User talk:Northern Muriqui

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note on my talk page. I think that if you would take a quick glance at the edit you rolled back, you'll find it necessary to reinstate it. Best regards, 2607:FEA8:7A20:AE5:692E:7E2C:991E:7946 (talk) 04:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for pointing that out. I missed the last line of the paragraph in the article—that definitely is not encyclopedic tone. I went ahead and removed that line from the article entirely, since it doesn't have a reference to back it up. —NorthernMuriqui 04:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Northern Muriqui. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Northern Muriqui. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Northern Muriqui! I am Galendalia and I have revived the WikiProject for Spoken Wikipedia. I noticed that you signed up at some point to be a participant and as I am reviving this project, one of my tasks is to get the participant list in order. Would you please go to the Participants List and add your name and language(s) you speak? If you are already there and do not want to be, please move yourself to the inactive list at the bottom of the page. If you want to remain, please put remain next to your name (this way you are not moved). If I do not see anything from you by May 30, 2020, I will move you to the inactive participant list. It would also be great if you would be willing to join the task force for Pronunciation that would be awesome, as there are troublesome words we run into. Thank you for considering joining us. If you decide to leave, I will be sad to see you leave as so many people have done a great job on the recordings and any work you have done makes a significant difference. Galendalia (talk · contribs) (sent via Mass Message. This is a message that is one time, so no unsubscribe link is provided.)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia at 11:42, 16 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Northern Muriqui! I hope this message finds you well and healthy! I am working this weekend on the Spoken Wikipedia project pages to get them in line with other projects. I just wanted to inform you in advance that some pages may be created. deleted, moved, or otherwise. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page.
Thanks, Galendalia (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC) WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia Coordinator[reply]

Can I ask why you reverted it as soon as I publish it? Have you done any actual research on the matter? I think you were quite quick on the trigger in this case. 166.62.177.150 (talk) 03:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages like that one are intended to link to articles about the topic (in this case, piston). If there is no article to link to, it doesn't belong on a disambiguation page. If you need any other help, let me know! Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 03:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll find this paragraph and link it bleh. This is so complicated.166.62.177.150 (talk) 03:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I need some help with something. I recently changed my username from Reliableforever to KorinoChikara. My old username, Reliableforever, is still on the whitelist though. I was wondering if there was a way to update it with KorinoChikara. Thanks! --Kanashimi Hyoketsu 21:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@KorinoChikara: I think I got you added. Up until now, I had absolutely no idea how the whitelist worked. Apparently, if an edit is marked as good (keyboard shortcut g), the editor behind it gets whitelisted. Being on the whitelist results in an "Are you sure?" box for (almost) any Huggler trying to undo your edits, and hides your edits from some(?) Huggle queues. I guess you really do learn something new every day. Thanks and happy editing!—NorthernMuriqui 22:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that either, but I did know a whitelist is good. Actually is very interesting. Anyways, thanks again! --Kanashimi Hyoketsu 13:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Northern Muriqui:, where have you been on Wikipedia? I haven't seen you edit yesterday! --Allen ^talk 18:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen: I've been watching Wikipedia, just not doing too much active editing. Real life is a little too stressful for me to be actively doing that and this. I'll be back full-time pretty soon. —NorthernMuriqui 19:12, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Muriqui:, I took a look at your contributions is you're trying to help them? I might think you're actively editing on Wikipedia as long you're in real life! --Allen ^talk 01:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm here for the long weekend. —NorthernMuriqui 01:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen: you don't need to worry about what I'm doing. I edit here when I feel like it; I don't when I don't. Please don't ask where I am; it clutters up my talk page. —NorthernMuriqui 16:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is unnecessary and misleading to say that Gabriel Soto is of Spanish decent when everyone in Mexico is of Spanish decent. I think the comment does not say or add much to his biography. Saying that someone is Mexican is saying that they are of Spanish decent, it goes without saying. Why is it necessary? It adds nothing. Is it because he is fair-skinned? There are many Mexicans of fair skin and I don't think any of us go around explaining that we are of Spanish decent. It perpetuates uneducated stereotypes about what it means to be Mexican. Mexico is another country in America that was colonized by Europeans and that is common knowledge; it goes without saying that the people of all American countries are to some extent of European decent. When Brad Pitt is discussed in wikipedia, there is no mention to his European roots, but they are obviously there. Why then does it become a necessary fact with Gabriel Soto?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.140.22.71 (talk)

While what you said is all (to some extent) true, there are other ethnicities in Mexico. There's even a list of those here. Perhaps it's not necessary to include anything ethnicity-wise in the article.—NorthernMuriqui 17:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it is not necessary to include ethnicity related information such as "Spanish" decent. It really does not say much. Yes there are many ethnicities in Mexico, but having Spanish roots is not an ethnicity in Mexico; it is a fact for most people. I am glad there are people like you that impart knowledge by sharing information; but in educating people there is a responsibility for the subtext of our messages. It is important not to perpetuate stereotypes and be mindful of commonly agreed upon misinformation. Thanks for lending an "ear."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.140.22.71 (talk)

I went ahead and removed it from the article: it was unsourced and not really needed there.—NorthernMuriqui 17:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you recent messages on your talk page? Did you archive them? --Allen ^talk 16:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen: Yes, I archive the first 3 weeks of the previous month on the 1st, and then the rest of the previous month around the 7th. The archives are listed in the box in the top right.—NorthernMuriqui 16:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Northern. No problem about the article. I figured it was up for deletion consideration but am unsure how to delete a page? I will leave the page as is. Is it possible to create a talk page for it?Anyway sorry for any confusion! Kingslove2013 (talk) 23:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingslove2013: You can request that it be deleted by adding

