User talk:LionFosset

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Maze of Bones. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Here are some other hints and tips:

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will try to answer your questions as best as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. ℳøℕø 00:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting that link in at Pocket God (comics), didn't know there was an article for Jason M. Burns. G₩PSP090+ 08:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swimming in Miami. Since you had some involvement with the Swimming in Miami redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). DGG ( talk ) 07:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Broadway Concert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Someone to Watch Over Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutterpillow tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear LionFosset,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Sky Harbor ^(talk) 12:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marcelito Pomoy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 _{REF THIS BLP} 02:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juan dela Cruz (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• rule over his kind and take over the human race. But his mother is a ''Tagabantay'' (Guardian), co}ing drom an ancient lineage of defenders using the ''Bakal na Krus'' (Iron Cross) to destroy the ''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creep (Radiohead song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Metro Manila Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One More Try (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, LionFosset. I removed the speedy delete notice from Tinimbang Ka Ngunit Kulang because the reasoning didn't seem to me to be consistent with WP:UE. As best I can determine, Weighed But Found Wanting seems to be the most commonly used English title for this film: 50,000+ hits on Google for <"Weighed But Found Wanting" Brocka>, about 50 hits on GBooks, which seems to be considerably more hits than for any of the other English variants. (The reason I was looking at this page today was that another editor had marked this article for proposed deletion on the basis that this landmark film had "no evidence of notability"!) If I've missed something, please don't hesitate to write back so we can discuss. Best, --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Arxiloxos: I didn't get to check Google, so I didn't know it was already being used by many sources, but nevertheless, the original title of "Tinimbang Ka Ngunit Kulang" is the one most commonly used by film critics and Filipino cinephiles. Also, other Filipino films retained their original film titles, like Himala, Kisapmata, and Ganito Kami Noon, Paano Kayo Ngayon, so I still hold my support for changing the film's English pagename back to its original title. I hope you can understand my point. LionFosset (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point, but I think it's overcome here, where there's a well-attested English alternative, given by the policy that "On the English Wikipedia, article titles are written using the English language." But you're certainly welcome to bring the question to Wikipedia:Requested moves. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited You Changed My Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shake, Rattle & Roll XV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All of Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rondel P. Lindayag has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Molina (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quiapo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Popstar: A Dream Come True tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Himala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lubang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you're invited and express your views on Talk:When Marnie Was There#Edits reverted without adding summary. Jotamide (talk) 18:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She's Funny That Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prank Caller. Since you had some involvement with the Prank Caller redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --  Kethrus |talk to me  02:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Informant!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Whitaker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 1980s page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Videocassette recorder has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Jeh (talk) 09:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kogonada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kogonada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New editor here; I have restored much of Kogonada's article without realizing that there had previously been a conversation about deleting the article to respect his privacy. I am hesitant to immediately delete what I have added because if Wikipedia did not have articles for every notable person that did not wish to have a Wikipedia article there would be massive blind spots in Wikipedia. Seeking your advice on how to proceed, or requesting that you delete the content once again.

John Tracy stated in the debate "My personal preference is that we should keep the page, but simply put "At the request of :: kogonada, a full Wikipedia page will not be created." along with a very brief summary." but it seems this was never done. I stumbled on a stub and proceeded to expand it before finding the larger version in the history. Malan88 (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fly to Your Heart (Selena Gomez song). Since you had some involvement with the Fly to Your Heart (Selena Gomez song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fly To Your Heart(Selena Gomez song). Since you had some involvement with the Fly To Your Heart(Selena Gomez song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

62.173.80.20 (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LionFosset. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Kogonada, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 07:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add FilmAffinity as an external link. Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are sufficient, and FilmAffinity is not noteworthy outside Wikipedia. To proliferate its link everywhere on Wikipedia is akin to spamming. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik: I'm very sorry, Erik. Once I saw a new external link for films in the article for Martin Scorsese's Silence (2016), I jumped to including it with the set of external links I add to film articles. I will not include the link in my edits from now on. LionFosset (talk) 14:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated beefing up that article that I started! But I'd recommend not linking to non-existent pages. I took care of that.--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 21:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinemaniac86: Well, okay. I was just trying to add red links to those that could be worthy of articles created about them, which Wikipedia encourages. Thanks for the appreciation, though! LionFosset (talk) 07:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's true. I suppose I was a bit hasty then. Although I'm not quite sure why any of those people warrant their own page. Are they notable enough? I guess I'd have to research them, but I've got some films to watch on TCM tonight, haha. So perhaps later. Thanks for reminding me of that factor however. I'm going to keep that in mind in any future articles that I create/edit.--Cinemaniac⁸⁶_{Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire} 01:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you recently made an edit to this article, however did not provide any adequate summary on your purpose to do so. If your edit was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you do think the edit was necessary, you can discuss on the article's talk page. 63.143.239.23 (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, anonymous user 63.143.239.23. I noticed you recently made an edit to this article, however did not provide any adequate summary on your purpose to do so. If your edit was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you do think the edit was necessary, you can discuss on the article's talk page. LionFosset (talk) 04:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LionFosset (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm blocked from editing with my account by KrakatoaKatie, despite me never vandalizing an article, at least on purpose. Apparently I'm using the IP address of 180.191.--.-/--. LionFosset (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. There's no block on 180.191.0.0/16, but may be one on your specific IP address. Please tell us your exact block message along with the exact IP address you are using. WhatIsMyIP will tell you your IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

