User talk:Mhym

Welcome!

Hello, Mhym, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 19:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russian Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! abakharev 05:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On December 23, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Kronrod, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 13:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Mhym created the article Alexander Kronrod. Thanks to you both! -Susanlesch 17:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving from another talk archive. Thanks Mhym. -Susanlesch 17:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mhym. I thought you might be interested to know that User:MathDawg024 copied your user page, and is using it as their own. I suppose it's a form of flattery. Cheers, Doctormatt 15:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Siegman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aryeh Dvoretzky, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On May 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jacob Tamarkin, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jamie^☆S93 02:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Herbert Busemann, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 11:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

On January 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alan Solow, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm recommending that the article on Bracelet (combinatorics) be merged into Necklace (combinatorics).

I saw that you had previously edited one (or both) of these article. You're invited to participate in the discussion here: Talk:Necklace (combinatorics).

Thanks, Justin W Smith ^talk/_stalk 15:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tanya Markova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --moreno oso (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ostomachion is so fragmentary that it cannot be said with any certainty what Archimedes did; what survives is geometry, not combinatorics. However, because it is a dissection puzzle, we can extract combinatorial problems from it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.217.37.24 (talk) 14:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the report about your edits at WP:AN3#User:Mhym reported by User:Meco (Result: ). You and User:JohnAlabamaNestroy have both been cited for edit warring. You should respond at the AN3 report and promise to wait for consensus before making further reverts. EdJohnston (talk) 16:29, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You proposed this redirect for deletion on July 20th; the {{prod}} template was removed, as it can't actually be used for redirects. However, I have nominated it for discussion at RFD, and your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 July 24#Refudiate. Robofish (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the Landau-Lifshitz model has been improved somewhat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.157.189.155 (talk) 18:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mhym,

Did you want to renominate the Daniel Biss article for deletion? If you want to let me know your deletion rationale I can fix the nomination for you. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I've nominated it for a speedy delete under WP:CSD#G4 as recreation of deleted material. Without being able to see the article in it's previous incarnation I don't know if it's significantly different enough to get through a speedy delete (if its substantially different it won't get deleted). If speedy is declined we can take it to Afd again. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Ignore the above - he's notable now he's been elected and so clearly eligible for an article. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jennifer Rubin (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable journalist. Fails at WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Sources provided are not WP:RS compliant.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mhym. An article you created may not comply with Wikipedia requirements. Please consider visiting the article and addressing the various issues. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 08:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It doesn't look like anyone informed you, but your Did You Know nomination of Jennifer Rubin (journalist) has received several comments that would need to be addressed before the article could be promoted to a hook. Please review and address. –Grondemar 06:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Moses Bloom at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Location (talk) 07:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: At the above page I posted a source that appears to contradict that Bloom was the first Jewish mayor of a major American city. I imagine a lot of this is open to what a particular author thinks is "major". Location (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Moses Bloom, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Moses Bloom was the first Jewish settler and mayor of Iowa City (1873–1875), and the first Jewish member of Iowa Senate? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SimoneWeil.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 22:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pages by copying and pasting the contents. Try WP:RM. —Ruud 20:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, see e.g. [1]: "Adolph Pavlovich Yushkevich was called Adolph Pavlovich throughout his life.". Try WP:RM if you still disagree. —Ruud 20:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iosif Begun, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the release from prison of Iosif Begun, a leader of the campaign to free the Jews of the USSR, was announced in 1987 by Soviet politician Georgy Arbatov on Face the Nation? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi-I started an article about Richard J. Phelps who was County Executive of Dane County, Wisconsin. I found out he was Hannah Rosenthal's husband and you had started that article about Rosenthal. Would you please look at the Phelps article? If you can improved the article please do so, Thank you-RFD (talk) 19:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IMVinogradov.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IPetrovskii.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:17, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANTikhonov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Moscow Mathematical Journal.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:National Interest (magazine).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:19, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mathematical Intelligencer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kronrod-book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Help:How to move a page for how to move a page properly. I've requested a histmerge to fix your cut-and-paste move. --Zundark (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mhym! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi,

the photograph of Linnik was nominated for deletion: [2], do you know how to save it?