{{subst:prod|[WHY IT SHOULD BE DELETED]}}

to the top of the page, filling in your reasoning where it belongs. If no one disagrees with it within a week, the article will be deleted. If anyone disagrees (by removing that tag), there's a more complicated process to see if the community thinks it should be deleted. I can help you with that, if that's the case. Let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 23:55, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have been trying to update our information on the site but don't have any understanding of code, etc. so would really appreciate some guidance on how to get it right. Thanks June Read (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC) June[reply]

@June Read: sure, I can definitely help. What specifically do you need help with?—NorthernMuriqui 01:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Muriqui: Hi, and are you just helping me on Wikipedia even you didn't look at my contributions? --Allen ^talk 17:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen: Yes, I am trying to help you. Sometimes that requires that I look at your contributions. I have done what I have done to help you and the project, not to make you feel bad. —NorthernMuriqui 17:57, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Muriqui: That's good even if you're helping me on Wikipedia a lot! :) --Allen ^talk 18:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are lies all over Wikipedia about Albert Pyun's involvement in the loan to make his film Max Havoc: Curse of the dragon. The people of Guam are spreading lies. We are friends of Albert's and here to set the record straight. Get it? We're not going anywhere— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

Are your claims backed up in any reliable sources? If not, I don't care what army you represent. Intimidation doesn't work here.—NorthernMuriqui 00:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you don't understand is Albert Pyun has been slandered by Wikipedia on his page and the max havoc page. We are here to put a stop to it. He's sick of it and has told his fans to correct things here and we will. For almost 10 years the people of Guam and the Guam press have tried to create a scandle over his max havoc film. he had nothing to do with the loan. DO YOUR RESEARCH. There is reliable sources everywhere that Albert Pyun is not a cheat or a dishonest man. He has fans in the thousands. How could he keep making films if he was going around ripping of people to make his films? YOU HAVE A VENDETTA AGAINST HIM!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

No, I actually don't have a vendetta against anyone. It's not my job to find sources supporting your claims; it's yours. If this is as much of an issue as you say it is, it'll be easy to find sources. —NorthernMuriqui 01:00, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I have a reliable source: Impact Online, February 15, 2014, article is called "Albert Pyun: Max Havoc Declassified" http://www.impactonline.co/features/1704-albert-pyun-max-havoc-unclassified In the article Albert Pyun is interviewed and gives THE TRUTH about the entire Max Havoc story. About how HE WAS SLANDERED by the Guam press and certain editors here at Wikipedia. He tells the only true story. The entire Guam press had a vendetta against him. I would add that to the article but the article is now locked. Might you add it for me?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

Per the reliable sources guideline, a reliable source is independent of its subject. The guy talking about himself is not independent. He could say he invented the Internet and since it's an interview, it would get printed. (Also, who the heck are the White Eyed Pees?)—NorthernMuriqui 04:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you from Guam? Probably— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

Please try to focus on the content, not who I am. —NorthernMuriqui 04:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I don't understand: Content keeps getting removed by editors from Guam (that IS NOT a personal attack)and they slant the story to say WHAT THEY WANT IT TO SAY that Albert Pyun scammed the island of Guam into giving him money to make Max Havoc and then Guam loses all the money when the film fails. Sources are hard to find that say the truth, which is Albert Pyun is an honest film maker with millions of fans AND HE DOESN'T HAVE TO STEAL FROM ISLANDS NOBODIES KNOWS ABOUT OR CARES ABOUT. Why are these sources hard to find? Because the Guam press (covered then by other bigger papers like The Los Angeles Times and the Wall Street Journal) is behind all the lies and they have slanted the story to create scandal and sell papers— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

I'm sorry to hear that you're dissatisfied with press coverage regarding this issue, but unless you can find an independent source that supports your opinion, it still doesn't belong here. Sources might be hard to find, but that doesn't mean they're not needed. Also, being from Guam wouldn't be a personal attack...if you weren't using it as one.—NorthernMuriqui 04:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

because the Guam Press and certain Wikipedia editors are a cabal with a unity of purpose of trying to slander Albert Pyun. We are his friends and we've been trying to convince him to sue, not only members of the Guam press but certain Wikipedia editors, also— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

Wikipedia, believe it or not, doesn't focus on truth. The focus is on verifiability: not repeating what we think is true, but repeating what reliable sources say is true. Also, don't threaten to take legal action—that can and will get you blocked (and trying to intimidate me still does nothing).—NorthernMuriqui 04:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So Wikipedia doesn't care about the truth? Then what's the point of having a Max Havoc page or an Albert Pyun page that's not the truth? That's lies?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.128.123.119 (talk)

Wikipedia is a summary of what others have accepted as truth about whatever subject. It's not about what any one editor sees as "truth". Once you get back from your block, we can discuss it more if you'd like.—NorthernMuriqui 14:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Northern Muriqui, Thank you for revising and commenting on my article about Stus Rollins aka Stewart Rollinson. However, it is important for you to know that the article you are referring to does not violate any copyrights, because I am the author of those texts on Stus Rollins Website. I also conducted personal interwievs as you can see on youtube. Please advise on how we can proceed. I would very much like to see my article published on wikipedia, so please advise. Thank you, Yours sincerely, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pattisantoni (talk • contribs)

@Pattisantoni: The content on that website is copyrighted: not available under a free license. If you'd like to donate that text to Wikipedia, you can follow the instructions here.—NorthernMuriqui 23:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr Muriqui, Is this better? Wasn't sure if we should leave off the website at the end. Thank you for your advice! We are new at this. Best regards, Catherine

Art Galleries&Artists of the South Magazine, an art magazine for the right-brain Art Galleries&Artists of the South magazine showcases art galleries with world renowned artists as well as artists located in the southern United States. The Lifestyle Destinations section which acts as an art directory for locating art galleries, Emerging Artists section which features emerging artists that have been selected by a judge and the Of Interest section are all integral to the magazine.

