User talk:Luciandrei

Welcome Luciandrei!

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research, such as this edit of yours to Jersey City, New Jersey. Original research refers to material obtained through personal knowledge, or unpublished syntheses of previously published material, rather than material that is supported by reliable, verifiable sources. Please make sure you cite a reliable source for all of the information you add or re-add to articles. You can learn how to do this at Wikipedia:Citing sources. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 18:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems? I know it can be assumed as the preliminary. The latest data given by INS should be used even if they do not reflect Romania's actual population. But it put us so nearly the acctual population as possible in reality! So let it be.

Why can't you accept and realise the changes in Romania's population. We shouldn't use 9 year old statistic when we can use updated ones. You should know that romanias popualtion decreasing heavily. Let us keep us up to date. --81.229.43.123 (talk) 17:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of the African Union.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Alianzalima.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see several AFD nominations today where you include "Only recently established." as part of your rationale for deleting an article. Please re-read WP:N, where it does not call for deleting things that were only recently established, and it does not call for keeping things that have been around a long time. Whether or not something has multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage is of more importance, unless the thing falls into one of the classifications which almost guarantees it a "Keep." Regards. Edison (talk) 00:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012 Romanian protests may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 283 demonstrators, led to police. Eight of them are in the gallery of Petrolul"], ''Evz.ro''</ref>)</small>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! Am vazut ca ai creat echipamentul stelei de acasa pentru acest sezon, dar ai facut cateva greseli si daca e sa modifici: la guler si maneci nu este culoarea neagra, ci albastru inchis, iar jampierele sunt rosii, nu albastre. Iti las si un link, sa observi detaliile http://www.prosport.ro/fotbal-intern/liga-1/super-foto-noul-echipament-al-stelei-pentru-sezonul-2013-2014-11111391

Jabierele pot fi şi roşii şi albastre vezi: [1], iar în imaginea de prezentare erau albastre. Am încărcat noua imagine pentru body şi am creat şi pentru restul echipamentului imagini noi.--Luciandrei (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! As vrea si eu sa invat cum sa creez patternuri pentru kit-urile echipelor de fotbal din Romania. Am citit Template:Footbal kit dar tot nu am inteles ce sunt patternurile. Narcis mi-a zis ca ma poti ajuta. Multumesc! :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Am citit vazut si lista cu pattern-urile. Am inceput sa fac kitul pentru Petrolul, o sa-ti arat mai tarziu cum a iesit.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Cum ti se pare?

8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

E bun, dar pentru guler poţi să foloseşti şi Football_kit/v_necks. --Luciandrei (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nu mi se pare ca am facut kit-ul prea bine, am incercat sa intreb pe cineva care face kit-uri frumoase, dar inca nu a raspuns.

• Away: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctmBzP30BpI
• Home: http://www.doarpetrolul.ro/index.php/201308041611/petrolul-brasov-00

Ar fi bine daca ai putea adauga si logo-ul Puma si pe cel al echipei. Multumesc anticipat :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 15:46, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pentru mărimea pe care o are imaginea în format, echipamentul realizat de tine mi-se pare bun. Datorită mărimi imaginii nu cred că o modificare poate îmbunătăți substanțial aspectul acestuia. Luciandrei (talk) 06:02, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multumesc pentru raspuns. Acum voi incerca sa creez kit-ul pentru deplasare.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 10:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Away

Cum ti se pare? Cred ca pana va face cineva unul mai bun, merge.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Cineva a creat niste kit-uri mai bune decat ale mele. Poti sa le vezi aici.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Am văzut kit-urile acestea păreau mai simple.--Luciandrei (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cand le-a creat, nu aveau logo-ul Petrolului si logo-urile Puma erau mai simple, dar le-am modificat si cred ca arata destul de bine.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Salut! Unii jucatori de la Petrolul at nationalitati duble, si nu stiu ce steag ar trebui sa apara pe pagina. M-am uitat in primul rand pe site-ul UEFA Europa League. De exemplu, Jeremy Bokila (stiu ca a fugit, dar inca trebuie inclus pe lista) este Olandezo-Congolez. Pe site apare steagul Olandei. Insa nu stiu daca cei de pe site au informatile exacte, deoarece am vazut si greseli. Pecanha are steagul Portugaliei, dar are cetatenie Braziliana. Tu ce steaguri crezi ca se potrivesc?8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 16:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cred că ai putea folosi ca sursă site-ul soccerway. Luciandrei (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerway arata pentru Bokila steagul Olandei, iar pentru Camara steagul Portugaliei. Cred ca asa e cel mai bine, deoarece aproape toate site-urile au aratat la fel. Multumesc pentru raspuns. :) 8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Narcis90 a dat revert la edit-urile mele in care am modificat steagurile jucatorilor. :/ Daca el zice ca asa e, asa o fi.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs)

