User talk:Ngancheekean

An article you recently created, Yan Fei, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: That's a problem what you are doing Ngancheekean (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a problem what you're doing. Please familiarize yourself with WP policies, such as WP:GNG and WP:VERIFY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: It is really a problem what you are doing and you means onel5969 Ngancheekean (talk) 15:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain what policy/guideline you were following when you moved this and what exactly compelled you to move an 18 year old article to draft space? CUPIDICAE💕 16:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: There are a lot of reason to move the page as you can see in Wikipedia:Drafts. Since you already moved it into mainspace, what do you want me to do. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, there isn't. Don't move an article that's already been around for a decade again unless you have a cogent reason within policy. CUPIDICAE💕 17:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: I don't want to say too much. Ngancheekean (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean,

Only move recently created articles (say, 6 months old or younger) to Draft space. If you think an older article should be deleted, please nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD. If you have questions about article deletion or any Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse where you can receive answers and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yan Zhiyi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: What did I do to you, that's you keep moving the article. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The problems with trying to attribute the White Horse poem being about Yan Liang: 1) Yan Liang isn't mentioned anywhere with a white horse. If one is to attribute that poem to be about a miliatry figure or even narrow it down to Guandu, why specifically about Yan Liang? Archery, career of errantry, fighting the Xiongnu and Xianbei, white horse, none of those speak of Yan Liang in particular. 2) Cao Zhi would have been eight or so at the time of Yan Liang's death so I wonder why he would have a personal reason to write about a (by the time he began writing) a dead general? Why, of all the officers of Yuan Shao, someone like Yan Liang would worry him so? Why write in such heroic terms for one who had died fighting against his father might not have been the wisest of ideas. 3) The poem more fits into a general subject of patriotism and expressing his wish to serve in a miliatry sense, something that Cao Zhi wrote about multiple times.

Might I suggest "The Incident at the Gate: Cao Zhi, the Succession, and Literary Fame" by Robert Cutter for a look into the meaning behind some of the poems of Cao Zhi?

If you find the article on Yan Liang unsatisfactory or wish to make the case for it to be deleted, might I suggest using the Yan Liang talk page to discuss what you feel needs to be changed? DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DongZhuo3kingdoms: It is a simple chinese article which only need to be translated rather than writing from scratch. Fyi, the article was written by an annoymous 18 years ago, which provoked you. Ngancheekean (talk) 14:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then feel free to, the article is accurate, translate it. Nobody is saying the article can't be updated, just it needs to be done properly.

I'm not sure I was provoked? Simply explaining why a poem (which I'm guessing your referring to) that has nothing to do with Yan Liang is not accepted in the Yan Liang entry. DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DongZhuo3kingdoms: Cao Zhi has every right to comment on Yan Liang regardless what your excuses are. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course he did. Might not be wise of him to do but your claiming he was writing about Yan Liang. The first point I raised though is that nothing points to it being about Yan Liang and the third is what it generally seen as being about (and I provided a test that might be helpful) i.e not Yan Liang. So if you want Cao Zhi included in the Yan Liang, your going to have to use the talk pages to convince the other editors that the likes of Cutter are wrong. DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DongZhuo3kingdoms: You can study however how much you can, if anything happens dont blame the others. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that? Not sure why others would be blamed for my studying? DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yan Liang shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
14:52, 8 March 2022 15:36, 7 March 2022‎ 06:00, 7 March 2022‎ Rastinition (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rastinition: What did you update at Yan Liang's page? Ngancheekean (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not in your edit wars. This is all.

Sorry! I don't want to update or join the the edit wars in there. Rastinition (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rastinition: Whatever that is I did not violate the rule and within the policy. Anyway, thanks for reminding. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy.In the wiki, no page belongs to you, everyone can edit it.If you have doubts, you should try to discuss your doubts. Rastinition (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said that Im against English. So funny, about their past working experience. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I copied my original text.In the wiki, no page belongs to you, everyone can edit it.If you have doubts, you should try to discuss your doubts.

By the way, I noticed that you seem to be getting belligerent, which is not good.At least I don't think my original text has the meaning of against English.You need to calm down and normalize your thinking. Rastinition (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is a English history that im being dragged into and 'you' said about edit wars. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yan Xie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already said it at your talk page. That's all. Ngancheekean (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yan Jianyuan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move my page. Ngancheekean (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yan Fei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Fei until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yan Silu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yan Silu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Yan Fei. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) He is a long time wikipedia editor. He didn't improve the article and keeps moving my page. Finally, he wanted to delete it. No idea what he is doing. 15:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Talk pages are for talking, not backing up articles. Rastinition (talk) 04:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yan Jianyuan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article lacks any dates or time periods. No indication of why they might be notable and what they were protesting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gusfriend (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cant do it. Go and improve the article. Your dragging me down. Ngancheekean (talk) 01:54, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is during Liang Dynasty, so there is a timeframe. Ngancheekean (talk) 02:13, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you have copied previous versions of the articles to the talk pages of Talk:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty) and Talk:Yan Jianyuan and wanted to mention that the talk page is designed for discussion of the page. Gusfriend (talk) 02:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is not my problem you wanted a meeting which I think is unnecessary. Ngancheekean (talk) 02:38, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive the uninvited observations, I am more of a science researcher than a policy expert, and so I usually avoid policy commentary.