Founded in 2003, the magazine highlights southern art galleries and the southern artist in a highly visual format. Art Galleries&Artists of the South is published by AGAS Publishing, llc (— Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtGalSouth (talk • contribs) )

The magazine also is featured in a website, AGASart.com, where many of the articles from the print magazine are available.

@ArtGalSouth: That is better, but it still sounds like an advertisement to me. It's very difficult to write neutrally about something you're this connected to. You should probably read this page and decide if you'd still like to write it. If you do, and you'd like any help, let me know here or by typing {{u|Northern Muriqui}}~~~~. Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 23:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will get someone to write it. Do you know anyone who could do this? Best, Catherine —NorthernMuriqui 01:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ArtGalSouth: the best way is to add it to the appropriate section at Requested Articles. Follow the instructions there, and eventually someone might decide to write it. It's not fast, and it's not guaranteed that it'll get written, but that's the easiest way to get someone else to write it. The other option is to keep writing AfC drafts like you did, and make whatever adjustments reviewers recommend. This can take a while too, because AfC is "severely backlogged", with over 2100 drafts awaiting reviewing.—NorthernMuriqui 01:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HI, I was going over the information you provided regarding Ja Rule and you have a lot of incorrect information. He was not raised a Jehova's Whitness for that long only until the age of 9 where he then relocated to 215th st. and Woodhull in Hollis Queens where he then began dealing crack cocaine and being arrested for gun and substance possession. He went to John Adams high school a notoriously rough school and in there he continued to sell drugs. I would very much appreciate it if you could put this in formation in place of what you already have, this information that I just laid out is all documented in his book "Unruly"— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbyrobbjm (talk • contribs)

The information you have would be great added to the article, instead of replacing information that's already there. Also, make sure that, if your addition is based on information in his book, you cite that book as a source by following the instructions here. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 04:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I'm leaving this message in the correct place or not. I know that Wikipedia is user generated so I figured the information is only as good as whatever the source of the person who wrote it is. Hope that makes sense. Regarding the change of last name & parents name of Dennis Alexio: I grew up in the same small town that Dennis did & he lived a few blocks away from me. His father was in fact my history teacher in high school (Reese Dick). When Dennis became a kick boxer he took his mothers maiden name (she was of Greek heritage & quite a beauty). His mom worked at our local theater as an usher & ticket taker. Very nice woman. For what I think are obvious reasons Dennis did not want to be know as Dennis Dick so he made a simple change. I can understand that. I can't site any written reference. Not even my old yearbook because Dennis was a lot younger then I so he wouldn't be in any of my year books. I do have photo a his father as a teacher is my yearbook & Dennis is the spitting image of him. I don't know how to reference something that I simply personally knew because I knew his parents. You can email me at (address removed) & I can show you photo of his father but not of him with the old name. So I guess my reference would be that I knew his family.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Redhedii (talk • contribs)

@Redhedii: Sorry for the slow reply, today was way busier than I would've liked it to be. Normally, we require more than "I know this is a fact" to add something to a biographical article, because it makes it hard to verify the truth of it. However, after a few Google searches, I did find a more reliable source to support that: http://www.celebrities-galore.com/celebrities/dennis-alexio/birth-data/. You can definitely re-add the name change to the article, and cite that page as a source, by adding this code <ref>{{cite web|title=Dennis Alexio Birth Data|url=http://www.celebrities-galore.com/celebrities/dennis-alexio/birth-data/|website=Celebrities Galore|publisher=Top Synergy Group|accessdate=14 August 2014}}</ref> after the first time the article talks about the name change. If you need help with this (or anything else), let me know here or by writing {{u|Northern Muriqui}}~~~~ on your talk page. Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia!—NorthernMuriqui 01:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I found it amusing that you decided to interpret my opinion as a "personal attack" towards Allen. But if you thoroughly check his contribs on Wikipedia, you'll understand what I mean (and I don't mean this in a malicious condescending demeanor). Yes, I said Wikipedia, not Wikia. I have already checked his on here. I don't think it's possible to contain the drama with him on Wikia, it's already on Wikipedia with his nonsensical replies to particular forums/talk pages. Anyway, rant over. Have a nice day. 94.9.178.146 (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's very possible to contain the drama on Wikia: don't bring it here and it won't be here. I have no idea whether Wikia prohibits harassment, but I know for a fact Wikipedia does. Nothing can constructively be accomplished by encouraging that he be blocked. It serves only to instigate conflicts and to drive away someone who's (apparently) trying hard to help. If he ever ends up causing problems, we'll have an issue. Until then, lay off the personal attacks.—NorthernMuriqui 01:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What?! --Allen ^talk 08:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am his granddaughter and this is what he told me. I did read the article cited and the person interviewed assumed this was why he was nicknamed Nig. He was actually not particularly dark skinned either.{{unsigned ip|65.242.35.130

Is that change supported in any published source?—NorthernMuriqui 18:29, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Northern,