LionFosset (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18958 was submitted on Aug 10, 2017 15:54:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Circus (Eraserheads album) tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, LionFosset. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: Just FYI - Kogonada is back ) --Balabinrm (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transit (Christian Petzold (director)). Since you had some involvement with the Transit (Christian Petzold (director)) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Venice 70: Future Reloaded. Since you had some involvement with the Venice 70: Future Reloaded redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 15:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Empire awards are by far more reliable and notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marked Man 808 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just what I was thinking as a comprise. Also, remember to sign whenever you leave a message on the talk page. LionFosset (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and sorry I undid your revision without letting you know, i did it before talking, I will leave you the choice what to do. Thank you.Marked Man 808 (talk) 06:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Thank you as well for being civil, and although I disagree with you on the inclusion of the Empire Awards (the films they award almost always seem to be the ones that have already succeeded box-office wise in the United States), I will let it join the article for now as compromise (did not notice the misspelling back there). LionFosset (talk) 06:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Country Winners
• Diversity winner
• High quality contributors
• Gender-gap fillers
• Page improvers
• Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. The linked article about the material you added to December 30 did not have any source that I could verify and add to this page to back up your addition so this change has been undone. If you restore it, please provide a direct reliable source. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddst1: Wait, there is already a source in the linked article for the birth date of Timité Bassori: "Directory of African Film-Makers and Films" (1992), edited by Keith Shiri... Okay, I just realized that I mistakenly put Françoise instead of Shiri in the reference, so if that was what caused you to be unable to verify the source, my bad, I will correct it immediately.LionFosset (talk) 03:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So the deal is that we need to add a direct source in the DOY page. I'm not trying to be pedantic but since I couldn't verity that the source in the article supported the DOB, I didn't feel like I could use that and add it to the DOY page. I did look at it. Anyway, I think this can be easily worked out if we can either verify the source or find another one. Make sense? (maybe?) Toddst1 (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. LionFosset (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for signing up to participate in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 200 articles created in over seven (7) languages! The figures soars to up to a thousand, if Wikidata entries are included. Furthermore, there have been about 5 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians in different countries across the world to create articles about African(a) cinema!

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

• Article suggestions can be found here. You can also add to this list.
• Some notable reliable sources for African cinema can be found here. Again, this list needs expansion.
• Interested in Wikidata translation? check out the Occupation Drive, which is being led by Wiki Loves Women, in support of the contest and the project!
• Please remember to list articles you have created or improved in the Article Achievements section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked.

Thank you once again for being part of this global event!

Kind regards.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LionFosset. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I'm bothering you because you are a recent contributor to the Home video page. There was a page Home entertainment which was a redirect to Home video. In connection with a dispute over the first sentence of Home video, I realized that Home entertainment covers more than video, so I have changed it to a DAB with contents as you can examine. Do you disagree? And, might I ask you to weigh in at talk:Home video#First sentence? Thanks in advance for any response. Jeh (talk) 08:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may have not have read this one before either:

WP:WNCAA You do not have to log in to edit, and almost anyone can edit almost any article at any given time. etc.

Or to put it another way "I'm too old for this ..." -- 109.79.73.193 (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I already get that anyone with access can edit Wikipedia, that's a given, but for that other reason... I guess that's fine too. LionFosset (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berting Labra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pateros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Elvis' Christmas Album tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon was concluded on 30 November 2018, and we've had amazing results. Over 570 articles were created across 8 language-Wikipedias. 7 in-person gatherings of Wikipedians were organized across different parts of the world.

All our winners have been recognized and you can check the complete list here.