However, within your repeated statements, there is a tell-tail indicator, specifically, the phrase "my page".

That phase prompted me to locate WP:Own. I can certainly sympathize with a sense of ownership of one's work, and I do have a habit of referring to some of my contributions as "my page on 'X'".

To be succinct, the policy states

"No one, no matter what, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article (or any part of it)."

I have managed to look at your original contribution to Yan Han (Jin Dynasty). All other issues aside, yes, there was clearly a paucity of citation (only one citation, and that in a fine language that unfortunately we poor English editors cannot verify. (Well, I did manage to ascertain that the Chinese source does assert that someone died at "age of 93", and fire was somehow involved with the coffin.))

If Yan Han is truly notable in the context of the English WP, regardless of most honored coverage in the Chinese language WP (please link in talk), then it would not be difficult to find English language citations. It is not my duty to find citations for Yan Han but this one took less than a minute:

Olivia Milburn (2015). Urbanization in Early and Medieval China Gazetteers for the City of Suzhou. p. 193. yan han of the Jin dynasty was known for his filial piety and for being .

All that is being asked of you is the same foundational requirement asked of all editors, that is, to provide sufficient citations all of your contributions. One citation requiring translation is insufficient, I know too well.

IveGoneAway (talk) 02:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter even matter if is your page. Ngancheekean (talk) 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does not matter if is your page? Do you mean sufficient citations do not matter if it is your page? Sufficient citations always matter on WP articles. IveGoneAway (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I write the articles from some sources. Ngancheekean (talk) 08:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say nobody can edit my page. Ngancheekean (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, what you mean by "my page" is your main space contributions like Yan Han. In the Wikipedia main space, there is no such thing as my page. IveGoneAway (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dont argue at my talkpage, which is owned by wikipedia. Ngancheekean (talk) 08:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Yan Han (Jin Dynasty) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Rastinition (talk) 04:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

just follow wikipedia policy and not your thoughts. Ngancheekean (talk) 07:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Yan Fei. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already contest the deletion and its Wikipedia:Verifiability. Just undo what happened. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Yan Silu, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already contest the deletion and its Wikipedia:Verifiability. Just undo what happened. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talking to a robot is ridiculous. At least, you won't draw any conclusions after talking to a bot. Rastinition (talk) 17:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your editing is so problematic in many ways that it seems that your presence may be doing more harm than good. Part of the problem is that you often don't understand what you are doing, for several reasons, including a limited grasp of English. However, much bigger problems are that you won't listen to other editors who try to explain things that you haven't understood, and that your response to anything you disagree with is aggression and belligerence, rather than a friendly and cooperative attempt to resolve disagreements. I am not going to spend time on listing all of the kinds of problems involved, because you have already had them explained to you, on this page and elsewhere. However, if you continue with disruptive editing of any kind, you are likely to be blocked from editing without further warning. Please take note of the things you have been told by other editors, and adjust your ways of doing things in line with the advice you have been given. Also, please don't try to correct English, as you are likely to make things worse rather than better. JBW (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which wikipedia policy that I should know. How can a lot of things is my problem. Ngancheekean (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you re-read your user talk page and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Checking_needed. I also suggest you ask for Onel5969's forgiveness.I'm sure you have offended Onel5969 many times. Rastinition (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What he wants to say sorry, what about thank you. Ngancheekean (talk) 08:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My talkpages (which is owned by wikipedia) is full with your talking and you keep talking to ANI. Ngancheekean (talk) 04:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I keep seeing edits like this, where it's largely unsourced content additions with an edit summary that says "Wikipedia:Verifiability". What is that even supposed to mean? Unsourced content additions are like the opposite of verifying your edits. Sergecross73 msg me 23:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the wikipedia policy? Ngancheekean (talk) 04:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This response does not make any sense. I am asking you to explain the meaning of your edit summaries. They don't make any sense in the context of the edits you're making. Sergecross73 msg me 13:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's an article about Yan Fei created on 11 January 2022‎, based on Wikipedia:Verifiability. In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. What counts as a reliable source? The work itself (the article, book). Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form". To discuss the reliability of a specific source for a particular statement, consult Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard, which seeks to apply this policy to particular cases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngancheekean (talk • contribs)