About 5 minutes ago, I received a note that says my IP address edited an article on July 12 around 4 that I'd never even looked at prior to receiving your notification. I spend a lot of time on Wikipedia but have never edited any articles so I was understandably quite confused and was wondering what was up with all this? Best, RebeccaIsabella (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RebeccaIsabella: IP addresses can be, and often are, shared between multiple people. Additionally, some IPs rotate over time. Because of all that weirdness, if the message doesn't apply to you, it doesn't apply to you. If you didn't make whatever edit it was, especially since you have an account, you can safely ignore the message. If you need help or have any more questions, let me know here or by typing {{u|Northern Muriqui}} ~~~~ along with a message on your talk page. Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 11:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you so much. :] — Preceding unsigned comment added by RebeccaIsabella (talk • contribs)

I noticed your review of this piece. I wondered if you miskeyed on the reason for declining it. The piece is a personal blog rather than an article and should probably have been rejected under what Wikipedia is not. References will not create the ability for this piece to be published, in my view. I wonder if you would mind looking again? Fiddle Faddle 08:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: I actually did mean to put the reason I did, I just never realized that the "subject doesn't meet notability guidelines" option didn't really talk about notability. I adjusted the review. Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 11:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about you, but I am always learning. Thanks. Fiddle Faddle 11:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

say, you really think i will read that tons of text for just publishing some article? that was my first & last time using your system.

WIKIPEDIA MADE ME SMILE... best wishes ALEX BURSKY Alaska Nofairy (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please put back the page of the Ghanian Referendum, which is a sourced and confirmed event which will take place later this year. It seems a speciality for Wikipedia to approve all false news and reject the correct and sourced articles. This is last time in my life I waste my time to try to improve this shameful community . It is simply disgusting. If you are not even able to click and verify on the link to see the validity of the source, than you really leave Wikipedia and stop tampering the works of the others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxcrc (talk • contribs)

First of all, the page is still there. Second, it doesn't matter how sourced and confirmed it is, an article that is 2 sentences long and only reports basic news is not an article; it's a headline. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. You can can feel free to look into our sister project Wikinews, where news is not only accepted, it is encouraged.

Also, if you feel that something (not this; anything else) is being done wrong or unfairly, do something about it. You can talk to me (on this page), any admin, or find a place to ask about it here. —NorthernMuriqui 20:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I messed up the Michigan article. I didn't mean to and noticed it pretty soon after I edited it. Sorry. 108.68.183.160 (talk) 21:52, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's fine. I'm glad you were trying to help Wikipedia! If you need help, have any questions, or anything else, let me know here (on my talk page) or type {{ping|Northern Muriqui}} on your talk page. Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 21:55, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wonder you left me a message on my talk page how you got rollback rights on Wikipedia? --Allen ^Talk 04:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen:I spent a long time (over 3 years, although much less than that is normal) making good, constructive edits and fighting vandalism (I had about 770 edits at the time I requested it). I had a need for it to do what I wanted to do: last month I averaged 45 edits a day, and most of that was fighting vandalism. It would've taken forever to do that by hand using the undo button. At this point in your Wikipedia career, I highly suggest you find something that interests you and work on it. Work hard and don't give up. If that's fighting vandalism, you'll know when the right time is to request rollback again. If it's something else, and you just happen to see vandalism in your day-to-day editing, the undo button should be more than sufficient. Any other questions? I'll gladly help with anything. —NorthernMuriqui 05:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I was doing chores, I have a couple friends over and left my computer running (MISTAKE!!!!!! HUGE ONE!) Ill check my contributions and see what they did, thanks for notifying me of what they did qq Dillpick88 (talk) 05:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Mr.Muriqui, I apologize for the edit made on Justin Johnson's page. Someone got a hold of my laptop and the rest is history. I'm new to wikipedia, so how do I check my other edits made? Thanks for undo-ing the mistake! Wow, there are a lot of apologies on your page. This will be the last one from me! Thanks a million, have an awesome summer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inaccurateinfo42 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Inaccurateinfo42:You can see all the edits you've made at Special:Contributions/Inaccurateinfo42, although I just checked and there are no outstanding non-constructive edits from your account. If you have any other questions or need any help, ever, just let me know here on my talk page, or by typing {{ping|Northern Muriqui}} on your talk page. Thanks and have a great day! —NorthernMuriqui 05:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Sorry about my recent post on that societal/cultural philosophies page. My cousin got a grasp of my laptop. Sorry again! — Preceding undated comment added 05:38, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I was not vandalizing the page. It really does suck. So, I am warning people so they dont have to watch this kind of shit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard (talk • contribs)

@RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard: Unless you have a source to back that up, it's vandalism, or at the very least, biased: neither of those are allowed.—NorthernMuriqui 23:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous reviews that prove it's a shitty movie!— Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard (talk • contribs)

@RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard:Then you need to nicely add that to the right section of the article, with properly cited sources. Profanely shouting it at the top of the article is not the right way to do that. —NorthernMuriqui 23:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was not trying to be rude or anything. --PUPPET MASER MOVIES ARE GAY! (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RyanBurnsTheHaruhiSuzumiyaFantard: Your signature makes that very hard to believe. —NorthernMuriqui 23:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello reason you did not allow my edit of the HK trail. I am not sure why ? I have run this trail for 8 years with a variety of GPS watches and with people doing the same. Trail running is a very popular activity and nowadays trailers want updated facts.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavignebap (talk • contribs)

