User talk:Korean Rail Fan

Hello, Korean Rail Fan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 07:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello! Korean Rail Fan, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 07:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May we invite you to join the Community. Please sign up if you would like to be part of this new User Group. Thank you. --Filipinayzd (talk) 06:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for signing up! --Filipinayzd 12:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Korean Rail Fan. Can you fix the exit list ("Mga labasan") in the Tagalog version of North Luzon Expressway, including more better translations? Thanks! JWilz12345 (talk) 10:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JWilz12345! I will surely try my best. Thanks for the trust! Korean Rail Fan 06:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop moving pages! A template is being used in naming station articles. -Hiwilms (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the issue was raised in the tambayan page at least a week ago and heck both the international admin User:Cuchullain (via the Central Terminal Station) and User:TagaSanPedroAko (for PNR) did it without hesitation from any other users. Korean Rail Fan 11:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really, having the stations of the Manila LRT and MRT stations based on a template such as {{LRT Station}} and {{MRT Station}} looks bad in the real situation. The names should reflect those that we see in reality, not those based on automatically-generated stuff. So does the Philippine National Railways stations, that used "[Name] railway station'", even that is not true also in reality (though "railway" has use is the Philippines, naming a PNR station using the name generated by {{RWS}}, that is, "[name] railway station" will not make sense in the Philippine context, plus that template seems to be intended for mainline railway station names in Commonwealth nations or in countries whose coreesponding WikiProject agreed to use such naming). I made several changes to the station names, just before I addressed them at the Tambayan Philippines talk whether the name changes are okay or not.-TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Hiwilms (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Korean Rail Fan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Maysilo Circle, Korean Rail Fan!

Wikipedia editor Gaioa just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Wow, this actually googled well. I stand corrected.

To reply, leave a comment on Gaioa's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you. Gaioa (t,c,l) 21:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Korean Rail Fan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the info on Metro Manila Subway being called Line 9? TIA. ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 02:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this data can be seen here [1] which is DOTr's internal presentation of railways in the country. Also present is the plans for Metro Manila Railways from Lines 1-9 and PNR lines. This still excludes unsolicited proposals from the private sector for Lines 10 and 11. Korean Rail Fan 02:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited North Avenue Grand Central Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line 7 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Makati Intra-City subway is different from Line 5. Line 5 starts from MOA and ends at Pasig. Makati Subway's terminus is at BGC. And also, Line 5 wasn't revived after the unveiling of the Makati Subway. In fact Sec. Art Tugade himself said that he didn't know about the subway. (interview here)

"dun sa makati hindi ko ho masasagot yan kasi hindi pa ho kami nag-uusap sa detalye... baka naman maghula-hula ako dito. antayin ko na lang ho mag-proceed sila and then siguro pagkatapos sasabihin ko ho sa inyo walang conflict, may conflict, may inter operability... ngayon ho yung offer nila naririnig ko lang sa pahayagan... nakikita ko sa pahayagan. dadating din ho siguro yung araw at ako'y naniniwala na darating yun na mag-uusap kami." ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 09:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note the date which is October 2018, such closed-door talks happened between the DOTr and Makati LGU in November prior to the groundbreaking. National Roads/Properties are required to have National co-ordination so Makati LGU needed to co-ordinate with DPWH and DOTr. In the internal meeting, an interface was agreed upon with Line 5 being split between 5A and 5B segments with 5A being the entire Makati Subway Line plus possible extensions to Taguig BGC via either the 26th or the 32nd alignment options, while 5B is the spur from Ayala via Gil Puyat-Diokno Avenue to MOA/Aseana in Pasay. Korean Rail Fan 02:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, MRTC Class 3100, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 09:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department of Transportation (Philippines), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your updates on the Manila rail-related pages! I've been wanting to see a new look for it, glad to see you're working on it! Let me know if I can be of any assistance. --Truflip99 (talk) 03:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for such kind words. I am actually securing more data for the entire planned and current maps from DOTr itself. Also on the process of updating some images of Manila Railway Stations. Probably I would be needing help on more data regarding rolling stocks such as the PNR Hyundai Rotem Diesel Multiple Unit and Draft:MRTC Class 3100 articles for improvement. Cheers! Korean Rail Fan 03:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:2015 Line 3 Single Journey Ticket.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:2015 Line 3 Stored Value Ticket.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As a wiki contributor, I would like to apologize for the erroneous edits to the Lines 5 and 9 infographic, and the SRTS infobox. Rest assured that the edits will be from the internal/official documents , and not from the self-imposing ones (coming from the media outlets).

