User talk:M i t r a

Welcome!

Hello, M i t r a, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, try one of these four things: click on the blue "17" in my signature, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Cheers!

—Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Hope we can all talk usefully and learn from each other. Ars longa, vita brevis, I think the saying goes; to which I might add "Also scientia". Cheers, Bill Wwheaton (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your question on cave paintings of 19 Jan on Talk:Life, in my suggested definition, one must distinguish between the organism, and the surrounding environment it which it lives. Admittedly this can be difficult to do without some arbitrariness or ambiguity (which is a problem, needing work). But having made that division and drawn that boundary, one must estimate the information content (in bits, say) in the organism necessary to sustain its necessary functions of protecting and reproducing its core information. Similarly, one must estimate the information necessary to define the minimal environment necessary for the organism to function successfully in it. Then the dimensionless ratio of those two is the interesting number. If it is small, the proposed bioform is not very lifelike; conversely, if the ratio is large, the proposed object has a strong case to be called "life". I think the cave painting hardly qualifies at all, because it cannot actively protect its core information or reproduce it, unless you include the artist as part of the organism (it which case it obviously becomes pretty lively, but not just "a painting"). If you say just the painting is the organism, and the artist is part of the environment, then the ratio is very small, because the information in the artist is huge, and in the painting much much smaller. Wwheaton (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allright. Peace. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Fey-page.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Derivative work of whatever publication this is

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 18:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]