User talk:Kouban

Welcome!

Hello, Kouban, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 20:11, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Hey, Koub -- you should probably put your own user page on your watchlist. For some reason it doesn't go on there by default, meaning you won't get notified if someone changes it. -- Antaeus Feldspar 17:35, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Where are your sources for the existing information? [Goshou World] is a decent resource, but it makes many assumptions that are inaccurate within the show's context. For instance, the 11 Masters of Sol don't appear to have a "leader" as such; I have not seen any data elsewhere to confirm this data. The Japanese Wikipedia entries themselves claim nothing of the sort, in particular; it appears as if Goshou World's webmaster made the idea up on the spot. Unless I'd watched the entire show, I wouldn't have known otherwise!

As the entries are relatively dormant, if it's not a bother, I'd like to do more work on GaoGaiGar and other Brave Series entries, as would a friend of mine who has vested interest in these shows; we have much more to add between the two of us. I find that it may be prudent in the near future to break sections out, similar to the way Neon Genesis Evangelion's entry was handled. We've discovered a great deal of show background and information on the technology involved.

Any context in which to take the data to date would be appreciated. --E. Megas 22:34, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before you're hasty in removing that link, I'd remind you to take a look at the two articles:

• Characters in The King of Braves GaoGaiGar
• Antagonists in The King of Braves GaoGaiGar

They're broken up the way they are for a reason: combining these two sets of data would create a massive entry that would need to be separated anyway! Given the potential size of these articles, I found this to be the best possible way to handle the situation.

If you still wish for me to merge the two of them—or if you have any better ideas—please post a reply on my Talk Page and we'll sort this out. --E. Megas 20:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I suggest retitling the first article "Protagonists in etc." To avoid confusion.Kouban 21:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Done. --E. Megas 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are listed as a participant of WikiProject Anime and manga. A recent change in how participants are listed — using a category — will result in your inadvertent removal from the project. If you wish to continue your participantion, please check the the project page for details on how to add yourself back to the project. - Squilibob 01:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:King_of_Braves_GaoGaiGar#Plan_for_long-term_entry_revamp.

If you take a look at the subpages to date, I believe you will find them satisfactory for replacing the character and mecha data on the main page's entry. I intend to do that as per the plan I've laid out in this talk section.

I await only your word to proceed. Thanks. --E. Megas 08:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Koub -- Tregoweth answered on why he removed the category tag for Television Puppetry. Basically, it was because the category "didn't exist" -- by which I think he means it didn't have a category page, even though items had been placed in the category.

I think he may have a bit of a point, though. There's a hierarchy of categories, and if there's no category page where Category:Television puppetry identifies its parent categories -- it's effectively outside the hierarchy. Then there's the problem of how it relates to the hierarchy; there are already categories for puppetry and television programming -- a category for television puppetry would be just an intersection category, and those kinds of categories have run into problems in the past. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Out of the three Super Robot Romance Trilogy mechas, Voltes V and Daimos are the most closest and extremely popular to the hearts and minds of the Filipino people.

• The only time you can see all three Super Robot Romance Trilogy mechas, featured in one package, namely Combattler V, Voltes V and Daimos, is in the following games: Super Robot Taisen (Wars) Alpha 2 and Super Robot Taisen Alpha 3 for the Playstation 2. The latter features a special combination attack of the three, exclusive only for the said game.

Wikipedia:Anime and Manga Collaboration of the Week

I nominated the article Kunio Okawara as an AMCOTW. You might want to toss your name in if interested. --E. Megas 20:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I really don't know much about Okawara, but thanks for the consideration. Kouban 23:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious, why exactly did you say that Genesis of Aquarion isn't a Super Robot anime? I can't think of what other genre it would be - it's not a Real Robot series by any stretch, Aquarion demonstrates a number of abilities which would be flatly impossible to explain short of magic or extreme metaphysics. At best, it's closer to a hybrid style like Neon Genesis Evangelion ... but even then, I'd argue that Aquarion relies far more heavily on Super Robot tropes than Evangelion ever did.

Shachihoko 13:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trampton has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trampton 06:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Kouban: 20% for major edits and 13% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you undid an edit of mine to remove a flag icon from a band's infobox. As I said in my edit summary when I removed it, this use of the flag is redundant; it carries no information beyond what the Netherlands gives. WP:FLAGS gives some interesting hints on the good and less good uses of flags. Best wishes, --John 07:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense. Kouban 07:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am a graduate student in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota. We are conducting research on ways to engage content experts on Wikipedia. Previously, Wikipedia started the Adopt-a-User program to allow new users to get to know seasoned Wikipedia editors. We are interested in learning more about how this type of relationship works. Based on your editing record on Wikipedia, we thought you might be interested in participating. If chosen to participate, you will be compensated for your time. We estimate that most participants will spend an hour (over two weeks on your own time and from your own computer) on the study. To learn more or to sign up contact KATPA at CS dot UMN dot EDU or User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring. Thanks. KatherinePanciera (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kouban, I noticed you reverted my correction of "Shiloh Hagen" to "Shiro Hagen" as the English-dub name of the Japanese character Shiro Ginga in the X-Bomber article. Just wanted to say that it was definitely a good idea of yours to list the original, Japanese names with the dub names in brackets, since the article's main subject is the original Japanese show. However, I believe Shiro's first name is actually Shiro in the English dub too. A few references: [1], [2], [3].

By the way, I think this article would benefit from additional referencing to reliable sources; don't suppose you have come across any suitable reviews or articles that we could cite? I've been looking but they are hard to find online since the show aired so long ago. I expect more will present themselves after the new DVD release in Jan, though. Cheers, Wiw8 (talk) 09:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I reverted the edit is because said character wears a helmet with his name printed on it. I'll try to find a screencap of said helmet ASAP. Kouban (talk) 14:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated R-Blade, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R-Blade. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 10:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create the article, I merely moved it from one name to another. I had honestly forgotten that it still existed, and don't really care if it gets deleted. Kouban (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank redirects at Wikipedia. We have a procedure to delete useless redirects at WP:RFD, please avail yourself of that. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, not meaning to be rude. But can you explain why you edited out my information on the SRI page, please? I could support my argument to the information I added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boso (talk • contribs) 10:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you think so, then feel free to replace the addition. Kouban (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you reverted my recent edits on Voltes V, Daimos and Gunbuster? - Areaseven (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toylines are not relevant to Wikipedia. Kouban (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? Where in Wiki does it say that toy lines are irrelevant? - Areaseven (talk) 23:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Primary and Secondary Phases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Go (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change this article from a redirect unless you can show how it meets notability guidelines and you add WP:reliable sources. noq (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should we also delete the rest of Threshold's albums, as well as the band itself, under those guidelines? Kouban (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do they meet the guidelines? If not, then there is a case for that. noq (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Roman gladiator types, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you brought it up on the talk page, would you happen to have any specific examples of video games (or be able to point to a publication that documents this) that use the Index (typography) as a cursor? I'm just trying to resolve some of the "citation needed" tags on that page. Thanks! -- Beland (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The most obvious example I can think of is the Final Fantasy series, where it's used in virtually every entry. Kouban (talk) 14:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kouban. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kouban. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kouban. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]