User talk:Medvedenko

This user may have left Wikipedia. Medvedenko has not edited Wikipedia since 19 July 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Medvedenko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

~Kylu (u|t) 04:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just noticed that you reverted vandalism on the Malcolm X page caused by User:68.55.222.76. Thanks for that, reverting vandalism is a very important task on Wikipedia. However, in future can you please leave a warning on the user's talk page? This will serve the dual purpose of encouraging the editor to stop their destructive activities and will also let other editors know that the user has a history of vandalism. For the full guidance on dealing with vandalism and what warning messages to use, please see Wikipedia:Vandalism. Thanks again. Road Wizard 13:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should develop a User:Medvedenko page ... ;-) --evrik 20:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like a lot of the work you have done on the portal. It's good to see someone else take an interest. --evrik 20:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't mind collaborating, or that there is a difference of opinion. Next time ... give me a head's up. As for the content ... please leave boathose row, and I think we need a woman in the biogrpahy for the next few months to balance things out. --evrik 19:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we disagreeing on this issue? I think tagging articvles promotes Philadelphia and the work of the wikiproject (pretzel or not). -- evrik 20:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded your last edit, and tried to add some more information. --evrik 15:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noting the redirect link on one of my project pages (User:Cobaltbluetony/Project Pages/Haddon Township). However, is it necessary to edit material which has not been formally submitted to an article? - CobaltBlueTony 15:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was harmless; I was just wondering how you came upon it. I imagine that sort of fix would have been picked up if/when I submitted the article. No worries, though. - CobaltBlueTony 17:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is given to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, and to let you know that your hard work is seen and appreciated. evrik 23:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you see you were listed as a coordinator for the Philly portal?

Wikipedia:Portal/Directory#Geography

--evrik 19:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to address some of the concerns you raised at The Wire (TV series) FAC including the TOC and repeated links. There is an ongoing discussion about the subsections of the Themes section and I wondered if you would have time to offer any further feedback.--Opark 77 21:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your comments on the BBC News peer review. I will act on your suggestions and hope others will do so as well. Wikiwoohoo 16:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your suggestions, would you agree that the substantial section and subsections relating to criticism be removed as a whole and summarised, with links to their new locations? That was an idea I had for that part of the article. Wikiwoohoo 16:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will try to work on the article where I have time to make the improvements. Your suggestions are very much appreciated. Wikiwoohoo 18:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask CComMack's talk page. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 16:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fully understand the purpose of the Cultural Depictions article. I simply don't agree with your interpretation. Expanding the introduction in the manner you should suggest would alter the article's fundamental purpose, and that's just not proper. -- ABCxyz 02:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to be argumentative or condescending, so please don't take it that way, but here is one of Merrian-Webster's defintions of "culture" --

"[a] the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon man's capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations, [b] the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group, [c] the set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes a company or corporation"

Believe or not, those things are embodied in a parade as diverse as the Mummers. It is not simply a parade, and cultural depictions need not be fictional. Even televised coverage of a circus is a depiction of culture (though I wouldn't put one on the list). That's why I disagree with you.

-- ABCxyz 02:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently left a comment on the Avatar: The Last Airbender FA nomination. I would like you to please review your comment because we fixed the article a little and we want your opinion on which of your objections still stand. I would appreciate greatly. Thank you. Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 20:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please check the article again. I am pretty sure your objections have been met. The Placebo Effect 14:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I have noticed that you have peer reviewed several articles at Wikipedia before. I am asking if you could find some time to peer review J. P. Morgan for me, and leave comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/J. P. Morgan/archive1. Many thanks! — Wackymacs 23:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have another look at Thomas Eakins? I've expanded the article, and supplied an ocean of cites. Thanks, JNW 13:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. I've tried to follow your recommendations. Please take a look when you have the time. Thanks, JNW 04:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! JNW 23:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There's been some recent activity getting the ball rolling at WikiProject Journalism, and if you'd like to join us, I'm sure your input would be valued. In particular, User:Wiki Wistah has proposed a guideline for editing articles about newspapers, and although I've responded with comments of my own, WW rightly suggested that it should be more than just a two-way conversation. I've noticed some of your own edits on related matters (especially The Philadelphia Inquirer), and thought you might be interested. Any suggestions would certainly be appreciated. Otherwise, if this is not of interest to you, or if you've already got a plateful of editing, feel free to ignore this message! -Tobogganoggin ^talk 02:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've been interested in the Justin Guarini page. Do you think that the AI template should be used on the page? Vote here, so it cannot be deleted again. - hmwithtalk 22:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate you nominating an image that I uploaded for deletion. It spices things up and gives me something to do. Next time though, since we have worked together in the past, could you give me the courtesy of asking me first ... or perhaps bringing a potrntyial issue to my attention. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 23:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I dropped all the other May items, is that they werte reported in May. The May 31 item is in todays paper. --evrik ^(talk) 15:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It's okay with me. --evrik ^(talk) 16:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You got the portal? ----evrik ^(talk) 20:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

• Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
• Join our mailing list
• Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your help with PMH I was going to clean it up later and found that you did. Thanks.

thank you for ur help

I have implemented your gracious suggestions from the initial GA-survey of this you've done, also adding a few comments on talk. Might you now see fit to reapproach/reappraise it. If you concur it is GA-fit, what say you have the energy to participate in the article's current Biography project A-class review request?? Regards from, TruthHider 11:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 5 and give your input about the next meet-up. Thank you.
This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot 21:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have received this message because you are on the invite list, you may change your invite options via that link. BrownBot 22:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on planning the sixth Philadelphia meetup, and I'm looking for ideas and votes about the place and location. Since you RSVP'd for the last one I thought you might like to weigh in. Thanks, and I hope to see you there! --TexasDex ★ 22:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must have forgotten, but the next quote you have lined up to play on the Philly Portal just ran in August. PS: Keep up the good work!--BillFlis (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Inquirerfront.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dailynewsfront.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You recently reverted my edit to the article The Philadelphia Inquirer with the edit summary "rvt awkward edits". What is awkward about my edits? Why should such easter egg links be included in the article? Aecis^Brievenbus 22:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Art Museum area.jpg. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 18:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have received this message because you are on the invite list, you may change your invite options via that link. BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for how much work you do to keep up with the formatting at WP:FA]; with six windows open to promote/archive FACs, I never remember that step. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ha ! I'm improving;[1] only one this week :-) Thanks again! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I moved Barkely to April. I think we need greater gender balance. How about selecting a woman for March? --evrik ^(talk) 19:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• What about Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander? --evrik ^(talk) 19:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay, the STAM would be good for May. --evrik ^(talk) 19:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The planning for the summer Philadelphia meetup has begun. We would appreciate your input.
You're getting this invitation because you're on Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot (talk) 21:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rohm and Haas Corporate Headquarters, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the review of Leonore Annenberg. I believe that I have completed the tasks on the GA Review page. Also, thanks for the book recommendation! Best, Happyme22 (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's like my brain is fried when I have six windows open and am trying to get them in the right place, always afraid I'm going to hit the wrong button or promote an article that should be archived. Now I should definitely leave the italics to you :-) Thanks, as always. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 September, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item involving the article(s) 2008 unrest in Bolivia, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently updated or created article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 00:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this notice to join the Good Article Collaboration Center, a project aimed at improving five articles to GA status every month. We hope to see you there!--LAAFansign review 02:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply] {{{1}}}

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reviewed this Good Article nomination and have left my thoughts on its review page. I have placed the nomination on hold to allow for some concerns to be addressed. Please get in touch if you have any questions (either on my talk page or on the review page). Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local Italian restaurant.
This has been an automatic delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Red River flood, which you expanded. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 11:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the only person who's put together a newspaper featured article, do you have any suggestions for someone interested in creating one? JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work on One Meridian Plaza.

I have added a suggestion about Triune by Robert Engman to the GA discussion. I saw the fire from Arch Street. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Comcast Center (office building) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Comcast Center (office building) for things needed to be addressed. SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it ...they were just simple minor fixes. Good work on the article and all the other Philadelphia-related articles! Been there once ...cool town. Ben Franklin statue had on a Phillies hat. Happy editing. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the afternoon, we will hold a session at Drexel dedicated to discussing Wikimedia Pennsylvania activity and cooperation with the regional Wikimedia New York City chapter.

Are events like a Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia in our future?

In the evening, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A RfC has been opened to discuss the issue of alignment of the lead image on the Joseph Priestley article. Because you have previously commented or been involved with this issue, your input is requested. Please stop by Talk:Joseph Priestley#RfC on lead image alignment and leave any feedback you may have. Thank you. Madcoverboy (talk) 03:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On July 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Condy Raguet, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The coordinates you added to Commerce Square are invalid because the number of minutes in the latitude (95) is greater than sixty. Perhaps you meant 39.9541 degrees north instead of 39 degrees 95 minutes 41 seconds north. Please check your sources and fix the coordinates in the article. --Stepheng3 (talk) 02:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found the problem and fixed it. You had confused minutes of latitude with hundredths of a degree of latitude. --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have undertaken a GA review of the above article. It is in very good shape and needs little done. Please check out the talk page. regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 04:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: The date and time of this meetup has been changed to accommodate other regional activities.

The purpose of this meeting is to finalize our plans for the Wiki Takes Philadelphia event. We'll discuss logistics, establish jobs, and coordinate with participating groups.

The floor will also be open to discussing other projects relating to the Wiki and Free Culture movement.