@Lavignebap: My issue was not with what you added, it was that you didn't have a source to go with it. If it is only based on your own observations, it is not allowed. The source that's already there says 50, so we go with 50 until there's something to prove otherwise.—NorthernMuriqui 05:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes but the original source is patently proven as incorrect by GPS technology. The source was an approximate reading from many years ago. Countless runners have expressed disappointment when they get to the finish and only find it is low 40kms. Wikipedia should be a resource to highlight inaccuracies rather than have acciracies deleted out by people that have no practical experience of the hk trail itself. I bracketed the correct distance to give prior warnings to runners contemplating doing the trail so they would not be shortchanged. Most would then access running GPS apps like strava, runkeeper, mapmyrun which would prove my correction.— Preceding unsigned comment added by lavignebap (talk • contribs)

@Lavignebap: First of all, please reply here at the bottom of the page. Second, you have to find some other source to support it only being 43 km. The trail's official website says 50, so unless you have independent proof, we can't include your observations. —NorthernMuriqui 15:38, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I wrote my correction in the wrong place and more sorry that you accept an "official website" that was updated in 1992! Some sources for you to back up my claims and actually add legitamacy to this page which is currently misleading and damaging for the runners who use the Hong Kong trail as a training playground.

(1) http://www.strava.com/segments/6512953

Green Power 50km

Run Segment Hong Kong, Hong Kong Island, Hong Kong

43.6km

Distance

-1%

Avg Grade

-2m

Lowest Elev

412m

Highest Elev

413m

Elev Difference

43 Attempts By 36 People

(2)http://www.strava.com/activities/108744937/segments/2369415798

Saturday, 25 January 2014

GreenPower 50km

Target - 5:00:00

Actual - 4:59:31

Position - 8th

Mood - Stoked.

•••

2

43.6km

Distance

5:00:19

Elapsed Time

6:53/km

Pace

Elevation

1,308m

Calories

4,321

Moving Time

4:55:00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by lavignebap (talk • contribs)

@Lavignebap: The reliable sources noticeboard is a little behind at the moment, so I don't have the second opinion I was looking for. However, according to the reliable source guideline, Strava is not a reliable source, because it is self published by its users. If you have any other source that says it's 43km, instead of 50, I'd love to see it. Until then, however, I'm more inclined to trust the government website that says 50. —NorthernMuriqui 15:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I find it pointless communicating with you. I will now add an article on Wikipedia about trail running in hk which will give the experience of myself and the 300+ members of my club. it will give accurate and useful information to the the many people who need it. I will highlight the the inaccuracies of official government sites(ironically one of the original goals of this very website). Because you don't even acknowledge that this a safety issue. Further I find it bizarre - to the extreme - that you label GPS technology as self published. The only way to perform a self publish with the application is to delete the run/hike/cycle is to delete your data. In all honesty this is a serious issue for hikers/runners. They rely on their GPS data to check they are going the correct direction. I have been involved in three search parties(where we relied on GPS) to find three lost runners in the early stages of the HK trail. One had actually fallen down a side of a cliff and died-which to this day haunts me. Why were they lost? Because the 'official site' says section 1 is 7km long and they had only gone 5km. They backtracked found a new trail and went well off trail.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavignebap (talk • contribs)

@Lavignebap: While I'm sorry to hear about that runner, I still don't see why, if the trail is 43 kilometers, absolutely no one has said anything about it. If I Google the trail's name and "50 km", I find many results naming it at 50 (most of the results are not reliable sources; however, some are). On the other hand, a search for its name with "43 km" returns...nothing. —NorthernMuriqui 00:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted an edit I made on my talk page?, What was that in regards to, Reply on my talk page The Newspaper (talk) 16:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a duck. As the CSD says, Admirenepal is the sockmaster and the creator here is the sockpuppet. Several admins have already been deleting pages created by other socks of Admirenepal, including a previous incarnation of this article yesterday. For some examples, see User_talk:Ponyo#Poudar. (I originally posted this reply on the article talk page but, per WP:BEANS, there is no point in alerting this prolific sockmaster to his "tells".) - Sitush (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush: Okay, that makes it clearer. I have zero experience recognizing ducks, and I'm trying to learn whatever I can. They didn't look alike, but after reading that, I can definitely see it. Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 21:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Unfortunately, I come across an awful lot of sockpuppets because of the topic area that I frequent. But even now I often spot them either after they've been messing around for quite a while or when someone else points out what (with hindsight) is obvious. It is a fine art but experience tends to count for a lot: the more you see, the easier it becomes to spot the signs. @Ponyo:, whose talk page I link to above, has checkuser rights, which means they can do some digging around that is not possible by the likes of you and I. - Sitush (talk) 00:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank You
	Thanks for removing the inappropriate comment by Wmd deisndn on my sandbox! Kind regards User:PabloOsvaldo17 ;) Paolo Vetere (talk) 15:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for patrolling my talk page. For the record this is a duck. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 21:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem. I mean, it's part of the job description. Cheers. (Okay, yeah, that doesn't feel right. I'm not gonna say cheers anymore. It's just not who I am.) —NorthernMuriqui 21:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Solarra: If you don't mind, can you explain FL's DUCKiness? I compared his/her contribs to Evlekis & co, along with Sinbad Barron (which was linked from that SPI) and couldn't find many similarities besides the welcoming of random IPs (which, by the way, are no longer in FL's contribs, because Nick nuked them). Thanks for any clarification you can give (and if you don't want to let FL know what got him/her caught, feel free to email me instead).—NorthernMuriqui 22:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Email sent. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 23:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You did wonder that you have replies on my talk page, and now do you like and enjoyed My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic? Probably I'm just a fan of it like other users love it so much and they have MLP userboxes on it! :D --Allen ^talk 19:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AllenHAcNguyen: I've actually never watched it. Also, please keep in mind that communication on Wikipedia should be about Wikipedia. Try to avoid random (and semi-random) conversations like this (and this), because Wikipedia is not a forum.—NorthernMuriqui 19:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello iam v srry about the mixup i believe this is more of a personal name i half for reinhard v sorry is not accurate!70.126.233.218 (talk) 03:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will have one of our staff go through the process of getting a photo approved for wikipedia next week. I would rather not spend my Saturday messing around with this - I can barely even figure out how to send you a message on here! That all said, I can tell you she does not give permission for that other photo to be used and has asked me to change it. I guess technically it was taken in a public setting, but she isn't a celebrity, just a government employee, so I'm not sure its ethically appropriate for random photos to be attached to her Wikipedia page - whatever the technical rules are.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpharomeo6 (talk • contribs)