Numele oficial al clubului este FC Unirea Slobozia. Dupa cum poti vedea aici: http://www.frfotbal.ro/index.php?competition_id=12&season=0&serie_id=804

Numele de pe stema e gresit

Numele de pe logo nu este greșit, echipa folosește în fotbal marca CSM Unirea Slobozia. Pe site-ul FRF cred că sunt trecute numele societăților comerciale pe care cluburile își desfășoară activitatea. Oricum pentru a stabili numele unei echipe ar trebuie să consultăm mai multe surse, vezi de ex: prosport și site-ul oficial al echipei. Aceeși situație este și la Vaslui, aici clubul este trecut pe site-ul FRF ca SC Sporting Club SA Vaslui [2]. Dacă ar fi să ne luăm numai după site-ul federației ar trebui redenumite foarte multe cluburi de ex CFR Cluj în SCS FC CFR 1907 Cluj SA, FC Dinamo București în FC Dinamo 1948 Bucureşti SA etc..--Luciandrei (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aici e vorba de fc-uri, cs-uri-, sc-uri, adica de acronimele din fata numelui...nu de completari ale numelor. In momentul de fata toate cluburile romanesti au toate numele scrise corect. Conform cu frf.ro.

Atunci am următoarele întrebări pt tine: De FC Vaslui și nu SC Vaslui? De ce CFR cluj și nu FC CFR Cluj? De ce FC Universitatea Craiova și nu FCU Craiova ? De ce FC Bihor Oradea și nu CS FC Bihor Oradea ? -Luciandrei (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pai SC Vaslui e SC Vaslui, nu vad unde e greseala. FCU Craiova nu e corect din acelasi motiv cum nici FCS Bucuresti nu e corect pt FC Steaua Bucuresti. Iar la Bihor s-au pus in fata doar ultimele acronime. E o ordine a lucrurilor. CFR in schimb e exceptia care confirma regula. E singurul club romanesc care nu are numele scris corect.

Deci recunoști că site-ul FRF nu e corect, dar cum rămâne cu cel al UEFA? Vezi FC Vaslui. FC Vaslui e SC Vaslui doar pt că l-ai redenumit tu dar nu înseamnă că e corect. Din punctul meu de vedere e o greșelă să te bazezi pe o singură sursă.

Dacă susții că „In momentul de fata toate cluburile romanesti au toate numele scrise corect. Conform cu frf.ro″. De ce ar fi greșit FCU Craiova? (La Steaua nu apare FCSB și nici FCS București pe site-ul FRF).

După ce criterii stabilești că acronimul FC e mai important decât CS?

De ce CFR cluj e excepție?

De cînd exista regula cu denumirile numai de pe site-ul FRF? (un link către o discuție ce a dus la această concluzie ar fi de ajutor) --Luciandrei (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stii pe cineva care ma poate ajuta sa scriu mai multe despre FC Petrolul Ploiesti? Desi este unul dintre cele mai vechi cluburi din Romania, are pagina cu cele mai putine informatii. Plus ca mi-ar trebui putin ajutor la pagina cu sezonul, sunt foarte multe informatii acolo care nu sunt trecute, doarece nu ma pricep la toate dintre ele. Si la sezonul Stelei este aceeasi problema. Stii pe cineva care sa ma ajute cu aceste probleme?8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nu te pot ajuta cu articole despre sezoanele individuale pentru că nu am prea contribuit la acest tip de articole. Cât despre Petrolul, ar trebui să pornești de la articolul în română și să cauți surse pentru afirmații de acolo.--Luciandrei (talk) 12:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stii pe cineva care traduce pagini din romana in engleza? As putea sa traduc eu pagina, dar n-am mai tradus niciodata o pagina asa mare si nu prea am timp. Dupa ce va fi tradusa, voi cauta eu sursele.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 15:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nu știu pe cineva, dar ai putea încerca google translate.--Luciandrei (talk) 18:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luciandrei,
Page moves such as this, should generally not be done without some discussion, or at least an edit summary explaining the resaon/s. --220 of ^Borg 12:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luciandrei. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luciandrei. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luciandrei. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]