sero kevqa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barev Kevork, inchpes es? Can you help me find more information about this Armenian village in Syria. Thank you.--Hovik95 (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2009 (UTC) OK. Thank you for help. --Hovik95 (talk) 14:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marhaba Kevork. Is there a more common name to this church? Yazan (talk) 10:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alaverdi131.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alaverdi stad2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed your tremendous work on Armenia all throughout 2009 and January 2010. Armenia is one of those countries in need of massive development on here and it is editors such as yourself who really are a credit to the project in expanding our coverage of it. Editors like you are more valuable to wikipedia than you probably realise. The "important" editors are not those who run about brandishing their tools and admin badges but those who genuinely care about developing parts of the world such as this and want to see wikipedia cover them as well as others. Keep up the great work and thanks for your photos too. Here is a Barnstar of National Merit of Armenia as a small token of my thanks. Also great work on Aleppo, Syria too. Regards. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ^ΨMonastery 22:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Vaskenian Theological Academy, Baghdasar Arzoumanian. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaskenian Theological Academy for Vaskenian Theological Academy, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baghdasar Arzoumanian for Baghdasar Arzoumanian. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also true of Zorats Karer2.jpg, Zorats Karer3.jpg, Zorats Karer4.jpg and Zorats Karer5.jpg. If you can't remember details, simply "View of Zorats Karer site" would probably suffice for them all. Best wishes --Haruth (talk) 14:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Armenian Prelacy.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Fransiscan Missionaries Aleppo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kevorkmail. Kasab is the name mostly used to refer to the town, as evident by a simple google search, Kesab only returns 6,000 results. Moreover, it is the grammatically more correct name as well. I would appreciate if you didn't move it again to Kesab. If you insist on the move, then at least start a discussion on the talk page first, so that people can weigh in. Besr. Yazan (talk) 04:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kevorkmail. Thank you for your response, and your kind words. I understand that in the local tongue it is pronounced "Kesab", or even "Keseb", but just like the city of Hims (as opposed to the local name of Homs) we can't accept that here as the encyclopedic name. Thank you for your understanding, and all your contributions here, on Armenian culture in Syria and Armenia. It is highly appreciated. Best. Yazan (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:The Bar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nn123645 (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I need some help on translation. Please translate the following word to Arabic.

• Bishop of Rome
• Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople
• Patriarch of Alexandria
• Patriarch of Antioch
• Patriarch of Jerusalem
• Bishopric of Rome
• Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople
• Patriarchate of Alexandria
• Patriarchate of Antioch
• Patriarchate of Jerusalem

Thank you. Amit6 (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please reference your articles. Ironholds (talk) 22:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're used to doing things in the "Syrian" way, but this is an American site and you will have to learn some basic ethics. You can't change what I write without even bothering to explain why. This is rude, to say the least. I think Wikipedia rules consider it vandalism to change articles without writing a summary.HD86 (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how removing dashes is wikipedian? Is there a rule in Wikipedia that says dashes shouldn't be used? Anyway I appreciate your apology but please learn to write a summary when you change an article; and if somebody disagrees with your edit you have to discuss with them.HD86 (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced and biased information to articles Baku and Azerbaijan thus vandalizing the pages.--NovaSkola (talk) 15:49, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make such edits. Otherwise the administrators will be informed. Thanks. --Quantum666 (talk) 19:07, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Njdeh3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Njdeh21.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that splendid collage on Yerevan! Could you please also do collages for Gyumri and Vanadzor? Thanks!--RM (Be my friend) 20:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain these edits: 1 2 3 --Quantum666 (talk) 07:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Impuls1.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting other people's work into Wikipedia without permission or attribution is unacceptable. Copyright infringement and plagiarism pose serious moral, legal, and reputation problems. Remember: Users who upload content (File:Aleppo multi.JPG) with false license declarations ... may be blocked. feydey (talk) 07:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all You cannot ever upload someone else's images without acknowledgement. Now You need to have the images' authors notify Wikimedia that they release the images, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.