@Alpharomeo6: According to this guideline, if the picture was taken in a public setting and has no negative connotations (defamatory captions, etc) attached to it, we don't really have a good reason to get rid of it. Also, since you're (as far as I can tell) being paid to do this editing, make sure you read and understand how to disclose that to avoid possible consequences. If you have any other questions, let me know! Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 15:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i tried to prove that this replay stuff is nonsense. Can you please visit the talk page of the Article? Common sence has to play a role. It's difficult to prove the opposite if one source claims something that no other source discussed about.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.114.38.2 (talk)

I do not recognize your authority on OSB, I looked at the other areas where you deleted people's input and it seems you are just deleting things without reason. I am a Habitat for Humanity crew lead, Project engineer for several construction projects, and my sources are first person accounts, many of them, by builders and people living in homes with OSB-related problems. The suspect information regarding OSB is that provided by the sellers. Do not use people trying to hawk the product as your sole source of information on the product, especially when it is very easy to find dozens of sources, including articles in the Boston Globe and New York Times, on the hazards of OSB.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyn8nn (talk • contribs)

@Lyn8nn: The reason I undid your changes is that the source associated with the first sentence says it has good features. If it doesn't, we need a different source. Along with that, the paragraph you added didn't cite any source. To keep Wikipedia reliable, we need to cite verifiable, reliable sources to back up anything that's likely to be disputed, like a claim that there are negative health effects connected with something. I suggest you read this page, find one of the dozens of sources supporting this, and then consider re-adding it. If you need help or anything else, let me know here or by typing {{ping|Northern Muriqui}}~~~~ on your user talk page. Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 04:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tagging those socks :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 23:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm LikeKaztoCastillo. You sent me this message.

" Hello, I'm Northern Thomas. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:Renrenrubas, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —NorthernMuriqui 04:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)"

I honestly don't know what you're talking about. I dunno what your message means.

But don't treat this as a hate message. I just need a better clarification of what I may have done. If it's something big, then I sincerely apologise. So here's a kitten! Peace!

LikeKaztoCastillo (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@LikeKaztoCastillo: Thanks for the kitten! I honestly don't know what you might have done; Renrenrubas has been deleted since then, so nobody* can see the history. I also don't see any messages on your talk page, though, so unless you were editing under another account, I'm a little confused about how you got that warning in the first place. —NorthernMuriqui 13:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Northern Muriqui, thanks for your comments. As a new user I have a lot to learn about wikipedia, but I understand the policy requirements that you mentioned. Concerning the text that you deleted, since I am part of the european project "ROADMARK" [1], I used the same text here as in the official webpage, without realizing that this would be a copyright problem. So, I will reformulate the text and add it again to the User:CFamal2014/sandbox. Is this ok? Once again, thanks for let me know this. CFamal2014 15:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@CFamal2014: Yes, that would solve the copyright problem. However, you also have to make sure that the article doesn't sound like an advertisement for the project. Make sure that you maintain a neutral tone when describing the project. If you do that, everything should end up working out. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask here or by typing {{u|Northern Muriqui}} and your question on your talk page. Thanks! —NorthernMuriqui 15:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have a complain, do you have any idea what are you writing about ? Millhouse Capital does exist till no, with a new owner but the same wealthy as Abramovich. The subject was MILLHOUSE CAPITAL and you did Millhouse LLC from it so what is this for a behaviour ? Your informations you took out from what ? Lies in magazines ? Maybe you will investigate a bit better before you publish such rubbish. The text was clear before you have changed it complete in a lie. And believe me, I should know what I am writing about because I am more involved in Millhouse than you ever will be ! If you will not restore the Millhouse Capital text with both owners let us see what the lawyers will tell to this ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.5.181.218 (talk)

@213.5.181.218: It's fine to disagree with the content of the article; it's not fine to delete it all. If you have reliable sources backing up what you say, then you can add it to the article. Until then, try to avoid marking it all as lies. —NorthernMuriqui 19:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a paper cut CAN'T be made with anything other than paper, change it back homo— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.70.102 (talk)

According to a source from the article, it can. —NorthernMuriqui 04:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my edit of Ray Rice's 2014 season that included the video of him dragging his then girlfriend out of an elevator after knocking her out. You said " I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ray Rice, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it." which I assume must be an auto-message of some sort because the video is the one used in court against him. If it is good enough for court, certainly it is good enough for Wikipedia. Please review my post and re-add it. The NFL swept his violence against women under the rug - please don't do the same.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.150.43.77 (talk)