For a pilot event, all our expectations were surpassed and we have you to thank for that. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! Thank you for helping to fix African content gaps on Wikipedia! We hope to see more of your participation in future AfroCine events and activities. Please remember to signup on the main WikiProject participants page, in order to get updated with these activities.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Where the World Meets. Since you had some involvement with the Where the World Meets redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hot Pepper (1973 film). Since you had some involvement with the Hot Pepper (1973 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 00:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. You have wrong information about on the page. Okay Ka Fairy Ko has Been aired in IBC 13 not RPN because RPN has no lineup on programming. StevenNBA89 (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StevenNBA89: You're right. It seems like the article I referenced stated the wrong channel (Channel 9), as the Thursdays after that article had the series listed as Channel 13. Thank you for the correction. LionFosset (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your contribution at Ferdinand Magellan. I noticed that in addition to the content you added, you made a lot of cosmetic changes involving whitespace. Not sure if this is the result of some automation you use when editing? But I was just kind of curious if there's a reason behind them, e.g. removing the space after * in bulleted lists? It seems like, if anything, there's a very mild community preference in favour of the spaces. Not to get too testy about it, but the article used a consistent style of spaces after asterisks before, so it seems contrary at least to the spirit of MOS:STYLEVAR to change that en masse. Also it just makes the diff a lot harder to read. Not a big deal at all, just wanted to mention it, and possibly get your view. Colin M (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Interpol: Hadlang sa Manlulupig.

User:Wugapodes while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect! This film isn't listed at Eddie Garcia filmography and you may want to add it there.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wugapodes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wug·a·po·des​ 06:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cultural depictions of the Yongle Emperor, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A Filipino Pilgrimage to Medjugorje. Since you had some involvement with the A Filipino Pilgrimage to Medjugorje redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Marites Dañguilan Vitug, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 17:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Interstellarity: Understandable. LionFosset (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philippine Ancestral Houses (1810–1930). Since you had some involvement with the Philippine Ancestral Houses (1810–1930) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Why Is Yellow the Middle of the Rainbow? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Is Yellow the Middle of the Rainbow? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Probably notable for founding Newsbreak, however the draft needs better quality sources to support it - facebook posts are not acceptable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marites Dañguilan Vitug and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marites Dañguilan Vitug, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LionFosset! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Shake, Rattle & Roll 11. I do not think that Shake, Rattle & Roll 11 fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because Many sources seem to refer to this by a roman number, and as per WP:COMMONNAME the "official name" does not control. Please establish consensus on the article talk page for any such move. I request that you consider not re-tagging Shake, Rattle & Roll 11 for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to Shake, Rattle and Roll 12. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And aso to Shake, Rattle and Roll Fourteen: The Invasion. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DESiegel: Okay, thank you for your assessment, DESiegel. However, may you reconsider the retitling of the article "Shake, Rattle and Roll XIV : The Invasion"? Sites such as IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, FilmAffinity, and Amazon Prime cite it as "Fourteen", while others such as PEP.ph, ABS-CBN News, and Regal on YouTube cite it as "14", so there is less of an argument for WP:COMMONNAME there, while the space before the colon is unnecessary. LionFosset (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but at least some seem to cite it with roman numerals, so I won't touch it until there is an article talk page move discussion, with either consents reached or no objections for over a week. Undisclosed moves should be clear-cut, not just arguable, and that goes double when you need to use the CSD to get rid of an obstructing page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 03:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Thank you very much for participating in The Months of African Cinema Global Edit-a-thon which was concluded on 30 November 2019. We are happy to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation approved to award tokens for our winners during this edition of the contest. These prizes would be given in the form of vouchers (primarily Amazon gift cards, but we can work with other possible options in your country) and would be distributed in this manner:

• Overall Winner - $100
• Second place - $50
• Third place - $30
• Diversity Winner - $30
• Gender gap filler - $30

If you want your articles to be considered for the contest, please make sure that your articles have been listed and properly linked on this page. If you are not interested in the competition aspect and prizes, you can also choose to remove your session from that page.

Thank you so much for being part of this wikievent!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Philippine-related articles use the mdy format due to the Philippines' strong national ti₯es to the United States. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 09:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@You've gone incognito: Okay. I'm from the Philippines myself, and we use the m-d-y format here. I just simply had the preference that the date format for references should be uniformly d-m-y for every article (except for US-related articles, that is). LionFosset (talk) 11:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent usage matters in the encyclopedia, so only one proper date format must be used in each article, whether in its body or inline citations. You've gone incognito (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia doesn't care about your preference, LionFosset. Stop removing the mdy format tags. Learn to follow the proper format.TheHotwiki (talk) 07:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@You've gone incognito: @Hotwiki:, thank you for noting! LionFosset (talk) 08:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really, thank you. LionFosset (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't. Do you even know what you're saying? Again stop disrupting articles. Who are you remove mdy dates and dictate things here. Stop it!TheHotwiki (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotwiki: Hm? What do you mean? LionFosset (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've gone incognito it is not correct to say that only one proper date format must be used in each article. MOS:DATE says Special rules apply to citations; see Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citation style. Later MOS:DATEUNIFY says:

Publication dates in an article's citations should all use the same format, which may be:

• the format used in the article body text,
• an abbreviated format from the "Acceptable date formats" table, provided the day and month elements are in the same order as in dates in the article body, or
• the format expected in the citation style being used (however, all-numeric date formats other than yyyy-mm-dd must still be avoided).

