User talk:Kurt Baty

The image you've uploaded is currently lacking the copyright tag. Do you own the copyright of this image? --BorgQueen 02:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I believe that it is owned by Professor Buttrey http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/coins/frames/TVBCV.html but it may be owned by the University. It was first published in Expedition magazine http://www.museum.upenn.edu/new/Zine/34.1-2.shtml in "Part I: The Coins from the Sanctuary of Demeter and Persephone." pp. 1-66 by Buttrey on page 62. I got permission to use that image in my articles from Professor Buttrey, It made the cover of Celator Vol. 9 No. 2 February 1995. I also own one of these coins, and could take picture of it (it's not as nice/pretty as that one!). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurt Baty (talk • contribs)

Welcome!

Hello, Kurt Baty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Thanks very much for your contributions to the Silphium article! They are much appreciated! See the question above about copyright. We need to figure out who owns the rights to this image and get the appropriate tag attached, or the image will be deleted. Wikipedia is serious about copyright of images. If you know who owns the copyrights, others here can help with properly tagging the image.--Srleffler 02:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cyrenecoin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]