Thanks for suggesting that we add the link to the video. I re-added it as a reference, linking to TMZ instead of YouTube. This is a more neutral method of adding it, which is what we aim for with contentious facts about living people.—NorthernMuriqui 00:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For keeping up with AllenHAcNguyen‎ and going the extra mile. I would have lost my patience, a long, long time ago.  NQ  talk 07:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently left a warning note on my talk page. Did you warn the other editor as well? --Malerooster (talk) 03:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Malerooster: Yes, I'm in the middle of typing it. Hold on.—NorthernMuriqui 03:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Not sure if you get involved in content disputes or would like to weigh in? --Malerooster (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it up to you two for now. If you need a third opinion (if you can't come up with a compromise on your own) let me know here or ping me on the talk page ({{u|Northern Muriqui}}). —NorthernMuriqui 03:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, --Malerooster (talk) 04:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your polite warning. Viriditas (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sir i will want to create a article with name G.Subash is the person who is not notable person .so give me ideas with step by step method to create this article.this is not my article.this article is someone else gsd (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i want to replace this name with the article name G.Subash.otherwise you will create artice with this name G.Subash of data User:Gsd12345/G._Subash gsd (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gsd12345: When the last editor declined it, s/he left a message on the page explaining why it was declined. We can't accept the article until you (or someone else) take care of those issues. The article needs to cite multiple reliable sources so that the subject can be proven to be notable (click on those links for more information). If you need help, let me know here or by typing [[User:Northern Muriqui]] on your talk page. Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 15:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am a newbie with editing wikipedia pages and I really don't want to cause trouble. I work for the company who produces the new TV shows. As the block was originally titled Xploration Nation, but about 4 or 5 months ago we realized the title needed to be changed. All of our social media content refers to Xploration Station and within the next couple days our new website will be up and running and will have an Xploration Station page. All recent articles including one that was posted yesterday for Xploration Earth 2050 and Joe Penna as the host also reference the title of Xploration Station as the name of the 2 hour block. I tried including that on the Wiki page and its there but its not in the right spot on the page. I need help to get through to these guys this is the real title going forward. If you can help I'll stop editing pages lol. I just want this page to be accurate. Thanks, Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjay931979 (talk • contribs)

@Mjay931979: (Sorry for the slow reply) Once you get back from your block, try discussing the issue on the article's talk page, and presenting whatever sources you have. I think that suggesting http://www.rotfeldproductions.com/ would be a good idea. Until you guys can reach a consensus on the talk page, you should avoid reverting other changes, especially more than three times a day. If you need help or anything else, let me know here! Thanks!—NorthernMuriqui 17:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry about the Uncle poopa thing on the Steven page, I left the editing page on and my friend erased Uncle and put Poopa. Thank you! Jakecartoon345 (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.79.110 (talk) [reply]

Hi! I'm sorry to hear about that happening! Thanks for the explanation and make sure you keep your friend away from Wikipedia ;) —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was announced tonight on NESN. You said I did not provide a reference. What do you want? !!Aflanders1 (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, take a deep breath. Second, ignore the "negative" part of my edit summary on the article--that was unintentional. Third, if you had provided a reference, as described in Wikipedia's policy, I wouldn't have reverted your changes. Feel free to re-add your contribution, with an appropriately cited source. If you need help, please let me know here on my talk page. Thanks!—Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 01:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I wrote about guayadeque is facatually accurate based on my experience. I don't like that I can't warn people about the uselessness of this program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fraxinus23 (talk • contribs)

Hi! Unfortunately, your personal experience is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Thanks, —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 04:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Northern Muriqui,

I write in response to your note stating that you deleted the first-person, naturalist observations I added to a plant entry.

The plant entries I saw on the site lacked cultural information on how to propagate, use with plant combinations, provide winter interest, provide plant cautions about invasive characteristics, where they grow and look best. These are first-person observations garnered by a naturalist over time. Do these observations provide no value to a new gardener?

I have been gardening and making observations of plants for 42 years. Today I have a 2 acre garden of perennials, shrubs, bulbs, vines and trees as well as specialty gardens including losange, rock/mountain, espalier, formal, temple, knot, late daylily, statue, winter interest, late narcissus/daffodil, grass, pond gardens.

Local garden clubs have toured this garden and it was featured on a county-wide garden tour and a full-page newspaper article on the garden's diversity. I have given classes at a local library for young gardeners.

Academically, I hold a bachelors and masters degree. I was a business reporter for 17 years. I hope that knowing this about me might better inform your decision to delete or not delete the cultural information I have provided on plants on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has my e-mail address. I would be happy to send you my cell phone to discuss it as I think this message is posted to the Web.

Sincerely, JohnnyAppleseed52 (talk) 04:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)JohnnyAppleseed52[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately (and this isn't a pretty answer), no, your observations do not serve any purpose on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has a policy prohibiting the posting of original research (like personal observations), even if you have many years of experience to back it up. The only way you can add this content to Wikipedia is if it is verifiable by a third-party source.

If that does not satisfy you, you can feel free to create a website or a blog and post about your experiences to your heart's content. However, your personal website is also not a verifiable source, and is still original research.