Now is also a good time to verify that Your other images have proper permissions. Best, feydey (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please discuss your edits on Talk:Aleppo. Part of being a Wikipedia editor is discussing your edits when disagreements arise; this helps to garner consensus so we can move articles forward. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I hope you can prove reliability of the sources in the article Garegin Njdeh. If you can please do it at the discussion page. And stop reverting without discussion otherwise the administrators will be informed. --Quantum666 (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I still hope that you will answer at Garegin Njdeh‎ discussion page. --Quantum666 (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Should we request WP:3O? If so you should define your position at the discussion page. --Quantum666 (talk) 11:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Garegin Njdeh. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  18:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for 3 days because, in addition to edit-warring, you constantly called the other editor's edits "vandalism", which they were not, and you also misused Wikipedia as an ethnic battleground (in addition to violating WP:NPA and WP:AGF) with this message. The other editor has been blocked for 24 hours.  Sandstein  18:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.  Sandstein  18:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir, I find your block unfair as I was trying to edit the article of Garegin Njdeh providing third-party reliable sources, but the other user; Quantum666, was insisting to call those sources "unreliable" which was very provocative. I accept that I was envolved in edit warring with him (which is against the rules of Wikipedia), for which I offer my apologies to Wikipedia, but as I told you, his action for denying the third-party sources was provocative and I was forced to call that vandalism (note that denying the fact of a murder is another murder). I'm always ready to discuss articles with anybody, but I expect from the other side to respect the historical facts which are based on third-party reliable sources. I promise that my future edits will be according to WP:DR. Great thanks. Kevorkmail (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kevorkmail. I am responding to a request for a Third Opinion on the Garegin Njdeh talk page. As you seem to be one of the parties in this dispute, would you care to comment on your position there? Thanks, WikiDao ☯ (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please explain your edit at the article's discussion page? --Quantum666 (talk) 05:37, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Although you don't take part in the discussion you continiue to revert. I am going to inform the administrators. --Quantum666 (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you please explain your edit? You stopped discussion but continue reverting. You should know that

A disruptive editor is an editor who:

• Does not engage in consensus building:
  • repeatedly disregards other editors' questions or requests for explanations concerning edits or objections to edits;
  • repeatedly disregards other editors' explanations for their edits.

Also you should know that

Sometimes people have edit wars over the NPOV dispute tag, or have an extended debate about whether there is a NPOV dispute or not. In general, if you find yourself having an ongoing dispute about whether a dispute exists, there's a good chance one does, and you should therefore leave the NPOV tag up until there is a consensus that it should be removed.

Best regards, --Quantum666 (talk) 10:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no dispute about the mentioned article, but seems you have a dilemma about the Armenia related articles. Kevorkmail (talk) 10:55, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read the rule:

Sometimes people have edit wars over the NPOV dispute tag, or have an extended debate about whether there is a NPOV dispute or not. In general, if you find yourself having an ongoing dispute about whether a dispute exists, there's a good chance one does, and you should therefore leave the NPOV tag up until there is a consensus that it should be removed.

In other words the fact you don't see the dispute doesn't mean other users don't see it too. Please discuss instead of reverting. --Quantum666 (talk) 11:05, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum666, as I told you, there is nothing to dispute about, but it is apparently obvious that you are directed towards the Armenian articles. Please be respectful and do not try to ruin our efforts to build up a good article. You did not even mention the reason for being an "unneutral article". The same thing I can do with all Azerbaijan-related articles but my principles do not allow me to do that, the respect that I owe to literary works prevents me from such a practice. Thanks for your understanding. Kevorkmail (talk) 11:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the discussion page and you will see the disputed points. I repeated them today for you as you can see. --Quantum666 (talk) 12:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look here please. --Quantum666 (talk) 10:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then, go for it. Kevorkmail (talk) 13:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The comparison is more than apt. The element of controversy is a lot greater for this article, just as it is the case for any major historical process or event. In the case of Khojaly, it is not wise to argue about the title of an article based on one-and-a-half source of questionable neutrality, when there are so many independent sources proving that it was what it was. Parishan (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 20:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Kevorkmail reported by User:HD86 (Result: Both 48h). EdJohnston (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the uploads by that user and left them a warning. Thanks for the note- if there are any further problems with people stealing images, please do let me know. J Milburn (talk) 11:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Syrian occupation of Lebanon. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.- Ankimai (talk) 10:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I have blocked this account for one month as a result of repeated disruptive and tendentious editing. The combination of recent blocks for edit-warring and sock-puppetry, new edit-warring at Aleppo, making article moves that you knew would be controversial without discussion, etc, all indicate that you are on a rapid downward path. I hope that this break will give you a chance to come back in a month and resume editing with a fresh approach. Looie496 (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am always ready to open a new page. Please just remember the following so we don't have the same problems again:

• When I add something to the article, don't change it unless there is some reason for that.
• When you disagree with somebody, do not try to force your edits on them without dicussion. You can only add things to the article if the other editors agree.--HD86 (talk) 06:34, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevorkmail. Thank you. Wknight94 ^talk 13:35, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Just to clarify, I reset this editor's block for a month for abusing multiple accounts. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All sites are written in 227, they are copied from Wikipedia because tkih like you, who wrote that the area which was in Yerevan 10 years ago. She now has a total area of 300 square kilometers. And for some reason you are blocked, and you continue to edit other IP addresses. I will inform the administration. ArmOvak (talk) 09:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ողջույն, հարգելի Martianmen: Ես Հայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի մասնակիցներից մեկն եմ: Վերջերս քննարկվել է Արևմտահայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի ստեղծումը (քննարկումը կարող եք գտնել այստեղ) և Հայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի համայնքը եկավ այն եզրակացության, որ կարելի է ստեղծել Արևմտահայերեն Վիքիպեդիա, բայց եթե որ գոնե մի քանի մասնակից, որոնք խոսում են արևմտահայերեն լեզվով, կխոստանան որ կմասնակցեն Արևմտահայեն Վիքիպեդիայում: Եթե դուք համաձայն եք և կաջակցեք այդ նախագծին, ապա գրեք ձեր անունը այստեղ և հաղորդեք այս լուրը մյուս հայ մասնակիցներին: Շնորհակալություն: --Pandukht (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Sardarapat Battle Memorial.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Surp Hagop Chapel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Karen jeppe image.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The IP 193.140.x.x is also vandalizing Orontid Dynasty and Kingdom_of_Commagene articles. Please report him. Thanks. Aryamahasattva (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have just reverted your reversion of the edits to the Tsitsernavank Monastery article. I have been asked as a neutral party to have a look at the issue, and though I'm loath to protect the page to one version or the other I have asked all involved editors to refrain from simple reversions while we try and resolve this issue, and find a wording that is verifiable, reliably sourced and hopefully meets somewhere in the middle. As someone involved in the article please could you respond to the questions I have left on the talk page. Best regards ^Khukri 14:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Karen Jeppe. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 08:44, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please watch for the user Verman1 removing the Armenian info and vandalizing this article. Tzitzernavank_Monastery <- Once again he removes the sources and puts Caucasian Albanian church/architecture etc. 75.51.174.190 (talk) 06:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They continue to vandalize this article [1] , here was the RS's that was put here, and every few weeks or months they change it, and now the page has been locked for a few days. Please help out to put back the reliable sources provide for the Qajar dynasty. 75.51.169.205 (talk) 18:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please watch the Orontid Dynasty article. There was an Azeri Turk blocked for 2 weeks, once he returned he changed the Orontids to "Persian dynasty" -> [2] again! Please watch these articles, I even let Moosh88 know about it and he didnt pay attention either to the changes. It was like this for 8 hours! The guy changed the info it was like this for hours! We cant allow this man. 76.246.27.46 (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing was added in the Satrapy of Armenia page [3], as it was in the Orontid page. Phoenicians8 (talk) 03:54, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you need more advice on the sources take a look here [4] Phoenicians8 (talk) 17:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert those edits, that is complete distortion of the sources [5] they are providing![6] They are saying that, "Armenian replaced the former language Urartian in 5TH CENTURY AD!, before that they are putting it was territory of Urartu!, before 5th century "AD" <--AD ??? Please read the discussions and revert back to the stable original versions.

Here is the POV and major distortions:

It is Classical Armenian that emerges in written records in the 5th century AD as the dominant language of what had used to be Urartian territory.[5]

76.237.8.254 (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you surely can see for yourself, the sentence does not say what the anon thinks it says. It doesn't say when Urartian was replaced by Armenian, it just says when the first written records of Armenian appear. We don't know exactly when Urartian was replaced by Armenian, but the previous sentence explicitly says "it [Urartian] must have been replaced by an early form of Armenian ... perhaps during the period of Achaemenid Persian rule." So no, it doesn't say that happened in the 5th century AD, because that was not "the period of Achaemenid Persian rule". --Anonymous44 (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They just added a section Khojaly Massacre in the Armenia article. I dont think that belongs in the article? And if it is even factual information to begin with. 75.51.173.222 (talk) 19:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Erebuni Dilijan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you revert the infobox recently changed by user Vahan. He has included a certain Turkish person, apparently of some Armenian decent, but is an unimportant figure for the infobox on Armenians. He also removed Hayk (he tries to give reasons for removing it in talk page), which we call ourselves by Hayk and Hay to our country and peoples. 76.246.27.197 (talk) 19:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please revert that new infobox already?? 76.246.25.215 (talk) 21:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yereva. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 19:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Vandalism from the user Kevorkmail. Thank you. --Diannaa ^(Talk) 14:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Israel Ori statue in Jermuk.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]