But it is not correct, LionFosset, that all citation dates must be in a uniform format across Wikipedia. Not is it correct to remove date format templates without discussion on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 14:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction, DESiegel. I will refrain from both actions from now on. LionFosset (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Listcruft. Also can you please stop removing mdy tags to articles, it wasn't added for you to remove for absolutely no reason. And looks like, I'm not the only person who noticed your questionable habit of deleting them. Your edits are highly disruptive. I'm tired of seeing your problematic edits. So just stop. Thank you. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotwiki: Episodes of a television series are not trivial. The partial list of episodes was an attempt at starting the list as a way to improve the article. I admit that I am not a perfect editor (though I don't think my edits are usually disruptive), but I do try my best to improve myself as an editor, such as when I realized that readability for editors is a priority on the website (the reason why spaces were added to infoboxes), and I will stop removing mdy tags, as I apologize for that. I was already following what you said about the mdy format for Philippine articles (Oops at the Lovingly Yours, Helen references, my bad there), so I hope you understand, "Restored". *wink wink* LionFosset (talk) 08:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is trivial when you select certain episodes to highlight in the article. "Partial" episode list is against Manual of Style. You clearly don't have the data for the entire list, so don't even bother. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotwiki: I will bother no more! Thanks, Hotwiki. LionFosset (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LionFosset! You created a thread called Friendly editor talk at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day!

Am going to leave a message here so we can discuss Magnum .357 here. I have a suggestion though. The remake is indeed entitled Magnum Muslim .357, but I think that was deliberate on E.R. Ejercito's part just so it can be defined which is which. Check the poster for the 1986 film. "Magnum" in shadow form precedes Muslim. That's why it has come to be known as Muslim .357 because the "Magnum" aspect was in shadow form while Muslim .357 is in bold form. It would also be beneficial down the line for us because then we wouldn't have to disambiguate the pages should a page devoted to the E.R. Ejercito movie be made.

Gardo Versace (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LionFosset: I have already modified the Synopsis by expanding the same and making it more closely resemble a summary of the film, as it should be. Now, all we have to do is ask the help of an administrator or a page mover to correct the title of the film. But before that, we have to discuss the proposal I have outline above. What do you think about it? I want to hear your take on the matter first and as you can see, I have not yet changed the title of the article. Gardo Versace (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gardo Versace: Okay, well the first thing to note is that in every film article, only one section should be allotted for the summary, so the "Plot" and "Synopsis" sections should be combined together under one "Plot" section. As for the title, unless the advertising for a film is so prevalent as to overtake the actual title of the film (e.g. Iron Man 3 instead of Iron Man Three, the latter as seen in the film itself), please use the title as seen in the film itself. I assume that the 1986 poster's "Magnum" shadow is merely to make obvious the reference to the .357 S&W Magnum by titling the film as Muslim .357; "Magnum" is not used in the film's onscreen title. Also, a friendly reminder never to use IMDb as a source on Wikipedia (you can use it as an easy reference for awards lists or crew information, but afterwards verify them with other more reliable sources). LionFosset (talk) 06:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LionFosset: I'll take note of that, though I am using IMDb as a mere placeholder until I can find better citations. I've had ao many unfortunate experiences of entire sections I've just put up being deleted simply because it is unsourced, hence my hands are forced into using IMDb for the time being. As for the title, I have checked the film and have seen Magnum is not used in the on-screen title, so I'd have to concede that one. As for the plot and synopsis, my apologies for that one as well. I've seen pages on Wikipedia contain both Plots and Synopsis and I thought the plot simply described the plot so that it wouldn't contain spoilers while the synopsis contains the summary of story itself. Gardo Versace (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gardo Versace: Quick tip: Add the template "Db-move" to the "Muslim .357" redirect holding up the page move you want to make, so that the redirect is speedily deleted for you to use it as the article title. LionFosset (talk) 07:35, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Back when I first used it in 2013, it was really satisfying to correct "The Eraserheads discography" to "Eraserheads discography". LionFosset (talk) 07:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@LionFosset: Thanks I highly appreciate it. I appreciate all the edits you've done on the pages I've created and those that I watch. I must say, it's a pleasure collaborating with you. I've got more FPJ movies in the pipeline that I'm still gathering enough references for, hopefully we can collaborate on those too. Gardo Versace (talk) 07:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Forever Love (1992 film). Since you had some involvement with the Forever Love (1992 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]