Thanks, Sasha (talk) 15:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also this Sasha (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC) With the help of User:David Eppstein the problem is resolved for now. Sasha (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pontriagin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harvard P R.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Lori Zaslow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matchmaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; a few years ago you made this edit to the article Eugene Dynkin. Recently that sentence was removed by an IP editor (diff), citing a personal communication with Dynkin (he probably read his own Wikipedia article, and found the mistake). Without a reliable source that states why he was forced to transfer universities, this information shouldn't be in his biography anyway. Just thought you might be interested. Mlm42 (talk) 01:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HexagonBorsuk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 05:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file is currently unused and has been replaced by the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Borsuk_Hexagon.svg. There is nothing wrong with the source or license, but in my view, I feel the jpg is redundant. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bassem Youssef (television host), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tamm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Amer Spect.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:QuantumEar.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vekua.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zeldovich.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vladka Meed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish resistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Vladka Meed at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:50, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Takehy.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vladka Meed, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Polish Jewish resistance fighter Vladka Meed was a central source of the 2001 television movie Uprising? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vladka Meed. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacob Wygodzki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish theater (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About that[3] Darkness Shines (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you still watching Dănuț Marcu? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dănuț Marcu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dănuț Marcu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	.. great, great work. Thank you .. Luigibob (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not indiscriminately italicize everything in non-TeX mathtematical notation.

|G| = 2^{N (right)}

|G| = 2^N (wrong)

One italicizes variables, but not digits and not parentheses or absolute-value signs and the like. This is codified in WP:MOSMATH and it done that way because it is consistent with TeX style, thus:

${\displaystyle |G|=2^{N}\,}$

And proper spacing should be used, thus:

|G| = 2^{N (right)}

|G|=2^{N (wrong)}

Also, in page ranges like 34–51, one uses an en-dash, not a stubby little hyphen. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of q-analogs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q-Jacobi polynomials. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of this edit. WP:MOS forbids capitalizing an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mhym. You recently tagged Heinz-Otto Kreiss as a recent death. Can you provide a link for that claim and, hopefully, a more precise date of death? I have been unable to find such a source online so for the time being, I'm removing your tag. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Spectator Magazine 18 September 2010 Front Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ira Gessel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MAA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish American mayors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Daniel Biss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please see WP:BLPN#Daniel Biss. You may add your own comment in that discussion if you wish. An editor has expressed concerns under the WP:BLP policy about some of the material you have been trying to add. Most likely they are talking about this edit by you. My suggestion is to wait for consensus before trying to add it again. Personal blogs are usually not considered to be reliable sources under BLP. Edits that *do* violate BLP can be reverted by others without penalty of WP:3RR, and there is a risk you might be considered to be the person at fault. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because the word was created, I assume serendipity exists. And I agree she is notable. Actually she is automatically notable I think because she has a name chair position. And everything else is just gravy supporting her being notable.

If admins are helpful by letting us see the old draft of the article, for its footnotes (this one has a lot of the same text but not the footnotes) and its relevant added text, I think we can improve the article and hope it will pass DYK. Just waiting on the admins. --2604:2000:E010:1100:B951:7500:D62B:D57A (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here, see why this was so weird! Just when the draft of this subject was cleared of any question of copyvio, a review it had been sitting awaiting for a couple of days for all to see, as it awaited promotion to article status -- that was the very same day of all days that your article was created! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DGG/Amy_Wax_temp&diff=891237124&oldid=890983584 And its not as though she was in the news that day, or week, or month. And as you can see, the article that had been put up for review prior to your draft is very similar (except for the last paragraph that yours added). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amy_Wax&action=history 2604:2000:E010:1100:5556:69C2:7421:D539 (talk) 08:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MathOverflow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MathOverflow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Friedrich Eisenbrand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

academic who does not meet the academic's notability guideline or the GNG. I looked for information on the web and, while he has a significant number of papers, he does not appear to have a large impact on his discipline yet. The only claim of significance this article makes is that he game a talk at an international symposium, which is not a sign of notability. The listed source is not reliable (and does not land on a page that includes information on Friedrich Eisenbrand), and the link to his website at EPFL is similarly broken.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockphed (talk) 12:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Wilmer's Google scholar citations (especially for the book) and look at WP:PROF#C1. Look at the book reviews and look at WP:AUTHOR. Look at the newspaper coverage of her and look at WP:GNG. Look at the clear statement in the article of what she is known for. Look at the requirements of A7 that there be not even any suggestion in the article of something that might be notable, far below the requirement that the subject actually be notable. And then remove your inane speedy tag before someone else has to remove it for you or before someone else acts on it and your inanity reproduces itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:GBorelli.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Гиперболоид инженера Гарина (book cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Antoni Zygmund.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 15:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American Journal of Mathematics (front cover).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Tanishism (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coxeter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]