Again, you misunderstand. I understand our verifiability policy very well. What I don't understand is why you putting it in edit summaries where you add unsourced content. Sergecross73 msg me 15:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Edit summary An edit summary is a brief explanation of an edit to a Wikipedia page. The first edit summary, (contest deletion), it was placed there, and editor can remove it to contest deletion. (Wikipedia:Verifiability) Because the article was deleted so i added it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngancheekean (talk • contribs)

No offense, but I don't think you're ready to be editing the English Wikipedia. You can't answer the most basic of questions. These responses do not make any sort of sense. Sergecross73 msg me 15:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that Onel5969 is not suitable to be editting wikipedia and should be banned. Ngancheekean (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for the issues raised at this and this ANI thread. Competence is required to edit on the English Wikipedia, and you're not listening to the advice you were given.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 05:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ngancheekean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I read Wikipedia:Competence is required, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing:Failure or refusal to "get the point", Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not: Wikipedia is not a battleground

Decline reason:

This request, and the angry assertions below, give me no confidence that you understand why you were blocked, or that you will cease your disruptive behaviour if you are unblocked. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You shouldnt be blocking me at all, there's no reason. Its that guy fault that keep vandalising my page. I didnt showed middle finger to that guy, I showed tolerance. Thats the reason Im blocked.? Ngancheekean (talk) 07:41, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I dont know why Im being blocked just for correcting the mistakes of the page that I created. Ngancheekean (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have any more reasons to be blocked. I think i never went there, so Im not really sure what to do. Ngancheekean (talk) 09:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont need to be dramatic since i dont owed any brother. Ngancheekean (talk) 09:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot parse this last sentence at all - I literally cannot understand what you are trying to say. I suspect that some of your problems arise from a lack of proficiency with the English language - perhaps it's not that you are unwilling to listen to what people are saying to you, but that you are unable to understand it. It might be better for you to try contributing to your native language's version of Wikipedia. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I dont talk bad English. Its not my problem to do so anyway. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(It might be better for you to try contributing to your native language's version of Wikipedia.) I dont quite understand this part. I dont wish to argue much, its pointless. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I dont study chinese language from where i live, only as free time, do i do so, just to cope up. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point explaining much. She just wanted me to fly. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's just too much to do which.... i do think i can bare responsible to all the surrounding.... all it was all good. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot edit the English Wikipedia if we cannot communicate well / talk easily / speak clearly. If we cannot speak clearly and understand each other, we will keep having these issues repeatedly. I am sorry. Adakah anda bercakap Melayu? (Do you speak Malay?) -- TNT (talk • she/her) 10:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just changed the language just like that? I have no idea whats happening, maybe i'll get back to you tomorrow. User:Ngancheekean maybe not blocked then. Ngancheekean (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kami, masyarakat Wikipedia bahasa Inggeris, ada masalah memahami bahasa inggeris anda. Keranu itu, saya cuba berkomunikasi dengan anda dalam bahasa Melayu kerana laman pengguna anda memberitahu saya bahawa anda adalah dari Malaysia dan saya juga dari Malaysia (tetapi sekerang saya meninggal dalam New Zealand). Saya faham anda mahu sumbangkan rencana kepada Wikipedia bahasa ingerris seperti rencana tentang orang yang mempunyai nama keluarga anda, tetapi semua sumbangan anda hingga sekarang tidak sesuai untuk pembaca kita. Walaupun anda percaya bahawa bahasa inggeris anda adalah tahap yang baik atau serdahana, penyuting Wikipedia yang lain tidak setuju berasaskan sumbangan anda. Kerana bahasa inggeris dalam sumbangan anda adalah tahap yang terlalu rendah, ia sangat susah untuk memahami sumbangan anda ataupun kami tidak boleh memahaminya. Kerana itu dan kerana anda tidak faham kita bila kita cuba terangkan masalah dengan sumbangan anda, kita perlu sekatan (block) akaun anda. Maaf tetapi sehingga kami boleh memahami anda, kita tidak boleh batalkan sekatan anda. Saya mencadang anda cuba sumbang kepada wikipedia bahasa Melayu (ms.wikipedia.org/ms:Laman utama), bahasa Cina (zh.wikipedia.org/zh:Wikipedia:首页) atau bahasa Kanton (yue.wikipedia.org/yue:頭版 jika anda fikir bahawa anda boleh berkomunikasi dan sumbangkan rencana dengan bahasa yang lebih baik. Nil Einne (talk) 12:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [1]. SN54129 16:57, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Serial Number 54129: Please help me. I don;t see (relevance) as once I did. 😜 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, DFO  :) It's in this section? SN54129 22:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 DMacks (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yan Xie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yan An (son of Luzhong), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yan Han (Jin Dynasty), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yan Minchu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Yan An".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yan An".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ngancheekean. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yan Xie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]