DEARPAUL24 07:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul adrianne madriaga (talk • contribs)

This is well noted, as contributors, we are to also counter-check info disseminated in media. If such does seem to not make sense, let us just keep status quo unless proven. Personally thankful for your contributions in making the templates more informative. Cheers! Korean Rail Fan 07:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MRTC Class 3100, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your moves of Sixth Avenue and Third Avenue (Manhattan) were disruptive. In the case of Sixth Avenue, we just had a discussion in which it was agreed to move the article from "Sixth Avenue (Manhattan)" to "Sixth Avenue". In the case of Third Avenue, you did not start a discussion on the talk page before making a potentially controversial move. Please be careful next time, as you are overriding a previously decided consensus. epicgenius (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles is not right as there are other places named the same. Manhattan does not own any rights for it to be named only as such and it is but right to add a disambiguator. Korean Rail Fan 15:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Hiwilms/LRT-1 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Hiwilms (talk) 05:32, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this is acknowledged as a minor mistake due to en-masse link migrations to new names. Probably an oversight. Thanks for the reminder. Korean Rail Fan 05:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Hiwilms/PNR Services may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Hiwilms (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One reminder is enough, see response above. Thanks. Korean Rail Fan 05:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magsaysay Boulevard station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niog station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line 6 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manila Metro Rail Transit System Line 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commonwealth Avenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your awesome work organizing and updating Metro Manila transit-related articles. Please keep up the amazing work! Truflip99 (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad there's someone here addressing much-needed updates to MM's transit-related articles. While I've been busy with the Portland side of things, I hope to assist you with some major expansions soon. I'd like you to know that you have been a source of motivation for me lately. Thank you for what you've been doing so far. --Truflip99 (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you could help developing the recent head-on collision into an article. It would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot! --Hiwilms (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sure thing although I suggest this to be just merely be a part of the main article to prevent creating a stub as this wouldn't pass notability guidelines here in Wikipedia resulting into non publication. In line with such, I shall move the content to my sandbox instead here and remove the template as the article barely merits any separate article similar to past incidents. Thanks! Korean Rail Fan 13:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate.

I was wondering if you could help shed light regarding the proposed deletion of a Line 9 station article. [2]

Jpg0813 06:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC) Jpg0813 (talk) 06:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. In the mean time you might want to get in touch with @RioHondo: thanks! Korean Rail Fan 01:43, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate.

I suppose BGC wasn't enough. Now they are after every single page. Would need your help again for this.

Thanks Jpg0813 (talk) 07:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I was taking a look at this article just now while NPP patrolling. I looked at the source, and I couldn't find a mention of the work 'Lourdes' in it. It's a pretty long document, so I don't pretend to have read it all the way through, but Ctrl+F didn't find it - can you point me to the point in the source that supports the assertions in the article? Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 19:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes, stations have not been named in the document but it has been a common practice to name it at the bisecting roadway or point of interest which in this case is Lourdes Drive and Lourdes School of Mandaluyong. Also since the naming file is a hard copy and confidential as of the moment, I cannot publish it but the names I reflected in the articles are the working names utilized in the confidential document. For the sake of sustaining an article, such naming can be utilized for the mean time until they release a new naming should they desire. Otherwise, these names in the confidential documents will be the final names. Korean Rail Fan 01:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Since there are many new railway projects in Metro Manila, I think we need to have a consensus on its colors. Currently the colors in wikipedia are: Line 1 = Green Line 2 = Blue Line 3 = Yellow However, DOTr's map uses the old colors, LRMC uses the new colors, LRTA uses the old colors. What should we do? ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 05:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My opinion regarding this is to de-colorize all railway articles and just indicate the current and former colors in the articles themselves. This would save us the pain of confusion regarding colors while retaining their names which was decolorized way back then based on articles history. Thanks! Korean Rail Fan 01:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Korean Rail Fan,

Thank you for creating N180 highway (Philippines).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add some references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 15:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, N180 highway (Philippines), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:10, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Korean Rail Fan,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kudpung and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Lourdes station, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

N180 highway (Philippines), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 14:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits to Line 2. I am currently focusing on collecting information for the different stations and adding more sources if I can help in any way just let me know :) Sabaybayin (talk) 00:33, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thanks for your edits and insights so far, especially in spite of the heated and cumbersome arguing in the RM discussion. Also... I really wish that the wikiproject proposed by Hiwilms would become a thing since 1) there's no standard logic on article layouts (which is what pushed me to do "drive-by editing" despite it posing a bit of risk towards on-wiki harrassment, and 2) so everyone could work on things under well-defined things instead of WP rule-bombing. The counterarguments and refutations get really tiring to look at, but regardless, I'm being quite a Wikipedholic! Regards to your friend Juls as well. :) {{ping|Koressha}} {interact|ambags} 12:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad to be of help! Korean Rail Fan 10:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Congressional Avenue (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congressional Avenue (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The article Gulod station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no references since 2019, all Wikipedia articles need at least one reference

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toad40 (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maysilo Circle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a roundabout - not notable per Wikipedia:Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 01:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maysilo Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maysilo Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thanks for uploading File:Dawonsys logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:2015 Line 3 Single Journey Ticket.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 20:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]