Afterward at around 5pm, we'll share dinner and friendly wiki-chat at a local sports bar.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On September 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Loews Philadelphia Hotel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 11:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.

Scheduled for Sunday, October 4, 2009, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.

Register your team here

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medvedenko, I was looking through some articles about Philadelphia skyscrapers and architecture and apparently you added a whole lot of interesting and unheard-of information about those skyscrapers. And you probably have cited many sources for that info. I just want to say congratulations for making those contributions because of it. I was hoping you could expand some more articles about other Philadelphia skyscrapers such as One and Two Liberty Place, the City Hall, and the Penn Center. Jim856796 (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing me back last November. Sorry you haven't had time for Wikipedia in recent months. I have created an article that you can improve and turn into a B-class article: It's The Ritz-Carlton Philadelphia. You have already edited articles for The Residences at the Ritz Carlton (Philadelphia and One Meridian Plaza, I'm suggesting that you create an article on the Ritz Carlton Hotel sonce the building, which was constructed in 1930, has connections to both 1MP and the Ritz-Carlton Residences. If there are any other editing sugestions for Philadelphia structures, should I post it in your talk page or is there another way to contact you? Or should I wait until you unexpectedly transform the structure's page? Jim856796 (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed the article for GA status. Please help me solve the few issues I have identified.

Wikipedia Takes Philadelphia is a photo scavenger hunt and free content photography contest to be held all around Philadelphia aimed at illustrating Wikipedia articles.

Scheduled for Sunday, April 11, 2010, the check-in location will be at the Drexel University quad (between Chestnut and Market, 33rd and 32nd) at noon, and the ending party and photo uploading (location to be announced) will be at 6 PM. To reach the Drexel quad, walk south from Market Street at 32nd Street into the campus.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 03:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed your review on hold so that you can addresses some minor items. I am prepared to work with you to complete the review on an expedited time schedule. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am still hoping to hear from you. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 11:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried putting in a new NRHP infobox with "contributing building" in it (as is usual but by no means required). I wanted to keep the technical details from the old infobox and tried to embed it - looks like sh--!

Don't worry on 2 counts. 1) I should be able to find somebody who can fix it. 2) if you then don't like it, it's easy enough to go back to the original.

BTW - I got some new pix today.

Smallbones (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox looks a lot better now - thanks to User:Niagara. I'm almost done with changes - but tomorrow will probably add a minor reference to the historic district. Do feel free to revert any or all of this. Smallbones (talk) 02:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After a long weekend, I'll certainly be able to take pix of just about any skyscrapers in Philly (there aren't any in NE Philly I hope). That said, skyscrapers are the most difficult buildings to photograph - you need to be blocks away (which can make getting the right address a pain) and have the right light. Best to give me a list of a score or so and be prepared to throw out half of the resulting pix. Just let me know what you need. Smallbones (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medvedenko, I just happened to come across one of your drafts (which was about the Liberty Place complex). And I was thinking about that draft being incorporated into an article. Currently, there are articles about the Liberty Place Complex and the two tallest buildings individually. Jim856796 (talk) 21:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area this Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 5 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together in the Azalea Garden, just behind the Philadelphia Museum of Art 39°58′05″N 75°10′59″W / 39.96801°N 75.183156°W / 39.96801; -75.183156

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

Smallbones (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Medvedenko, thanks for the interesting article. Please see comments at Template talk:Did you know#Liberty Place. Cheers. --Elekhh (talk) 04:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia) for comments about the article. Well done! My apologies for the delay. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liberty Place, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the construction of One Liberty Place was in breach of a "gentlemen's agreement" not to build any building taller than the statue of William Penn on Philadelphia City Hall (both buildings pictured)? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo dailynews.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Philadelphia's Great American Wiknic at Penn Park
	You are invited to the Philadelphia edition of the Great American Wiknic taking place in Penn Park, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there!--User:Ocaasi (talk)|}}

Wikipedians are invited to the GLAM Café at the Chemical Heritage Foundation to meet, talk, and edit. We provide the space, the coffee, and the snacks: you provide ideas and enthusiasm! On the second Tuesday of each month, starting November 12, 2013.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've worked on articles about Philadelphia, so I'd like you to see a discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Philadelphia#IP_editors_are_erasing_neighborhoods.

It's about a spate of recent changes, largely by anonymous users, to articles about Center City Philadelphia. The changes seem misguided to me, and I'd like to hear what other people think. TypoBoy (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Join us this Saturday (July 30) at the Philadelphia Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit". This is an opportunity to meet other local Wikipedians, have fun, and discuss potential projects.

The event is this Saturday, between 1pm-5pm at the Picnic Grove in Penn Park.

(To unsubscribe from future messages, remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list.)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Philadelphia Inquirer for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 19:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/4, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Philadelphia/Quotes archive/4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 19:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History of Philadelphia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]