If you have any more questions, please let me know! Thanks! —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 04:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	(Redacted)
	Aaron Hines is Shin Jongkook English name Aaron the sloth (talk) 23:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Find me a source and I'll gladly agree. Until then, please take a deep breath.—Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do know some misguided soul re-uploaded it; I just have plausible deniability it ever existed ;). Nate • (chatter) 01:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I am new here , wiki is very mix ) I want to make article Unity 3D in Armenian , but I understand after your message that I change english post ) Can somebody tell me how to start? So I look russian article I change to, can you write how made that article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vardan Meliksetyan (talk • contribs) 22:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! The Armenian Wikipedia is located here (http://hy.wikipedia.org). If you need help, please let me know here (on this page), or by posting anything on your talk page on the Armenian wiki. Thanks!—Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 22:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iove Princeanthony1 (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And what exactly do you mean by that?—Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My Ubuntu. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Beeblebrox (talk) 22:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response and for the right! —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi My Ubuntu,

Thank you for your cordial explanation of why my contribution on Delayed Ejaculation was removed. The explanation was that the contribution did not appear constructive. In response to your suggestion to leave a message, I provide the following:

With respect to "Psychological causes of delayed ejaculation," my contribution stated: "Recent studies have indicated that excessive porn usage may also prevent a man from achieving orgasm during sexual intercourse."

In light of those who have a religious or moral agenda about porn, the entry may appear to not be constructive or to be biased. Also, I only provided one citation to support the contribution. However, I assure you that the contribution is only based on objective research. I apologize because I should have provided more on-point citations to support the contribution. Many independent articles support the contribution:

"Rapid proliferation of Internet porn also plays a role in the rise of delayed ejaculation. The reason is that easy access to porn has made frequent masturbation among men more common. This can lead to an increase in the time it takes to reach orgasm and ejaculate during real sex. The result: With so many varieties of porn at their fingertips, men who get in the habit of having a steady flow of sexual novelty and intense visual stimulation, have a more difficult time reaching peak levels of sexual arousal with their real-world partners."

http://www.goodinbed.com/miniguides/2010/04/delayed-ejaculation-de.php

"Turn off the porn. It creates unrealistic "sexpectations." Writes Perelman, "Disparity between the reality of sex with the partner and the sexual fantasy (whether or not unconventional) used during masturbation is another potential cause of [Delayed Ejaculation].”"

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26992311/ns/today-relationships/t/johnny-come-lately-tips-help-your-man/

"Ian Kerner, a sexuality counselor, who wrote that he noticed a distinct rise in the number of men approaching him with concerns about delayed ejaculation. Kerner went on to attribute much of the problem to a “rapid proliferation of Internet porn” which leads to “over-masturbation[]...” Porn is not only shaping men’s physical and emotional interest in sex on a very fundamental neurological level, but it’s also having a series of unexpected ripple effects—namely on women... For a lot of guys, switching gears from porn’s fireworks and whiz-bangs to the comparatively mundane calm of ordinary sex is like leaving halfway through an Imax 3-D movie to check out a flipbook."

http://nymag.com/news/features/70976/

"Many porn users report... delayed ejaculation... Years of porn use can cause a variety of symptoms..., desensitization of the reward circuitry and sensitized addiction pathways."

http://yourbrainonporn.com/any-suggestions-for-healing-delayed-ejaculation

"The predictable, though not necessarily intended, result of the standard ejaculation advice is that many younger men believe it is unhealthy not to ejaculate very frequently-at least once a day... Indeed, even after their hormonal rush of puberty and sexual peak have passed, guys can use today’s superstimulating masturbation aids (Internet porn, cam-2-cam, sex toys) to remain veritable geysers of semen…at least until they hit a wall. Now, many men, as early as age twenty, are complaining of delayed ejaculation, an inability to climax with mates who don’t look/act like their favorite fetish porn star... How could something that feels so great ever be a problem? Answer: Our sexual expression is occurring in an environment very different from the one in which it evolved."

http://marnia.scienceblog.com/48/is-today%e2%80%99s-ejaculation-advice-right-for-our-species/

These articles seem to support the facts behind the contribution of: "Recent studies have indicated that excessive porn usage may also prevent a man from achieving orgasm during sexual intercourse."

Indeed, the contribution does not indicate that porn is bad. It only indicates that studies have indicated that excessive porn usage may lead to delayed ejaculation. Believe me, I am a man, and I have no problem with porn. The contribution was only based on existing and apparently unbiased articles that did not appear to promote religious or moral opinions in that they were based on objective findings.

Please let me know if this helps or if there is anything else I can provide to support the contribution.

Thanks for your efforts to make the Wikipedia articles reliable! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.178.27.127 (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd first like to apologise for taking over a month to reply...I've been rather busy... Anywho, in removing your contribution I was not attempting to display any bias whatsoever. I hold absolutely no strong feelings one way or the other about ejaculation or pornography...I was critiquing your editing style, not your edits. In general, when content is wrongly removed by accident, the editor who wishes for that content to still be there will challenge it...the accepted way is to post a message on the talk page of that page. If I remember correctly, you simply readded the content that I had removed. Whether or not you should have is a topic I don't really feel like discussing at the moment...so I'm just going to say that I'm sorry for reverting your changes that you were completely entitled to make. —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 21:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with it being vandalism. The city of San Antonio's educational needs for higher education have already been fufilled with the six other universities already operating in the city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.166.51 (talk • contribs)

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not the place for your personal political opinions. —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So the idea that the south side of san antonio had an unmet educational need is not a biased statement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.166.51 (talk • contribs)

The idea that any government is wasting taxpayer money is a biased statement —Northern Muriqui, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 22:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I know how difficult it is fighting vandalism on wiki, it's easy to get into a quick pattern! Keep up the good work anywho. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 15:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]